Nevada Question 2, District Courts Writ Authority Amendment (1992)
Nevada Question 2 | |
---|---|
Election date |
|
Topic State judiciary |
|
Status |
|
Type Legislatively referred constitutional amendment |
Origin |
Nevada Question 2 was on the ballot as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment in Nevada on November 3, 1992. It was approved.
A "yes" vote supported allowing District Courts to issue habeas corpus and prohibition writs for certain convicted individuals. |
A "no" vote opposed allowing District Courts to issue habeas corpus and prohibition writs for certain convicted individuals. |
Election results
Nevada Question 2 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
279,273 | 60.43% | |||
No | 182,854 | 39.57% |
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Question 2 was as follows:
“ | Shall the Nevada Constitution be amended to clarify the authority of District Courts to issue writs of prohibition and to authorize District Courts to issue writs of habeas corpus on behalf of persons who have been convicted of crimes within their respective jurisdictions but who have not completed their sentences? | ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Path to the ballot
- See also: Amending the Nevada Constitution
A simple majority vote is required during two successive legislative sessions for the Nevada State Legislature to place a constitutional amendment on the ballot. That amounts to a minimum of 22 votes in the Nevada State Assembly and 11 votes in the Nevada State Senate, assuming no vacancies. Amendments do not require the governor's signature to be referred to the ballot.
See also
External links
Footnotes
![]() |
State of Nevada Carson City (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |