Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Monica Márquez

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Monica Márquez
Image of Monica Márquez
Colorado Supreme Court
Tenure

2010 - Present

Term ends

2034

Years in position

15

Compensation

Base salary

$215,904

Elections and appointments
Last elected

November 5, 2024

Appointed

2010

Education

Bachelor's

Stanford University, 1991

Law

Yale Law School, 1997

Contact


Monica Márquez is a judge of the Colorado Supreme Court. She assumed office in 2010. Her current term ends on January 10, 2034.

Márquez ran for re-election for judge of the Colorado Supreme Court. She won in the retention election on November 5, 2024.

Márquez first became a member of the Colorado Supreme Court by appointment. She was appointed by Gov. Bill Ritter (D) in 2010 to succeed retiring Justice Mary Mullarkey.[1][2] To read more about judicial selection in Colorado, click here.

In 2020, Ballotpedia published Ballotpedia Courts: State Partisanship, a study examining the partisan affiliation of all state supreme court justices in the country. As part of this study, we assigned each justice a Confidence Score describing our confidence in the degree of partisanship exhibited by the justices' past partisan behavior, before they joined the court.[3] Márquez received a confidence score of Strong Democrat.[4] Click here to read more about this study.

Márquez was the first Latina to serve on the state supreme court, and her father, Jose Márquez, was the first Latino to serve on the Colorado Court of Appeals.[5]

On July 26, 2024, Márquez became the chief justice of the court, replacing Brian Boatright.[6]

Biography

Márquez grew up in Grand Junction, Colorado. She earned her undergraduate degree from Stanford University in 1991 and her J.D. from Yale Law School in 1997.[2]

Following her admission to the bar, Márquez served as a clerk for Judge Michael Ponsor of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts and Judge David Ebel of the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit. She then entered private practice at the firm Holme Roberts & Owen, LLP. Following that, Márquez entered public service as an assistant solicitor general and assistant attorney general. She was promoted to deputy attorney general for Colorado in 2009.[7] Márquez was appointed to the Colorado Supreme Court in 2010.[2]

Márquez previously chaired the Denver Mayor’s GLBT Commission. As of June 2021, she was a liaison justice to the Office of Attorney Regulation and co-led the Bench Dream Team, a group "dedicated to diversity and inclusion in Colorado’s judicial system," according to her official bio.[2]

Elections

2024

See also:  Colorado Supreme Court elections, 2024

Colorado Supreme Court, Monica Márquez' seat

Monica Márquez was retained to the Colorado Supreme Court on November 5, 2024 with 64.1% of the vote.

Retention
 Vote
%
Votes
Yes
 
64.1
 
1,613,684
No
 
35.9
 
905,209
Total Votes
2,518,893


Endorsements

Ballotpedia did not identify endorsements for Márquez in this election.

2014

See also: Colorado judicial elections, 2014

Márquez was retained to the Supreme Court with 67.8 percent of the vote on November 4, 2014.[8][9] 

Judicial performance evaluation

The Colorado Commissions on Judicial Performance recommended that Justice Márquez be Retained. The full report is available here.

2010

On September 8, 2010, Gov. Bill Ritter (D) appointed Márquez to the state supreme court.[1]


Campaign themes

2024

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Monica Márquez did not complete Ballotpedia's 2024 Candidate Connection survey.

Campaign finance summary


Note: The finance data shown here comes from the disclosures required of candidates and parties. Depending on the election or state, this may represent only a portion of all the funds spent on their behalf. Satellite spending groups may or may not have expended funds related to the candidate or politician on whose page you are reading this disclaimer. Campaign finance data from elections may be incomplete. For elections to federal offices, complete data can be found at the FEC website. Click here for more on federal campaign finance law and here for more on state campaign finance law.


Monica Márquez campaign contribution history
YearOfficeStatusContributionsExpenditures
2024* Colorado Supreme CourtWon general$0 $0
Grand total$0 $0
Sources: OpenSecretsFederal Elections Commission ***This product uses the openFEC API but is not endorsed or certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
* Data from this year may not be complete

Analysis

Ballotpedia Courts: State Partisanship (2020)

See also: Ballotpedia Courts: State Partisanship and Ballotpedia Courts: Determiners and Dissenters

Last updated: June 15, 2020

In 2020, Ballotpedia published Ballotpedia Courts: State Partisanship, a study examining the partisan affiliation of all state supreme court justices in the country as of June 15, 2020.

The study presented Confidence Scores that represented our confidence in each justice's degree of partisan affiliation. This was not a measure of where a justice fell on an ideological spectrum, but rather a measure of how much confidence we had that a justice was or had been affiliated with a political party. The scores were based on seven factors, including but not limited to party registration.[10]

The five resulting categories of Confidence Scores were:

  • Strong Democrat
  • Mild Democrat
  • Indeterminate[11]
  • Mild Republican
  • Strong Republican

This justice's Confidence Score, as well as the factors contributing to that score, is presented below. The information below was current as of June 2020.

Monica
Márquez

Colorado

  • Partisan Confidence Score:
    Strong Democrat
  • Judicial Selection Method:
    Assisted appointment through governor controlled judicial nominating commission
  • Key Factors:
    • Held political office as a Democrat
    • Was a registered Democrat before 2020
    • Donated less than $2,000 to Democratic candidates


Partisan Profile

Details:

Márquez served as Colorado’s deputy attorney general as a Democrat. She was a registered Democrat prior to 2020. Márquez donated $115.00 to Democratic candidates and organizations. She was appointed by Gov. Bill Ritter (D), while Colorado was a Democratic trifecta.

Other Scores:

In a 2012 study of campaign contributions, Márquez received a campaign finance score of -1.3, indicating a liberal ideological leaning.


Bonica and Woodruff campaign finance scores (2012)

See also: Bonica and Woodruff campaign finance scores of state supreme court justices, 2012

In October 2012, political science professors Adam Bonica and Michael Woodruff of Stanford University attempted to determine the partisan ideology of state supreme court justices. They created a scoring system in which a score above 0 indicated a more conservative-leaning ideology, while scores below 0 were more liberal.

Marquez received a campaign finance score of -1.3, indicating a liberal ideological leaning. This was more liberal than the average score of -0.29 that justices received in Colorado.

The study was based on data from campaign contributions by the judges themselves, the partisan leaning of those who contributed to the judges' campaigns, or, in the absence of elections, the ideology of the appointing body (governor or legislature). This study was not a definitive label of a justice, but an academic summary of various relevant factors.[12]

Noteworthy cases

Anderson v. Griswold (2023)

See also: Presidential election in Colorado, 2024

On December 19, 2023, Márquez joined in the 4-3 Colorado Supreme Court majority ruling that excluded Donald Trump (R) from the state's presidential primary ballot. On March 4, 2024, the United States Supreme Court overruled the state supreme court's ruling.[13]

The Colorado Supreme Court reversed a Denver district court's ruling that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which "disqualifies people who have engaged in insurrection against the Constitution after having taken an oath to support it from holding office," did not apply to the presidency.[14] The majority opinion said, "A majority of the court holds that President Trump is disqualified from holding the office of President under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Because he is disqualified, it would be a wrongful act under the Election Code for the Colorado Secretary of State to list him as a candidate on the presidential primary ballot."[15]

The Colorado Supreme Court was the first court in the country to determine that the 14th Amendment's disqualification clause applied to Trump. The decision was stayed until January 4, 2024, to allow for appeals. Trump's campaign said they would appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.[14]

On January 5, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision barring Trump from the state’s primary ballot. Oral arguments in the case took place on February 8, 2024.[16]

State supreme court judicial selection in Colorado

See also: Judicial selection in Colorado


The seven justices on the Colorado Supreme Court are selected through the assisted appointment method. Each justice is appointed by the governor from a list of names compiled by the Colorado Supreme Court Nominating Commission.[17][18]

Initial terms last at least two years, after which justices must stand for retention in a yes-no election. Subsequent terms last 10 years.[18]

Qualifications

To serve on this court, a justice must be:[19]

  • a qualified elector in the state;
  • licensed to practice law in the state for five years; and
  • under the age of 72 (retirement by 72 is mandatory).

Chief justice

The chief justice of the supreme court is selected by peer vote. Beginning in January 2021, the chief justice began serving for a set term on a rotating basis. Previously, the chief justice served indefinitely as long as he or she had the support of his or her peers.[20]

Vacancies

See also: How vacancies are filled in state supreme courts

If a midterm vacancy occurs on the court, the seat is filled as it normally would be if the vacancy occurred at the end of a justice's term. A judicial nominating commission recommends to the governor three qualified candidates for an appellate court vacancy (two or three for a trial court vacancy), and the governor selects a successor from that list. After occupying the seat for two years, the newly appointed justice stands for retention in the next general election. The justice then serves a full 10-year term if he or she is retained by voters.[18]

The map below highlights how vacancies are filled in state supreme courts across the country.


See also

Colorado Judicial Selection More Courts
Seal of Colorado.png
Judicialselectionlogo.png
BP logo.png
Courts in Colorado
Colorado Court of Appeals
Colorado Supreme Court
Elections: 202520242023202220212020201920182017
Gubernatorial appointments
Judicial selection in Colorado
Federal courts
State courts
Local courts

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 The Pueblo Chieftan, "Governor names new justice," September 9, 2010
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Colorado Supreme Court, "Monica M. Márquez," accessed June 17, 2021
  3. We calculated confidence scores by collecting several data points such as party registration, donations, and previous political campaigns.
  4. The five possible confidence scores were: Strong Democrat, Mild Democrat, Indeterminate, Mild Republican, and Strong Republican.
  5. The Denver Post, "Colorado Supreme Court milestone a family affair," December 11, 2010
  6. Colorado Judicial Branch, "New Supreme Court Chief Justice Sworn In," accessed August 1, 2024
  7. Bloomberg, "Monica M Marquez," accessed June 17, 2021
  8. Colorado Secretary of State, "2014 Abstract of Votes Cast," accessed June 17, 2021
  9. National Center for State Courts, "Methods of Judicial Selection: Colorado," accessed July 13, 2015
  10. The seven factors were party registration, donations made to partisan candidates, donations made to political parties, donations received from political parties or bodies with clear political affiliation, participation in political campaigns, the partisanship of the body responsible for appointing the justice, and state trifecta status when the justice joined the court.
  11. An Indeterminate score indicates that there is either not enough information about the justice’s partisan affiliations or that our research found conflicting partisan affiliations.
  12. Stanford University, "State Supreme Court Ideology and 'New Style' Judicial Campaigns," October 31, 2012
  13. Supreme Court, "Trump v. Anderson," accessed March 4, 2024
  14. 14.0 14.1 The New York Times, "Trump Is Disqualified From the 2024 Ballot, Colorado Supreme Court Rules," December 19, 2023
  15. NBC News, "Colorado Supreme Court kicks Trump off the state's 2024 primary ballot for violating the U.S. Constitution," December 19, 2023
  16. The New York Times, "Justices to Decide Whether Trump Is Eligible for Colorado Ballot," January 5, 2024
  17. Colorado Judicial Branch, "Colorado Supreme Court," accessed March 28, 2023
  18. 18.0 18.1 18.2 Colorado Judicial Branch, "Judicial Nominating Commissions," accessed March 28, 2023
  19. Colorado Judicial Branch, "What it takes to become a Judge," accessed March 28, 2023
  20. The Denver Post, "Colorado Supreme Court to impose term lengths for chief justice as current one retires," August 19, 2020