Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. GULLETT GIN CO. (1951)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. GULLETT GIN CO.
Term: 1950
Important Dates
Argued: November 29, 1950
Decided: January 15, 1951
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
8-0
Majority
Hugo BlackHarold BurtonTom ClarkWilliam DouglasFelix FrankfurterRobert JacksonSherman MintonStanley Reed

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. GULLETT GIN CO. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on January 15, 1951. The case was argued before the court on November 29, 1950.

In an 8-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1950s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Vinson Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Judicial Power - Judicial review of administrative agency's or administrative official's actions and procedures
  • Petitioner: National Labor Relations Board, or regional office or officer
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: employer. If employer's relations with employees are governed by the nature of the employer's business (e.g., railroad, boat), rather than labor law generally, the more specific designation is used in place of Employer.
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 340 U.S. 361
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Frederick Vinson
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Sherman Minton

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes