Election law changes? Our legislation tracker’s got you. Check it out!

Nancy L. Whittenburg

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Local Politics Image.jpg

Ballotpedia provides comprehensive election coverage of the 100 largest cities in America by population as well as mayoral, city council, and district attorney election coverage in state capitals outside of the 100 largest cities. This judge is outside of that coverage scope and does not receive scheduled updates.


BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Ballotpedia does not currently cover this office or maintain this page. Please contact us with any updates.
Nancy L. Whittenburg

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png

Do you have a photo that could go here? Click here to submit it for this profile!


Iowa District Court 3A
Tenure
Present officeholder

Education

Bachelor's

Drake University, 1980

Law

Drake University, 1986


Nancy L. Whittenburg is a judge of District 3A of Iowa. She was appointed to this position in 2004, and retained in 2012 for a term that expires in 2018.[1]

Education

Whittenburg received her bachelor's and J.D. degrees from Drake University in 1980 and 1986, respectively.[1]

Career

Whittenburg began her legal career in 1988 as a private practice lawyer. She became a Clay County magistrate in 1989 and worked in this capacity until 2004.[1]

2012 election

Whittenburg was retained in the general election on November 6, winning 77.79% of the vote.[2][3]

See also: Iowa judicial elections, 2012

Noteworthy cases

Judge Whittenburg approves visitation rights for mother convicted of murder

Judge Whittenburg ruled, in September of 2012, that Michael Roberts must take his children to visit their incarcerated mother, Tracy Richter, and may not move his family out of the country until her appeals are exhausted. Richter, Roberts's ex-wife, was convicted of the 2001 murder of Dustin Wehde and is being held in Mitchellville, Iowa. Reports say she shot Wehde several times at her home while her kids were in another room of the house. Roberts has since moved with his children, now 12 and 14-years-old, to California.

Whittenburg stated that Roberts's contact with his ex-wife was "not consistent with the duties imposed on a joint legal custodian." Pointing to a positive relationship between the children and their mother, as well as the need for closure, she ordered that Roberts take the kids to visit their mother three times while she appeals her conviction. Additionally, Roberts was not allowed to move his family back to Australia, as he hoped to do, until Richter's appeal was finished.

Prosecutor Ben Smith, disagreed with the judge's ruling, arguing that Richter "should have lost any and all rights to make those kinds of decisions or to have an influence in her kids' lives when she executed somebody."[4][5]

See also

External links

Footnotes