Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, et al. v. WILLIAM HIBBS et al. (2003)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, et al. v. WILLIAM HIBBS et al.
Term: 2002
Important Dates
Argued: January 15, 2003
Decided: May 27, 2003
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
6-3
Majority
Stephen BreyerRuth Bader GinsburgSandra Day O'ConnorWilliam Rehnquist
Concurring
David SouterJohn Paul Stevens
Dissenting
Anthony KennedyAntonin ScaliaClarence Thomas

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, et al. v. WILLIAM HIBBS et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 27, 2003. The case was argued before the court on January 15, 2003.

In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Nevada U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Federalism - national supremacy: miscellaneous
  • Petitioner: State department or agency
  • Petitioner state: Nevada
  • Respondent type: Governmental employee or job applicant
  • Respondent state: Nevada
  • Citation: 538 U.S. 721
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: William Rehnquist

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes