N. AND J. DICK AND COMPANY v. HARDIN D. RUNNELS (1846)
From Ballotpedia
- Justices
- CASES BY TERM
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2025-2026
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2024-2025
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2023-2024
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2022-2023
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2021-2022
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2020-2021
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2019-2020
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2018-2019
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2017-2018
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2016-2017
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2015-2016
- All earlier cases
- HISTORY OF THE COURT
- Recent vacancies
 |
| N. AND J. DICK AND COMPANY v. HARDIN D. RUNNELS |
|---|
| Term: 1847 |
| Important Dates |
| Decided: December 21, 1846 |
| Outcome |
| Certification to or from a lower court |
| Vote |
| 9-0 |
| Majority |
| John Catron • Peter Vivian Daniel • Robert Cooper Grier • John McKinley • John McLean • Samuel Nelson • Roger Brooke Taney • James Moore Wayne • Levi Woodbury |
N. AND J. DICK AND COMPANY v. HARDIN D. RUNNELS is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on December 21, 1846.
The U.S. Supreme Court examined the lower court's certified question. The case originated from the Mississippi U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Mississippi.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1840s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Taney Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Due Process - due process: hearing or notice (other than as pertains to government employees or prisoners' rights)
- Petitioner: Unidentifiable
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Witness, or person under subpoena
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 46 U.S. 7
- How the court took jurisdiction: Certification
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Roger Brooke Taney
- Who wrote the majority opinion: John McLean
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes
