Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
Nevada Margin Tax for Public Schools Initiative, Question 3 (2014)
| ||||||||||||
|
The Nevada Margin Tax for Public Schools Initiative, Question 3 was on the November 4, 2014 ballot in the state of Nevada as an indirect initiated state statute, where it was defeated. The measure would have instituted a two percent margin tax on businesses operating in Nevada that make more than $1 million. Revenue from the tax would have been allocated to public schools, from kindergarten through high school, and kept in the State Distributive School Account.[1]
The two percent taxed margin could have been determined using two different methods:[1]
- Taxation of 70% of total revenue of the business.
- Taxation of a business’ total revenue minus compensation to owners and employers or cost related to goods sold. A business would choose whether to subtract compensation or cost of goods, but not both.
The measure would also have temporarily increased the two percent modified business tax on financial institutions to 2.29 percent or 2.42 percent. Revenue would have been used to pay for the administration of the margin tax.
The margin tax would have started to accrue on January 1, 2015.[1]
The initiative was filed by the Nevada AFL-CIO, led by Executive Secretary Treasurer Danny Thompson, and the Nevada State Education Association (NSEA). However, on May 2, 2014, the AFL-CIO passed a resolution to officially oppose the measure. It was still supported by the Nevada State Education Association.[2] Supporters call the measure The Education Initiative.[3] Opponents called the measure The Margin Tax Initiative.[4]
Election results
Below are the official, certified election results:
Nevada Question 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
![]() | 429,324 | 78.74% | ||
Yes | 115,891 | 21.26% |
Election results via: Nevada Secretary of State
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot question appeared as follows:[5]
“ | Shall the Nevada Revised Statutes be amended to create a 2% tax to be imposed on a margin of the gross revenue of entities doing business in Nevada whose total revenue for any taxable year exceeds $1 million, with the proceeds of the tax going to the State Distributive School Account to be apportioned among Nevada’s school districts and charter schools? | ” |
Ballot summary
The ballot summary was as follows:[5]
“ | EXPLANATION—This ballot measure proposes to impose a two-percent (2%) margin tax on business entities in Nevada with total revenue in excess of $1,000,000, and it requires that the proceeds of the tax be used to fund the operation of the public schools in this State for kindergarten through grade 12. If this ballot measure is approved by the voters in the 2014 General Election, the applicable margins tax would take effect January 1, 2015.
The ballot measure includes an exemption from the tax for natural persons not engaged in business, passive entities, governmental entities, tax exempt organizations and credit unions authorized to do business in Nevada. Also, any business entities with total revenue of $1 million or less are not subject to margin tax. The tax would apply to all other businesses and organizations with total revenue in excess of $1 million in any taxable year. The ballot measure would impose the 2% tax rate on the entity’s taxable margin. Under the ballot measure, a business entity’s taxable margin is determined by taking the lesser of:
The 2% tax would be imposed on the percentage of this margin that corresponds to the percentage of the entity’s total business that is done in Nevada. A business entity that pays the existing tax on payroll, commonly referred to as the modified business tax, would be credited for that amount against the amount it would owe under this measure. If approved by the voters, proceeds from the tax would be deposited in the State’s Distributive School Account (DSA) in the State General Fund and will be apportioned among the county school districts and charter schools in the manner provided by state law to fund K-12 public education. The DSA provides the primary source of public education funding for Nevada’s 17 county school districts and its various charter schools. The DSA is funded by legislative appropriations from the State General Fund and other revenues. The ballot measure does not change how funds in the DSA can be spent or allocated. A “Yes” vote would impose a 2% margins tax on Nevada businesses with revenue in excess of $1 million with the tax proceeds being deposited in the State Distributive School Account in the State General Fund and used to fund K-12 public education. A “No” vote would retain the existing tax liability for businesses in Nevada and retain the existingsources of K-12 education funding. DIGEST— This ballot measure creates, generates and increases public revenue. Existing law provides for the collection and enforcement of various taxes by the Department of Taxation. This ballot measure would amend and add to these existing laws by creating a new tax. The new law would impose a 2% tax on a margin of the total revenue of certain businesses in Nevada whose total revenue exceeds $1 million in any taxable year. This measure would require that the tax be administered and collected by the Nevada Department of Taxation. To cover the cost of administering the tax before proceeds are collected, this measure would require a temporary increase in the modified business tax assessed to and paid by financial institutions in Nevada. The existing 2% modified business tax currently paid by financial institutions would temporarily be increased to 2.29% percent effective January 1, 2015. A second temporary increase to 2.42% would become effective on July 1, 2015. On July 1, 2016, the modified business tax rate on financial institutions will return to its current rate of 2%. If approved, the following amount of funds will be appropriated from the State General Fund to the Department of Taxation for the initial costs of administering the tax: (i) $1,400,000 for fiscal year 2014-2015; and (ii) $4,200,000 for fiscal year 2015-2016. If the revenue raised by the increase in the modified business tax rate for financial institutions is not sufficient to cover the full amount of either appropriation, that appropriation will be reduced so that there is no deficiency. [6] |
” |
Full text
The full text can be read below:
Section 1. This act provides for the imposition of a margin tax on business entities engaged in business in this State, and requires that the proceeds of the tax be used to fund the operation of the public schools in this State for kindergarten through grade 12.
Sec. 2. Title 32 of NRS is hereby amended by adding thereto a new chapter to consist of the provisions set forth as sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act.
Sec. 3. As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires, the words and terms defined in sections 4 to 17, inclusive, of this act have the meanings ascribed to them in those sections.
Sec. 4. “Affiliated group” means a group of two or more business entities, each of which is controlled by one or more common owners or by one or more of the members of the group.
Sec. 5. “Business” means any activity engaged in or caused to be engaged in with the object of gain, benefit or advantage, either direct or indirect, to any person or governmental entity.
Sec. 6. 1. Except as otherwise provided in this section, "business entity" means a corporation, partnership, proprietorship, limited-liability company, business association, joint venture, limited-liability partnership, business trust, professional association, joint stock company, holding company and any other person engaging in a business, and includes a combined group.
2. "Business entity" does not include:
- (a) A natural person unless that person is engaging in a business and is required to file with the Internal Revenue Service a Schedule C (Form 1040), Profit or Loss From Business, or its equivalent or successor form, a Schedule E (Form 1040), Supplemental Income and Loss, or its equivalent or successor form, or a Schedule F (Form 1040), Profit or Loss From Farming, or its equivalent or successor form, for that business;
- (b) A governmental entity;
- (c) Any person or other entity that this State is prohibited from taxing under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States or the Nevada Constitution; or
- (d) Any credit union that is authorized to transact business in this State pursuant to the provisions of chapter 678 of NRS.
Sec. 7. “Combined group” means an affiliated group of business entities that is required to file a group return pursuant to section 27 of this act.
Sec. 8. “Commission” means the Nevada Tax Commission.
Sec. 9. “Controlled by” means the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of a business entity, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise.
Sec. 10. “Engaging in a business” means commencing, conducting or continuing a business, the exercise of corporate or franchise powers regarding a business, and the liquidation of a business which is or was engaging in a business when the liquidator holds itself out to the public as conducting that business.
Sec. 11. “Governmental entity” means:
- 1. The United States and any of its unincorporated agencies and instrumentalities.
- 2. Any incorporated agency or instrumentality of the United States wholly owned by the United States or by a corporation wholly owned by the United States.
- 3. The State of Nevada and any of its unincorporated agencies and instrumentalities.
- 4. Any county, city, district or other political subdivision of this State.
Sec. 12. “Lending institution” means an entity that makes loans and:
- 1. Is regulated by the Federal Reserve Board, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the Office of Thrift Supervision or any comparable regulatory body;
- 2. Is licensed by, registered with or otherwise regulated by the Commissioner of Financial Institutions;
- 3. Is a “broker” or “dealer” as defined in 15 U.S.C. § 78c; or
- 4. Provides financing to unrelated parties solely for agricultural production.
Sec. 13. “Pass-through revenue” means:
- 1. Revenue received by a business entity solely on behalf of another in a disclosed agency capacity, including, without limitation, revenue received as a broker, bailee, consignee or auctioneer, notwithstanding that the business entity may incur liability, primarily or secondarily, in a transaction in its capacity as an agent;
- 2. Taxes collected from a third party by a business entity and remitted by the business entity to a taxing authority; and
- 3. Reimbursement for advances made by a business entity on behalf of a customer or client, other than with respect to services rendered or with respect to purchases of goods by the business entity in carrying out the business in which it engages.
Sec. 14. “Taxable year” means the taxable year used by a business entity for the purposes of federal income taxation.
Sec. 15. “Total income” means the total amount received by a business entity from all sources, without subtracting any costs or expenses.
Sec. 16. “Total revenue” means the total revenue of a business entity as determined under section 24 of this act.
Sec. 17. “Unitary business” means a business characterized by unity of ownership, functional integration, centralization of management and economy of scale.
Sec. 18. 1. For the purposes of this chapter, an entity constitutes a “passive entity” only if:
- (a) The entity is a general partnership, limited partnership, limited-liability partnership or limited-liability limited partnership or a trust, other than a business trust; and
- (b) During the period on which margin is based, at least 90 percent of the entity’s federal gross income consists of:
- (1) Dividends or interest; and
- (2) Royalties, bonuses or delay rental income from mineral properties and income from other nonoperating mineral interests.
2. The income described in paragraph (b) of subsection 1 does not include any:
- (a) Rent; or
- (b) Income received by a nonoperator from mineral properties under a joint operating agreement if the nonoperator is a member of an affiliated group and another member of that group is the operator under that joint operating agreement.
Sec. 19. The Department shall:
- 1. Administer and enforce the provisions of this chapter, and may adopt such regulations as it deems appropriate for those purposes.
- 2. Adopt such regulations as may be necessary or appropriate to interpret and carry out the provisions of sections 24 and 27 of this act.
- 3. Retain from the proceeds of the taxes, interest and penalties it receives pursuant to this chapter an amount sufficient to reimburse the Department for the actual cost of administering this chapter, to the extent that the Department incurs any cost it would not have incurred but for the enactment of this chapter, and deposit the amount so retained with the State Treasurer for credit to the State General Fund. The amount so retained must not exceed the amount authorized by statute for this purpose.
- 4. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 3, deposit all taxes, interest and penalties it receives pursuant to this chapter in the State Distributive School Account in the State General Fund. The money so deposited must be apportioned among the several school districts and charter schools of this State at the times and in the manner provided by law for the money in the State Distributive School Account.
Sec. 20. 1. Each person responsible for maintaining the records of a business entity shall:
- (a) Keep such records as may be necessary to determine the amount of the liability of the business entity pursuant to the provisions of this chapter;
- (b) Preserve those records for 4 years or until any litigation or prosecution pursuant to this chapter is finally determined, whichever is longer; and
- (c) Make the records available for inspection by the Department upon demand at reasonable times during regular business hours.
2. The Department may by regulation specify the types of records which must be kept to determine the amount of the liability of a business entity pursuant to the provisions of this chapter.
3. Any person who violates the provisions of subsection 1 is guilty of a misdemeanor.
Sec. 21. 1. To verify the accuracy of any return filed or, if no return is filed by a business entity, to determine the amount required to be paid, the Department, or any person authorized in writing by the Department, may examine the books, papers and records of any person who may be liable for the tax imposed by this chapter.
2. Any person who may be liable for the tax imposed by this chapter and who keeps outside of this State any books, papers and records relating thereto shall pay to the Department an amount equal to the allowance provided for state officers and employees generally while traveling outside of the State for each day or fraction thereof during which an employee of the Department is engaged in examining those documents, plus any other actual expenses incurred by the employee while he or she is absent from his or her regular place of employment to examine those documents.
Sec. 22. 1. Except as otherwise provided in this section, a margin tax is hereby imposed on each business entity that engages in a business in this State during any taxable year beginning on or after the effective date of this section, at the rate of 2 percent of the taxable margin of the business entity for the taxable year.
2. The margin tax extends to the limits of the Nevada Constitution, the Constitution of the United States and the federal law adopted under the United States Constitution.
3. A business entity is exempt from the margin tax imposed for each taxable year regarding which:
- (a) The amount of the total revenue of the business entity from its entire business is less than or equal to $1,000,000, as determined under section 24 of this act;
- (b) The business entity qualifies as a passive entity, as determined pursuant to section 18 of this act; or
- (c) The business entity qualifies as a tax-exempt organization pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 501(c).
4. A business entity that pays any tax imposed on the business entity pursuant to NRS 363A.130 or 363B.110 for any of the last four calendar quarters ending on or before the last day of a taxable year for which the margin tax is imposed pursuant to this section is entitled to a credit against the amount of the margin tax due from that business entity for that taxable year in the amount of the taxes paid by the business entity pursuant to NRS 363A.130 and 363B.110 for those calendar quarters, but not more than the amount of the margin tax due from the business entity for that taxable year.
Sec. 23. 1. Subject to the provisions of section 27 of this act, the taxable margin of a business entity must be computed by:
- (a) Determining the business entity’s margin, which is the lesser of 70 percent of the total revenue of the business entity from its entire business, as determined under section 24 of this act, or an amount computed by:
- (1) Determining the total revenue of the business entity from its entire business under section 24 of this act; and
- 2) Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, subtracting from the amount determined under subparagraph (1), at the election of the business entity, either:
- (I) The cost of goods sold, as determined under section 25 of this act; or
- (II) The amount of compensation, as determined under section 26 of this act; and
- (b) Apportioning the business entity’s margin to this State as provided in section 28 of this act to determine the business entity’s taxable margin.
2. An election under subparagraph (2) of paragraph (a) of subsection 1 must be made by a business entity on its annual return and is effective only for that annual return. A business entity shall notify the Department of its election not later than the date the annual return is due.
3. In making any computation under this section, an amount that is zero or less must be computed as zero.
Sec. 24. 1. Except as otherwise provided in this section and subject to the provisions of section 27 of this act, for the purpose of computing its taxable margin under section 23 of this act, the total revenue of a business entity is:
- (a) For a business entity treated for the purposes of federal income taxation as a corporation, an amount computed by:
- (1) Adding:
- (I) The amount reportable as income on line 1c of Internal Revenue Service Form 1120; and
- (II) The amounts reportable as income on lines 4 to 10, inclusive, of Internal Revenue Service Form 1120; and
- (2) Subtracting:
- (I) The amount of any bad debts expensed for the purposes of federal income taxation that corresponds to items of income included in subparagraph (1) for the current reporting period or a past reporting period;
- (II) To the extent included in subparagraph (1), any foreign royalties and foreign dividends;
- (III) To the extent included in subparagraph (1), any net distributive income from a business entity treated as a partnership or as an S corporation for the purposes of federal income taxation;
- (IV) Any allowable deductions from Internal Revenue Service Form 1120, Schedule C, to the extent that the relating dividend income is included in total revenue;
- (V) To the extent included in subparagraph (1), any items of income attributable to an entity that is a disregarded entity for the purposes of federal income taxation; and
- (VI) To the extent included in subparagraph (1), any other amounts authorized by this section;
- (1) Adding:
- (b) For a business entity treated for the purposes of federal income taxation as a partnership, an amount computed by:
- (1) Adding:
- (I) The amount reportable as income on line 1c of Internal Revenue Service Form 1065;
- (II) The amounts reportable as income on lines 4, 6 and 7 of Internal Revenue Service Form 1065;
- (III) The amounts reportable as income on lines 3a and 5 to 11, inclusive, of Internal Revenue Service Form 1065, Schedule K;
- (IV) The amount reportable as income on line 17 of Internal Revenue Service Form 8825; and
- (V) The amount reportable as income on line 11, plus the amount reportable on line 2 or line 45, of Internal Revenue Service Form 1040, Schedule F; and
- (2) Subtracting:
- (I) The amount of any bad debts expensed for the purposes of federal income taxation that corresponds to items of income included in subparagraph (1) for the current reporting period or a past reporting period;
- (II) To the extent included in subparagraph (1), any foreign royalties and foreign dividends;
- (III) To the extent included in subparagraph (1), any net distributive income from a business entity treated as a partnership or as an S corporation for the purposes of federal income taxation;
- (IV) To the extent included in subparagraph (1), any items of income attributable to an entity that is a disregarded entity for the purposes of federal income taxation; and
- (V) To the extent included in subparagraph (1), any other amounts authorized by this section; or
- (1) Adding:
- (c) For any business entity other than a business entity treated for the purposes of federal income taxation as a corporation or partnership, an amount determined in a manner substantially equivalent to the amount determined under paragraph (a) or (b), as prescribed in regulations adopted by the Department.
2. Subject to the provisions of section 27 of this act, a business entity that is part of a federal consolidated group shall compute its total revenue under subsection 1 as if it had filed a separate return for the purposes of federal income taxation.
3. A business entity that owns an interest in a passive entity may exclude from the total revenue of the business entity the business entity’s share of the net income of the passive entity, but only to the extent the net income of the passive entity was generated by the margin of any other business entity.
4. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 5, to the extent included under subparagraph (1) of paragraph (a) of subsection 1, subparagraph (1) of paragraph (b) of subsection 1 or paragraph (c) of subsection 1:
- (a) A business entity may exclude from its total revenue:
- (1) The amount of any pass-through revenue of the business entity; and
- (2) The amount of tax basis, as determined under the Internal Revenue Code and any regulations adopted pursuant thereto, of any securities and loans sold; and
- (b) A business entity that is a lending institution may exclude from its total revenue the amount of any proceeds from the principal repayment of loans.
5. If a business entity is part of an affiliated group, the business entity may not exclude from its total revenue any of the amounts described in subsection 4 which are paid to entities that are members of the affiliated group.
6. To the extent included under subparagraph (1) of paragraph (a) of subsection 1, subparagraph (1) of paragraph (b) of subsection 1 or paragraph (c) of subsection 1:
- (a) A business entity may exclude from its total revenue the amount of any revenue attributable to dividends and interest upon any bonds or securities of the Federal Government, the State of Nevada or a political subdivision of this State.
- (b) A business entity that is required to pay a license fee pursuant to NRS 463.370 may exclude from its total revenue the amount of its gross revenue used to determine the amount of that fee.
7. Any amount excluded under this section from the total revenue of a business entity must not be included in the determination of the cost of goods sold under section 25 of this act or the determination of the amount of compensation under section 26 of this act.
8. For the purposes of this section, any reference to:
- (a) An Internal Revenue Service form includes any variant of the form and any subsequent form with a different number or designation that substantially provides the same information as the original form.
- (b) An amount reportable as income on a line number of an Internal Revenue Service form means the amount entered to the extent the amount entered complies with federal income tax law and includes the corresponding amount entered on a variant of the form or subsequent form with a different line number to the extent the amount entered complies with federal income tax law.
Sec. 25. 1. Subject to the provisions of section 27 of this act, a business entity that elects to subtract the cost of goods sold for the purpose of computing its taxable margin under section 23 of this act must determine the amount of that cost as provided in this section.
2. Except as otherwise provided in this section, the cost of goods sold includes:
- (a) All direct costs of acquiring or producing the goods, including:
- (1) Labor costs;
- (2) The cost of materials that are an integral part of the specific property produced;
- (3) The cost of materials that are consumed in the ordinary course of performing production activities;
- (4) Handling costs, including costs attributable to processing, assembling, repackaging and transportation to the business entity;
- (5) Storage costs, including the costs of carrying, storing or warehousing property;
- (6) Depreciation, depletion and amortization, as reported on the federal income tax return on which the return under this chapter is based, to the extent associated with and necessary for the production of the goods;
- (7) The cost of renting or leasing equipment, facilities or real property which is directly used for the production of the goods;
- (8) The cost of repairing and maintaining equipment, facilities or real property which is directly used for the production of the goods;
- (9) The costs attributable to any research, experimental, engineering or design activities directly related to the production of the goods;
- (10) Taxes paid in relation to acquiring or producing any material, and taxes paid in relation to services that are a direct cost of production; and
- (11) The cost of producing or acquiring any electricity sold; and
- (b) The following costs in relation to the business entity’s goods:
- (1) Deterioration of the goods;
- (2) Obsolescence of the goods;
- (3) Spoilage and abandonment of the goods, including the costs of rework labor, reclamation and scrap;
- (4) If the property is held for future production, the direct costs of preproduction allocable to the property;
- (5) The direct costs of postproduction allocable to the property;
- (6) The costs of insurance on any plant, facility, machinery, equipment or materials directly used in the production of the goods;
- (7) The cost of insurance on the produced goods;
- (8) The cost of utilities, including any electricity, gas and water, directly used in the production of the goods;
- (9) The costs of quality control, including any replacement of defective components pursuant to standard warranty policies, inspection directly allocable to the production of the goods, and repairs and maintenance of the goods; and
- (10) Licensing and franchise costs, including any fees incurred in securing the contractual right to use a trademark, corporate plan, manufacturing procedure, special recipe or other similar right directly associated with the goods produced.
3. The cost of goods sold does not include the following costs in relation to the business entity’s goods:
- (a) The cost of renting or leasing any equipment, facilities or real property that is not used for the production of the goods;
- (b) Selling costs, including employee expenses relating to sales;
- (c) Distribution costs;
- (d) Advertising and marketing costs;
- (e) Expenses for idle facilities;
- (f) Rehandling costs;
- (g) Bidding costs incurred in the solicitation of contracts, whether or not the contracts are ultimately awarded to the business entity;
- (h) Interest, including interest on debt incurred or continued during the period of production of the goods to finance such production;
- (i) Any taxes assessed on the business entity based on income;
- (j) Strike or lockout expenses, except the wages of employees hired to replace striking personnel;
- (k) Compensation of directors, officers and consultants;
- (l) Dividends to shareholders or distributions to members or partners which are business entities;
- (m) Professional fees and costs of litigation;
- (n) Fines, damages or restitution paid pursuant to judgments, consent decrees or settlements of legal actions including arbitration; and
- (o) Any of the amounts described in subsection 2 which are paid to entities that are members of an affiliated group of which the business entity is a part.
4. For the purposes of this section and section 23 of this act, and subject to the provisions of section 27 of this act, a business entity:
- (a) May make a subtraction in relation to the cost of goods sold only if that entity owns those goods.
- (b) Must determine its cost of goods sold in accordance with the methods used on the federal income tax return on which is based the return under this chapter. This paragraph does not affect the type or category of cost of goods sold that may be subtracted in accordance with this section to compute the taxable margin of a business entity.
5. As used in this section:
- (a) “Goods” means real property or tangible personal property sold in the ordinary course of business of a business entity.
- (b) “Production” includes construction, installation, manufacture, development, extraction, improvement, creation, raising or growth.
Sec. 26. 1. Except as otherwise provided in this section and subject to the provisions of section 27 of this act, a business entity that elects to subtract the amount of compensation for the purpose of computing its taxable margin under section 23 of this act may subtract an amount equal to:
- (a) All wages, salaries and bonuses paid by the business entity to its officers, directors, owners, partners and employees who are natural persons; and
- (b) The cost of all benefits, to the extent deductible for the purposes of federal income taxation, the business entity provides to its officers, directors, owners, partners and employees, including retirement, health care, employer contributions made to employees’ health savings accounts and workers’ compensation benefits.
2. Notwithstanding the actual amount of wages, salaries and bonuses paid by a business entity to its officers, directors, owners, partners and employees, a business entity may not include in the amount of wages, salaries and bonuses the business entity subtracts pursuant to paragraph (a) of subsection 1, in relation to each individual person, more than $300,000 per taxable year on which margin is based. If a person is paid by more than one entity of a combined group, the combined group may not subtract pursuant to paragraph (a) of subsection 1, in relation to that person, a total of more than $300,000 per taxable year on which margin is based.
3. As used in this section:
- (a) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b), “wages, salaries and bonuses means the amount entered in the Medicare wages and tips box of Internal Revenue Service Form W-2 or any subsequent form with a different number or designation that substantially provides the same information.
- (b) “Wages, salaries and bonuses” includes, to the extent not included in the amount described in paragraph (a), the amount of any:
- (1) Net distributive income from a business entity treated as a partnership for the purposes of federal income taxation, but only if the person receiving the distribution is a natural person;
- (2) Net distributive income from limited-liability companies and corporations treated as S corporations for the purposes of federal income taxation, but only if the person receiving the distribution is a natural person; and
- (3) Net distributive income from a limited-liability company treated as a sole proprietorship for the purposes of federal income taxation, but only if the person receiving the distribution is a natural person.
Sec. 27. 1. Business entities that are part of an affiliated group engaged in a unitary business must file, in lieu of individual returns, a combined group return based on the combined group’s business. The combined group:
- (a) Must not include a business entity that conducts business outside of the United States if, as determined in accordance with regulations adopted by the Department:
- (1) Eighty percent or more of that business entity’s property and payroll are allocable to locations outside of the United States; or
- (2) That business entity has no property or payroll and 80 percent or more of the business entity’s total income is allocable to locations outside of the United States.
- (b) Constitutes a single business entity for purposes of the application of the tax imposed by this chapter.
2. For the purposes of section 23 of this act, a combined group shall determine its total revenue by:
- (a) Determining the total revenue of each of its members as provided in section 24 of this act as if the member was an individual business entity;
- (b) Adding the total revenue of all its members determined under paragraph (a); and
- (c) Subtracting from the amount determined under paragraph (b), to the extent included under subparagraph (1) of paragraph (a) of subsection 1 of section 24 of this act, subparagraph (1) of paragraph (b) of subsection 1 of section 24 of this act or paragraph (c) of subsection 1 of section 24 ofthis act, any items of total revenue received from a member of the combined group.
3. For the purposes of section 23 of this act, a combined group shall make an election to subtract either the cost of goods sold or the amount of compensation that applies to all of its members. Regardless of the election, the taxable margin of the combined group may not exceed 70 percent of the combined group’s total revenue from its entire business.
4. A member of a combined group may claim as the cost of goods sold those costs that qualify under section 25 of this act if the goods for which the costs are incurred are owned by another member of the combined group.
5. For the purposes of section 23 of this act, a combined group that elects to subtract:
- (a) The cost of goods sold must determine that amount by:
- (1) Determining the cost of goods sold for each of its members as provided in section 25 of this act as if the member was an individual business entity;
- (2) Adding all the amounts of the costs of goods sold determined under subparagraph (1);and
- (3) Subtracting from the amount determined under subparagraph (2) any amount of the costs of goods sold paid from one member of the combined group to another member of the combined group, but only to the extent that the corresponding item of total revenue was subtracted under paragraph (c) of subsection 2.
- (b) The amount of compensation must determine that amount by:
- (1) Determining the amount of compensation for each of its members as provided in section 26 of this act as if the member was an individual business entity, subject to the limitation set forth in subsection 2 of section 26 of this act;
- (2) Adding all the amounts of compensations determined under subparagraph (1); and
- (3) Subtracting from the amount determined under subparagraph (2) any amount of compensation paid from one member of the combined group to another member of the combined group, but only to the extent that the corresponding item of total revenue was subtracted under paragraph (c) of subsection 2.
6. Each business entity that is part of a combined group’s return must, for the purposes of determining margin and apportionment, include its activities for the same period as that used by the combined group.
7. Each member of a combined group is jointly and severally liable for the tax of the combined group.
Sec. 28. 1. A business entity’s margin must be apportioned to this State to determine the amount of tax imposed by section 22 of this act by multiplying the margin by a fraction, the numerator of which is the business entity’s total income from business done in this State, as determined under section 29 of this act, and the denominator of which is the business entity’s total income from its entire business, as determined under section 30 of this act.
2. For the purpose of apportioning margin:
- (a) Income excluded from total revenue by a business entity under section 24 of this act must not be included in either the total income of the business entity from its business done in this State as determined under section 29 of this act or the total income of the business entity from its entire business as determined under section 30 of this act.
- (b) Income derived from transactions between individual members of a combined group that are excluded under paragraph (c) of subsection 2 of section 27 of this act must not be included in:
- (1) The total income of the business entity from its business done in this State as determined under section 29 of this act, except that income ultimately derived from the sale of tangible personal property between individual members of a combined group where one member party to the transaction does not have nexus in this State must be included in the total income of the business entity from its business done in this State as determined under section 29 of this act to the extent that the member of the combined group that does not have nexus in this State resells the tangible personal property without substantial modification to a purchaser in this State. For the purposes of this subsection, “income ultimately derived from the sale of tangible personal property” means the amount paid for the tangible personal property by the third-party purchaser.
- (2) The total income of the business entity from its entire business as determined under section 30 of this act.
- (c) Notwithstanding any provision of paragraph (a) or (b) to the contrary, if a loan or security is treated as inventory of the seller for the purposes of federal income taxation, the gross proceeds of the sale of that loan or security are considered total income.
Sec. 29. 1. Subject to the provisions of section 28 of this act, in apportioning margin, the total income of a business entity from its business done in this State is the sum of the business entity’s total income from:
- (a) Each sale of tangible personal property which is delivered or shipped to a buyer in this State, regardless of the specified terms and conditions of the sale;
- (b) Each service performed in this State;
- (c) Each rental of property situated in this State;
- (d) The use of a patent, copyright, trademark, franchise or license in this State;
- (e) Each sale of real property located in this State, including royalties from oil, gas or other mineral interests; and
- (f) Any other business done in this State.
2. For the purposes of paragraph (b) of subsection 1, the total income derived from servicing loans secured by real property shall be deemed to be performed in this State if the real property is located in this State.
3. A combined group shall include in its total income computed under subsection 1 the total income of each business entity that is a member of the combined group which has a nexus in this State for the purpose of taxation.
Sec. 30. 1. Subject to the provisions of section 28 of this act, in apportioning margin, the total income of a business entity from its entire business is the sum of the business entity’s total income from:
- (a) Each sale of the business entity’s tangible personal property;
- (b) Each service, rental or royalty; and
- (c) Any other business.
2. If a business entity sells an investment or capital asset, the business entity’s total income from its entire business for taxable margin includes only the net gain from the sale.
3. A combined group shall include in its total income computed under subsection 1 the total income of each business entity that is a member of the combined group, without regard to whether that entity has a nexus with this State for the purpose of taxation.
Sec. 31. 1. A business entity shall use the same accounting methods to apportion margin as used in computing margin.
2. A business entity may not change its accounting methods used to calculate its total income more often than once every 4 years without the express written consent of the Department. A change in accounting methods is not justified solely because the change results in a reduction of tax liability.
Sec. 32. 1. The tax imposed by this chapter for each taxable year is due on the last day of the calendar month following that taxable year.
2. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, each business entity engaging in a business in this State during a taxable year that is not exempt from the tax imposed by this chapter for that taxable year shall file with the Department a return on a form prescribed by the Department, together with the remittance of any tax due pursuant to this chapter for that taxable year, not later than 30 days after the date the business entity is required to file its federal income tax return for that taxable year with the Internal Revenue Service. The return required by this subsection must be executed under penalty of perjury and include the taxpayer identification number or social security number of the business entity, as applicable, and such other information as is required by the Department.
Sec. 33. Upon written application made before the date on which a business entity is otherwise required to file a return and pay the tax imposed by this chapter, the Department may:
- 1. If the business entity is granted an extension of time by the Federal Government for the filing of its federal income tax return, extend the time for filing the return required by this chapter until not later than 30 days after the date the business entity is required to file its federal income tax return pursuant to the extension of time granted by the Federal Government. The Department may require, as a condition to the granting of any extension pursuant to this subsection, the payment of the tax estimated to be due pursuant to this chapter.
- 2. For good cause extend by 30 days the time within which the business entity is required to pay the tax. If the tax is paid during a period of extension granted pursuant to this subsection, no penalty or late charge may be imposed for failure to pay at the time required, but the business entity shall pay interest at the rate of 1 percent per month from the date on which the amount would have been due without the extension until the date of payment, unless otherwise provided in NRS 360.232 or 360.320.
Sec. 34. 1. If the taxable margin of a business entity changes as a result of:
- (a) The filing by the business entity of an amended federal income tax return or other return, the business entity shall, within 30 days after that filing, file an amended return with the Department.
- (b) An audit or other adjustment by the Internal Revenue Service or another competent authority, the business entity shall, within 30 days after the audit report or other adjustment becomes final, file an amended return with the Department.
2. If, based upon an amended return filed pursuant to this section, it appears that the tax imposed by this chapter has not been fully assessed, the Department shall assess the deficiency, with interest calculated at the rate and in the manner set forth in NRS 360.417. Any assessment required by this subsection must be made within 3 years after the Department receives the amended return.
Sec. 35. If the Department determines that any tax, penalty or interest has been paid more than once or has been erroneously collected or computed, the Department shall set forth that fact in the records of the Department and certify to the State Board of Examiners the amount collected in excess of the amount legally due and the person from whom it was collected or by whom it was paid. If approved by the State Board of Examiners, the excess amount collected or paid must, after being credited against any amount then due from the person in accordance with NRS 360.236, be refunded to the person or his or her successors in interest.
Sec. 36. 1. Except as otherwise provided in NRS 360.235 and 360.395:
- (a) No refund may be allowed unless a claim for it is filed with the Department within 3 years after the last day of the month following the taxable year for which the overpayment was made.
- (b) No credit may be allowed after the expiration of the period specified for filing claims for refund unless a claim for credit is filed with the Department within that period.
2. Each claim must be in writing and must state the specific grounds upon which the claim is founded.
3. Failure to file a claim within the time prescribed in this chapter constitutes a waiver of any demand against the State on account of overpayment.
4. Within 30 days after rejecting any claim in whole or in part, the Department shall serve notice of its action on the claimant in the manner prescribed for service of notice of a deficiency determination.
Sec. 37. 1. No injunction, writ of mandate or other legal or equitable process may issue in any suit, action or proceeding in any court against this State or against any officer of this State to prevent or enjoin the collection under this chapter of the tax imposed by this chapter or any amount of tax, penalty or interest required to be collected.
2. No suit or proceeding may be maintained in any court for the recovery of any amount alleged to have been erroneously determined or collected unless a claim for refund or credit has been filed.
Sec. 38. 1. Within 90 days after a final decision upon a claim filed pursuant to this chapter is rendered by the Commission, the claimant may bring an action against the Department on the grounds set forth in the claim in a court of competent jurisdiction in Carson City, the county of this State where the claimant resides or maintains his or her principal place of business or a county in which any relevant proceedings were conducted by the Department, for the recovery of the whole or any part of the amount with respect to which the claim has been disallowed.
2. Failure to bring an action within the time specified constitutes a waiver of any demand against the State on account of alleged overpayments.
Sec. 39. 1. If the Department fails to mail notice of action on a claim within 6 months afterthe claim is filed, the claimant may consider the claim disallowed and file an appeal with the Commission within 30 days after the last day of the 6-month period. If the claimant is aggrieved by the decision of the Commission rendered on appeal, the claimant may, within 90 days after the decision is rendered, bring an action against the Department on the grounds set forth in the claim for the recovery of the whole or any part of the amount claimed as an overpayment.
2. If judgment is rendered for the plaintiff, the amount of the judgment must first be credited towards any tax due from the plaintiff.
3. The balance of the judgment must be refunded to the plaintiff.
Sec. 40. If the court finds that the Department acted arbitrarily or capriciously in denying the plaintiff’s claim, interest on the amount refunded to the plaintiff may be allowed at the Federal Funds Target Rate, but no greater than 6 percent per annum, upon the amount refunded to the plaintiff from the date of payment of the amount to a date preceding the date of the refund warrant by not more than 30 days. The date must be determined by the Department.
Sec. 41. A judgment may not be rendered in favor of the plaintiff in any action brought against the Department to recover any amount paid when the action is brought by or in the name of an assignee of the person paying the amount or by any person other than the person who paid the amount.
Sec. 42. 1. The Department may recover a refund or any part thereof which is erroneously made and any credit or part thereof which is erroneously allowed in an action brought in a court of competent jurisdiction in Carson City or Clark County in the name of the State of Nevada.
2. The action must be tried in Carson City or Clark County unless the court, with the consent of the Attorney General, orders a change of place of trial.
3. The Attorney General shall prosecute the action, and the provisions of NRS, the Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure and the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure relating to service of summons, pleadings, proofs, trials and appeals are applicable to the proceedings.
Sec. 43. 1. If any amount in excess of $25 has been illegally determined, either by the Department or by the person filing the return, the Department shall certify this fact to the State Board of Examiners, and the latter shall authorize the cancellation of the amount upon the records of the Department.
2. If an amount not exceeding $25 has been illegally determined, either by the Department or by the person filing the return, the Department, without certifying this fact to the State Board of Examiners, shall authorize the cancellation of the amount upon the records of the Department.
Sec. 44. 1. A person shall not:
- (a) Make, cause to be made or permit to be made any false or fraudulent return or declaration or false statement in any return or declaration with intent to defraud the State or to evade payment of the tax or any part of the tax imposed by this chapter.
- (b) Make, cause to be made or permit to be made any false entry in books, records or accounts with intent to defraud the State or to evade the payment of the tax or any part of the tax imposed by this chapter.
- (c) Keep, cause to be kept or permit to be kept more than one set of books, records or accounts with intent to defraud the State or to evade the payment of the tax or any part of the tax imposed by this chapter.
2. Any person who violates the provisions of subsection 1 is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
Sec. 45. The remedies of the State provided for in this chapter are cumulative, and no action taken by the Department or the Attorney General constitutes an election by the State to pursue any remedy to the exclusion of any other remedy for which provision is made in this chapter.
Sec. 46. NRS 360.2937 is hereby amended to read as follows:
360.2937 1. Except as otherwise provided in this section, NRS 360.320 or any other specific statute, and notwithstanding the provisions of NRS 360.2935, interest must be paid upon an overpayment of any tax provided for in chapter 362, 363A, 363B, 369, 370, 372, 374, 377 or 377A of NRS , or sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act, any fee provided for in NRS 444A.090 or 482.313, or any assessment provided for in NRS 585.497, at the rate of 0.25 percent per month from the last day of the calendar month following the period for which the overpayment was made.
2. No refund or credit may be made of any interest imposed on the person making the overpayment with respect to the amount being refunded or credited.
3. The interest must be paid:
- (a) In the case of a refund, to the last day of the calendar month following the date upon which the person making the overpayment, if the person has not already filed a claim, is notified by the Department that a claim may be filed or the date upon which the claim is certified to the State Board of Examiners, whichever is earlier.
- (b) In the case of a credit, to the same date as that to which interest is computed on the tax or the amount against which the credit is applied.
Sec. 47. NRS 360.300 is hereby amended to read as follows:
360.300 1. If a person fails to file a return or the Department is not satisfied with the return or returns of any tax, contribution or premium or amount of tax, contribution or premium required to bepaid to the State by any person, in accordance with the applicable provisions of this chapter, chapter 360B, 362, 363A, 363B, 369, 370, 372, 372A, 374, 377, 377A or 444A of NRS, sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act, NRS 482.313, or chapter 585 or 680B of NRS as administered or audited by the Department, it may compute and determine the amount required to be paid upon the basis of:
- (a) The facts contained in the return;
- (b) Any information within its possession or that may come into its possession; or
- (c) Reasonable estimates of the amount.
2. One or more deficiency determinations may be made with respect to the amount due for one or for more than one period.
3. In making its determination of the amount required to be paid, the Department shall impose interest on the amount of tax determined to be due, calculated at the rate and in the manner set forth in NRS 360.417, unless a different rate of interest is specifically provided by statute.
4. The Department shall impose a penalty of 10 percent in addition to the amount of a determination that is made in the case of the failure of a person to file a return with the Department.
5. When a business is discontinued, a determination may be made at any time thereafter within the time prescribed in NRS 360.355 as to liability arising out of that business, irrespective of whether the determination is issued before the due date of the liability.
Sec. 48. NRS 360.417 is hereby amended to read as follows:
360.417 Except as otherwise provided in NRS 360.232 and 360.320, and unless a different penalty or rate of interest is specifically provided by statute, any person who fails to pay any tax provided for in chapter 362, 363A, 363B, 369, 370, 372, 374, 377, 377A, 444A or 585 of NRS, or sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act, or any fee provided for in NRS 482.313, and any person or governmental entity that fails to pay any fee provided for in NRS 360.787, to the State or a county within the time required, shall pay a penalty of not more than 10 percent of the amount of the tax or fee which is owed, as determined by the Department, in addition to the tax or fee, plus interest at the rate of 0.75 percent per month, or fraction of a month, from the last day of the month following the period for which the amount or any portion of the amount should have been reported until the date of payment. The amount of any penalty imposed must be based on a graduated schedule adopted by the Nevada Tax Commission which takes into consideration the length of time the tax or fee remained unpaid.
Sec. 49. NRS 360.510 is hereby amended to read as follows:
360.510 1. If any person is delinquent in the payment of any tax or fee administered by the Department or if a determination has been made against the person which remains unpaid, the Department may:
- (a) Not later than 3 years after the payment became delinquent or the determination became final; or
- (b) Not later than 6 years after the last recording of an abstract of judgment or of a certificate constituting a lien for tax owed,
give a notice of the delinquency and a demand to transmit personally or by registered or certified mail to any person, including, without limitation, any officer or department of this State or any political subdivision or agency of this State, who has in his or her possession or under his or her control any credits or other personal property belonging to the delinquent, or owing any debts to the delinquent or person against whom a determination has been made which remains unpaid, or owing any debts to the delinquent or that person. In the case of any state officer, department or agency, the notice must be given to the officer, department or agency before the Department presents the claim of the delinquent taxpayer to the State Controller.
2. A state officer, department or agency which receives such a notice may satisfy any debt owed to it by that person before it honors the notice of the Department.
3. After receiving the demand to transmit, the person notified by the demand may not transfer or otherwise dispose of the credits, other personal property, or debts in his or her possession or under his or her control at the time the person received the notice until the Department consents to a transfer or other disposition.
4. Every person notified by a demand to transmit shall, within 10 days after receipt of the demand to transmit, inform the Department of and transmit to the Department all such credits, other personal property or debts in his or her possession, under his or her control or owing by that person within the time and in the manner requested by the Department. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 5, no further notice is required to be served to that person.
5. If the property of the delinquent taxpayer consists of a series of payments owed to him or her, the person who owes or controls the payments shall transmit the payments to the Department until otherwise notified by the Department. If the debt of the delinquent taxpayer is not paid within 1 year after the Department issued the original demand to transmit, the Department shall issue another demand to transmit to the person responsible for making the payments informing him or her to continue to transmit payments to the Department or that his or her duty to transmit the payments to the Department has ceased.
6. If the notice of the delinquency seeks to prevent the transfer or other disposition of a deposit in a bank or credit union or other credits or personal property in the possession or under the control of a bank, credit union or other depository institution, the notice must be delivered or mailed to any branch or office of the bank, credit union or other depository institution at which the deposit is carried or at which the credits or personal property is held.
7. If any person notified by the notice of the delinquency makes any transfer or other disposition of the property or debts required to be withheld or transmitted, to the extent of the value of the property or the amount of the debts thus transferred or paid, that person is liable to the State for any indebtedness due pursuant to this chapter, or chapter 360B, 362, 363A, 363B, 369, 370, 372, 372A, 374, 377, 377A or 444A of NRS, sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act, NRS 482.313, or chapter 585 or 680B of NRS from the person with respect to whose obligation the notice was given if solely by reason of the transfer or other disposition the State is unable to recover the indebtedness of the person with respect to whose obligation the notice was given.
Sec. 50. NRS 363A.130 is hereby amended to read as follows:
363A.130 1. There is hereby imposed an excise tax on each employer at the rate of 2 2.29 percent of the wages, as defined in NRS 612.190, paid by the employer during a calendar quarter with respect to employment in connection with the business activities of the employer.
2. The tax imposed by this section:
- (a) Does not apply to any person or other entity or any wages this State is prohibited from taxing under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States or the Nevada Constitution.
- (b) Must not be deducted, in whole or in part, from any wages of persons in the employment of the employer.
3. Each employer shall, on or before the last day of the month immediately following each calendar quarter for which the employer is required to pay a contribution pursuant to NRS 612.535:
- (a) File with the Department a return on a form prescribed by the Department; and
- (b) Remit to the Department any tax due pursuant to this section for that calendar quarter.
Sec. 51. NRS 363A.130 is hereby amended to read as follows:
363A.130 1. There is hereby imposed an excise tax on each employer at the rate of 2.29 2.42 percent of the wages, as defined in NRS 612.190, paid by the employer during a calendar quarter with respect to employment in connection with the business activities of the employer.
2. The tax imposed by this section:
- (a) Does not apply to any person or other entity or any wages this State is prohibited from taxing under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States or the Nevada Constitution.
- (b) Must not be deducted, in whole or in part, from any wages of persons in the employment of the employer.
3. Each employer shall, on or before the last day of the month immediately following each calendar quarter for which the employer is required to pay a contribution pursuant to NRS 612.535:
- (a) File with the Department a return on a form prescribed by the Department; and
- (b) Remit to the Department any tax due pursuant to this section for that calendar quarter.
Sec. 52. NRS 363A.130 is hereby amended to read as follows:
363A.130 1. There is hereby imposed an excise tax on each employer at the rate of 2.42 2 percent of the wages, as defined in NRS 612.190, paid by the employer during a calendar quarter with respect to employment in connection with the business activities of the employer.
2. The tax imposed by this section:
- (a) Does not apply to any person or other entity or any wages this State is prohibited from taxing under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States or the Nevada Constitution.
- (b) Must not be deducted, in whole or in part, from any wages of persons in the employment of the employer.
3. Each employer shall, on or before the last day of the month immediately following each calendar quarter for which the employer is required to pay a contribution pursuant to NRS 612.535:
- (a) File with the Department a return on a form prescribed by the Department; and
- (b) Remit to the Department any tax due pursuant to this section for that calendar quarter.
Sec. 53. NRS 78.245 is hereby amended to read as follows:
78.245 No
1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, no stocks, bonds or other securities issued by any corporation organized under this chapter, nor the income or profits therefrom, nor the transfer thereof by assignment, descent, testamentary disposition or otherwise, shall be taxed by this State when such stocks, bonds or other securities shall be owned by nonresidents of this State or by foreign corporations.
2. The provisions of subsection 1 do not apply to the tax imposed pursuant to sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act.
Sec. 54. NRS 90.420 is hereby amended to read as follows:
90.420 1. The Administrator by order may deny, suspend or revoke any license, fine any licensed person, limit the activities governed by this chapter that an applicant or licensed person may perform in this State, bar an applicant or licensed person from association with a licensed broker-dealer or investment adviser or bar from employment with a licensed broker-dealer or investment adviser a person who is a partner, officer, director, sales representative, investment adviser or representative of an investment adviser, or a person occupying a similar status or performing a similar function for anapplicant or licensed person, if the Administrator finds that the order is in the public interest and that the applicant or licensed person or, in the case of a broker-dealer or investment adviser, any partner, officer, director, sales representative, investment adviser, representative of an investment adviser, or person occupying a similar status or performing similar functions or any person directly or indirectly controlling the broker-dealer or investment adviser, or any transfer agent or any person directly or indirectly controlling the transfer agent:
- (a) Has filed an application for licensing with the Administrator which, as of its effective date, or as of any date after filing in the case of an order denying effectiveness, was incomplete in a material respect or contained a statement that was, in light of the circumstances under which it was made, false or misleading with respect to a material fact;
- (b) Has violated or failed to comply with a provision of this chapter as now or formerly in effect or a regulation or order adopted or issued under this chapter;
- (c) Is the subject of an adjudication or determination after notice and opportunity for hearing, within the last 5 years by a securities agency or administrator of another state or a court of competent jurisdiction that the person has violated the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Commodity Exchange Act or the securities law of any other state, but only if the acts constituting the violation of that state's law would constitute a violation of this chapter had the acts taken place in this State;
- (d) Within the last 10 years has been convicted of a felony or misdemeanor which the Administrator finds:
- (1) Involves the purchase or sale of a security, taking a false oath, making a false report, bribery, perjury, burglary, robbery or conspiracy to commit any of the foregoing offenses;
- (2) Arises out of the conduct of business as a broker-dealer, investment adviser, depository institution, insurance company or fiduciary; or
- (3) Involves the larceny, theft, robbery, extortion, forgery, counterfeiting, fraudulent concealment, embezzlement, fraudulent conversion or misappropriation of money or securities or conspiracy to commit any of the foregoing offenses;
- (e) Is or has been permanently or temporarily enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction, unless the order has been vacated, from acting as an investment adviser, representative of an investment adviser, underwriter, broker-dealer or as an affiliated person or employee of an investment company, depository institution or insurance company or from engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with any of the foregoing activities or in connection with the purchase or sale of a security;
- (f) Is or has been the subject of an order of the Administrator, unless the order has been vacated, denying, suspending or revoking the person's license as a broker-dealer, sales representative, investment adviser, representative of an investment adviser or transfer agent;
- (g) Is or has been the subject of any of the following orders which were issued within the last 5 years, unless the order has been vacated:
- (1) An order by the securities agency or administrator of another state, Canadian province or territory or by the Securities and Exchange Commission or a comparable regulatory agency of another country, entered after notice and opportunity for hearing, denying, suspending or revoking the person's license as a broker-dealer, sales representative, investment adviser, representative of an investment adviser or transfer agent;
- (2) A suspension or expulsion from membership in or association with a member of a self-regulatory organization;
- (3) An order of the United States Postal Service relating to fraud;
- (4) An order to cease and desist entered after notice and opportunity for hearing by the Administrator, the securities agency or administrator of another state, Canadian province or territory, the Securities and Exchange Commission or a comparable regulatory agency of another country, or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission; or
- (5) An order by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission denying, suspending or revoking registration under the Commodity Exchange Act;
- (h) Has engaged in unethical or dishonest practices in the securities business;
- (i) Is insolvent, either in the sense that liabilities exceed assets or in the sense that obligations cannot be met as they mature, but the Administrator may not enter an order against a broker-dealer or investment adviser under this paragraph without a finding of insolvency as to the broker-dealer or investment adviser;
- (j) Has failed to pay a tax as required pursuant to the provisions of chapter 363A of NRS
;or sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act; - (k) Is determined by the Administrator in compliance with NRS 90.430 not to be qualified on the basis of lack of training, experience and knowledge of the securities business; or
- (l) Has failed reasonably to supervise a sales representative, employee or representative of an investment adviser.
2. The Administrator may not institute a proceeding on the basis of a fact or transaction known to the director when the license became effective unless the proceeding is instituted within 90 days after issuance of the license.
3. If the Administrator finds that an applicant or licensed person is no longer in existence or has ceased to do business as a broker-dealer, sales representative, investment adviser, representative of an investment adviser or transfer agent or is adjudicated mentally incompetent or subjected to the control of a committee, conservator or guardian or cannot be located after reasonable search, the Administrator may by order deny the application or revoke the license.
Sec. 55. NRS 90.730 is hereby amended to read as follows:
90.730 1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, information and records filed with or obtained by the Administrator are public information and are available for public examination.
2. Except as otherwise provided in subsections 3 and 4 and NRS 239.0115, the following information and records do not constitute public information under subsection 1 and are confidential:
- (a) Information or records obtained by the Administrator in connection with an investigation concerning possible violations of this chapter; and
- (b) Information or records filed with the Administrator in connection with a registration statement filed under this chapter or a report under NRS 90.390 which constitute trade secrets or commercial or financial information of a person for which that person is entitled to and has asserted a claim of privilege or confidentiality authorized by law.
3. The Administrator may submit any information or evidence obtained in connection with an investigation to the:
- (a) Attorney General or appropriate district attorney for the purpose of prosecuting a criminal action under this chapter; and
- (b) Department of Taxation for its use in carrying out the provisions of chapter 363A of NRS
.and sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act.
4. The Administrator may disclose any information obtained in connection with an investigation pursuant to NRS 90.620 to the agencies and administrators specified in subsection 1 of NRS 90.740 but only if disclosure is provided for the purpose of a civil, administrative or criminal investigation or proceeding, and the receiving agency or administrator represents in writing that under applicable law protections exist to preserve the integrity, confidentiality and security of the information.
5. This chapter does not create any privilege or diminish any privilege existing at common law, by statute, regulation or otherwise.
Sec. 56. NRS 604A.820 is hereby amended to read as follows:
604A.820 1. If the Commissioner has reason to believe that grounds for revocation or suspension of a license exist, the Commissioner shall give 20 days' written notice to the licensee stating the contemplated action and, in general, the grounds therefor and set a date for a hearing.
2. At the conclusion of a hearing, the Commissioner shall:
- (a) Enter a written order either dismissing the charges, revoking the license or suspending the license for a period of not more than 60 days, which period must include any prior temporary suspension. The Commissioner shall send a copy of the order to the licensee by registered or certified mail.
- (b) Impose upon the licensee an administrative fine of not more than $10,000 for each violation by the licensee of any provision of this chapter or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto.
- (c) If a fine is imposed pursuant to this section, enter such order as is necessary to recover the costs of the proceeding, including investigative costs and attorney's fees of the Commissioner.
3. The grounds for revocation or suspension of a license are that:
- (a) The licensee has failed to pay the annual license fee;
- (b) The licensee, either knowingly or without any exercise of due care to prevent it, has violated any provision of this chapter or any lawful regulation adopted pursuant thereto;
- (c) The licensee has failed to pay a tax as required pursuant to the provisions of chapter 363A of NRS
;or sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act; - (d) Any fact or condition exists which would have justified the Commissioner in denying the licensee's original application for a license pursuant to the provisions of this chapter; or
- (e) The licensee:
- (1) Failed to open an office for the conduct of the business authorized by his or her license within 180 days after the date the license was issued; or
- (2) Has failed to remain open for the conduct of the business for a period of 180 days without good cause therefor.
4. Any revocation or suspension applies only to the license granted to a person for the particular office for which grounds for revocation or suspension exist.
5. An order suspending or revoking a license becomes effective 5 days after being entered unless the order specifies otherwise or a stay is granted.
Sec. 57. NRS 612.265 is hereby amended to read as follows:
612.265 1. Except as otherwise provided in this section and NRS 239.0115, information obtained from any employing unit or person pursuant to the administration of this chapter and any determination as to the benefit rights of any person is confidential and may not be disclosed or be open to public inspection in any manner which would reveal the person's or employing unit's identity.
2. Any claimant or a legal representative of a claimant is entitled to information from the records of the Division, to the extent necessary for the proper presentation of the claimant's claim in any proceeding pursuant to this chapter. A claimant or an employing unit is not entitled to information from the records of the Division for any other purpose.
3. Subject to such restrictions as the Administrator may by regulation prescribe, the information obtained by the Division may be made available to:
- (a) Any agency of this or any other state or any federal agency charged with the administration or enforcement of laws relating to unemployment compensation, public assistance, workers' compensation or labor and industrial relations, or the maintenance of a system of public employment offices;
- (b) Any state or local agency for the enforcement of child support;
- (c) The Internal Revenue Service of the Department of the Treasury;
- (d) The Department of Taxation; and
- (e) The State Contractors' Board in the performance of its duties to enforce the provisions of chapter 624 of NRS.
Information obtained in connection with the administration of the Employment Service may be made available to persons or agencies for purposes appropriate to the operation of a public employment service or a public assistance program.
4. Upon written request made by a public officer of a local government, the Administrator shall furnish from the records of the Division the name, address and place of employment of any person listed in the records of employment of the Division. The request must set forth the social security number of the person about whom the request is made and contain a statement signed by proper authority of the local government certifying that the request is made to allow the proper authority to enforce a law to recover a debt or obligation owed to the local government. Except as otherwise provided in NRS 239.0115, the information obtained by the local government is confidential and may not be used or disclosed for any purpose other than the collection of a debt or obligation owed to that local government. The Administrator may charge a reasonable fee for the cost of providing the requested information.
5. The Administrator may publish or otherwise provide information on the names of employers, their addresses, their type or class of business or industry, and the approximate number of employeesemployed by each such employer, if the information released will assist unemployed persons to obtain employment or will be generally useful in developing and diversifying the economic interests of this State. Upon request by a state agency which is able to demonstrate that its intended use of the information will benefit the residents of this State, the Administrator may, in addition to the information listed in this subsection, disclose the number of employees employed by each employer and the total wages paid by each employer. The Administrator may charge a fee to cover the actual costs of any administrative expenses relating to the disclosure of this information to a state agency. The Administrator may require the state agency to certify in writing that the agency will take all actions necessary to maintain the confidentiality of the information and prevent its unauthorized disclosure.
6. Upon request therefor, the Administrator shall furnish to any agency of the United States charged with the administration of public works or assistance through public employment, and may furnish to any state agency similarly charged, the name, address, ordinary occupation and employment status of each recipient of benefits and the recipient's rights to further benefits pursuant to this chapter.
7. To further a current criminal investigation, the chief executive officer of any law enforcement agency of this State may submit a written request to the Administrator that the Administrator furnish, from the records of the Division, the name, address and place of employment of any person listed in the records of employment of the Division. The request must set forth the social security number of the person about whom the request is made and contain a statement signed by the chief executive officer certifying that the request is made to further a criminal investigation currently being conducted by the agency. Upon receipt of such a request, the Administrator shall furnish the information requested. The Administrator may charge a fee to cover the actual costs of any related administrative expenses.
8. In addition to the provisions of subsection 5, the Administrator shall provide lists containing the names and addresses of employers, and information regarding the wages paid by each employer to the Department of Taxation, upon request, for use in verifying returns for the taxes imposed pursuant to chapters 363A and 363B of NRS . and sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act. The Administrator may charge a fee to cover the actual costs of any related administrative expenses.
9. A private carrier that provides industrial insurance in this State shall submit to the Administrator a list containing the name of each person who received benefits pursuant to chapters 616A to 616D, inclusive, or chapter 617 of NRS during the preceding month and request that the Administrator compare the information so provided with the records of the Division regarding persons claiming benefits pursuant to chapter 612 of NRS for the same period. The information submitted by the private carrier must be in a form determined by the Administrator and must contain the social security number of each such person. Upon receipt of the request, the Administrator shall make such a comparison and, if it appears from the information submitted that a person is simultaneously claiming benefits under chapter 612 of NRS and under chapters 616A to 616D, inclusive, or chapter 617 of NRS, the Administrator shall notify the Attorney General or any other appropriate law enforcement agency. The Administrator shall charge a fee to cover the actual costs of any related administrative expenses.
10. The Administrator may request the Comptroller of the Currency of the United States to cause an examination of the correctness of any return or report of any national banking association rendered pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, and may in connection with the request transmit any such report or return to the Comptroller of the Currency of the United States as provided in section 3305(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.
11. If any employee or member of the Board of Review, the Administrator or any employee of the Administrator, in violation of the provisions of this section, discloses information obtained from any employing unit or person in the administration of this chapter, or if any person who has obtained a list of applicants for work, or of claimants or recipients of benefits pursuant to this chapter uses or permits the use of the list for any political purpose, he or she is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
12. All letters, reports or communications of any kind, oral or written, from the employer or employee to each other or to the Division or any of its agents, representatives or employees are privileged and must not be the subject matter or basis for any lawsuit if the letter, report or communication is written, sent, delivered or prepared pursuant to the requirements of this chapter.
Sec. 58. NRS 616B.012 is hereby amended to read as follows:
616B.012 1. Except as otherwise provided in this section and NRS 239.0115, 616B.015, 616B.021 and 616C.205, information obtained from any insurer, employer or employee is confidential and may not be disclosed or be open to public inspection in any manner which would reveal the person's identity.
2. Any claimant or legal representative of the claimant is entitled to information from the records of the insurer, to the extent necessary for the proper presentation of a claim in any proceeding under chapters 616A to 616D, inclusive, or chapter 617 of NRS.
3. The Division and Administrator are entitled to information from the records of the insurer which is necessary for the performance of their duties. The Administrator may, by regulation, prescribe the manner in which otherwise confidential information may be made available to:
- (a) Any agency of this or any other state charged with the administration or enforcement of laws relating to industrial insurance, unemployment compensation, public assistance or labor law and industrial relations;
- (b) Any state or local agency for the enforcement of child support;
- (c) The Internal Revenue Service of the Department of the Treasury;
- (d) The Department of Taxation; and
- (e) The State Contractors' Board in the performance of its duties to enforce the provisions of chapter 624 of NRS.
Information obtained in connection with the administration of a program of industrial insurance may be made available to persons or agencies for purposes appropriate to the operation of a program of industrial insurance.
4. Upon written request made by a public officer of a local government, an insurer shall furnish from its records the name, address and place of employment of any person listed in its records. The request must set forth the social security number of the person about whom the request is made and contain a statement signed by proper authority of the local government certifying that the request is made to allow the proper authority to enforce a law to recover a debt or obligation owed to the local government. Except as otherwise provided in NRS 239.0115, the information obtained by the local government is confidential and may not be used or disclosed for any purpose other than the collection of a debt or obligation owed to the local government. The insurer may charge a reasonable fee for the cost of providing the requested information.
5. To further a current criminal investigation, the chief executive officer of any law enforcement agency of this State may submit to the Administrator a written request for the name, address and place of employment of any person listed in the records of an insurer. The request must set forth the social security number of the person about whom the request is made and contain a statement signed by the chief executive officer certifying that the request is made to further a criminal investigation currently being conducted by the agency. Upon receipt of a request, the Administrator shall instruct the insurer to furnish the information requested. Upon receipt of such an instruction, the insurer shall furnish the information requested. The insurer may charge a reasonable fee to cover any related administrative expenses.
6. Upon request by the Department of Taxation, the Administrator shall provide:
- (a) Lists containing the names and addresses of employers; and
- (b) Other information concerning employers collected and maintained by the Administrator or the Division to carry out the purposes of chapters 616A to 616D, inclusive, or chapter 617 of NRS,
to the Department for its use in verifying returns for the taxes imposed pursuant to chapters 363A and 363B of NRS . and sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act. The Administrator may charge a reasonable fee to cover any related administrative expenses.
7. Any person who, in violation of this section, discloses information obtained from files of claimants or policyholders or obtains a list of claimants or policyholders under chapters 616A to 616D, inclusive, or chapter 617 of NRS and uses or permits the use of the list for any political purposes, is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
8. All letters, reports or communications of any kind, oral or written, from the insurer, or any of its agents, representatives or employees are privileged and must not be the subject matter or basis for any lawsuit if the letter, report or communication is written, sent, delivered or prepared pursuant to the requirements of chapters 616A to 616D, inclusive, or chapter 617 of NRS.
9. The provisions of this section do not prohibit the Administrator or the Division from disclosing any nonproprietary information relating to an uninsured employer or proof of industrial insurance.
Sec. 59. NRS 645B.060 is hereby amended to read as follows:
645B.060 1. Subject to the administrative control of the Director of the Department of Business and Industry, the Commissioner shall exercise general supervision and control over mortgage brokers and mortgage agents doing business in this State.
2. In addition to the other duties imposed upon him or her by law, the Commissioner shall:
- (a) Adopt regulations:
- (1) Setting forth the requirements for an investor to acquire ownership of or a beneficial interest in a loan secured by a lien on real property. The regulations must include, without limitation, the minimum financial conditions that the investor must comply with before becoming an investor.
- (2) Establishing reasonable limitations and guidelines on loans made by a mortgage broker to a director, officer, mortgage agent or employee of the mortgage broker.
- (b) Adopt any other regulations that are necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter, except as to loan brokerage fees.
- (c) Conduct such investigations as may be necessary to determine whether any person has violated any provision of this chapter, a regulation adopted pursuant to this chapter or an order of the Commissioner.
- (d) Except as otherwise provided in subsection 4, conduct an annual examination of each mortgage broker doing business in this State. The annual examination must include, without limitation, a formal exit review with the mortgage broker. The Commissioner shall adopt regulations prescribing:
- (1) Standards for determining the rating of each mortgage broker based upon the results of the annual examination; and
- (2) Procedures for resolving any objections made by the mortgage broker to the results of the annual examination. The results of the annual examination may not be opened to public inspection pursuant to NRS 645B.090 until after a period of time set by the Commissioner to determine any objections made by the mortgage broker.
- (e) Conduct such other examinations, periodic or special audits, investigations and hearings as may be necessary for the efficient administration of the laws of this State regarding mortgage brokers and mortgage agents. The Commissioner shall adopt regulations specifying the general guidelines that will be followed when a periodic or special audit of a mortgage broker is conducted pursuant to this chapter.
- (f) Classify as confidential certain records and information obtained by the Division when those matters are obtained from a governmental agency upon the express condition that they remain confidential. This paragraph does not limit examination by:
- (1) The Legislative Auditor; or
- (2) The Department of Taxation if necessary to carry out the provisions of chapter 363A of NRS
.or sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act.
- (g) Conduct such examinations and investigations as are necessary to ensure that mortgage brokers and mortgage agents meet the requirements of this chapter for obtaining a license, both at the time of the application for a license and thereafter on a continuing basis.
3. For each special audit, investigation or examination, a mortgage broker or mortgage agent shall pay a fee based on the rate established pursuant to NRS 645F.280.
4. The Commissioner may conduct examinations of a mortgage broker, as described in paragraph (d) of subsection 2, on a biennial instead of an annual basis if the mortgage broker:
- (a) Received a rating in the last annual examination that meets a threshold determined by the Commissioner;
- (b) Has not had any adverse change in financial condition since the last annual examination, as shown by financial statements of the mortgage broker;
- (c) Has not had any complaints received by the Division that resulted in any administrative action by the Division; and
- (d) Does not maintain any trust accounts pursuant to NRS 645B.170 or 645B.175 or arrange loans funded by private investors.
Sec. 60. NRS 645B.670 is hereby amended to read as follows:
645B.670 Except as otherwise provided in NRS 645B.690:1. For each violation committed by an applicant for a license issued pursuant to this chapter, whether or not the applicant is issued a license, the Commissioner may impose upon the applicant an administrative fine of not more than $25,000 if the applicant:
- (a) Has knowingly made or caused to be made to the Commissioner any false representation of material fact;
- (b) Has suppressed or withheld from the Commissioner any information which the applicant possesses and which, if submitted by the applicant, would have rendered the applicant ineligible to be licensed pursuant to the provisions of this chapter; or
- (c) Has violated any provision of this chapter, a regulation adopted pursuant to this chapter or an order of the Commissioner in completing and filing his or her application for a license or during the course of the investigation of his or her application for a license.
2. For each violation committed by a mortgage broker, the Commissioner may impose upon the mortgage broker an administrative fine of not more than $25,000, may suspend, revoke or place conditions upon the mortgage broker's license, or may do both, if the mortgage broker, whether or not acting as such:
- (a) Is insolvent;
- (b) Is grossly negligent or incompetent in performing any act for which the mortgage broker is required to be licensed pursuant to the provisions of this chapter;
- (c) Does not conduct his or her business in accordance with law or has violated any provision of this chapter, a regulation adopted pursuant to this chapter or an order of the Commissioner;
- (d) Is in such financial condition that the mortgage broker cannot continue in business with safety to his or her customers;
- (e) Has made a material misrepresentation in connection with any transaction governed by this chapter;
- (f) Has suppressed or withheld from a client any material facts, data or other information relating to any transaction governed by the provisions of this chapter which the mortgage broker knew or, by the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have known;
- (g) Has knowingly made or caused to be made to the Commissioner any false representation of material fact or has suppressed or withheld from the Commissioner any information which the mortgage broker possesses and which, if submitted by the mortgage broker, would have rendered the mortgage broker ineligible to be licensed pursuant to the provisions of this chapter;
- (h) Has failed to account to persons interested for all money received for a trust account;
- (i) Has refused to permit an examination by the Commissioner of his or her books and affairs or has refused or failed, within a reasonable time, to furnish any information or make any report that may be required by the Commissioner pursuant to the provisions of this chapter or a regulation adopted pursuant to this chapter;
- (j) Has been convicted of, or entered or agreed to enter a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, a felony in a domestic, foreign or military court within the 7 years immediately preceding the date of the application, or at any time if such felony involved an act of fraud, dishonesty or a breach of trust, moral turpitude or money laundering.
- (k) Has refused or failed to pay, within a reasonable time, any fees, assessments, costs or expenses that the mortgage broker is required to pay pursuant to this chapter or a regulation adopted pursuant to this chapter;
- (l) Has failed to satisfy a claim made by a client which has been reduced to judgment;
- (m) Has failed to account for or to remit any money of a client within a reasonable time after a request for an accounting or remittal;
- (n) Has commingled the money or other property of a client with his or her own or has converted the money or property of others to his or her own use;
- (o) Has engaged in any other conduct constituting a deceitful, fraudulent or dishonest business practice;
- (p) Has repeatedly violated the policies and procedures of the mortgage broker;
- (q) Has failed to exercise reasonable supervision over the activities of a mortgage agent as required by NRS 645B.460;
- (r) Has instructed a mortgage agent to commit an act that would be cause for the revocation of the license of the mortgage broker, whether or not the mortgage agent commits the act;
- (s) Has employed a person as a mortgage agent or authorized a person to be associated with the mortgage broker as a mortgage agent at a time when the mortgage broker knew or, in light of all the surrounding facts and circumstances, reasonably should have known that the person:
- (1) Had been convicted of, or entered or agreed to enter a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, a felony in a domestic, foreign or military court within the 7 years immediately preceding the date of application, or at any time if such felony involved an act of fraud, dishonesty or a breach of trust, moral turpitude or money laundering; or
- (2) Had a license or registration as a mortgage agent, mortgage banker, mortgage broker or residential mortgage loan originator revoked in this State or any other jurisdiction or had a financial services license or registration revoked within the immediately preceding 10 years;
- (t) Has violated NRS 645C.557; or
- (u) Has failed to pay a tax as required pursuant to the provisions of chapter 363A of NRS
.or sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act.
3. For each violation committed by a mortgage agent, the Commissioner may impose upon the mortgage agent an administrative fine of not more than $25,000, may suspend, revoke or place conditions upon the mortgage agent's license, or may do both, if the mortgage agent, whether or not acting as such:
- (a) Is grossly negligent or incompetent in performing any act for which the mortgage agent is required to be licensed pursuant to the provisions of this chapter;
- (b) Has made a material misrepresentation in connection with any transaction governed by this chapter;
- (c) Has suppressed or withheld from a client any material facts, data or other information relating to any transaction governed by the provisions of this chapter which the mortgage agent knew or, by the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have known;
- (d) Has knowingly made or caused to be made to the Commissioner any false representation of material fact or has suppressed or withheld from the Commissioner any information which the mortgage agent possesses and which, if submitted by the mortgage agent, would have rendered the mortgage agent ineligible to be licensed pursuant to the provisions of this chapter;
- (e) Has been convicted of, or entered or agreed to enter a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, a felony in a domestic, foreign or military court within the 7 years immediately preceding the date of the application, or at any time if such felony involved an act of fraud, dishonesty or a breach of trust, moral turpitude or money laundering.
- (f) Has failed to account for or to remit any money of a client within a reasonable time after a request for an accounting or remittal;
- (g) Has commingled the money or other property of a client with his or her own or has converted the money or property of others to his or her own use;
- (h) Has engaged in any other conduct constituting a deceitful, fraudulent or dishonest business practice;
- (i) Has violated NRS 645C.557;
- (j) Has repeatedly violated the policies and procedures of the mortgage broker with whom the mortgage agent is associated or by whom he or she is employed; or
- (k) Has violated any provision of this chapter, a regulation adopted pursuant to this chapter or an order of the Commissioner or has assisted or offered to assist another person to commit such a violation.
Sec. 61. NRS 645E.300 is hereby amended to read as follows:
645E.300 1. Subject to the administrative control of the Director of the Department of Business and Industry, the Commissioner shall exercise general supervision and control over mortgage bankers doing business in this State.
2. In addition to the other duties imposed upon him or her by law, the Commissioner shall:
- (a) Adopt regulations establishing reasonable limitations and guidelines on loans made by a mortgage banker to a director, officer or employee of the mortgage banker.
- (b) Adopt any other regulations that are necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter, except as to loan fees.
- (c) Conduct such investigations as may be necessary to determine whether any person has violated any provision of this chapter, a regulation adopted pursuant to this chapter or an order of the Commissioner.
- (d) Except as otherwise provided in subsection 4, conduct an annual examination of each mortgage banker doing business in this State.
- (e) Conduct such other examinations, periodic or special audits, investigations and hearings as may be necessary for the efficient administration of the laws of this State regarding mortgage bankers.
- (f) Classify as confidential certain records and information obtained by the Division when those matters are obtained from a governmental agency upon the express condition that they remain confidential. This paragraph does not limit examination by:
- (1) The Legislative Auditor; or
- (2) The Department of Taxation if necessary to carry out the provisions of chapter 363A of NRS
.or sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act.
- (g) Conduct such examinations and investigations as are necessary to ensure that mortgage bankers meet the requirements of this chapter for obtaining a license, both at the time of the application for a license and thereafter on a continuing basis.
3. For each special audit, investigation or examination, a mortgage banker shall pay a fee based on the rate established pursuant to NRS 645F.280.
4. The Commissioner may conduct biennial examinations of a mortgage banker instead of annual examinations, as described in paragraph (d) of subsection 2, if the mortgage banker:
- (a) Received a rating in the last annual examination that meets a threshold determined by the Commissioner;
- (b) Has not had any adverse change in financial condition since the last annual examination, as shown by financial statements of the mortgage banker; and
- (c) Has not had any complaints received by the Division that resulted in any administrative action by the Division.
Sec. 62. NRS 645E.670 is hereby amended to read as follows:
645E.670 1. For each violation committed by an applicant, whether or not the applicant is issued a license, the Commissioner may impose upon the applicant an administrative fine of not more than $25,000 if the applicant:
- (a) Has knowingly made or caused to be made to the Commissioner any false representation of material fact;
- (b) Has suppressed or withheld from the Commissioner any information which the applicant possesses and which, if submitted by the applicant, would have rendered the applicant ineligible to be licensed pursuant to the provisions of this chapter; or
- (c) Has violated any provision of this chapter, a regulation adopted pursuant to this chapter or an order of the Commissioner in completing and filing his or her application for a license or during the course of the investigation of his or her application for a license.
2. For each violation committed by a licensee, the Commissioner may impose upon the licensee an administrative fine of not more than $25,000, may suspend, revoke or place conditions upon the license, or may do both, if the licensee, whether or not acting as such:
- (a) Is insolvent;
- (b) Is grossly negligent or incompetent in performing any act for which the licensee is required to be licensed pursuant to the provisions of this chapter;
- (c) Does not conduct his or her business in accordance with law or has violated any provision of this chapter, a regulation adopted pursuant to this chapter or an order of the Commissioner;
- (d) Is in such financial condition that the licensee cannot continue in business with safety to his or her customers;
- (e) Has made a material misrepresentation in connection with any transaction governed by this chapter;
- (f) Has suppressed or withheld from a client any material facts, data or other information relating to any transaction governed by the provisions of this chapter which the licensee knew or, by the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have known;
- (g) Has knowingly made or caused to be made to the Commissioner any false representation of material fact or has suppressed or withheld from the Commissioner any information which the licensee possesses and which, if submitted by the licensee, would have rendered the licensee ineligible to be licensed pursuant to the provisions of this chapter;
- (h) Has failed to account to persons interested for all money received for a trust account;
- (i) Has refused to permit an examination by the Commissioner of his or her books and affairs or has refused or failed, within a reasonable time, to furnish any information or make any report that may be required by the Commissioner pursuant to the provisions of this chapter or a regulation adopted pursuant to this chapter;
- (j) Has been convicted of, or entered or agreed to enter a plea of nolo contendere to, a felony in a domestic, foreign or military court within the 7 years immediately preceding the date of the application, or at any time if such felony involved an act of fraud, dishonesty or a breach of trust, moral turpitude or money laundering;
- (k) Has refused or failed to pay, within a reasonable time, any fees, assessments, costs or expenses that the licensee is required to pay pursuant to this chapter or a regulation adopted pursuant to this chapter;
- (l) Has failed to pay a tax as required pursuant to the provisions of chapter 363A of NRS
;or sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act; - (m) Has failed to satisfy a claim made by a client which has been reduced to judgment;
- (n) Has failed to account for or to remit any money of a client within a reasonable time after a request for an accounting or remittal;
- (o) Has violated NRS 645C.557;
- (p) Has commingled the money or other property of a client with his or her own or has converted the money or property of others to his or her own use; or
- (q) Has engaged in any other conduct constituting a deceitful, fraudulent or dishonest business practice.
3. An order that imposes discipline and the findings of fact and conclusions of law supporting that order are public records.
Sec. 63. NRS 658.151 is hereby amended to read as follows:
658.151 1. The Commissioner may forthwith take possession of the business and property of any depository institution to which this title or title 56 of NRS applies when it appears that the depository institution:
- (a) Has violated its charter or any laws applicable thereto.
- (b) Is conducting its business in an unauthorized or unsafe manner.
- (c) Is in an unsafe or unsound condition to transact its business.
- (d) Has an impairment of its stockholders' or members' equity.
- (e) Has refused to pay its depositors in accordance with the terms on which such deposits were received, or has refused to pay its holders of certificates of indebtedness or investment in accordance with the terms upon which those certificates of indebtedness or investment were sold.
- (f) Has become or is in imminent danger of becoming otherwise insolvent.
- (g) Has neglected or refused to comply with the terms of a lawful order of the Commissioner.
- (h) Has refused, upon proper demand, to submit its records, affairs and concerns for inspection and examination of an appointed or authorized examiner of the Commissioner.
- (i) Has made a voluntary assignment of its assets to trustees.
- (j) Has failed to pay a tax as required pursuant to the provisions of chapter 363A of NRS
.or sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act.
2. The Commissioner also may forthwith take possession of the business and property of any depository institution to which this title or title 56 of NRS applies when it appears that the officers of the depository institution have refused to be examined upon oath regarding its affairs.
Sec. 64. NRS 665.133 is hereby amended to read as follows:
665.133 1. The records and information described in NRS 665.130 may be disclosed to:
- (a) An agency of the Federal Government or of another state which regulates the financial institution which is the subject of the records or information;
- (b) The Director of the Department of Business and Industry for the Director's confidential use;
- (c) The State Board of Finance for its confidential use, if the report or other information is necessary for the State Board of Finance to perform its duties under this title;
- (d) The Department of Taxation for its use in carrying out the provisions of chapter 363A of NRS
;and sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act; - (e) An entity which insures or guarantees deposits;
- (f) A public officer authorized to investigate criminal charges in connection with the affairs of the depository institution;
- (g) A person preparing a proposal for merging with or acquiring an institution or holding company, but only after notice of the disclosure has been given to the institution or holding company;
- (h) Any person to whom the subject of the report has authorized the disclosure;
- (i) Any other person if the Commissioner determines, after notice and opportunity for hearing, that disclosure is in the public interest and outweighs any potential harm to the depository institution and its stockholders, members, depositors and creditors; and
- (j) Any court in a proceeding initiated by the Commissioner concerning the financial institution.
2. All the reports made available pursuant to this section remain the property of the Division of Financial Institutions, and no person, agency or authority to whom the reports are made available, or any officer, director or employee thereof, may disclose any of the reports or any information contained therein, except in published statistical material that does not disclose the affairs of any natural person or corporation.
Sec. 65. NRS 669.275 is hereby amended to read as follows:
669.275 1. The Commissioner may require a licensee to provide an audited financial statement prepared by an independent certified public accountant licensed to do business in this State.
2. On the fourth Monday in January of each year, each licensee shall submit to the Commissioner a list of stockholders required to be maintained pursuant to paragraph (c) of subsection 1 of NRS 78.105 or the list of members required to be maintained pursuant to paragraph (a) of subsection 1 of NRS 86.241, verified by the president or a manager, as appropriate.
3. The list of members required to be maintained pursuant to paragraph (a) of subsection 1 of NRS 86.241 must include the percentage of each member’s interest in the company, in addition to the requirements set forth in that section.
4. Except as otherwise provided in NRS 239.0115, any document submitted pursuant to this section is confidential. This subsection does not limit the examination of any document by the Department of Taxation if necessary to carry out the provisions of sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act.
Sec. 66. NRS 669.2825 is hereby amended to read as follows:
669.2825 1. The Commissioner may institute disciplinary action or forthwith initiate proceedings to take possession of the business and property of any retail trust company when it appears that the retail trust company:
- (a) Has violated its charter or any state or federal laws applicable to the business of a trust company.
- (b) Is conducting its business in an unauthorized or unsafe manner.
- (c) Is in an unsafe or unsound condition to transact its business.
- (d) Has an impairment of its stockholders' equity.
- (e) Has refused to pay or transfer account assets to its account holders as required by the terms of the accounts' governing instruments.
- (f) Has become insolvent.
- (g) Has neglected or refused to comply with the terms of a lawful order of the Commissioner.
- (h) Has refused, upon proper demand, to submit its records, affairs and concerns for inspection and examination of an appointed or authorized examiner of the Commissioner.
- (i) Has made a voluntary assignment of its assets to receivers, conservators, trustees or creditors without complying with NRS 669.230.
- (j) Has failed to pay a tax as required pursuant to the provisions of chapter 363A of NRS
.or sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act. - (k) Has materially and willfully breached its fiduciary duties to its customers.
- (l) Has failed to properly disclose all fees, interest and other charges to its customers.
- (m) Has willfully engaged in material conflicts of interest regarding a customer's account.
- (n) Has made intentional material misrepresentations regarding any aspect of the services performed or proposed to be performed by the retail trust company.
2. The Commissioner also may forthwith initiate proceedings to take possession of the business and property of any trust company when it appears that the officers of the trust company have refused to be examined upon oath regarding its affairs.
Sec. 67. NRS 669.2847 is hereby amended to read as follows:
669.2847 1. If the Commissioner has reason to believe that grounds for revocation or suspension of a license exist, the Commissioner shall give at least 20 days' written notice to the licensee stating the contemplated action and, in general, the grounds therefor and set a date for a hearing.
2. At the conclusion of a hearing, the Commissioner shall:
- (a) Enter a written order dismissing the charges, revoking the license or suspending the license for a period of not more than 60 days, which period must include any prior temporary suspension. The Commissioner shall send a copy of the order to the licensee by registered or certified mail.
- (b) Impose upon the licensee an administrative fine of not more than $10,000 for each violation by the licensee of any provision of this chapter or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto.
- (c) If a fine is imposed pursuant to this section, enter such order as is necessary to recover the costs of the proceeding, including his or her investigative costs and attorney's fees.
3. The grounds for revocation or suspension of a license are that:
- (a) The licensee has failed to pay the annual license fee;
- (b) The licensee, either knowingly or without any exercise of due care to prevent it, has violated any provision of this chapter or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto or any lawful order of the Division of Financial Institutions;
- (c) The licensee has failed to pay a tax as required pursuant to the provisions of chapter 363A of NRS
;or sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act; - (d) Any fact or condition exists which would have justified the Commissioner in denying the licensee's original application for a license pursuant to the provisions of this chapter; or
- (e) The licensee:
- (1) Failed to open an office for the conduct of the business authorized by his or her license within 180 days after the date the license was issued; or
- (2) Has failed to remain open for the conduct of the business for a period of 30 days without good cause therefor.
4. An order suspending or revoking a license becomes effective 5 days after being entered unless the order specifies otherwise or a stay is granted.
Sec. 68. NRS 669.285 is hereby amended to read as follows:
669.285 Except as otherwise provided in NRS 239.0115, any application and personal or financial records submitted by a person pursuant to the provisions of this chapter and any personal or financial records or other documents obtained by the Division of Financial Institutions pursuant to an examination or audit conducted by the Division are confidential and may be disclosed only to:
1. The Division, any authorized employee of the Division and any state or federal agency investigating the activities covered under the provisions of this chapter; and
2. The Department of Taxation for its use in carrying out the provisions of sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act; and
3. Any person when the Commissioner, in the Commissioner’s discretion, determines that the interests of the public that would be protected by disclosure outweigh the interest of any person in the confidential information not being disclosed.
Sec. 69. NRS 669A.310 is hereby amended to read as follows:
669A.310 1. Except as otherwise provided in this section, any application and personal or financial records submitted by a person pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, any personal or financial records or other documents obtained by the Division of Financial Institutions pursuant to an examination or audit conducted by the Division pursuant to this chapter and any other private information relating to a family trust company are confidential and may be disclosed only to:
- (a) The Division, any authorized employee of the Division and a state or federal agency investigating activities regulated pursuant to this chapter;
and - (b) The Department of Taxation for its use in carrying out the provisions of sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act; and
- (c) Any other person if the Commissioner, in the Commissioner’s discretion, determines that the interests of the public in disclosing the information outweigh the interests of the person about whom the information pertains in not disclosing the information.
2. The Commissioner shall give to the family trust company to which the information relates 10-days’ prior written notice of intent to disclose confidential information directly or indirectly to a person pursuant to paragraph (b) (c) of subsection 1. Any family trust company which receives such a notice may object to the disclosure of the confidential information and will be afforded the right to a hearing in accordance with the provisions of chapter 233B of NRS. If a family trust company requests a hearing, the Commissioner may not reveal confidential information prior to the conclusion of the hearing and a ruling. Prior to dissemination of any confidential information, the Commissioner shall require a written agreement not to reveal the confidential information by the party receiving the confidential information. In no event shall the Commissioner disclose confidential information to the general public, any competitor or any potential competitor of a family trust company.
3. Nothing in this chapter is intended to preclude a law enforcement officer from gaining access to otherwise confidential records by subpoena, court order, search warrant or other lawful means. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the Commissioner shall have the ability to share information with other out of state or federal regulators with whom the Department of Business and Industry has an agreement regarding the sharing of information. Nothing in this chapter is intended to preclude any agency of this State from gaining access to otherwise confidential records in accordance with any applicable law.
Sec. 70. NRS 673.484 is hereby amended to read as follows:
673.484 The Commissioner may after notice and hearing suspend or revoke the charter of any association for:
1. Repeated failure to abide by the provisions of this chapter or the regulations adopted thereunder.
2. Failure to pay a tax as required pursuant to the provisions of chapter 363A of NRS . or sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act.
Sec. 71. NRS 675.440 is hereby amended to read as follows:
675.440 1. If the Commissioner has reason to believe that grounds for revocation or suspension of a license exist, he or she shall give 20 days' written notice to the licensee stating the contemplated action and, in general, the grounds therefor and set a date for a hearing.
2. At the conclusion of a hearing, the Commissioner shall:
- (a) Enter a written order either dismissing the charges, revoking the license, or suspending the license for a period of not more than 60 days, which period must include any prior temporary suspension. A copy of the order must be sent by registered or certified mail to the licensee.
- (b) Impose upon the licensee an administrative fine of not more than $10,000 for each violation by the licensee of any provision of this chapter or any lawful regulation adopted under it.
- (c) If a fine is imposed pursuant to this section, enter such order as is necessary to recover the costs of the proceeding, including his or her investigative costs and attorney's fees.
3. The grounds for revocation or suspension of a license are that:
- (a) The licensee has failed to pay the annual license fee;
- (b) The licensee, either knowingly or without any exercise of due care to prevent it, has violated any provision of this chapter or any lawful regulation adopted under it;
- (c) The licensee has failed to pay a tax as required pursuant to the provisions of chapter 363A of NRS
;or sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act; - (d) Any fact or condition exists which would have justified the Commissioner in denying the licensee's original application for a license hereunder; or
- (e) The applicant failed to open an office for the conduct of the business authorized under this chapter within 120 days after the date the license was issued, or has failed to remain open for the conduct of the business for a period of 120 days without good cause therefor.
4. Any revocation or suspension applies only to the license granted to a person for the particular office for which grounds for revocation or suspension exist.
5. An order suspending or revoking a license becomes effective 5 days after being entered unless the order specifies otherwise or a stay is granted.
Sec. 72. NRS 677.510 is hereby amended to read as follows:
677.510 1. If the Commissioner has reason to believe that grounds for revocation or suspension of a license exist, he or she shall give 20 days' written notice to the licensee stating the contemplated action and, in general, the grounds therefor and set a date for a hearing.
2. At the conclusion of a hearing, the Commissioner shall:
- (a) Enter a written order either dismissing the charges, or revoking the license, or suspending the license for a period of not more than 60 days, which period must include any prior temporary suspension. A copy of the order must be sent by registered or certified mail to the licensee.
- (b) Impose upon the licensee an administrative fine of not more than $10,000 for each violation by the licensee of any provision of this chapter or any lawful regulation adopted pursuant thereto.
- (c) If a fine is imposed pursuant to this section, enter such order as is necessary to recover the costs of the proceeding, including his or her investigative costs and attorney's fees.
3. The grounds for revocation or suspension of a license are that:
- (a) The licensee has failed to pay the annual license fee;
- (b) The licensee, either knowingly or without any exercise of due care to prevent it, has violated any provision of this chapter, or any lawful regulation adopted pursuant thereto;
- (c) The licensee has failed to pay a tax as required pursuant to the provisions of chapter 363A of NRS
;or sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act; - (d) Any fact or condition exists which would have justified the Commissioner in denying the licensee's original application for a license hereunder; or
- (e) The applicant failed to open an office for the conduct of the business authorized under this chapter within 120 days after the date the license was issued, or has failed to remain open for the conduct of the business for a period of 120 days without good cause therefor.
4. Any revocation or suspension applies only to the license granted to a person for the particular office for which grounds for revocation or suspension exist.
5. An order suspending or revoking a license becomes effective 5 days after being entered unless the order specifies otherwise or a stay is granted.
Sec. 73. NRS 680B.037 is hereby amended to read as follows:
680B.037 Payment
1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, payment by an insurer of the tax imposed by NRS 680B.027 is in lieu of all taxes imposed by the State or any city, town or county upon premiums or upon income of insurers and of franchise, privilege or other taxes measured by income of the insurer.
2. The provisions of subsection 1 do not apply to the tax imposed pursuant to the provisions of sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act.
Sec. 74. NRS 683A.451 is hereby amended to read as follows:
683A.451 The Commissioner may refuse to issue a license or certificate pursuant to this chapter or may place any person to whom a license or certificate is issued pursuant to this chapter on probation, suspend the person for not more than 12 months, or revoke or refuse to renew his or her license or certificate, or may impose an administrative fine or take any combination of the foregoing actions, for one or more of the following causes:
1. Providing incorrect, misleading, incomplete or partially untrue information in his or her application for a license.
2. Violating a law regulating insurance, or violating a regulation, order or subpoena of the Commissioner or an equivalent officer of another state.
3. Obtaining or attempting to obtain a license through misrepresentation or fraud.
4. Misappropriating, converting or improperly withholding money or property received in the course of the business of insurance.
5. Intentionally misrepresenting the terms of an actual or proposed contract of or application for insurance.
6. Conviction of a felony.
7. Admitting or being found to have committed an unfair trade practice or fraud.
8. Using fraudulent, coercive or dishonest practices, or demonstrated incompetence, untrustworthiness or financial irresponsibility in the conduct of business in this State or elsewhere.
9. Denial, suspension or revocation of a license as a producer of insurance, or its equivalent, in any other state, territory or province.
10. Forging another's name to an application for insurance or any other document relating to the transaction of insurance.
11. Improperly using notes or other reference material to complete an examination for a license related to insurance.
12. Knowingly accepting business related to insurance from an unlicensed person.
13. Failing to comply with an administrative or judicial order imposing an obligation of child support.
14. Failing to pay a tax as required pursuant to the provisions of chapter 363A of NRS . or sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act.
Sec. 75. NRS 686C.360 is hereby amended to read as follows:
686C.360 The Association is exempt from payment of all fees and all taxes levied by this state or any of its political subdivisions, except taxes on property . and the tax imposed pursuant to sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act.
Sec. 76. NRS 687A.130 is hereby amended to read as follows:
687A.130 The Association is exempt from payment of all fees and all taxes levied by this State or any of its subdivisions, except taxes:
1. Levied on real or personal property; or
2. Imposed pursuant to the provisions of chapter 363A or 363B of NRS . or sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act.
Sec. 77. NRS 688C.210 is hereby amended to read as follows:
688C.210 1. After notice, and after a hearing if requested, the Commissioner may suspend, revoke, refuse to issue or refuse to renew a license under this chapter if the Commissioner finds that:
- (a) There was material misrepresentation in the application for the license;
- (b) The licensee or an officer, partner, member or significant managerial employee has been convicted of fraudulent or dishonest practices, is subject to a final administrative action for disqualification, or is otherwise shown to be untrustworthy or incompetent;
- (c) A provider of viatical settlements has engaged in a pattern of unreasonable payments to viators;
- (d) The applicant or licensee has been found guilty or guilty but mentally ill of, or pleaded guilty, guilty but mentally ill or nolo contendere to, a felony or a misdemeanor involving fraud, forgery, embezzlement, obtaining money under false pretenses, larceny, extortion, conspiracy to defraud or any crime involving moral turpitude, whether or not a judgment of conviction has been entered by the court;
- (e) A provider of viatical settlements has entered into a viatical settlement in a form not approved pursuant to NRS 688C.220;
- (f) A provider of viatical settlements has failed to honor obligations of a viatical settlement or an agreement to purchase a viatical settlement;
- (g) The licensee no longer meets a requirement for initial licensure;
- (h) A provider of viatical settlements has assigned, transferred or pledged a viaticated policy to a person other than another provider licensed under this chapter, a purchaser of the viatical settlement or a special organization;
- (i) The applicant or licensee has provided materially untrue information to an insurer that issued a policy that is the subject of a viatical settlement;
- (j) The applicant or licensee has failed to pay a tax as required pursuant to the provisions of chapter 363A of NRS
;or sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act; - (k) The applicant or licensee has violated a provision of this chapter or other applicable provisions; or
- (l) The applicant or licensee has acted in bad faith with regard to a viator.
2. A suspension imposed for grounds set forth in paragraph (k) or (l) of subsection 1 must not exceed a period of 12 months.
3. If the Commissioner takes action as described in subsection 1, the applicant or licensee may apply in writing for a hearing before the Commissioner to determine the reasonableness of the action taken by the Commissioner, pursuant to the provisions of NRS 679B.310 to 679B.370, inclusive.
Sec. 78. NRS 694C.450 is hereby amended to read as follows:
694C.450 1. Except as otherwise provided in this section, a captive insurer shall pay to the Division, not later than March 1 of each year, a tax at the rate of:
- (a) Two-fifths of 1 percent on the first $20,000,000 of its net direct premiums;
- (b) One-fifth of 1 percent on the next $20,000,000 of its net direct premiums; and
- (c) Seventy-five thousandths of 1 percent on each additional dollar of its net direct premiums.
2. Except as otherwise provided in this section, a captive insurer shall pay to the Division, not later than March 1 of each year, a tax at a rate of:
- (a) Two hundred twenty-five thousandths of 1 percent on the first $20,000,000 of revenue from assumed reinsurance premiums;
- (b) One hundred fifty thousandths of 1 percent on the next $20,000,000 of revenue from assumed reinsurance premiums; and
- (c) Twenty-five thousandths of 1 percent on each additional dollar of revenue from assumed reinsurance premiums.
The tax on reinsurance premiums pursuant to this subsection must not be levied on premiums for risks or portions of risks which are subject to taxation on a direct basis pursuant to subsection 1. A captive insurer is not required to pay any reinsurance premium tax pursuant to this subsection on revenue related to the receipt of assets by the captive insurer in exchange for the assumption of loss reserves and other liabilities of another insurer that is under common ownership and control with the captive insurer, if the transaction is part of a plan to discontinue the operation of the other insurer and the intent of the parties to the transaction is to renew or maintain such business with the captive insurer.
3. If the sum of the taxes to be paid by a captive insurer calculated pursuant to subsections 1 and 2 is less than $5,000 in any given year, the captive insurer shall pay a tax of $5,000 for that year. The maximum aggregate tax for any year must not exceed $175,000. The maximum aggregate tax to be paid by a sponsored captive insurer applies only to each protected cell and does not apply to the sponsored captive insurer as a whole.
4. Two or more captive insurers under common ownership and control must be taxed as if they were a single captive insurer.
5. Notwithstanding any specific statute to the contrary and except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the tax provided for by this section constitutes all the taxes collectible pursuant to the laws of this State from a captive insurer, and no occupation tax or other taxes may be levied or collected from a captive insurer by this State or by any county, city or municipality within this State, except for taxes imposed pursuant to chapter 363A or 363B of NRS or sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act and ad valorem taxes on real or personal property located in this State used in the production of income by the captive insurer.
6. Twenty-five percent of the revenues collected from the tax imposed pursuant to this section must be deposited with the State Treasurer for credit to the Account for the Regulation and Supervision of Captive Insurers created pursuant to NRS 694C.460. The remaining 75 percent of the revenues collected must be deposited with the State Treasurer for credit to the State General Fund.
7. A captive insurer that is issued a license pursuant to this chapter after July 1, 2003, is entitled to receive a nonrefundable credit of $5,000 applied against the aggregate taxes owed by the captive insurer for the first year in which the captive insurer incurs any liability for the payment of taxes pursuant to this section. A captive insurer is entitled to a nonrefundable credit pursuant to this section not more than once after the captive insurer is initially licensed pursuant to this chapter.
8. As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires:
- (a) “Common ownership and control” means:
- (1) In the case of a stock insurer, the direct or indirect ownership of 80 percent or more of the outstanding voting stock of two or more corporations by the same member or members.
- (2) In the case of a mutual insurer, the direct or indirect ownership of 80 percent or more of the surplus and the voting power of two or more corporations by the same member or members.
- (b) “Net direct premiums” means the direct premiums collected or contracted for on policies or contracts of insurance written by a captive insurer during the preceding calendar year, less the amounts paid to policyholders as return premiums, including dividends on unabsorbed premiums or premium deposits returned or credited to policyholders.
Sec. 79. NRS 695A.550 is hereby amended to read as follows:
695A.550 Every society organized or licensed under this chapter is hereby declared to be a charitable and benevolent institution, and is exempt from every state, county, district, municipal and school tax other than the tax imposed pursuant to sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act and taxes on real property and office equipment.
Sec. 80. 1. Subject to the provisions of section 82 of this act, there is hereby appropriated from the State General Fund to the Department of Taxation for the initial costs of administering the provisions of sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act:
For fiscal year 2013-2014 .............................................................................$2,900,000
For fiscal year 2014-2015 .............................................................................$2,700,000
2. The sums appropriated by subsection 1 are available for either fiscal year. Any remaining balance of the appropriation made by subsection 1 must not be committed for expenditure after June 30, 2015, and reverts to the State General Fund as soon as all payments of money committed have been made.
Sec. 81. 1. Subject to the provisions of section 82 of this act, there is hereby appropriated from the State General Fund to the Department of Taxation for the initial costs of administering the provisions of sections 3 to 45, inclusive, of this act:
For fiscal year 2014-2015 .............................................................................$1,400,000
For fiscal year 2015-2016 .............................................................................$4,200,000
2. The sums appropriated by subsection 1 are available for either fiscal year. Any remaining balance of the appropriation made by subsection 1 must not be committed for expenditure after June 30, 2016, and reverts to the State General Fund as soon as all payments of money committed have been made.
Sec. 82. The amendatory provisions of sections 50 and 51 of this act, as applicable, are intended to raise the revenue necessary to support the appropriation made by section 80 or 81 of this act, whichever becomes effective, as required by Section 6 of Article 19 of the Nevada Constitution. If the revenue so raised is not sufficient to support the full amount of the appropriation in either fiscal year, the appropriation for that year is reduced to the extent of the deficiency.
Sec. 83. 1. If this act is enacted by the 77th Session of the Legislature and approved by the Governor as provided in subsection 3 of Section 2 of Article 19 of the Nevada Constitution:
- (a) This section, sections 1 to 21, inclusive, sections 23 to 50, inclusive, sections 53 to 80, inclusive, and sections 82 and 84 of this act become effective on July 1, 2013.
- (b) Section 22 of this act becomes effective on January 1, 2014.
- (c) Section 50 of this act expires by limitation on June 30, 2015.
- (d) Sections 51, 52 and 81 of this act shall not become effective.
2. If this act is not enacted and approved as provided in subsection 1, but is approved by the voters after the act has been referred or submitted to the voters pursuant to subsection 3 of Section 18 of Article 4 or subsection 3 of Section 2 of Article 19 of the Nevada Constitution:
- (a) This section, sections 1 to 50, inclusive, sections 53 to 79, inclusive, and sections 81, 82 and 84 of this act become effective on January 1, 2015.
- (b) Section 51 of this act becomes effective on July 1, 2015.
- (c) Section 52 of this act becomes effective on July 1, 2016.
- (d) Section 80 of this act shall not become effective.
3. For the purposes of subsection 1, this act shall be deemed to have been approved by the Governor if, in accordance with Section 35 of Article 4 of the Nevada Constitution:
- (a) The Governor signs the act;
- (b) The act is passed by both Houses of the Legislature during its 77th Session notwithstanding the objections of the Governor; or
- (c) The Governor fails to return or file the act within the time provided by Section 35 of Article 4 of the Nevada Constitution.
Sec. 84. If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held to invalid or ineffective, that invalidity or ineffectiveness must be given the narrowest possible construction and shall not affect any other provision or application of this act.
Fiscal note
The fiscal note was as follows:[5]
“ | FINANCIAL IMPACT – CANNOT BE DETERMINED
OVERVIEW Question 3 proposes to amend Title 32 of the Nevada Revised Statutes to impose a new margin tax on the taxable margin of specified business entities in the state. The proceeds of the tax, less administrative costs incurred by the Department of Taxation, would be deposited in the State Distributive School Account. Question 3 requires that appropriations be made from the State General Fund to the Department of Taxation for the initial costs of administering the margin tax. Question 3 also proposes a temporary increase in the rate of the Modified Business Tax on Financial Institutions to generate revenue to support the appropriations made to the Department. FINANCIAL IMPACT OF QUESTION 3 The provisions of Question 3 would require specified business entities in the state whose total revenue exceeds $1 million to pay an annual tax at a rate of 2 percent of the taxable margin of the business entity (margin tax). The provisions of Question 3 require that the proceeds from the margin tax be deposited in the State Distributive School Account (DSA). An amount that is necessary to defray the cost of the administration of the margin tax may be withheld from these proceeds by the Department of Taxation, for deposit in the State General Fund. The provisions of Question 3 also require a temporary increase in the rate of the current Modified Business Tax on Financial Institutions (MBT-FI), from the current rate of 2 percent to a rate of 2.29 percent in the last six months of Fiscal Year 2015 and 2.42 percent in Fiscal Year 2016. The revenue generated from this temporary increase in the MBT-FI is intended to raise the revenue necessary to support the appropriations made from the State General Fund to the Department of Taxation for the initial costs of administering the margin tax. If the revenue raised from the increase in the MBT-FI is not sufficient to support the full amount of the appropriation in either fiscal year, the appropriation for that fiscal year is reduced to the extent of the deficiency. If approved by the voters, the provisions of Question 3 would become effective on January 1, 2015, but would not result in additional revenue for the DSA until the last three months of Fiscal Year 2016. However, the Fiscal Analysis Division cannot predict what regulations or other actions may be taken by the Department of Taxation to implement and administer the margin tax that may affect a taxpayer’s taxable margin or tax liability, nor can it predict the timing by which revenue would be received due to the ability of taxpayers to file extensions. Thus, while additional revenue will be generated for the DSA in Fiscal Years 2016 and 2017 and in future fiscal years, the Fiscal Analysis Division has not prepared an estimate of the amount of revenue that would be generated for the DSA during these years due to the multitude of assumptions that would need to be made and the uncertainty regarding how the assumptions made would impact the revenue estimates. Question 3 requires appropriations to be made from the State General Fund to the Department of Taxation in the amount of $1.4 million for the last six months of Fiscal Year 2015 and $4.2 million for Fiscal Year 2016, if Question 3 is approved by the voters.Question 3 specifies that the proceeds from the temporary increase in the MBT-FI rate are intended to raise the revenue necessary to support the appropriations made from the State General Fund to the Department of Taxation for the initial costs of administering the margin tax. The Fiscal Analysis Division cannot state with certainty whether the rate increase for the MBT-FI would generate sufficient revenue to support the required appropriations. However, it is reasonable to conclude that the appropriation amounts required would be supported by the 0.29 percent and 0.42 percent increase in the MBT-FI rate, based on an analysis of the historical actual tax collections from FY 2005 to FY 2013. The Fiscal Analysis Division has determined that imposition of the margin tax would increase state government expenditures, due to increased costs of administration and enforcement that would be borne by the Department of Taxation. The Department of Taxation, based on a request made by the Fiscal Analysis Division, has estimated that its initial costs of administration would be approximately $1.4 million in Fiscal Year 2015 and $3.9 million in Fiscal Year 2016, for a two-year total of approximately $5.3 million. The Department estimated that future ongoing costs of enforcement and administration of the margin tax would be approximately $12.1 million per biennium. Based on the estimate of $5.3 million for the initial costs of administration provided by the Department of Taxation, the $5.6 million in appropriations from the State General Fund included in Question 3 would be sufficient to support the initial costs of administering the margin tax. Question 3 may result in a negative impact on the State General Fund from the initial costs of administration of the margin tax if: 1) The actual proceeds generated from the temporary increase in the MBT-FI are not sufficient to fund the General Fund appropriations included in Question 3; 2) The actual costs for the initial administration of the margin tax are greater than the amount of the appropriations specified in Question 3; or 3) The actual costs for the initial administration of the margin tax are greater than the amount of revenue generated from the temporary increase in the MBT-FI. Question 3 may result in a positive impact on the State General Fund if the amount of revenue generated from the temporary increase in the MBT-FI is greater than the actual costs for the initial administration of the margin tax incurred by the Department of Taxation. [6] |
” |
Background
In 2006, Texas implemented a margin tax, which supporters of the Nevada tax have used as a model in crafting their own. The tax fully went into effect in 2008, after significant resistance from small businesses. Officials anticipated the tax would raise $5.9 billion per year, with some putting that number even higher at approximately $12 billion. However, 2008 saw only $4.45 billion in revenue from the margin tax and that number fell below $4 billion by 2009.[7]
Support
Supporters called the measure The Education Initiative.[3]The Education Initiative PAC advocated for the initiative.[8]
The measure was initiated by the Nevada AFL-CIO and the Nevada State Education Association, the state affiliate of the National Education Association, though it is now only supported by the NSEA.[3][2]
Arguments
The Education Initiative PAC provided its fact sheet to argue in support of the initiative:
“ | Nevada is 49th in per pupil spending
Nevada has the lowest corporate taxes in the United States
Education in Nevada has suffered through over $700 million in cuts since 2009
A study referred to Brian Sandoval's 2011 proposed cuts to k-12 education as "by far the largest in modern history" of Nevada
87% of Nevada Businesses would be unaffected by TEI
Research shows that a high-quality education increases the earnings of individuals and the economic health of their communities.
|
” |
—The Education Initiative PAC |
An "explanatory video" put out by The Education Initiative PAC.
|
The Nevada State Education Association argued the following in support of the initiative:[10]
- "Education is everyone’s responsibility. Businesses benefit from a qualified, educated workforce, yet they do not pay their fair share. At a critical time in Nevada’s economy, it is imperative big businesses invest in K-12 education to ensure our economy turns around and improves."
- "Funds raised through the Education Initiative will go directly to the Distributive Schools Account—the education budget—in the state’s general fund. This funding can be used to reduce class sizes, more tools and technology, early childhood education, a safe and supportive learning environment, and the ability to attract and retain quality educators [sic]."
Campaign contributions
As of the most recent report filing on December 31, 2014, the Education Initiative PAC had received $1,888,204 in contributions.[11] The following information was accurate as of October 31, 2014.
PAC info:
PAC | Amount raised | Amount spent |
---|---|---|
Education Initiative PAC | $1,888,204 | $1,642,691 |
Total | $1,888,204 | $1,642,691 |
An Yes on 3 video put out by iVoters.
|
Top 3 contributors:
Donor | Amount |
---|---|
Nevada State Education Association | $1,135,000 |
National Education Association | $100,000 |
Nevadans For The American Dream | $1,000 |
Committee to Elect Segerblom | $250 |
AFL-CIO opposition
The measure was initiated by the Nevada AFL-CIO and the Nevada State Education Association, the state affiliate of the National Education Association.[3] However, Executive Secretary Treasurer Danny Thompson of the AFL-CIO, despite giving his prior support, criticized the plan, saying he supports a smaller margin tax of 0.8 percent. The Nevada AFL-CIO decided to hold a vote in May 2014 as to whether to support the initiative.[12] On May 2, 2014, the AFL-CIO officially voted to oppose the measure.[2] After the resolution opposing the measure was passed, Thompson released the following statement:
“ |
The Nevada State AFL-CIO has always supported funding education to the National Average. There is no equivocation on our support for funding our schools so that our children receive a great education. We are a strong voice and advocate at every level of government for more funding for classrooms, teachers, and school buildings. The vote today in opposition to the margins tax initiative is not a vote against education. It is a vote against a flawed initiative that will cost many of our members their jobs and raise the cost of living on Nevadans on a fixed income and on citizens that are still struggling to make ends meet after years of a terrible recession.[6] |
” |
—Danny Thompson of Nevada AFL-CIO[2] |
Read the full text of the resolution opposing Question 3 here.
Opposition
Opponents called the measure The Margin Tax Initiative.[4] NO on 3: Coalition to Defeat the Margin Tax Initiative led the campaign against the initiative.[4]
Opponents
Officials
Organizations
- Associated Builders and Contractors, Nevada Chapter[16]
- Associated General Contractors, Nevada Chapter
- Associated General Contractors, Las Vegas Chapter
- Builders Association of Western Nevada (BAWN)
- Carson Valley Chamber of Commerce
- Economic Development Authority of Western Nevada (EDAWN)
- Elko Area Chamber of Commerce
- The Fallon Chamber of Commerce
- Financial and Intangible Assets Enterprises (FIAE)
- Las Vegas Metro Chamber of Commerce
- National Association of Industrial and Office Properties (NAIOP), Northern and Southern Nevada Chapters
- National Federation of Independent Business – Nevada
- Nevada AFL-CIO
- Nevada Association of Employers
- Nevada Farm Bureau Federation
- Nevada Manufacturers Association
- Nevada Mining Association
- Nevada Policy Research Institute
- Nevada Resort Association
- Nevada Restaurant Association
- Nevada Taxpayers Association
- Retail Association of Nevada
- Southern Nevada Homebuilders Association
- The Chamber of Reno, Sparks, and Northern Nevada
Individuals
- Jim Murren, CEO of MGM[13]
Arguments
A NO on 3 advertisement featuring Rebecaa Merrihew, the owner of Red Rock Insulation.
|
NO on 3: Coalition to Defeat the Margin Tax Initiative provided its fact sheet to argue against the initiative. The fact sheet included the following points:[17]
- "Overall, it would dump a massive $750 million increase on the costs of doing business for Nevada employers. That would severely damage our state’s already struggling economy and job market."
- "Proponents claim that the $1 million gross revenues threshold protects small businesses. But in reality, the Margin Tax Initiative would hurt thousands of small businesses in Nevada that have total annual gross revenues of over $1 million but also have high overhead and very small profit margins – such as family-owned restaurants, medical clinics, daycare centers, repair shops, veterinarians, janitorial services, ranches, and farms."
- "The Margin Tax Initiative contains 84 sections of complicated legal and technical language that would create a logistical and legal nightmare for businesses to navigate."
- "In fact, for businesses, the Margin Tax Initiative would make Nevada one of the highest taxed states in which to operate. This would severely damage our state’s struggling economy, cause the loss of thousands of existing jobs and make it nearly impossible to attract new businesses and jobs to Nevada."
- "Even if the legislature decides that education should get more money through the Margin Tax, the initiative provides no plans or requirements to ensure that its revenues go to the classroom instead of into the hands of bureaucrats."
- "Nevada’s unemployment rate is still one of the highest in the nation and the Margin Tax Initiative would only make it worse. Large employers like gaming companies, banks, hospitals, and manufacturing companies would be forced to lay off workers, and many small businesses would be forced to downsize or close altogether."
- "The Margin Tax Initiative would impose a new 2% tax on revenues generated by almost all types of goods and services sold in Nevada, including: food, clothing and other retail store products; gas, electricity and telephone services; prescription medicines sold by pharmacies; and, medical care provided by doctors and hospitals. Ultimately, the providers of these goods and services would pass on some or all of their tax increase to Nevada consumers."
Campaign contributions
As of the most recent report filing on December 31, 2014, the Coalition to Defeat the Margin Tax Initiative had received $5,624,859 in contributions.[18]
Total campaign cash ![]() as of October 31, 2014 | |
![]() |
$1,888,204 |
![]() |
$5,659,759 |
PAC info:
PAC | Amount raised | Amount spent |
---|---|---|
Coalition to Defeat the Margin Tax Initiative | $5,659,759 | $4,950,742 |
Total | $5,659,759 | $4,950,742 |
Top contributors:
Donor | Amount |
---|---|
Las Vegas Metro Chamber of Commerce BIZPAC | $583,425 |
Nevada Resort Association | $571,000 |
Sands | $250,000 |
Cox Communications | $250,000 |
Nevada Mining Association, Inc. | $225,000 |
Retail Association of Nevada | $217,600 |
Nevada Franchise Auto Dealers Association | $187,331 |
Farmers Group, Inc. | $150,000 |
RAN Services | $105,000 |
Nevada Franchised Auto Dealers Association | $100,000 |
Caesars Entertainment Operating Company | $100,000 |
MGM Resorts | $100,000 |
Media editorial positions
Opposition
- The Las Vegas Review-Journal said,
“ | More money, by itself, won’t make our schools better, and Question 3 includes no education reforms as part of its language. That’s by design. Question 3 was written to be a reform killer. The path to improved school funding in Nevada has always been a policy trade-off: reforms and accountability for revenues. That’s how teacher tenure guarantees were stripped down and how teacher evaluations were enacted earlier this decade. But if voters deliver a huge new pile of revenue to the Legislature’s majority Democrats, those lawmakers won’t have to vote for reforms the teachers unions hate, such as performance pay and stronger charter school laws. Question 3 would preserve the failing status quo.
The margins tax doesn’t guarantee better schools. But it does guarantee a much worse economy. This tax, which purportedly benefits our children, will make it much harder for graduates — and their parents and everyone else in Nevada — to find jobs in a state that already has one of the highest unemployment rates in America.[6] |
” |
—Las Vegas Review-Journal[19] |
- The Moapa Valley Progress said,
“ | Question 3 would damage the Nevada economy and be a disaster for Nevada businesses. Proponents are insisting that the $1 million threshold protects small businesses and only affects those “evil” large corporations. But $1 million in gross revenues is not a whole lot in business. Indeed it pulls in many much smaller businesses as well. Given that threshhold, the tax might very well affect many small businesses right here on the main street of Overton, as well as on the main streets of many other small towns in the state. The fact is, this measure would hurt small business most of all.
While the adequate funding of education is a worthy and important goal, Question 3 is the wrong way to go about it. Question 3 is an extremely regressive tax. It would hurt the little guys the most. It would damage the Nevada economy and its citizens just when an economic recovery is starting to take hold in the state. And, in the end, the real benefits to K-12 education are quite arguable to say the least. We recommend a NO vote on Question 3.[6] |
” |
—Moapa Valley Progress[20] |
- The Reno Gazette-Journal said,
“ | The voters should reject Question 3 and then ensure that Gov. Brian Sandoval makes good on his promise to submit a new tax plan early in the 2015 session of the Legislature to give the lawmakers plenty of time to digest the governor's plan and approve it before the 180-day limit on the session runs out. Nevadans cannot afford any more excuses by legislators unwilling to make hard decisions on a 21st century tax policy.[6] | ” |
—Reno Gazette-Journal[21] |
- The Las Vegas Sun said,
“ | If voters do the right thing and defeat Question 3, the burden will be on the governor and the Legislature to take the vote as a mandate. They must step up and address the needs of education and provide the proper tax policy to fund it. If they don’t, voters must hold them accountable at the next election, and a poorly worded ballot question would only be the start. The Sun endorses a no vote on Question 3.[6] | ” |
—Las Vegas Sun[22] |
Polls
- See also: Polls, 2014 ballot measures
Nevada Question 3 (2014) | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poll | Support | Oppose | Undecided | Margin of error | Sample size | ||||||||||||||
Survey USA 10/16/2014 - 10/21/2014 | 49% | 34% | 17% | +/-4.1 | 434 | ||||||||||||||
Survey USA 9/29/2014 - 10/01/2014 | 37% | 40% | 23% | +/-4.2 | 569 | ||||||||||||||
Harstad Strategic Research 9/18/2013 - 9/24/2013 | 61% | 34% | 5% | +/-3.4 | 819 | ||||||||||||||
Public Opinion Strategies 2/16/2013 - 2/18/2013 | 58% | 39% | 3% | +/-4.4 | 500 | ||||||||||||||
AVERAGES | 51.25% | 36.75% | 12% | +/-4.03 | 580.5 | ||||||||||||||
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org. |
Reports and analyses
Applied Analysis
Applied Analysis was hired by the Coalition to Defeat the Margin Tax to analyze Nevada Ballot Question #3. However, both opponents and supporters have cited the study as supporting their position.[23][24] Applied Analysis stated their neutrality, saying, “Applied Analysis offers no opinion as to the policy merits of the proposed margin tax. Our task was not to determine whether the levy is “good” or “bad” or whether it is “needed” from a revenue sufficiency standpoint; rather, our sole focus is to estimate the approximate yield of the proposed margin tax and to evaluate its expected incidence on various sectors of the economy as well as various types of businesses.” The following is an excerpt from their findings summary:
“ |
|
” |
—Applied Analysis |
Nevada Policy Research Institute
Geoffrey Lawrence, deputy director of policy at the Nevada Policy Research Institute (NPRI), authored a comprehensive study of the proposed Nevada margin tax. In it, he took a closer look at how the Texas tax disproportionally affects certain industries within the state:[26]
The study further examined the proposed margins tax in Nevada and the role it would play within the broad spectrum of tax reform. NPRI came to the conclusion that the tax would do the following:
“ |
|
” |
—Geoffrey Lawrence of NPRI[26] |
The Executive Summary of the report went on to say, "A business margin tax in Texas — after which the unions' proposal is modeled — has been widely recognized as a tax-policy failure. In 2009 alone, Texas lawmakers heard more than 100 bills proposing to modify or repeal the tax. Nevada should look to import successful policies from other states — not failing ones."[26]
Tax Foundation
Basing their information on a study by Billy Hamilton entitled "Cosmetic Surgery for the Texas Margin Tax," an article compiled by the Tax Foundation stated:
“ |
Far from solving the problems of the previous corporate franchise tax, the margin tax seems to have only aggravated them. The tax was designed to reach businesses not reached by the corporate income tax, including partnerships, unprofitable businesses, and small businesses. As the tax was enacted, however, legislators expanded exclusions in the face of arguments that hefty tax compliance costs on small businesses were disproportionate.[6] |
” |
—Tax Foundation[7] |
Path to the ballot
Proponents of the measure were required to collect and submit 72,324 valid signatures by November 13, 2012. According to Lynn Warne of the Nevada State Education Association, 150,000 signatures were collected.[27] Since the measure was submitted as an indirect initiated state statute, it was first sent to the state legislature. The legislature had the opportunity to either approve the measure, thus keeping the initiative off the ballot, or ignore or defeat the measure, thus putting the initiative on the ballot. Voting down an initiative would have given the legislature the ability to offer a competing measure alongside the initiative.
In the legislature
The Nevada Legislature did not take action on the initiative within the forty-day limit prescribed by the Nevada Constitution. The constitution allows the governor or legislature to place a competing measure on the ballot, meaning that constituents would vote on two alternative measures and whichever one received the largest majority would be approved. However, the constitution appears to require that to place an alternative on the ballot, the legislature must first vote down the indirect initiative. Republicans in support of a competing measure said that no action was equivalent to a de facto rejection. However, the Nevada State Education Association claimed the opposite, that no action was not de facto rejection. Rick Combs, Director of the Legislative Counsel Bureau, said, “We don’t believe it’s an issue that has been decided before.”[28]
The Nevada Secretary of State, in communication with the attorney general, determined that no action by the legislature did not equate to de facto rejection. Therefore, an alternative competing measure could not appear on the ballot.[29]
See also
External links
Information
Support
Opposition
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Nevada Secretary of State, "The Education Initiative," accessed May 1, 2014
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Las Vegas Review Journal, "Nevada AFL-CIO opposes proposed margins tax to fund public schools," May 2, 2014
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Las Vegas Review-Journal, "Tax plan has miles to go before it's passed," June 8, 2012
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 NO on 3: Coalition to Defeat the Margin Tax Initiative
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 Nevada Secretary of State, "Question No. 3," accessed September 19, 2014
- ↑ 6.00 6.01 6.02 6.03 6.04 6.05 6.06 6.07 6.08 6.09 6.10 6.11 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 Tax Foundation, "Nevada May Consider New Business Taxes," May 18, 2011
- ↑ The Education Initiative, "Homepage," accessed October 31, 2014
- ↑ The Education Initiative, "Facts," accessed May 1, 2014
- ↑ Nevada State Education Association, "The Education Initiative," accessed May 1, 2014
- ↑ Nevada Secretary of State Campaign Finance Disclosure, "The Education Initiative PAC," accessed December 7, 2014
- ↑ Las Vegas Review-Journal, "Business margins tax on Nevada ballot could pit union against union," January 25, 2014
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 RGJ, "'The Education Initiative' will be tough to beat by Nevada businesses, top politicians," March 25, 2014
- ↑ RGJ, "‘Game on’ in battle over Nevada margins tax vote," April 26, 2014
- ↑ Las Vegas Review-Journal, "Democratic lieutenant governor candidate Flores opposes proposed margins tax," April 27, 2014
- ↑ NO on 3: Coalition to Defeat the Margin Tax Initiative, "Who We Are," accessed May 1, 2014
- ↑ NO on 3: Coalition to Defeat the Margin Tax Initiative, "Information about the Margin Tax Initiative," accessed May 1, 2014
- ↑ Nevada Secretary of State Campaign Finance Disclosure, "Coalition to Defeat the Margin Tax Initiative," accessed December 7, 2014
- ↑ Las Vegas Review-Journal, "EDITORIAL: Vote no on Question 3," September 28, 2014
- ↑ Moapa Valley Progress, "EDITORIAL: A Brief Guide to NV Ballot Questions," October 22, 2014
- ↑ Reno Gazette-Journal, "Editorial: Question 3 isn't answer to Nevada's tax woes," October 23, 2014
- ↑ Las Vegas Sun, "Endorsements for state questions," October 21, 2014
- ↑ News 3, "Hugh Jackson Commentary," May 1, 2014
- ↑ Las Vegas Sun, "How many jobs would be lost if Nevada margin tax passes? It depends," April 9, 2014
- ↑ Applied Analysis, "The Fiscal and Economic Impacts of Nevada Question #3," February 2014
- ↑ 26.0 26.1 26.2 Nevada Policy Research Institute, "Facts and fiction about the unions tax initiative," June 27, 2012
- ↑ RGJ, "At bat Tuesday at the Nevada Legislature: Hearing on that 'dreaded' margins tax," February 28, 2013
- ↑ Las Vegas Sun, “OK, voters, margins tax ball is now in your court,” March 15, 2013
- ↑ Las Vegas Sun, “Teachers’ business-tax measure catches break on 2014 ballot,” April 2, 2013
![]() |
State of Nevada Carson City (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |