NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, et al. v. WILLIAM HIBBS et al. (2003)

![]() |
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, et al. v. WILLIAM HIBBS et al. |
---|
Term: 2002 |
Important Dates |
Argued: January 15, 2003 |
Decided: May 27, 2003 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
6-3 |
Majority |
Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Sandra Day O'Connor • William Rehnquist |
Concurring |
David Souter • John Paul Stevens |
Dissenting |
Anthony Kennedy • Antonin Scalia • Clarence Thomas |
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, et al. v. WILLIAM HIBBS et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 27, 2003. The case was argued before the court on January 15, 2003.
In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Nevada U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Federalism - national supremacy: miscellaneous
- Petitioner: State department or agency
- Petitioner state: Nevada
- Respondent type: Governmental employee or job applicant
- Respondent state: Nevada
- Citation: 538 U.S. 721
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: William Rehnquist
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes