Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
Missouri Amendment 4, Allow Legislature to Require a City to Increase Funding without State Reimbursement for a Police Force Established by State Board Measure (August 2024)
Missouri Allow Legislature to Require a City to Increase Funding without State Reimbursement for a Police Force Established by State Board Amendment | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Election date August 6, 2024 | |
Topic State and local government budgets, spending and finance | |
Status![]() | |
Type Constitutional amendment | Origin State legislature |
Missouri Amendment 4, the Allow Legislature to Require a City to Increase Funding without State Reimbursement for a Police Force Established by State Board Measure, was on the ballot in Missouri as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on August 6, 2024.[1] The measure was approved.
A "yes" vote supported allowing the legislature to increase minimum funding for a police force established by a state board of police commissioners. |
A "no" vote opposed allowing the legislature to increase minimum funding for a police force established by a state board of police commissioners. |
Election results
Missouri Amendment 4 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
549,919 | 51.13% | |||
No | 525,657 | 48.87% |
Overview
What did this measure do?
- See also: Text of measure
This measure amended Section 21, Article X of the Missouri Constitution by allowing the Missouri General Assembly to increase minimum required funding for a police force established by a state board of police commissioners before 2027. This specifically increased the minimum funding to the police force of Kansas City, Missouri.
Section 21 of the Missouri Constitution prohibited increases made to an activity or service beyond the ones required by existing law, unless a state appropriation is made and dispersed to pay for the costs. This amendment created an exception for a police force established by a state board of police commissioners. At the time of the election, Kansas City, Missouri, was the only city that did not have local jurisdiction over its department, and therefore the only city that this measure impacted.[2]
Legislators passed Senate Bill 678 in March 2024, requiring the city to devote 25% of its general revenue to the police department. Before SB 678, that requirement was 20%.[3]
Was this measure previously on the ballot?
Voters approved Amendment 4 on November 8, 2022, 63%-37%. The Missouri Supreme Court overturned Amendment 4 on April 30, 2024, and ordered a new election to take place.
The lawsuit, filed by Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas, said that Kansas City leaders informed state officials prior to the November 2022 election that the ballot measure would cost the city nearly $39 million.[4] Meanwhile, the fiscal note said "state and local governmental entities estimate no additional costs or savings related to this proposal." State Supreme Court Judge Paul C. Wilson wrote in the ruling, "Instead, the only issue in this case is whether the auditor’s fiscal note summary – the very last thing each and every voter saw before voting “yes” or “no” on Amendment No. 4 – fairly and accurately summarized the auditor’s fiscal note ... This Court concludes it did not."[5]
What were the arguments for and against this measure?
- See also: Support and Opposition
State Rep. Doug Richey (R-38), a supporter of Amendment 4, brought up two ordinances passed by the Kansas City Council in 2021. "The actions of the mayor and city council last year raised tremendous alarm regarding the stability of funding for something as important as the Kansas City Police Department,” Richey said.[6] One ordinance would have given city leaders more control over the Kansas City Police Department (KCPD), and another would have reduced the funding of the KCPD by $42.3 million. This led to a lawsuit filed by the Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners against Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas and the Kansas City Council. Jackson County Circuit Court Judge Patrick W. Campbell later found that the Kansas City Council violated state law in plans to reallocate the $42.3 million. State Sen. Tony Luetkemeyer (R-34), who sponsored the measure, argued this measure would prevent future attempts to decrease police funding. "This legislation will stop future radical attempts by the city council to defund the KCPD and ensure the brave men and women of law enforcement have the resources they need to keep our community safe," he said.[7]
Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas said that this measure would take away the ability to work with local police departments and neighborhood leaders in looking for better solutions to violent crime. "I do not support anything that takes away our ability to work with our local police department and neighborhood leaders in terms of how we get to better solutions for violent crime," he said.[6] Gwen Grant, President and CEO of the Urban League of Greater Kansas City, said, "It has the potential of causing a lot of harm to Kansas City." Grant added, “It just makes absolutely no sense that the state legislature would dictate how our local government should allocate its resources, all for the protection of the police in response to a false narrative of defunding.”[8]
Text of measure
Ballot title
The official ballot title was as follows:[9]
“ | Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to authorize laws, passed before December 31st, 2026, that increase minimum funding for a police force established by a state board of police commissioners to ensure such police force has additional resources to serve its communities?
This would authorize a law passed in 2022 increasing required funding by the City of Kansas City for police department requests from 20% of general revenue to 25%, an increase of $38,743,646, though the City previously provided that level of funding voluntarily. No other state or local governmental entities estimate costs or savings.[10] |
” |
Ballot summary
The official ballot summary was as follows:
“ |
A “yes” vote will amend the Missouri Constitution to allow the general assembly by law to increase the minimum funding for a police force established by the state board of police commissioners to ensure such police force has additional resources to serve its communities. Currently the only police force established by the state board of police commissioners is found in Kansas City, Missouri. A “no” vote will not amend the Missouri Constitution regarding the funding for a police force established by the state board of police commissioners. If passed, this measure will have no impact on taxes. [10] |
” |
Constitutional changes
- See also: Article X, Missouri Constitution
The measure amended section 21 of Article X of the state constitution. The following underlined text was added, and struck-through text would be deleted:[2]
Note: Hover over the text and scroll to see the full text.
Text of Section 21: 1. The state is hereby prohibited from reducing the state financed proportion of the costs of any existing activity or service required of counties and other political subdivisions. A new activity or service or an increase in the level of any activity or service beyond that required by existing law shall not be required by the general assembly or any state agency of counties or other political subdivisions, unless a state appropriation is made and disbursed to pay the county or other political subdivision for any increased costs.
2. Notwithstanding the foregoing prohibitions, before December 31, 2026, the general assembly may by law increase minimum funding for a police force established by a state board of police commissioners to ensure such police force has additional resources to serve its communities.[10]
Readability score
- See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2024
Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title and summary for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The secretary of state wrote the ballot language for this measure.
The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 17, and the FRE is 25. The word count for the ballot title is 90.
The FKGL for the ballot summary is grade level 14, and the FRE is 39. The word count for the ballot summary is 97.
Support
Supporters
Officials
- State Sen. Tony Luetkemeyer (R)
- State Rep. Doug Richey (R)
Arguments
Opposition
Opponents
Officials
- Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas
Arguments
Campaign finance
If you are aware of a committee that was registered to support or oppose this amendment, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.
Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Support | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Oppose | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Total | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Media editorials
- See also: 2024 ballot measure media endorsements
Support
Ballotpedia did not locate media editorial boards in support of the ballot measure.
Opposition
The following media editorial boards published an editorial opposing the ballot measure:
Polls
- See also: 2024 ballot measure polls
- Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
Missouri Allow Legislature to Require a City to Increase Funding without State Reimbursement for a Police Force Established by State Board Amendment (2024) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Emerson College Polling/The Hill | 10/26/22-10/28/22 | 1,000 LV | ± 3.0% | 44% | 22% | 33% |
Question: "Amendment 4 would increase the amount of police force funding to 25% of a municipality’s general revenue. How do you plan to vote on Amendment 4?" | ||||||
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.
Background
Amendment 4 (2022)
In 2022, voters previously approved Amendment 4 on November 8, 2022 by 63.19%-36.81%. On April 30, 2024, the Missouri Supreme Court overturned Amendment 4 following a lawsuit by Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas, who said that the fiscal note on the ballot measure was inaccurate and misled voters. The lawsuit said that Kansas City leaders informed state officials prior to the November 2022 election that the ballot measure would cost the city nearly $39 million.[11] Meanwhile, the fiscal note said "state and local governmental entities estimate no additional costs or savings related to this proposal." State Supreme Court Judge Paul C. Wilson wrote in the ruling, "Instead, the only issue in this case is whether the auditor’s fiscal note summary – the very last thing each and every voter saw before voting “yes” or “no” on Amendment No. 4 – fairly and accurately summarized the auditor’s fiscal note ... This Court concludes it did not."[5] The Missouri Supreme Court ordered a new election to take place on August 6, 2024.
Kansas City Police Department
The Kansas City Police Department (KCPD) was founded in 1874. At that time, the KCPD was governed by a board of commissioners appointed by the governor. This changed in 1932, when the Kansas City Council brought the KCPD under city governance. In 1939, the KCPD returned to being governed by the state board of commissioners.[12]
As of 2022, Kansas City was the only police department in the state of Missouri that was governed by a state board of commissioners.
Kansas City Police Department funding
In May 2021, the Kansas City Council passed two ordinances that gave the city leaders more control over the funding of the Kansas City Police Department. The first ordinance reduced the KCPD budget by $42.3 million, cutting it to 20% of the city's general fund. Missouri Law requires the city to spend 20% of its general fund revenue on policing. The second ordinance negotiated how that $42.3 million would be spent.[13]
On May 28, 2022, the Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners filed a lawsuit in the Jackson County Circuit Court against Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas and the city council. The lawsuit stated that the police board of commissioners had sole management over the police budget and that the city had to spend at least 20% of its general revenue on policing. The lawsuit demanded the return of the $42.3 million.[14] On October 5, 2021, a Jackson County judge ruled that the Kansas City Council violated state law in its plans to relocate the $42.3 million.
On May 13, 2022, the Missouri State Legislature passed Missouri Senate Bill 678 (SB678) to increase the funding of the Kansas City Police Department from 20% of the Kansas City general revenues to 25% of the general revenues.[15] On August 17, 2022, Lucas announced he was filing a lawsuit in the Jackson County Circuit Court against the state of Missouri over SB678.[16] On September 22, 2022, the Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners filed a motion to dismiss Lucas' petition, saying that "the claim is not ripe for adjudication."[17]
Missouri ballot measures from 1985 to 2020
In Missouri, a total of 131 ballot measures appeared on statewide ballots between 1985 and 2020. Eighty-three ballot measures were approved, and 48 ballot measures were defeated.
Missouri statewide ballot measures, 1985-2020 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total number | Annual average | Annual minimum | Annual maximum | Approved | Defeated | ||
# | % | # | % | ||||
Path to the ballot
- See also: Amending the Missouri Constitution
To put a legislatively referred constitutional amendment before voters in 2022, a simple majority vote was required in both the Missouri State Senate and the Missouri House of Representatives.
On March 21, 2022, the Missouri State Senate approved Senate Joint Resolution 38 (SJR38) by a vote of 23-10, with one absent. In the Senate, the amendment was passed largely along party lines, with 22 Republicans and one Democrat in favor and nine Democrats and one Republican opposed.[1]
On May 13, 2022, the Missouri House of Representatives voted to approve SJR38. In the House, 103 voted yes, and 44 voted no (with nine absent). The voting largely occurred along party lines, with 100 Republicans and three Democrats voting for the measure, while 44 Democrats and three Republicans opposed the measure.[1]
|
|
This amendment was approved by voters in 2022. Following a lawsuit, the Missouri State Supreme Court struck down the measure, and ordered it to be placed on the ballot on August 6, 2024.
How to cast a vote
- See also: Voting in Missouri
See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Missouri.
See also
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Missouri State Legislature, "Senate Joint Resolution 38," accessed March 22, 2022
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Missouri Legislature, "Senate Joint Resolution 38 text," accessed March 22, 2022
- ↑ Missouri Government, "Senate Bill No.678," accessed June 1, 2022
- ↑ Supreme Court of Missouri, "Brief of Kansas City's mayor in Supreme Court of Missouri case number SC99931," accessed May 1, 2024
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Supreme Court of Missouri, "Supreme Court of Missouri's decision in case number SC99931," May 1, 2024
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 The Kansas City Star, "On final day of session, Missouri passes bill to force KC to increase police spending," May 13, 2022
- ↑ Missouri Senate, "Sen. Tony Luetkemeyer’s Bill to Increase KCPD Funding Advances Out of Committee," January 18, 2022
- ↑ NPR in Kansas City, "Missouri legislature passes bill requiring Kansas City to give more money to the KCPD," May 13, 2022
- ↑ St. Louis Missouri, "Sample Ballot," accessed July 29, 2024
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ Supreme Court of Missouri, "Brief of Kansas City's mayor in Supreme Court of Missouri case number SC99931," accessed May 1, 2024
- ↑ Kansas City Missouri Police Department, "History," accessed June 4, 2022
- ↑ The Kansas City Star, "In dramatic day at City Hall, Kansas City Council OK’s more control of police spending," May 21, 2022
- ↑ The Kansas City Star, "Kansas City police board files lawsuit against city leaders over budget measure," May 28, 2022
- ↑ NPR in Kansas City, "Missouri legislature passes bill requiring Kansas City to give more money to the KCPD," May 13, 2022
- ↑ US News & World Report, "Kansas City Mayor Sues Missouri Over Police Funding Law," Aug 17, 2022
- ↑ Heartlander News, "Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners Motion to Dismiss," September 22, 2022
- ↑ Missouri Secretary of State - Elections and Voting, "Frequently Asked Questions," accessed April 4, 2023
- ↑ 19.0 19.1 19.2 Missouri Secretary of State, "Register to Vote," accessed April 4, 2023
- ↑ 20.0 20.1 20.2 NCSL, "State Profiles: Elections," accessed August 27, 2024
- ↑ BillTrack50, "MO HB1878," accessed April 4, 2023
- ↑ Missouri Secretary of State, "FAQs Voter Registration," accessed August 27, 2024
- ↑ Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
- ↑ Missouri Secretary of State, "How To Vote," accessed August 27, 2024
- ↑ Missouri Secretary of State, "Do I need an ID to vote?" accessed April 3, 2023
![]() |
State of Missouri Jefferson City (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |