Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

Morgan Christen

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Morgan Christen
Image of Morgan Christen
United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
Tenure

2012 - Present

Years in position

13

Education

Bachelor's

University of Washington, 1983

Law

Golden Gate University School of Law, 1986

Personal
Birthplace
Chehalis, Wash.


Morgan Brenda Christen is a federal judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. She joined the court in 2011 after a nomination from President Barack Obama. At the time of her nomination, she was a justice on the Alaska Supreme Court, a post she held from 2009 until her confirmation.[1][2]

Early life and education

A native of Chehalis, Washington, Christen began her collegiate coursework at Richmond College in London in 1979. She then studied at the American College of Switzerland in 1980. She continued her studies at Nanjing University, People's Republic of China, in 1982. She earned her undergraduate degree in International Studies from the University of Washington in 1983. She went on to receive her J.D. from Golden Gate University School of Law in 1986.[3][4][5]

Professional career

Judicial career

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Nomination Tracker
Fedbadgesmall.png
Nominee Information
Name: Morgan Christen
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
Progress
Confirmed 211 days after nomination.
ApprovedANominated: May 18, 2011
ApprovedAABA Rating: Unanimously Well Qualified
Questionnaire: Questionnaire
ApprovedAHearing: July 13, 2011
Hearing Transcript: Hearing Transcript
QFRs: QFRs (Hover over QFRs to read more)
ApprovedAReported: September 8, 2011 
ApprovedAConfirmed: December 15, 2011
ApprovedAVote: 95-3

Christen was nominated on May 18, 2011, to the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit by President Barack Obama to a seat vacated by Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, who assumed senior status.[6] President Obama commented on the nomination, stating, "I am proud to nominate this outstanding candidate to serve on the United States Court of Appeals. I am confident Justice Morgan Christen will serve the American people with integrity and distinction."[7] The American Bar Association rated Christen Unanimously Well Qualified for the nomination.[8]

Christen's nomination was hotly contested due to her role as a former board member of Planned Parenthood. However, her nomination was supported by both senators from Alaska. Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski told the press:

Over the course of a decade on the bench she has a track record of impartial, intelligent and fair judgments that demonstrate respect for the rule of law and the role of the judiciary in our democratic system. She is a valuable asset to the Alaska legal community and I will support her wholeheartedly through the confirmation process.[9][10]

Hearings were held before the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary on July 13, 2011, and her nomination was reported by U.S. Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) on September 8, 2011. She was confirmed on a recorded 95-3 vote of the United States Senate on December 15, 2011, and she received her commission on January 11, 2012.[5][11]

Noteworthy cases

Law firm wins rights to George Clinton songs (2014)

The Ninth Circuit upheld a lower court’s decision to require musician George Clinton to sign over rights to certain songs to a law firm. The law firm had a judgment against Clinton for unpaid legal fees. After Clinton failed to pay, the firm sought a court’s help in executing on the judgment and requested the copyright to four songs.

Clinton argued that his work was protected from involuntary transfer because the songs were exempt under Section 201(e) of the Copyright Act. That provision states that intellectual property cannot be unwillingly taken from an author if he or she has never transferred that property previously. A lower court found that the author of the songs was not, in fact, George Clinton; the author was actually Warner Bros. Clinton wrote and recorded the songs as part of a work-for-hire arrangement with the studio. He later sued and obtained the copyrights to the songs as an assignee, not an author. As a result, the lower court said the songs had been transferred previously by the author, Warner Bros., and were no longer protected by the provision in the Copyright Act.

Clinton appealed the lower court’s ruling, and a three-judge panel for the Ninth Circuit affirmed. Judge Morgan Christen wrote for the panel, stating that the rights in the songs were Clinton’s personal property, even if he was not the author, and were therefore eligible to be seized to satisfy a judgment.

Articles:

Awards and associations

Awards

  • Light of Hope Award
  • American Jurisprudence Award, Evidence
  • American Jurisprudence Award, Constitutional Law
  • Athena Society Award, Chamber of Commerce
  • Community Outreach Award, Alaska Supreme Court, 2008
  • Philanthropist of the Year, 2004[4]

Associations

  • Member, Anchorage Downtown Rotary, 1992-Present
  • Board Member, Alaska Community Foundation, 2005-Present
  • Board Member, Rasmuson Foundation, 2004-Present
  • Former Board Member, United Way of Anchorage
  • Former Board Member, Big Brothers, Big Sisters
  • Former Big Sister, Big Brothers, Big Sisters
  • Former Member, Anchorage Association of Women Attorneys
  • Former Board Member, Planned Parenthood[12][4]

Political ideology

See also: Political ideology of State Supreme Court Justices

In October 2012, political science professors Adam Bonica and Michael Woodruff of Stanford University attempted to determine the partisan ideology of state supreme court justices. They created a scoring system in which a score above 0 indicated a more conservative-leaning ideology, while scores below 0 were more liberal.

Christen received a campaign finance score of -0.18, indicating a liberal ideological leaning. This was more liberal than the average score of -0.11 that justices received in Alaska.

The study was based on data from campaign contributions by the judges themselves, the partisan leaning of those who contributed to the judges' campaigns, or, in the absence of elections, the ideology of the appointing body (governor or legislature). This study was not a definitive label of a justice, but an academic summary of various relevant factors.[13]

See also

External links

Footnotes

Political offices
Preceded by
-
United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
2012-Present
Succeeded by
-