NEW MEXICO v. EARNEST (1986)

![]() |
NEW MEXICO v. EARNEST |
---|
Term: 1985 |
Important Dates |
Argued: April 1, 1986 |
Decided: June 27, 1986 |
Outcome |
Vacated and remanded |
Vote |
9-0 |
Majority |
Harry Blackmun • William Brennan • Thurgood Marshall • John Paul Stevens • Byron White |
Concurring |
Warren Burger • Sandra Day O'Connor • Lewis Powell • William Rehnquist |
NEW MEXICO v. EARNEST is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 27, 1986. The case was argued before the court on April 1, 1986.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the New Mexico State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1980s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Burger Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Confrontation (right to confront accuser, call and cross-examine witnesses)
- Petitioner: State
- Petitioner state: New Mexico
- Respondent type: Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 477 U.S. 648
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Per curiam (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Warren Burger
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Unknown
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes