Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
NEVADA COMMISSION ON ETHICS, PETITIONER v. MICHAEL A. CARRIGAN (2011)

![]() |
NEVADA COMMISSION ON ETHICS, PETITIONER v. MICHAEL A. CARRIGAN |
---|
Term: 2010 |
Important Dates |
Argued: April 27, 2011 |
Decided: June 13, 2011 |
Outcome |
Reversed and remanded |
Vote |
9-0 |
Majority |
Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Elena Kagan • John Roberts • Antonin Scalia • Sonia Sotomayor • Clarence Thomas |
Concurring |
Samuel Alito • Anthony Kennedy |
NEVADA COMMISSION ON ETHICS, PETITIONER v. MICHAEL A. CARRIGAN is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 13, 2011. The case was argued before the court on April 27, 2011.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Nevada State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2010s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: First Amendment - First Amendment, miscellaneous (cf. comity: First Amendment)
- Petitioner: State commission, board, committee, or authority
- Petitioner state: Nevada
- Respondent type: Governmental employee or job applicant
- Respondent state: Nevada
- Citation: 564 U.S. 117
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Antonin Scalia
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes