Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
NATIONAL CITY BANK OF NEW YORK v. REPUBLIC OF CHINA et al. (1955)
- Justices
- CASES BY TERM
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2025-2026
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2024-2025
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2023-2024
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2022-2023
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2021-2022
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2020-2021
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2019-2020
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2018-2019
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2017-2018
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2016-2017
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2015-2016
- All earlier cases
- HISTORY OF THE COURT
- Recent vacancies
 |
| NATIONAL CITY BANK OF NEW YORK v. REPUBLIC OF CHINA et al. |
|---|
| Term: 1954 |
| Important Dates |
| Argued: November 9, 1954 |
| Decided: March 7, 1955 |
| Outcome |
| Reversed and remanded |
| Vote |
| 4-3 |
| Majority |
| Hugo Black • Felix Frankfurter • Sherman Minton • Earl Warren |
| Dissenting |
| Harold Burton • Tom Clark • Stanley Reed |
NATIONAL CITY BANK OF NEW YORK v. REPUBLIC OF CHINA et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 7, 1955. The case was argued before the court on November 9, 1954.
In a 4-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the New York Southern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1950s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Warren Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Judicial Power - Miscellaneous judicial power, especially diversity jurisdiction
- Petitioner: Bank, savings and loan, credit union, investment company
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Foreign nation or instrumentality
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 348 U.S. 356
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Earl Warren
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Felix Frankfurter
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes
