Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
NARDONE et al. v. UNITED STATES (1939)

![]() |
NARDONE et al. v. UNITED STATES |
---|
Term: 1939 |
Important Dates |
Argued: November 14, 1939 |
Decided: December 11, 1939 |
Outcome |
Reversed |
Vote |
6-1 |
Majority |
Hugo Black • William Douglas • Felix Frankfurter • Charles Evans Hughes • Owen Josephus Roberts • Harlan Fiske Stone |
Dissenting |
James Clark McReynolds |
NARDONE et al. v. UNITED STATES is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on December 11, 1939. The case was argued before the court on November 14, 1939.
In a 6-1 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the New York Southern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1930s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Hughes Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - subconstitutional fair procedure: presentation, admissibility, or sufficiency of evidence (not necessarily a criminal case)
- Petitioner: Person convicted of crime
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: United States
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 308 U.S. 338
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Charles Evans Hughes
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Felix Frankfurter
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes