Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

Nebraska Initiative 430, Authorizing Gambling at Racetracks Initiative (2020)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Nebraska Initiative 430
Flag of Nebraska.png
Election date
November 3, 2020
Topic
Gambling
Status
Approveda Approved
Type
State statute
Origin
Citizens


Nebraska Initiative 430, the Authorizing Gambling at Racetracks Initiative, was on the ballot in Nebraska as an initiated state statute on November 3, 2020.[1][2] It was approved.

A "yes" vote supported enacting a law that authorizes gambling operations within licensed racetracks and establishes the Nebraska Gaming Commission to regulate gambling operations. Together, Initiatives 429, 430, and 431 would allow, authorize and regulate, and tax gambling at licensed racetracks.

A "no" vote opposed enacting a law that authorizes gambling operations within licensed racetracks and establishes the Nebraska Gaming Commission to regulate gambling operations.


Election results

Nebraska Initiative 430

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

591,086 65.01%
No 318,094 34.99%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Overview

How did Initiative 430 change the status of gambling in Nebraska?

See also: Measure design and Text of measure

Initiative 430 authorized gambling at licensed racetracks with licensed gaming operators. It established the Nebraska Gaming Commission to enact rules to license gaming operators and regulate the gambling industry. The measure prohibited anyone under the age of 21 from playing on gambling devices or participating in gambling at the racetrack. At the time of the election, Nebraska outlawed gambling, except with respect to the state lottery, licensed raffles, and bingo.[2]

Initiative 429 amended the Nebraska Constitution to allow for the enactment of Initiative 430 and Initiative 431, which imposed an annual tax of 20% on gross gambling revenue of licensed gaming operators.

How did the amendment get on the ballot?

See also: Path to the ballot

Initiative 430 was filed with an initiated constitutional amendment, Initiative 429, and an initiated state statute, Initiative 431, by Keep the Money in Nebraska. Initiative 429 added a new section to the Nebraska Constitution to exempt laws authorizing gambling at licensed racetracks from the state's constitutional prohibition on gambling. Initiative 431 imposed an annual tax of 20% on gross gambling revenue of licensed gaming operators.

The campaign submitted approximately 470,000 signatures for the three petitions. On August 25, 2020, Nebraska Secretary of State Bob Evnen (R) announced that the initiatives did not qualify for the ballot after receiving written objections to the ballot language of the petitions despite submitting the required number of valid signatures. The campaign appealed the decision to the Nebraska Supreme Court. On September 10, the Court ordered the initiatives to be placed on the ballot reversing the secretary's determination that the petitions violated the state's single-subject rule.[3]

What was the status of gambling across the U.S.?

See also: Status of gambling across the U.S.

As of October 2020, gambling in some form was legal in 48 of the 50 states, with Utah and Hawaii completely banning it. Twenty-five states have legalized commercial gambling, and 30 states have authorized tribal casinos.[4]

Three states voted on four measures concerning gambling in November. Colorado Amendment 77 allowed local jurisdictions where gambling is legal to approve a maximum single bet limit of any amount and expand allowable game types in addition to slot machines, blackjack, poker, roulette, and craps. Colorado Amendment C would have lowered the number of years an organization must have existed before obtaining a charitable gaming license from five years to three years. Maryland Question 2 authorized sports and events wagering at certain licensed facilities with state revenue intended to fund public education. South Dakota Constitutional Amendment B authorized the South Dakota State Legislature to legalize sports betting within the city limits of Deadwood.

Measure design

Click on the arrows (▼) below for summaries of the different provisions of Nebraska 430.

Authorization of gambling at licensed racetracks: Changes to gambling law in Nebraska

Initiative 430 authorized gambling at licensed racetracks with licensed gaming operators. The initiative allowed the Nebraska Gaming Commission to issue one gaming operator license per licensed racetrack. The gaming operator would not be required to also hold a racing license or operate the licensed racetrack. The measure prohibited anyone under the age of 21 from playing on gambling devices or participating in gambling at the racetrack. The act took effect on January 1, 2021.

At the time of the election, Nebraska outlawed gambling, except with respect to the state lottery, licensed raffles, and bingo.[2]

Nebraska Gaming Commission: Composition and responsibilities of the commission

Initiative 430 created the Nebraska Gaming Commission. It consisted of seven members, with no more than four members from the same political party. The initiative prohibits members from having any personal financial interest in a licensed racetrack or gaming operator while serving on the commission. The members would elect one member to be the chair of the commission.[2]

Five members of the State Racing Commission would be ex officio members of the gaming commission. Members of the State Racing Commission are appointed by the governor and approved by a majority of the legislature to serve for four years. The governor would appoint two additional members to the gaming commission. These members would serve five years, and at least one would need to be a member of the "organization representing the majority of licensed owners and trainers of horses at racetracks in Nebraska."[2]

The Nebraska Gaming Commission is responsible for the following:[2]

  • licensing and regulating gaming operators at racetracks based on established criteria;
  • regulating gambling practices in order to prevent fraud and maintain security;
  • establishing criteria to license gaming operators and other positions incident to the gambling operation;
  • collecting fees for license applications and issuances;
  • collecting fees to cover the cost of oversight and regulation;
  • imposing a one-time fee of $1 million on each authorized gaming operator for each licensed racetrack;
  • denying or suspending gaming operator licenses for violating the "reasonable criteria and procedures established by the commission to facilitate the integrity, productivity, and lawful conduct of gaming within the state";
  • granting or denying applications for gaming operator licenses not to expire within 20 years;
  • conducting background checks into applicants;
  • adopting rules for gaming machine standards;
  • inspecting gaming operations, issuing subpoenas for witnesses and records, and administering oaths;
  • imposing fines for violations against the act, not to exceed $25,000;
  • adopting rules for assessing and collecting taxes on gambling operations;
  • promoting the treatment of gambling-related behavioral disorders; and
  • providing for the administration of the commission through necessary staff and facilities.



Text of measure

Ballot question

The ballot question was as follows:[2]

Shall a statute be enacted which: (1) allows games of chance to be conducted by authorized gaming operators within licensed racetrack enclosures in Nebraska; (2) establishes a Nebraska Gaming Commission to license and regulate such gaming; and (3) amends and repeals existing sections of law to harmonize provisions consistent with the enactment of such statute?

[ ] For

[ ] Against[5]

Ballot summary

The ballot summary was as follows:[6]

A vote 'FOR' will enact a statute which: (1) allows games of chance to be conducted by authorized gaming operators within licensed racetrack enclosures in Nebraska; (2) establishes a Nebraska Gaming Commission to license and regulate such gaming; and (3) amends and repeals existing sections of law to harmonize provisions consistent with the enactment of such statute.

A vote 'AGAINST' will not cause such a statute to be enacted.[5]

Object statement

The object statement was as follows:[2]

The object of this petition enacts a statute allowing all games of chance to be conducted by authorized gaming operators within licensed racetrack enclosures in Nebraska and establishes a Nebraska Gaming Commission to regulate such gaming in Nebraska.[5]

Full text

The full text of the measure is available here.

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2020
Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title and summary for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The secretary of state wrote the ballot language for this measure.


The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 13, and the FRE is 29. The word count for the ballot title is 54, and the estimated reading time is 14 seconds. The FKGL for the ballot summary is grade level 14, and the FRE is 32. The word count for the ballot summary is 66, and the estimated reading time is 17 seconds.


Support

Keep the Money in Nebraska campaign logo

Keep The Money In Nebraska led the campaign in support of Initiative 430.[7]

Supporters

Candidates

  • Janet Palmtag (Nonpartisan) - Candidate for Nebraska State Senate

Corporations

  • Ho-Chunk, Inc.

Unions

  • The Horsemen's Benevolent and Protective Association

Arguments

  • Mike Newlin, general manager of Horsemen’s Park and Lincoln Race Course: "[If this measure passes], we'd finally be able to reap the rewards that we've been giving our neighbor states in entertainment and gambling dollars. The overall impact is not only the tax revenue but the jobs that would be created. The ancillary work that would come with casino gambling, increased horse racing, and things like that will have a huge economic effect."
  • Lance Morgan, chief executive officer of Ho-Chunk Inc.: "Given the fact that rural Nebraska—rural America really—is really struggling in a lot of ways, I think it'll be great for the rural economy."

Official arguments

  • Initiative Measures Pamphlet: "Initiative 430 will create a state regulatory body to govern and license Nebraska casinos. The organization will be responsible for ensuring the fair and legal gaming practices at each location. The organization will also be responsible for ensuring reporting from each gaming facility is accurate and complies with all state laws. The initiative will also require that casinos are responsible for the funding of the regulatory expenses to prevent Nebraska taxpayers from taking on additional expense."


Opposition

Gambling with the Good Life campaign logo

Gambling with the Good Life led the campaign in opposition to Initiative 430.[8]

Opponents

Officials

Former Officials

Arguments

  • Nate Grasz, policy director for the Nebraska Family Alliance: "Casinos create more gambling addicts than jobs, drain money from their host communities and increase social costs that are paid for by all taxpayers. The last thing we need right now is for casinos to worsen the heartaches and financial burdens that are being placed on Nebraska families and businesses."
  • Nebraska Governor Pete Ricketts (R): "There are all sorts of social problems that come along with expanding gambling, which is why Nebraskans have historically rejected expanding gambling here in the state. I certainly support rejecting expanded gambling and would encourage other Nebraskans to support rejecting it as well."
  • Pat Loontjer, executive director of Gambling with the Good Life: "It's very deceptive because they're gonna say this is going to help property tax. That's a lie. But sometimes, when you hear the lie long enough, you're going to believe it. It's not going to give anything for property tax relief."

Official arguments

  • Initiative Measures Pamphlet: "Initiative 430 provides for special interest legislation and bypasses the state legislature. This initiative amends existing state law to give tax breaks to racetracks that conduct gaming operations by exempting them from sales and use tax. It also amends other state laws to exempt gaming at racetracks from other forms of taxes. The state legislature should determine which and how many racetracks should be allowed to operate casinos, at what tax rate, and how that revenue should be spent not special interest groups."


Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Nebraska ballot measures
The campaign finance information on this page reflects the most recent scheduled reports that Ballotpedia has processed, which covered through January 12, 2021.


One political action committee was registered in support of Initiative 430. Keep the Money in Nebraska raised a total of $7.3 million in cash and in-kind contributions. Two political action committees were registered in opposition to Initiative 430. Gambling with the Good Life and Keep the Good Life, Inc. reported receiving over $2.1 million.[9][10]

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $6,159,100.00 $1,169,486.81 $7,328,586.81 $6,158,174.47 $7,327,661.28
Oppose $2,180,418.00 $0.00 $2,180,418.00 $1,929,227.27 $1,929,227.27
Total $8,339,518.00 $1,169,486.81 $9,509,004.81 $8,087,401.74 $9,256,888.55

Support

The following were contribution and expenditure totals for the committee in support of Initiative 430.[9]

Committees in support of Initiative 430
Committee Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Keep the Money in Nebraska $6,159,100.00 $1,169,486.81 $7,328,586.81 $6,158,174.47 $7,327,661.28
Total $6,159,100.00 $1,169,486.81 $7,328,586.81 $6,158,174.47 $7,327,661.28

Donors

The following is a list of the top donors that contributed to Keep the Money in Nebraska:[9]

Donor Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions
Ho-Chunk, Inc. $5,859,100.00 $814,429.38 $6,673,529.38
Battleaxe Digital $0.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00
NE Horsemens & Benevolent Protective Association $200,000.00 $0.00 $200,000.00
Omaha Exposition & Racing Inc. $100,000.00 $0.00 $100,000.00
The Lamar Companies $0.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00

Opposition

The following were contribution and expenditure totals for the committee in opposition to Initiative 430.[10]

Committees in support of Initiative 430
Committee Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Keep the Good Life, Inc. $1,985,000.00 $0.00 $1,985,000.00 $1,645,334.00 $1,645,334.00
Gambling with the Good Life $195,418.00 $0.00 $195,418.00 $283,893.27 $283,893.27
Total $2,180,418.00 $0.00 $2,180,418.00 $1,929,227.27 $1,929,227.27

Top donors

The following is a list of the top donors that contributed to the committees opposing Initiative 430:[10]

Donor Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions
Collective Prosperity $1,735,000.00 $0.00 $1,735,000.00
Pete Ricketts $350,000.00 $0.00 $350,000.00
Archdiocese of Omaha $15,000.00 $0.00 $15,000.00
Cornhusker Bank $10,000.00 $0.00 $10,000.00
Paul and Lori Hogan $10,000.00 $0.00 $10,000.00
Tom Osborne $5,000.00 $0.00 $5,000.00

Methodology

To read Ballotpedia's methodology for covering ballot measure campaign finance information, click here.

Media editorials

See also: 2020 ballot measure media endorsements

Ballotpedia identified the following media editorial boards as taking positions on the ballot measure. If you are aware of a media editorial board position that is not listed below, please email the editorial link to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Support

  • The Sioux City Journal Editorial Board: "Tens of thousands of Nebraskans are already playing slot machines and table games -- only they're doing it in other states. Each year, they leave behind around $400 million alone just across the border in Iowa. The tax revenue derived from that wagering could instead be staying in the Cornhusker state to help fund state and local governments, reduce property taxes and pay for counseling for problem gamblers. That's why we support three measures that will appear on the Nov. 3 general election ballot."
  • Lincoln Journal Star Editorial Board: "Under the terms of the initiative, $45 million of the $65 million the state is estimated to receive from casinos would be devoted to property tax relief. Horse racetracks now operate in or near Omaha, Lincoln, Grand Island, Sioux City, Columbus and Hastings. It is likely more tracks and casinos would open across the state if the initiative is approved. Those casinos will predominantly keep gamblers in the state, not dramatically increase the number of gamblers and the amount wagered by Nebraskans. That money, however, will remain in the state and will benefit the entire citizenry, which is why we recommend a 'yes' vote.
  • The Grand Island Independent Editorial Board: "It’s reasonable to believe that if there are casinos in our state, Nebraskans will stay here, rather than spending their money in Iowa or any of the surrounding states. That will help fund property tax relief, provide additional funding to counties and pay for problem gamblers assistance in Nebraska because another of the three initiatives provides for a 20% tax on gross gambling revenue of licensed operators. From that tax revenue, 70% would go to property tax relief, 25% would go to counties, 2.5% would go to problem gambler assistance and 2.5% would go to the state general fund. Supporters estimate the state would receive $65 million, with $45 million going to property tax relief annually. ... Vote FOR Initiatives 429, 430 and 431."
  • Omaha World-Herald Editorial Board: "From our offices in downtown Omaha, we can see Harrah’s, one of three Council Bluffs casinos that together brought in more than $400 million in gross revenue in fiscal 2019. Unless casinos are in a tourism destination, they rely on bettors from the nearest population center, meaning that Nebraskans are subsidizing Iowa tax relief, infrastructure, environmental programs, problem gambler assistance and more. ... We urge Nebraskans to vote FOR Initiatives 429, 430 and 431."

Opposition

Ballotpedia had not identified media editorial boards in opposition to the ballot measure.

Background

Status of gambling across the U.S.

As of September 2020, gambling in some form was legal in 48 of the 50 states, with Utah and Hawaii completely banning it. In 2019, total gross commercial gambling revenue across the 989 commercial and tribal casinos was $77.3 billion, and $40.8 billion was paid in gaming taxes at the state and local levels. Twenty-five states have legalized commercial gaming, and 30 states have authorized tribal casinos.[4][11]

The following chart contains the gross gaming revenue, the tax rate on gross gaming revenue, the amount of taxes raised, and the number of casinos in the states bordering Nebraska. Wyoming also borders Nebraska, but it did not have commercial gambling as of September 2020. Wyoming does have four tribal casinos.[12]

Horse racing in Nebraska

In March 1935, pari-mutuel wagering was legalized in Nebraska and the Nebraska State Racing Commission was established. Pari-mutuel wagering is the practice of wagering against all participants rather than the racetrack. The total amount of money wagered on a winning horse is divided evenly among the participants that placed bets on that horse. As of 2020, there were six licensed racetracks in Nebraska, namely Atokad Downs, Columbus Races, Fair Play Park, Fonner Park, Horsemen’s Park, and Lincoln Race Course. The racetracks are licensed through the Nebraska State Racing Commission.[13][14]

2016 proposed gambling initiatives

In 2016, Keep the Money in Nebraska sponsored three initiatives that would together legalize, regulate, and tax gambling at horse racetracks. The campaign submitted over 310,000 for the three initiative petitions. The initiatives did not qualify for the ballot after the Nebraska Secretary of State rejected about 40,000 of the submitted signatures during the verification process. The campaign filed a lawsuit against the petitioning company they contracted with to collect signatures, Northstar Campaign Systems, arguing that the company was responsible for the high error rate.[15]

Compulsive Gamblers Assistance Fund

The Compulsive Gamblers Assistance Fund was established in 1993 by state law and receives funds from the State Lottery Operation Trust Fund and the Charitable Gaming Operations Fund. The stated goal of the fund is to provide "assistance to agencies, groups, organizations, and individuals that provide education, assistance, and counseling to individuals and families experiencing difficulty as a result of problem gambling, to promote the awareness of problem gamblers assistance programs, and to pay the costs and expenses of the Gamblers Assistance Program." According to the Nebraska Lottery's website, the fund had nearly $17.7 million as of July 2020.[16][17]

Gambling on the ballot in 2020

  • Approveda Colorado Amendment 77: Amendment 77 would allow voters in Central, Black Hawk, and Cripple Creek Cities — the only towns where gaming is legal in Colorado — to (1) approve a maximum single bet limit of any amount and (2) expand allowable game types in addition to slot machines, blackjack, poker, roulette, and craps.
  • Defeatedd Colorado Amendment C: Amendment C would amend the state constitution to lower the number of years an organization must have existed before obtaining a charitable gaming license from five years to three years and to allow charitable organizations to hire managers and operators of gaming activities so long as they are not paid more than the minimum wage.
  • Approveda Maryland Question 2: The measure would authorize sports and events wagering at certain licensed facilities with state revenue intended to fund public education.
  • Approveda South Dakota Constitutional Amendment B: The amendment would amend the state constitution to authorize the South Dakota State Legislature to legalize sports betting within the city limits of Deadwood, South Dakota, with all net municipal proceeds (defined) dedicated to the Deadwood Historic Restoration and Preservation Fund.


Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing the initiative process in Nebraska

In Nebraska, the number of signatures required to qualify an initiated state statute for the ballot is equal to 7 percent of registered voters as of the deadline for filing signatures. Because of the unique signature requirement based on registered voters, Nebraska is also the only state where petition sponsors cannot know the exact number of signatures required until they are submitted. Nebraska law also features a distribution requirement mandating that petitions contain signatures from 5 percent of the registered voters in each of two-fifths (38) of Nebraska's 93 counties.

Signatures must be submitted at least four months prior to the next general election. Signatures do not roll over; they become invalid after the next general election at least four months after the initial initiative application filing. Depending on when the initiative application is filed, petitioners can have up to just under two years to circulate petitions.

The requirements to get an initiated state statute certified for the 2020 ballot:

Signatures are submitted to the secretary of state. The secretary of state sends the appropriate signature petitions to each county, where county election officials verify the signatures. Upon receiving the signatures back from county officials, the secretary of state determines whether or not the requirements were met.

Stages of this initiative

  • Lynne Schuller filed this initiative on July 1, 2019, on behalf of Keep The Money In Nebraska; Ho-Chunk, Inc.; the Nebraska Horsemen's Benevolent & Protective Association; and Omaha Exposition & Racing, Inc.[2]
  • On July 2, 2020, Keep the Money in Nebraska announced that they had submitted 135,000 signatures to the Nebraska Secretary of State.[19]
    • According to the July 2020 voter registration report, there were a total of 1,222,741 registered voters in Nebraska at the time of the state's signature deadline. This means that a total of 85,592 valid signatures were required to qualify this initiative for the ballot.[20]
  • On August 25, 2020, the Nebraska Secretary of State announced that the initiative did not qualify for the ballot because the sponsors divided "the tax proposals between two initiatives, and [failed] to disclose the tax breaks contained in [this initiative]," which "creates a condition under which voters will be confused and cannot know the effect of their vote." The secretary of state ruled that it was not legally sufficient. The other two initiatives filed with this initiative also did not qualify for the ballot.[21]
    • The same day Evnen announced his decision, the Nebraska Supreme Court agreed to hear the sponsor's appeal of Evnen's decision. In the sponsor's court filing, they argued that the secretary's decision was "incorrect as a matter of law because each of the three initiatives meets the applicable requirements of the Nebraska Constitution as to form and procedure." The court heard oral arguments on September 2.[22]
    • On September 10, 2020, the Nebraska Supreme Court ruled in favor of the petitioners and ordered the secretary of state to place the three initiatives on the November ballot. The Court concluded that the three initiatives did not violate the single-subject rule as argued by the secretary of state and also disagreed with the logrolling argument. The Court said, " We conclude that in response to our alternative writ, the Secretary has not shown cause why either the Constitutional Initiative, the Regulatory Initiative, or the Tax Initiative should not be placed on the ballot." The full opinion can be read here.[3]

Cost of signature collection:
Sponsors of the measure hired National Ballot Access and Taylor Policy Group Inc. to collect signatures for the petition to qualify this measure for the ballot. A total of $469,013.27[23] was spent to collect the 85,628 valid signatures required to put this measure before voters, resulting in a total cost per required signature (CPRS) of $5.48.

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Nebraska

Click "Show" to learn more about voter registration, identification requirements, and poll times in Nebraska.

See also

External links

Support

Opposition

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Nebraska Secretary of State, "Petitions in Circulation for the 2020 General Election," accessed August 25, 2019 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "SoS" defined multiple times with different content
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 Nebraska Secretary of State, "Initiative Petition text," accessed August 25, 2019 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "Text" defined multiple times with different content
  3. 3.0 3.1 Nebraska Supreme Court, "State ex rel. McNally v. Evnen, September 10, 2020
  4. 4.0 4.1 Tech Radar, "State laws around gambling in the US," accessed September 21, 2020
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  6. Nebraska Secretary of State, "2020 Initiative Voter Pamphlet," accessed September 29, 2020
  7. Keep the Money in Nebraska, "Home," accessed December 23, 2019
  8. Gambling with the Good Life, "Home," accessed December 23, 2019
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 Nebraska Accountability and Disclosure Committee, "Keep the Money in Nebraska," accessed November 5, 2019
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 Nebraska Accountability and Disclosure Committee, "Gambling with the Good Life," accessed November 5, 2019
  11. American Gaming Association, "State of the States 2020," June 3, 2020
  12. American Gaming Association, "State of Play," accessed September 21, 2020
  13. National National Horsemen's Benevolent and Protective Association, "About," accessed September 16, 2020
  14. HorseRacing.com, "Nebraska Racetracks," accessed September 16, 2020
  15. KETV.com, "Nebraska casino gambling measure fails to make 2016 ballot," August 11, 2016
  16. Nebraska Revised Statute, "Section 9-1006 - Compulsive Gamblers Assistance Fund," accessed September 21, 2020
  17. Nebraska Lottery, "$12.5 Million in Proceeds Raised for Nebraska Lottery Beneficiaries," July 6, 2020
  18. This requirement is approximate. Since the Nebraska signature requirement is based on the number of registered voters at the time of filing, it can vary slightly.
  19. Omaha World-Herald, "Backers of expanding gambling turn in trio of petitions to get casino gaming on November ballot," July 2, 2020
  20. Nebraska Secretary of State, "VR Statistics Count Report," July 1, 2020
  21. Nebraska Secretary of State, "Games of Chance Ballot Initiatives Determination Letter," August 25, 2020
  22. Omaha World-Herald, "Nebraska Supreme Court to let gambling backers argue for place on November ballot," August 26, 2020
  23. Keep the Money in Nebraska, sponsor of Initiatives 429, 430, and 431, spent $1,617,287.14 to collect 122,274 required signatures for I-429, 85,628 required signatures for I-430, and 85,628 required signatures for I-431. Ballotpedia divided the total amount spent in proportion to the number of required signatures to determine the CPRS.
  24. Nebraska Statutes, "Section 32-908," accessed April 18, 2023
  25. Nebraska Secretary of State, “Nebraska Voter Registration Background,” accessed April 18, 2023
  26. Nebraska Secretary of State, “Felon Voting Rights FAQ,” accessed April 18, 2023
  27. 27.0 27.1 Nebraska Secretary of State, “Voter Information Frequently Asked Questions,” accessed April 18, 2023
  28. Nebraska Secretary of State, “Online Voter Registration Frequently Asked Questions,” accessed April 18, 2023
  29. 29.0 29.1 NCSL, "State Profiles: Elections," accessed August 28, 2024
  30. Omaha World-Herald, “Online voter registration is coming to Nebraska,” September 5, 2015
  31. Nebraska Secretary of State’s Official Voter Registration Application," accessed November 1, 2024
  32. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."