News and analysis right to your inbox. Click to get Ballotpedia’s newsletters!

Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Federalism Banner-Blue.png
Supreme Court of the United States
Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC
Docket number: 24-1238
Term: 2025
Court: United States Supreme Court
Important dates
Argued: March 4, 2026
Court membership
Chief Justice John RobertsClarence ThomasSamuel AlitoSonia SotomayorElena KaganNeil GorsuchBrett KavanaughAmy Coney BarrettKetanji Brown Jackson

Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC is a case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on March 4, 2026, during the court's October 2025-2026 term.

HIGHLIGHTS
  • The questions presented: "Does § 14501(c) preempt a state common-law claim against a broker for negligently selecting a motor carrier or driver?"[1]
  • The outcome: The appeal is pending adjudication before the U.S. Supreme Court.

  • The case came on a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. To review the lower court's opinion, click here.

    Why it matters: This case asks whether a federal transportation statute preempts state common-law negligence claims against freight brokers, directly affecting the boundary between federal regulatory policy and state tort law. The Court’s decision will determine whether individuals injured in trucking accidents may pursue state-law claims against brokers for negligent selection, or whether federal law forecloses that avenue of liability, shaping how accountability and remedies operate in the interstate transportation system.[2]

    Background

    Federalism
    Federalism Icon 200x200.png

    Key terms
    Court cases
    Major arguments
    State responses to federal mandates
    State oversight of federal grants
    Federalism by the numbers
    Index

    Case summary

    The following are the parties to this case:[3]

    • Petitioner: Shawn Montgomery
      • Legal counsel: Paul D. Clement
    • Respondent: Caribe Transport II, LLC
      • Legal counsel: Warren L. Dean Jr.

    The following summary of the case was published by Oyez, a free law project from Cornell’s Legal Information Institute, Justia, and the Chicago-Kent College of Law:[4]

    Shawn Montgomery was severely injured when his tractor-trailer, stopped on the shoulder of an Illinois highway, was struck by another truck. The other driver, Yosniel Varela-Mojena, was employed by the motor carrier Caribe Transport II, LLC (“Caribe”). C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (“Robinson”), a freight broker, had arranged for Caribe to haul the shipment. Robinson and Caribe operated under an agreement stating that Caribe was an independent contractor and retained exclusive control over its personnel and the manner of its performance.

    Montgomery sued the driver and Caribe, and also sued the broker, Robinson. His claims against Robinson alleged that the broker was vicariously liable for the driver’s negligence, arguing Caribe was Robinson’s agent. Montgomery also claimed Robinson had negligently hired the driver and the carrier.

    The district court granted judgment to Robinson on all claims. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed, holding that Caribe was an independent contractor, which defeated the vicarious liability claim, and that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act preempted the state-law negligent hiring claim.[5]

    To learn more about this case, see the following:


    Timeline

    The following timeline details key events in this case:

    • March 4, 2026: The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument.
    • October 3, 2025: The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the case.
    • June 2, 2025: Shawn Montgomery appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
    • January 3, 2025: The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed the lower court's decision that neither the broker, nor the carrier, could be held liable for negligent hiring practices, as the party involved was an independent contractor. The court cited a case that the Seventh Circuit had made the year before, stating that there was no compelling reason to revisit the precedent.

    Questions presented

    The petitioner presented the following questions to the court:[1]

    Questions presented:
    Does§ 14501(c) preempt a state common-law claim against a broker for negligently selecting a motor carrier or driver?[5]

    Oral argument

    Audio

    Audio of oral argument:[6]



    Transcript

    Transcript of oral argument:[7]

    Outcome

    The case is pending adjudication before the U.S. Supreme Court.

    October term 2025-2026

    See also: Supreme Court cases, October term 2025-2026

    The Supreme Court began hearing cases for the term on October 6, 2025. The court's yearly term begins on the first Monday in October and lasts until the first Monday in October the following year. The court generally releases the majority of its decisions by mid-June.[8]


    See also

    External links

    Footnotes