Nebraska 2014 ballot measure campaign expenditure recipients
2014 measures |
---|
November 4 |
Initiative 425 ![]() |
Endorsements |
Expenditures |
Local measures |
The following information details to whom 2014 Nebraska ballot measure campaign expenditures went. Those who received expenditures provided services, such as consulting, advertising, polling, legal work and signature collection, for the ballot measure campaigns.
The top five recipients of ballot measure campaign expenditures were:
- FieldWorks: $515,375
- 50 States Payroll, LLC: $286,705
- Clark Creative Group: $88,084
- Danielle Conrad: $48,000
- Unionist Printing: $43,315
An aggregation of data on expenditure recipients in all states can be found here.
All data was compiled from expenditures data made available through the state's campaign finance website.[1]
Expenditure recipients
The following chart illustrates which firms received payments greater than or equal to $5,000 from ballot measure campaign committees in 2014.
- A green background indicates that the expenditure recipient was employed by supporters of a measure.
- A red background indicates that the recipient was employed by opponents of the measure.
Recipient | Total | Initiative 425 |
---|---|---|
50 States Payroll, LLC | $286,705 | $286,705 |
Blue Labs | $5,000 | $5,000 |
Chism Strategies | $28,997 | $28,997 |
Clark Creative Group | $88,084 | $88,084 |
Danielle Conrad | $48,000 | $48,000 |
FieldWorks | $515,375 | $515,375 |
Goldenrod Printing | $23,721 | $23,721 |
Unionist Printing | $43,315 | $43,315 |
See also
- Nebraska 2014 ballot measures
- 2014 ballot measure campaign expenditure recipients
- Campaign finance requirements for Nebraska ballot measures
External links
Footnotes
![]() |
State of Nebraska Lincoln (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |