Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
New Administrative State Banner.png
What are administrative law judges and administrative judges?

Administrative law judges (ALJs) and non-ALJ adjudicators, sometimes referred to as administrative judges (AJs), are federal administrative adjudicators. Although many of these officials have the word judge in their job title, administrative adjudicators are part of the executive rather than the judicial branch.

Visit Ballotpedia's Administrative State Project for more information about federal administrative adjudicators and the administrative state.

National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
NAALJ Logo.png
Basic facts
Location:New Mexico
Type: 501(c)(6)
Top official:Gabriel Paul
Year founded:1974
Website:Official website


The National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (NAALJ) is a 501(c)(6) nonprofit organization that, according to its website, is the largest professional organization devoted to administrative adjudication for the executive branch. The NAALJ has members in all 50 states, some territories, Australia and Canada.[1][2]

Mission

According to its website, the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary has the following mission:[1]

“ The mission of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary is to promote an impartial, professional administrative judiciary that adheres to high ethical standards and furthers the recognition and understanding of its necessary role in the function of government.[3] ”

Work

See also: Federal administrative adjudicators

The NAALJ includes local, state and federal administrative law judges as well as other hearing officers and commissioners as voting members. The organization aims to improve the quality of administrative justice and to further alternative dispute resolution through arbitration and mediation.[2]

In addition to hosting seminars and conferences, the NAALJ publishes a journal and newsletter. Semi-annually, the group publishes its journal, Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary, with Pepperdine University School of Law. The publication showcases scholarly articles about developments affecting the administrative judiciary.[4]

Beyond its Journal, the NAALJ adopted a Model Code of Judicial Conduct in 1993 that states have used to develop rules for judicial conduct.[4]

Leadership

As of May 2024, the following people held leadership positions with the organization:[5]

  • Hon. Gabriel Paul, President
  • Hon. Thomas J. Augustine, President-Elect
  • Hon. Stephen Thibodeau, Secretary
  • Hon. Carrie Ingram, Treasurer

Finances

The following is a breakdown of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary's revenue and expenses for 2013-2017:

Annual revenue and expenses for the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary, 2013-2017
Tax Year Total Revenue Total Expenses
2017[6] $97,524 $97,211
2016[7] $85,488 $67,604
2015[8] $88,669 $66,500
2014[9] $95,950 $143,812
2013[10] $145,266 $140,555

Recent news

The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms 'National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary'. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary - Google News

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary, "Home," accessed August 8, 2018
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary, "About NAALJ," accessed August 8, 2018
  3. ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary, "Publications," accessed August 8, 2018
  5. ↑ National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary, "NAALJ Officers," accessed September 28, 2019
  6. ↑ GuideStar, "National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary IRS Form 990 (2017)," accessed September 28, 2019
  7. ↑ GuideStar, "National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary IRS Form 990 (2016)," accessed September 28, 2019
  8. ↑ GuideStar, "National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary IRS Form 990 (2015)," accessed August 8, 2018
  9. ↑ GuideStar, "National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary IRS Form 990 (2014)," accessed August 8, 2018
  10. ↑ GuideStar, "National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary IRS Form 990 (2013)," accessed August 8, 2018
v • e
The Administrative State
MainThe Administrative State Project Badge.png
Pillars
Reporting
Laws
Administrative Procedure Act • Antiquities Act • Civil Service Reform Act • Clayton Antitrust Act • Communications Act of 1934 • Congressional Review Act • Electronic Freedom of Information Act • Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938 • Federal Housekeeping Statute • Federal Reserve Act • Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 • Freedom of Information Act • Government in the Sunshine Act • Independent Offices Appropriations Act of 1952 • Information Quality Act • Interstate Commerce Act • National Labor Relations Act • Paperwork Reduction Act • Pendleton Act • Privacy Act of 1974 • Regulatory Flexibility Act • REINS Act • REINS Act (Wisconsin) • Securities Act of 1933 • Securities Exchange Act of 1934 • Sherman Antitrust Act • Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act • Truth in Regulating Act • Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Cases
Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner • A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States • Association of Data Processing Service Organizations v. Camp • Auer v. Robbins • Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council • Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe • Federal Trade Commission (FTC) v. Standard Oil Company of California • Field v. Clark • Food and Drug Administration v. Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation • Humphrey's Executor v. United States • Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) v. Chadha • J.W. Hampton Jr. & Company v. United States • Lucia v. SEC • Marshall v. Barlow's • Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency • Mistretta v. United States • National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) v. Sebelius • National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning Company • National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. • Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan • Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation • Skidmore v. Swift & Co. • United States v. Lopez • United States v. Western Pacific Railroad Co. • Universal Camera Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board • Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council • Wayman v. Southard • Weyerhaeuser Company v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service • Whitman v. American Trucking Associations • Wickard v. Filburn • Wiener v. United States
Terms
Adjudication (administrative state) • Administrative judge • Administrative law • Administrative law judge • Administrative state • Arbitrary-or-capricious test • Auer deference • Barrier to entry • Bootleggers and Baptists • Chevron deference (doctrine) • Civil servant • Civil service • Code of Federal Regulations • Codify (administrative state) • Comment period • Compliance costs • Congressional Record • Coordination (administrative state) • Deference (administrative state) • Direct and indirect costs (administrative state) • Enabling statute • Ex parte communication (administrative state) • Executive agency • Federal law • Federal Register • Federalism • Final rule • Formal rulemaking • Formalism (law) • Functionalism (law) • Guidance (administrative state) • Hybrid rulemaking • Incorporation by reference • Independent federal agency • Informal rulemaking • Joint resolution of disapproval (administrative state) • Major rule • Negotiated rulemaking • Nondelegation doctrine • OIRA prompt letter • Organic statute • Pragmatism (law) • Precautionary principle • Promulgate • Proposed rule • Publication rulemaking • Regulatory budget • Regulatory capture • Regulatory dark matter • Regulatory impact analysis • Regulatory policy officer • Regulatory reform officer • Regulatory review • Rent seeking • Retrospective regulatory review • Risk assessment (administrative state) • Rulemaking • Separation of powers • Significant regulatory action • Skidmore deference • Statutory authority • Substantive law and procedural law • Sue and settle • Sunset provision • Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions • United States Code • United States Statutes at Large
Bibliography
Agencies
v • e
Influencers
MainInfluencer Project Badge.png
Retrieved from "https://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=National_Association_of_Administrative_Law_Judiciary&oldid=9568834"