Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.
Municipal elections in Tulsa County, Oklahoma (2021)
Special state legislative • Local ballot measures • School boards • Municipal • Recalls • How to run for office |
2022 →
← 2020
|
2021 Tulsa County elections |
---|
Election dates |
Filing deadline: December 9, 2020 |
Primary election: February 9, 2021 General election: April 6, 2021 |
Election stats |
Offices up: Tulsa Technology Center Board of Education and treasurer (special) |
Total seats up: 2 |
Election type: Partisan |
Other municipal elections |
U.S. municipal elections, 2021 |
Tulsa County, Oklahoma, held a general election for Tulsa Technology Center Board of Education Zone 6 and a special election for treasurer on April 6, 2021. A primary was scheduled for February 9, 2021. The filing deadline for this election was December 9, 2020.
Elections
Click on the tabs below to show more information about those topics.
Candidates and results
Treasurer
General election
The general election was canceled. Incumbent John Fothergill won election in the special general election for Tulsa County Treasurer.
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- Maria Sanchez (D)
Democratic primary election
The Democratic primary election was canceled. Maria Sanchez advanced from the special Democratic primary for Tulsa County Treasurer.
Republican primary election
Special Republican primary for Tulsa County Treasurer
Incumbent John Fothergill defeated Francis Hart III in the special Republican primary for Tulsa County Treasurer on February 9, 2021.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | John Fothergill | 71.3 | 3,775 | |
Francis Hart III | 28.7 | 1,522 |
Total votes: 5,297 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Tulsa Tech
General election
General election for Tulsa Tech Center Board Member, Zone 6
Incumbent Sharon Whelpley defeated Paul Kroutter Jr. in the general election for Tulsa Tech Center Board Member, Zone 6 on April 6, 2021.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | Sharon Whelpley (Nonpartisan) | 67.7 | 3,015 | |
Paul Kroutter Jr. (Nonpartisan) | 32.3 | 1,436 |
Total votes: 4,451 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Endorsements
Do you know of an official or organization that endorsed a candidate in this race? Let Ballotpedia know by email at editor@ballotpedia.org.
Additional elections on the ballot
- See also: Oklahoma elections, 2021
February 9, 2021
- Broken Arrow Public Schools, Oklahoma, elections (2021)
- Jenks Public Schools, Oklahoma, elections (2021)
- Union Public Schools, Oklahoma, elections (2021)
- Tulsa Public Schools, Oklahoma, elections (2021)
- Bixby Public Schools, Oklahoma, elections (2021)
- Catoosa Public Schools, Oklahoma, elections (2021)
- Owasso Public Schools, Oklahoma, elections (2021)
April 6, 2021
- Broken Arrow Public Schools, Oklahoma, elections (2021)
- Jenks Public Schools, Oklahoma, elections (2021)
- Union Public Schools, Oklahoma, elections (2021)
- Tulsa Public Schools, Oklahoma, elections (2021)
- Bixby Public Schools, Oklahoma, elections (2021)
- Catoosa Public Schools, Oklahoma, elections (2021)
- Owasso Public Schools, Oklahoma, elections (2021)
What was at stake?
Report a story for this election
Ballotpedia researches issues in local elections across the United States, but information availability is a challenge for us in many areas. Please contact us about the issues that impact your local election. Note that not all submissions may meet Ballotpedia's coverage requirements for inclusion.
Candidate survey
Ballotpedia invites candidates to participate in its annual survey. |
About the county
Demographics
The following table displays demographic data provided by the United States Census Bureau.
Demographic Data for Tulsa County, Oklahoma | ||
---|---|---|
Tulsa County | Oklahoma | |
Population | 669,279 | 3,959,353 |
Land area (sq mi) | 570 | 68,596 |
Race and ethnicity** | ||
White | 68.7% | 71.1% |
Black/African American | 10% | 7.3% |
Asian | 3.6% | 2.2% |
Native American | 5.1% | 7.7% |
Pacific Islander | 0.1% | 0.2% |
Other (single race) | 3.4% | 2.8% |
Multiple | 9.1% | 8.7% |
Hispanic/Latino | 13.1% | 10.9% |
Education | ||
High school graduation rate | 89.9% | 88.6% |
College graduation rate | 32% | 26.1% |
Income | ||
Median household income | $57,024 | $53,840 |
Persons below poverty level | 14.3% | 15.3% |
Source: population provided by U.S. Census Bureau, "Decennial Census" (2020). Other figures provided by U.S. Census Bureau, "American Community Survey" (5-year estimates 2015-2020). | ||
**Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here. |
Pivot Counties
- See also: Pivot Counties by state
There are no Pivot Counties in Oklahoma. Pivot Counties are counties that voted for Barack Obama (D) in 2008 and 2012 and for Donald Trump (R) in 2016. Altogether, the nation had 206 Pivot Counties, with most being concentrated in upper midwestern and northeastern states.
In the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump (R) won Oklahoma with 65.3 percent of the vote. Hillary Clinton (D) received 28.9 percent. In presidential elections between 1904 and 2016, Oklahoma voted for the winning presidential candidate 72.4 percent of the time. In that same time frame, Oklahoma supported Republican candidates for president more often than Democratic candidates, 65.5 to 34.5 percent. The state favored Republicans in every presidential election between 2000 and 2016.
Presidential results by legislative district
The following table details results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections by state House districts in Oklahoma. Click [show] to expand the table. The "Obama," "Romney," "Clinton," and "Trump" columns describe the percent of the vote each presidential candidate received in the district. The "2012 Margin" and "2016 Margin" columns describe the margin of victory between the two presidential candidates in those years. The "Party Control" column notes which party held that seat heading into the 2018 general election. Data on the results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections broken down by state legislative districts was compiled by Daily Kos.[1][2]
In 2012, Barack Obama (D) won 8 out of 101 state House districts in Oklahoma with an average margin of victory of 37.4 points. In 2016, Hillary Clinton (D) won 11 out of 101 state House districts in Oklahoma with an average margin of victory of 27.7 points. Clinton won one district controlled by a Republican heading into the 2018 elections. |
In 2012, Mitt Romney (R) won 93 out of 101 state House districts in Oklahoma with an average margin of victory of 37.3 points. In 2016, Donald Trump (R) won 90 out of 101 state House districts in Oklahoma with an average margin of victory of 42.2 points. Trump won 18 districts controlled by Democrats heading into the 2018 elections. |
2016 presidential results by state House district | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | Obama | Romney | 2012 Margin | Clinton | Trump | 2016 Margin | Party Control |
1 | 24.32% | 75.68% | R+51.4 | 16.67% | 80.81% | R+64.1 | D |
2 | 29.47% | 70.53% | R+41.1 | 20.82% | 76.06% | R+55.2 | R |
3 | 29.56% | 70.44% | R+40.9 | 19.56% | 76.82% | R+57.3 | R |
4 | 43.62% | 56.38% | R+12.8 | 34.58% | 58.79% | R+24.2 | D |
5 | 31.75% | 68.25% | R+36.5 | 22.03% | 74.09% | R+52.1 | R |
6 | 28.92% | 71.08% | R+42.2 | 19.41% | 76.14% | R+56.7 | D |
7 | 34.12% | 65.88% | R+31.8 | 23.64% | 72.17% | R+48.5 | D |
8 | 29.55% | 70.45% | R+40.9 | 19.53% | 75.61% | R+56.1 | R |
9 | 26.43% | 73.57% | R+47.1 | 20.72% | 73.96% | R+53.2 | R |
10 | 27.27% | 72.73% | R+45.5 | 19.29% | 75.83% | R+56.5 | R |
11 | 26.06% | 73.94% | R+47.9 | 23.18% | 70.49% | R+47.3 | R |
12 | 30.64% | 69.36% | R+38.7 | 21.78% | 73.34% | R+51.6 | R |
13 | 46.26% | 53.74% | R+7.5 | 36.08% | 59.48% | R+23.4 | R |
14 | 38.47% | 61.53% | R+23.1 | 29.50% | 65.07% | R+35.6 | R |
15 | 31.90% | 68.10% | R+36.2 | 20.23% | 75.99% | R+55.8 | D |
16 | 39.02% | 60.98% | R+22 | 29.97% | 65.84% | R+35.9 | R |
17 | 31.39% | 68.61% | R+37.2 | 21.06% | 74.60% | R+53.5 | D |
18 | 31.64% | 68.36% | R+36.7 | 21.84% | 73.83% | R+52 | D |
19 | 27.18% | 72.82% | R+45.6 | 17.56% | 79.47% | R+61.9 | R |
20 | 25.66% | 74.34% | R+48.7 | 19.48% | 75.42% | R+55.9 | R |
21 | 27.83% | 72.17% | R+44.3 | 20.76% | 75.19% | R+54.4 | R |
22 | 29.42% | 70.58% | R+41.2 | 19.19% | 76.84% | R+57.7 | R |
23 | 37.17% | 62.83% | R+25.7 | 34.74% | 59.77% | R+25 | R |
24 | 34.55% | 65.45% | R+30.9 | 24.22% | 71.24% | R+47 | D |
25 | 30.62% | 69.38% | R+38.8 | 24.52% | 70.33% | R+45.8 | R |
26 | 33.33% | 66.67% | R+33.3 | 27.68% | 65.11% | R+37.4 | R |
27 | 27.54% | 72.46% | R+44.9 | 19.98% | 74.47% | R+54.5 | R |
28 | 31.29% | 68.71% | R+37.4 | 23.00% | 72.55% | R+49.6 | R |
29 | 27.44% | 72.56% | R+45.1 | 19.03% | 76.45% | R+57.4 | R |
30 | 27.26% | 72.74% | R+45.5 | 22.28% | 72.41% | R+50.1 | R |
31 | 24.22% | 75.78% | R+51.6 | 21.13% | 72.89% | R+51.8 | R |
32 | 28.96% | 71.04% | R+42.1 | 19.60% | 75.11% | R+55.5 | R |
33 | 30.42% | 69.58% | R+39.2 | 24.69% | 68.50% | R+43.8 | R |
34 | 43.63% | 56.37% | R+12.7 | 41.69% | 47.73% | R+6 | D |
35 | 27.29% | 72.71% | R+45.4 | 19.27% | 75.77% | R+56.5 | R |
36 | 27.27% | 72.73% | R+45.5 | 20.70% | 74.80% | R+54.1 | R |
37 | 30.60% | 69.40% | R+38.8 | 24.59% | 70.14% | R+45.6 | R |
38 | 22.95% | 77.05% | R+54.1 | 15.96% | 79.29% | R+63.3 | R |
39 | 27.52% | 72.48% | R+45 | 30.36% | 61.83% | R+31.5 | R |
40 | 27.22% | 72.78% | R+45.6 | 23.93% | 69.43% | R+45.5 | R |
41 | 20.25% | 79.75% | R+59.5 | 19.65% | 74.25% | R+54.6 | R |
42 | 24.59% | 75.41% | R+50.8 | 16.63% | 79.04% | R+62.4 | R |
43 | 23.51% | 76.49% | R+53 | 22.34% | 70.39% | R+48.1 | R |
44 | 60.12% | 39.88% | D+20.2 | 58.74% | 32.02% | D+26.7 | D |
45 | 46.57% | 53.43% | R+6.9 | 45.28% | 45.98% | R+0.7 | D |
46 | 40.27% | 59.73% | R+19.5 | 41.33% | 51.65% | R+10.3 | D |
47 | 20.44% | 79.56% | R+59.1 | 18.77% | 75.26% | R+56.5 | R |
48 | 31.02% | 68.98% | R+38 | 24.52% | 71.34% | R+46.8 | R |
49 | 25.99% | 74.01% | R+48 | 17.67% | 78.58% | R+60.9 | R |
50 | 24.87% | 75.13% | R+50.3 | 18.06% | 78.21% | R+60.2 | R |
51 | 21.55% | 78.45% | R+56.9 | 15.47% | 80.44% | R+65 | R |
52 | 26.37% | 73.63% | R+47.3 | 19.34% | 76.19% | R+56.9 | R |
53 | 30.19% | 69.81% | R+39.6 | 28.09% | 64.20% | R+36.1 | R |
54 | 30.53% | 69.47% | R+38.9 | 27.73% | 64.36% | R+36.6 | R |
55 | 20.90% | 79.10% | R+58.2 | 13.10% | 82.88% | R+69.8 | R |
56 | 35.15% | 64.85% | R+29.7 | 26.25% | 68.53% | R+42.3 | D |
57 | 23.41% | 76.59% | R+53.2 | 18.74% | 75.79% | R+57.1 | R |
58 | 17.05% | 82.95% | R+65.9 | 11.66% | 83.28% | R+71.6 | R |
59 | 16.90% | 83.10% | R+66.2 | 13.11% | 83.23% | R+70.1 | R |
60 | 27.03% | 72.97% | R+45.9 | 21.85% | 72.52% | R+50.7 | R |
61 | 13.07% | 86.93% | R+73.9 | 11.23% | 84.53% | R+73.3 | R |
62 | 48.97% | 51.03% | R+2.1 | 44.21% | 50.19% | R+6 | R |
63 | 35.33% | 64.67% | R+29.3 | 27.60% | 67.41% | R+39.8 | R |
64 | 44.83% | 55.17% | R+10.3 | 39.78% | 53.14% | R+13.4 | R |
65 | 27.73% | 72.27% | R+44.5 | 19.27% | 75.91% | R+56.6 | R |
66 | 36.00% | 64.00% | R+28 | 31.50% | 62.79% | R+31.3 | R |
67 | 24.45% | 75.55% | R+51.1 | 27.75% | 66.45% | R+38.7 | R |
68 | 31.36% | 68.64% | R+37.3 | 28.26% | 65.55% | R+37.3 | R |
69 | 24.16% | 75.84% | R+51.7 | 25.05% | 69.12% | R+44.1 | R |
70 | 38.78% | 61.22% | R+22.4 | 41.95% | 51.10% | R+9.2 | R |
71 | 46.54% | 53.46% | R+6.9 | 49.59% | 43.09% | D+6.5 | R |
72 | 64.07% | 35.93% | D+28.1 | 57.75% | 36.56% | D+21.2 | D |
73 | 89.78% | 10.22% | D+79.6 | 85.51% | 10.95% | D+74.6 | D |
74 | 23.76% | 76.24% | R+52.5 | 21.80% | 72.58% | R+50.8 | R |
75 | 36.45% | 63.55% | R+27.1 | 36.07% | 58.00% | R+21.9 | D |
76 | 29.23% | 70.77% | R+41.5 | 29.60% | 64.51% | R+34.9 | R |
77 | 46.33% | 53.67% | R+7.3 | 42.71% | 50.64% | R+7.9 | D |
78 | 46.33% | 53.67% | R+7.3 | 47.44% | 45.53% | D+1.9 | D |
79 | 36.43% | 63.57% | R+27.1 | 38.62% | 54.86% | R+16.2 | R |
80 | 22.50% | 77.50% | R+55 | 22.26% | 72.43% | R+50.2 | R |
81 | 30.71% | 69.29% | R+38.6 | 32.57% | 58.39% | R+25.8 | R |
82 | 28.67% | 71.33% | R+42.7 | 32.14% | 60.98% | R+28.8 | R |
83 | 37.63% | 62.37% | R+24.7 | 41.87% | 50.91% | R+9 | R |
84 | 34.99% | 65.01% | R+30 | 34.26% | 57.94% | R+23.7 | R |
85 | 38.90% | 61.10% | R+22.2 | 43.24% | 49.36% | R+6.1 | D |
86 | 33.30% | 66.70% | R+33.4 | 22.16% | 72.65% | R+50.5 | D |
87 | 44.55% | 55.45% | R+10.9 | 45.90% | 45.36% | D+0.5 | D |
88 | 62.10% | 37.90% | D+24.2 | 62.41% | 28.23% | D+34.2 | D |
89 | 59.05% | 40.95% | D+18.1 | 57.41% | 36.36% | D+21.1 | D |
90 | 39.90% | 60.10% | R+20.2 | 35.95% | 56.77% | R+20.8 | R |
91 | 26.81% | 73.19% | R+46.4 | 27.93% | 66.24% | R+38.3 | R |
92 | 58.72% | 41.28% | D+17.4 | 54.66% | 38.25% | D+16.4 | D |
93 | 42.09% | 57.91% | R+15.8 | 43.18% | 50.17% | R+7 | D |
94 | 47.76% | 52.24% | R+4.5 | 43.29% | 49.41% | R+6.1 | D |
95 | 41.84% | 58.16% | R+16.3 | 37.94% | 54.62% | R+16.7 | R |
96 | 24.15% | 75.85% | R+51.7 | 21.91% | 72.25% | R+50.3 | R |
97 | 74.13% | 25.87% | D+48.3 | 69.20% | 26.39% | D+42.8 | D |
98 | 25.49% | 74.51% | R+49 | 23.71% | 70.43% | R+46.7 | R |
99 | 81.48% | 18.52% | D+63 | 76.46% | 17.59% | D+58.9 | D |
100 | 36.62% | 63.38% | R+26.8 | 38.23% | 54.28% | R+16.1 | R |
101 | 32.40% | 67.60% | R+35.2 | 27.61% | 66.12% | R+38.5 | R |
Total | 33.23% | 66.77% | R+33.5 | 28.93% | 65.32% | R+36.4 | - |
Source: Daily Kos |
See also
Tulsa County, Oklahoma | Oklahoma | Municipal government | Other local coverage |
---|---|---|---|
External links
Footnotes
|