NOLLAN et ux. v. CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION (1987)

![]() |
NOLLAN et ux. v. CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION |
---|
Term: 1986 |
Important Dates |
Argued: March 30, 1987 |
Decided: June 26, 1987 |
Outcome |
Reversed |
Vote |
5-4 |
Majority |
Sandra Day O'Connor • Lewis Powell • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • Byron White |
Dissenting |
Harry Blackmun • William Brennan • Thurgood Marshall • John Paul Stevens |
NOLLAN et ux. v. CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 26, 1987. The case was argued before the court on March 30, 1987.
In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the California State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1980s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Due Process - Due process: takings clause, or other non-constitutional governmental taking of property
- Petitioner: Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: State commission, board, committee, or authority
- Respondent state: California
- Citation: 483 U.S. 825
- How the court took jurisdiction: Appeal
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Antonin Scalia
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes