Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

NEW PROCESS STEEL, L. P. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD (2010)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
NEW PROCESS STEEL, L. P. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Term: 2009
Important Dates
Argued: March 23, 2010
Decided: June 17, 2010
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
5-4
Majority
Samuel AlitoJohn RobertsAntonin ScaliaJohn Paul StevensClarence Thomas
Dissenting
Stephen BreyerRuth Bader GinsburgAnthony KennedySonia Sotomayor

NEW PROCESS STEEL, L. P. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 17, 2010. The case was argued before the court on March 23, 2010.

In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Judicial Power - Judicial review of administrative agency's or administrative official's actions and procedures
  • Petitioner: employer. If employer's relations with employees are governed by the nature of the employer's business (e.g., railroad, boat), rather than labor law generally, the more specific designation is used in place of Employer.
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: National Labor Relations Board, or regional office or officer
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 560 U.S. 674
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: John Paul Stevens

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes