Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Nebraska Amendment 2, Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Repayment Amendment (2020)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Nebraska Amendment 2
Flag of Nebraska.png
Election date
November 3, 2020
Topic
Taxes and Property
Status
Approveda Approved
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature


Nebraska Amendment 2, the Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Repayment Amendment, was on the ballot in Nebraska as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 3, 2020.[1] It was approved.

A "yes" vote supported this constitutional amendment to increase the repayment period for tax increment financing from 15 to 20 years for areas where more than one-half of properties are designated as extremely blighted.

A "no" vote opposed this constitutional amendment, thereby keeping the repayment period for tax increment financing at 15 years, including for areas where more than one-half of properties are designated as extremely blighted.


Election results

Nebraska Amendment 2

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

520,236 61.16%
No 330,445 38.84%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Overview

What did Amendment 2 change?

Amendment 2 increased the repayment period for tax-increment financing (TIF) from 15 years to 20 years for areas where more than one-half of properties are designated as extremely blighted.[1] In Nebraska, an extremely blighted area is defined as a census tract with an average unemployment rate that is 200 percent or more of the average state unemployment rate and the poverty rate is more than 20 percent.[2]

What is TIF?

TIF is intended to finance economic development in an area. In Nebraska, the governing bodies of cities and villages can enact resolutions to declare an area as substandard, blighted, and in need of redevelopment and create a TIF district. The local government can then issue bonds to finance improvements associated with redevelopment projects in the district. As of 2019, local governments can use increased tax revenue, resulting from increased property values due to development, to pay off the bonds over a 15-year period. The ballot measure would increase the period to pay off the bonds and indebtedness from 15 years to 20 years for TIF districts designated as extremely blighted.[2]

Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title would be as follows:[1]

A constitutional amendment to authorize the Legislature to allow cities and villages to pledge property taxes as part of a redevelopment project for a period not to exceed twenty years if, due to a high rate of unemployment combined with a high poverty rate as determined by law, more than one-half of the property in the project area is extremely blighted.

[ ] For

[ ] Against[3]

Ballot summary

The ballot summary would be as follows:[1]

A vote FOR this constitutional amendment would amend the Nebraska Constitution to authorize the Legislature to extend the maximum length of time for the repayment of indebtedness related to tax-increment financing from 15 years to 20 years if more than one-half of the property in the project area is designated as extremely blighted.


A vote AGAINST this constitutional amendment would leave the maximum length of time for repayment of indebtedness unchanged at 15 years.[3]

Constitutional changes

See also: Article VIII, Nebraska Constitution

The ballot measure amended Section 12 of Article VIII of the Nebraska Constitution. The following underlined text was added and struck-through text was deleted:[1]

Note: Hover over the text and scroll to see the full text.

For the purpose of rehabilitating, acquiring, or redeveloping substandard and blighted property in a redevelopment project as determined by law, any city or village of the state may, notwithstanding any other provision in the Constitution, and without regard to charter limitations and restrictions, incur indebtedness, whether by bond, loans, notes, advance of money, or otherwise. Notwithstanding any other provision in the Constitution or a local charter, such cities or villages may also pledge for and apply to the payment of the principal, interest, and any premium on such indebtedness all taxes levied by all taxing bodies, which taxes shall be at such rate for a period not to exceed fifteen years, on the assessed valuation of the property in the project area portion of a designated blighted and substandard area that is in excess of the assessed valuation of such property for the year prior to such rehabilitation, acquisition, or redevelopment. Cities and villages may pledge such taxes for a period not to exceed fifteen years, except that the Legislature may allow cities and villages to pledge such taxes for a period not to exceed twenty years if, due to a high rate of unemployment combined with a high poverty rate as determined by law, more than one-half of the property in the project area is designated as extremely blighted.

When such indebtedness and the interest thereon have been paid in full, such property thereafter shall be taxed as is other property in the respective taxing jurisdictions and such taxes applied as all other taxes of the respective taxing bodies.[3]


Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2020
Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title and summary for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The secretary of state wrote the ballot language for this measure.


The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 12, and the FRE is 45. The word count for the ballot title is 64, and the estimated reading time is 17 seconds. The FKGL for the ballot summary is grade level 19, and the FRE is 21. The word count for the ballot summary is 73, and the estimated reading time is 19 seconds.


Support

Supporters

Officials

Arguments

  • Nebraska State Senator Justin Wayne (D): "Historically, the basic goal of TIF has been to revitalize those portions of our community that have been left behind. What we’ve seen in Omaha is that because developers are able to access TIF in many newer neighborhoods, there’s less incentive for them to explore that same type of development in struggling communities like North and South Omaha. Amendment 2, which appears on the November general election ballot, is designed to incentivize developers to use TIF in those areas that need the most help."


Opposition

Opponents

Officials


Campaign finance

The campaign finance information on this page reflects the most recent scheduled reports that Ballotpedia has processed, which covered through January 12, 2020.


See also: Campaign finance requirements for Nebraska ballot measures

There were no ballot measure committees registered in support of or in opposition to Amendment 2.[4]

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Background

TIF in Nebraska

See also: Nebraska Redevelopment Bonds, Amendment 1 (1978)

In 1978, voters approved a constitutional amendment allowing for tax-increment financing (TIF), and the legislature passed a statute to implement the amendment the following year.

TIF is intended to finance economic development in an area. In Nebraska, cities and villages have the power to declare an area as substandard, blighted, and in need of redevelopment and create a TIF district. The local government can then issue bonds to finance improvements associated with redevelopment projects in the district. As of 2019, local governments can use increased tax revenue, resulting from increased property values due to development, to pay off the bonds over a 15-year period.[2]

Referred amendments on the ballot

From 1996 through 2018, the state legislature referred 54 constitutional amendments to the ballot. Voters approved 20 and rejected 34 of the referred amendments. All of the amendments appeared on even-year ballots. The average number of amendments appearing on the ballot was between four and five. The approval rate at the ballot box was 37.0 percent during the 22-year period from 1996 through 2018. The rejection rate was 63.0 percent. Preceding 2020, the last time voters in Nebraska addressed legislatively referred constitutional amendments was 2012.

Legislatively referred constitutional amendments, 1996-2018
Years Total number Approved Percent approved Defeated Percent defeated Average Median Minimum Maximum
Even years 54 20 37.0% 34 63.0% 4.5 3.5 0 17

Tax policies on the ballot in 2020

See also: Taxes on the ballot

In 2020, voters in 14 states voted on 21 ballot measures addressing tax-related policies. Ten of the measures addressed taxes on properties, three were related to income tax rates, two addressed tobacco taxes, one addressed business-related taxes, one addressed sales tax rates, one addressed fees and surcharges, and one was related to tax-increment financing (TIF).

Click Show to read details about the tax-related measures on statewide ballots in 2020.

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Nebraska Constitution

In Nebraska, a constitutional amendment requires a 60 percent vote in the Nebraska State Senate in one legislative session.

On January 23, 2019, Sen. Justin T. Wayne (D-13) introduced the constitutional amendment as Legislative Resolution 14CA (LR 14CA). On April 4, 2019, the full state Senate voted 40-0 to send the measure to final reading.

On April 18, the state Senate held the final reading of LR 14CA. The legislature voted to refer LR 14CA to the ballot, with 43 senators supporting the amendment, two senators opposing the amendment, and four members not voting.[1]

Vote in the Nebraska State Senate
April 18, 2019
Requirement: Three-fifths (60 percent) vote of all members of the legislature
Number of yes votes required: 30  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total4324
Total percent87.76%4.08%8.16%
Democrat1800
Republican2424
Independent100

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Nebraska

Click "Show" to learn more about voter registration, identification requirements, and poll times in Nebraska.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Nebraska State Legislature, "LR14CA," accessed April 5, 2019
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Nebraska State Legislature, "Ballot measure for TIF repayment extension approved," April 18, 2019
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content
  4. Nebraska Accountability and Disclosure Commission, "Campaign Finance," accessed March 12, 2019
  5. Arizona Secretary of State, "Initiative 31-2020," February 14, 2020
  6. Colorado Secretary of State, "2019-2020 Initiative Filings, Agendas & Results," accessed April 17, 2020
  7. Illinois State Legislature, "Senate Joint Resolution Constitutional Amendment 1," accessed May 2, 2019
  8. Illinois State Board of Elections,"Committee Search," accessed May 28, 2019
  9. Alaska Division of Elections, "Alaska's Fair Share Act," accessed January 13, 2020
  10. Anchorage Daily News, "Group says it has enough signatures to put Alaska oil tax initiative on ballot," January 14, 2020
  11. APOC, "Online Reports," accessed January 7, 2020
  12. Nebraska Secretary of State, "Initiative Petition text," accessed August 22, 2019
  13. California Attorney General, "Initiative 19-0008," September 17, 2019
  14. California the Legislative Analyst's Office, "A.G. File No. 2019-0008," February 5, 2018
  15. California State Legislature, "Assembly Concurrent Resolution 11," accessed May 8, 2019
  16. Colorado General Assembly, "SCR 20-001," accessed June 10, 2020
  17. Arkansas State Legislature, "House Joint Resolution 1018," accessed March 7, 2019
  18. UA Little Rock Public Radio, "Arkansas Governor Signs $95 Million Highway Funding Bill Into Law," accessed March 25, 2019
  19. Arkansas Ethics Commission, "Filings," accessed August 18, 2020
  20. Colorado State Legislature, "House Bill 20-1427," accessed June 15, 2020
  21. Oregon State Legislature, "HB 2270," accessed June 25, 2019
  22. Colorado Secretary of State, "2019-2020 Initiative Filings, Agendas & Results," accessed February 10, 2020
  23. Nebraska State Legislature, "LR14CA," accessed April 5, 2019
  24. Nebraska Statutes, "Section 32-908," accessed April 18, 2023
  25. Nebraska Secretary of State, “Nebraska Voter Registration Background,” accessed April 18, 2023
  26. Nebraska Secretary of State, “Felon Voting Rights FAQ,” accessed April 18, 2023
  27. 27.0 27.1 Nebraska Secretary of State, “Voter Information Frequently Asked Questions,” accessed April 18, 2023
  28. Nebraska Secretary of State, “Online Voter Registration Frequently Asked Questions,” accessed April 18, 2023
  29. 29.0 29.1 NCSL, "State Profiles: Elections," accessed August 28, 2024
  30. Omaha World-Herald, “Online voter registration is coming to Nebraska,” September 5, 2015
  31. Nebraska Secretary of State’s Official Voter Registration Application," accessed November 1, 2024
  32. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  33. Nebraska Secretary of State, "Full text," accessed June 8, 2023
  34. Nebraska Secretary of State, "Election Day FAQ," accessed June 8, 2023