Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

NORTHERN COAL & DOCK COMPANY et al. v. STRAND et al. (1928)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
NORTHERN COAL & DOCK COMPANY et al. v. STRAND et al.
Term: 1928
Important Dates
Argued: October 23, 1928
Decided: December 10, 1928
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
9-0
Majority
Pierce ButlerJames Clark McReynoldsEdward Terry SanfordGeorge SutherlandWilliam Howard TaftWillis Van Devanter
Concurring
Louis Dembitz BrandeisOliver Wendell HolmesHarlan Fiske Stone

NORTHERN COAL & DOCK COMPANY et al. v. STRAND et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on December 10, 1928. The case was argued before the court on October 23, 1928.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Wisconsin State Trial Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1920s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Taft Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Economic Activity - Liability, other than as in sufficiency of evidence, election of remedies, punitive damages
  • Petitioner: employer. If employer's relations with employees are governed by the nature of the employer's business (e.g., railroad, boat), rather than labor law generally, the more specific designation is used in place of Employer.
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Employee, or job applicant, including beneficiaries of
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 278 U.S. 142
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Howard Taft
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: James Clark McReynolds

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes