Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
NARDONE et al. v. UNITED STATES (1937)

![]() |
NARDONE et al. v. UNITED STATES |
---|
Term: 1937 |
Important Dates |
Argued: November 15, 1937 |
Decided: December 20, 1937 |
Outcome |
Reversed |
Vote |
7-2 |
Majority |
Hugo Black • Louis Dembitz Brandeis • Pierce Butler • Benjamin Nathan Cardozo • Charles Evans Hughes • Owen Josephus Roberts • Harlan Fiske Stone |
Dissenting |
James Clark McReynolds • George Sutherland |
NARDONE et al. v. UNITED STATES is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on December 20, 1937. The case was argued before the court on November 15, 1937.
In a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the New York Southern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1930s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Hughes Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - search and seizure (other than as pertains to vehicles or Crime Control Act)
- Petitioner: Person convicted of crime
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: United States
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 302 U.S. 379
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Charles Evans Hughes
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Owen Josephus Roberts
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes