Missouri Marijuana Legalization and Regulation Initiative (2012)
Not on Ballot |
---|
![]() |
This measure was not put on an election ballot |
Voting on Marijuana | |||
---|---|---|---|
![]() | |||
Ballot Measures | |||
By state | |||
By year | |||
Not on ballot | |||
|
The Missouri Marijuana Legalization and Regulation Initiative did not appear on the November 2012 ballot in the state of Missouri as either an initiated constitutional amendment or initiated state statute. A total of two initiative versions have been filed.[1]
The proposed measure would have decriminalized marijuana use, possession and small-scale cultivation by those age 21 and older. Additionally, it would require retail licenses to sell marijuana and oversee a medical marijuana program. Licenses would be issued by the state.[2]
The proposed initiatives were filed with the Missouri Secretary of State on July 6, 2011 and were approved for circulation on November 7, 2011.[3] It is sponsored by Show-Me Cannabis.[4] According to news reports, the petition was submitted by Columbia attorney Dan Viets. He is a also a Missouri state coordinator for the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML).[5]
Text of measure
Initiated constitutional amendment
The ballot title for the petition reads:[3]
Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to:
- legalize cannabis (commonly known as marijuana) for individuals 21 years or older;
- make medical cannabis available to individuals with a physician’s recommendation including those under 21 with parental or legal guardian consent and physician supervision;
- create licensing processes for operation of cannabis establishments;
- release individuals incarcerated or on probation or parole for non-violent, cannabis-only offenses which would no longer be illegal and expunge all records related to such offenses; and
- allow the legislature to enact a tax on the retail sale of dried cannabis up to $100 per pound?
Annual state government operating costs would increase by at least $1 million with the total increase being unknown. Those costs would be offset by an unknown increase in fee and tax revenues. The fiscal impact to local governmental entities is unknown with some increase in revenue possible.
Initiated state statute
The ballot title for the petition reads:[3]
Shall Missouri law be amended to:
- legalize cannabis (commonly known as marijuana) for individuals 21 years or older;
- make medical cannabis available to individuals with a physician’s recommendation including those under 21 with parental or legal guardian consent and physician supervision;
- create licensing processes for operation of cannabis establishments;
- release individuals incarcerated or on probation or parole for non-violent, cannabis-only offenses which would no longer be illegal and expunge all records related to such offenses; and
- allow the legislature to enact a tax on the retail sale of dried cannabis up to $100 per pound?
Annual state government operating costs would increase by at least $1 million with the total increase being unknown. Those costs would be offset by an unknown increase in fee and tax revenues. The fiscal impact to local governmental entities is unknown with some increase in revenue possible.
Support
- The measure was sponsored by Show-Me Cannabis.
- Columbia attorney Dan Viets, the Missouri coordinator for the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws stated: "If people are allowed to grow their own and share with their friends just like people grow their tomatoes and share, then we really don’t need marijuana retail stores."[6]
Opposition
The Missouri Narcotics Officers Association has vowed to fight the effort.[7]
Path to the ballot
- See also: Missouri signature requirements
To qualify for the ballot, the initiative required signatures from registered voters equal to 5% of the total votes cast in the 2008 governor's election from six of the state's nine congressional districts. Signatures on behalf of all initiative petitions for the 2012 ballot were due to the secretary of state’s office by no later than 5 p.m. on May 6, 2012.
Signatures on behalf of all initiative petitions for the 2012 ballot are due to the secretary of state’s office by no later than 5 p.m. on May 6, 2012. However the group behind the initiative only collected around a third of the 144000 signatures needed to get the initiative on the ballot.
See also
Additional reading
- KSDK, "Missouri ballot measure to legalize marijuana burns out," April 27, 2012
- EMissourian.com, "Officials Raise Concerns About Marijuana Initiative Petition," January 29, 2012
- Daily Tribune, "Group to begin circulating petition to legalize marijuana," January 22, 2012
- Examiner.com, "Missouri voters may vote on legal marijuana industry in November 2012," January 16, 2012
- Webster-Kirkwood Times, "Petition Circulating To Legalize Marijuana In State Of Missouri," November 25, 2011
- Examiner, "Cannabis initiative approved for circulation in Missouri," November 19, 2011
- Associated Press, "Mo. ballot measures proposed to legalize marijuana," November 8, 2011
Footnotes
- ↑ Examiner, "Two Initiatives Filed in Missouri to ask voters to “Show-Me Cannabis,"" July 13, 2011
- ↑ Associated Press, "Missouri pot advocates to pursue 2012 ballot measure to legalize drug, regulate medical use" July 7, 2011
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Missouri Secretary of State, "Two Initiative Petitions Approved for Circulation for 2012 Ballot," November 7, 2011
- ↑ KPR11, "Group Wants Legalized Pot Put to a Vote In Missouri," July 8, 2011
- ↑ West End Word, "Petition Circulates To Legalize Marijuana In Missouri," November 30, 2011
- ↑ The Maneater, "Initiatives could legalize marijuana in November," February 10, 2012
- ↑ KSPR, "Campaign to Legalize Marijuana Underway in Missouri," December 2, 2011
![]() |
State of Missouri Jefferson City (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |