Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. HIGHLAND PARK MANUFACTURING CO. (1951)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. HIGHLAND PARK MANUFACTURING CO.
Term: 1950
Important Dates
Argued: April 23, 1951
Decided: May 14, 1951
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
6-2
Majority
Harold BurtonTom ClarkRobert JacksonSherman MintonStanley ReedFrederick Vinson
Dissenting
William DouglasFelix Frankfurter

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. HIGHLAND PARK MANUFACTURING CO. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 14, 1951. The case was argued before the court on April 23, 1951.

In a 6-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1950s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Vinson Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: First Amendment - loyalty oath or non-Communist affidavit (other than bar applicants, government employees, political party, or teacher)
  • Petitioner: National Labor Relations Board, or regional office or officer
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: employer. If employer's relations with employees are governed by the nature of the employer's business (e.g., railroad, boat), rather than labor law generally, the more specific designation is used in place of Employer.
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 341 U.S. 322
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Frederick Vinson
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Robert Jackson

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes