Nevada Question 2, Minimum Wage Amendment (2022)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Nevada Question 2
Flag of Nevada.png
Election date
November 8, 2022
Topic
Minimum wage
Status
On the ballot
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature

Nevada Question 2, the Minimum Wage Amendment, is on the ballot in Nevada as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 8, 2022.

A "yes" vote supports amending the state constitution to:

  • increase the minimum wage for all employees in Nevada to $12 per hour by July 1, 2024; 
  • remove the existing annual inflation adjustments to the minimum wage; and 
  • allow the state legislature to pass a minimum wage law setting the rate higher than the constitutionally mandated minimum.

A "no" vote opposes this amendment, thereby maintaining the existing increase of the minimum wage to $11 for employees receiving health benefits and $12 for employees not receiving health benefits by 2024 with annual inflation adjustments required by the state constitution.


Overview

How would the amendment change the minimum wage in Nevada?

See also: Measure design

The amendment would increase the minimum wage in Nevada to $12 per hour by July 1, 2024, and stop the existing annual adjustments determined by inflation. The wage would apply to all workers regardless if they receive health benefits from their employers. It also would allow the legislature to pass laws that establish a higher minimum wage than the rate established by the amendment.[1]

On July 1, 2022, the minimum wage increased to $9.50 for employees with employer health benefits and $10.50 for employees without employer health benefits. Under Assembly Bill 456 (AB 456), which was passed in 2019, the rate is set to increase incrementally until 2024 when it reaches $11 and $12 for the respective employee tiers. The minimum wage would then be adjusted annually for inflation.[2]

When did the state first adopt a minimum wage in the state constitution?

See also: Minimum wage on the ballot in Nevada

A minimum wage of $5.15 per hour worked if the employer provides health benefits or $6.15 per hour worked if the employer does not provide health benefits was adopted in 2006 via an initiated constitutional amendment. In Nevada, initiated constitutional amendments need to be approved in two consecutive even-numbered election years. In 2004, Nevadans first approved Question 6 by a vote of 68.4% to 31.6%. The amendment tied the minimum wage to annual inflation increases but limited any annual increase to 3%. The amendment received final approval in 2006 by a vote of 68.7% to 31.3%.

Nevada is the sole state to constitutionally require a tiered minimum wage based on employee health benefits. The 2022 amendment would remove the tiered system.

What are supporters and opponents saying about the amendment?

See also: Support and Opposition

Assembly Speaker Jason Frierson (D) said, "The distinction between minimum wage depending on whether or not there is health care has been included in the Nevada constitution for some time. ... It’s important to note that Nevada is the only state that has this distinction. We’ve had numerous conversations in an attempt to define what health care benefits need to be in order to qualify. It’s an unusual way to calculate minimum wage and distinguish between minimum wage rates. We believe it’s time to make that change so Nevada can remain competitive to our surrounding states."[3]

Marcos Lopez, legislative liaison for Americans for Prosperity- Nevada, said, "AJR10 would lead to decreased economic opportunity for the very people it is intended to help. There is a strong body of research indicating that minimum wage policies reduce overall employment and have no negligible impacts on reducing poverty. No matter how well-intended, a significant increase to the Nevada minimum wage would undermine individual opportunity for tens of thousands of Nevada residents to earn a living while offering a positive short-term impact for very few current workers."[4]

Measure design

The amendment would increase the minimum wage in Nevada to $12 per hour by July 1, 2024, and stop the existing annual adjustments determined by inflation. The wage would apply to all workers regardless if they receive health benefits from their employers. It also would allow the legislature to pass laws that establish a higher minimum wage than the rate established by the amendment.[1]

In the 2019 state legislative session, the Nevada State Legislature passed Assembly Bill 456 (AB 456), which enacted a minimum wage increase beginning in 2020 at a rate of $8.00 for employees that received health benefits and $9.00 for those who did not. The rate is set to increase incrementally until 2024 when it reaches $11 and $12 for the respective employee tiers.[2]

Text of measure

Ballot title

The official ballot title is as follows:[1]

Question 2: Assembly Joint Resolution No. 10 of the 80th Session:

Shall the Nevada Constitution be amended, effective July 1, 2024, to: (1) establish the State’s minimum wage that employers must pay to certain employees at a rate of $12 per hour worked, subject to any applicable increases above that $12 rate provided by federal law or enacted by the Nevada Legislature; (2) remove the existing provisions setting different rates for the minimum wage based on whether the employer offers certain health benefits to such employees; and (3) remove the existing provisions for adjusting the minimum wage based on applicable increases in the cost of living? [5]

Ballot summary

The official ballot summary is as follows:[1]

This ballot measure amends the Nevada Constitution to require that, beginning July 1, 2024, each employer must pay each employee to whom the minimum wage requirements apply (referred to as a “nonexempt employee”) a minimum wage of not less than $12 per hour worked, subject to any applicable increases above $12 per hour worked provided by federal law or enacted by the Legislature.

This ballot measure further removes from the Nevada Constitution, effective July 1, 2024, the existing provisions allowing an employer that offers certain health benefits to nonexempt employees to pay a minimum wage of $1 per hour less than an employer that does not offer such health benefits to nonexempt employees.

This ballot measure also removes from the Nevada Constitution, effective July 1, 2024, the existing provisions adjusting the State’s minimum wage rates based on the greater of certain increases in the federal minimum wage or certain increases in the cost of living measured by percentage increases in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), with caps on the cost-of-living increases for the adjusted rates. However, this ballot measure requires the State’s minimum wage to be increased based on applicable increases in the federal minimum wage, providing that if, at any time, the federal minimum wage is greater than $12 per hour worked, the State’s minimum wage is increased to the amount established for the federal minimum wage, unless the Legislature establishes, by state statute, a minimum wage that is greater than the federal minimum wage as permitted by federal law.

This ballot measure additionally expresses in the Nevada Constitution the existing authority of the Legislature to establish, by state statute, a minimum wage that is greater than the minimum hourly rate required by the Nevada Constitution.

If approved by the voters, this ballot measure supersedes any conflicting provisions in the State’s existing minimum wage statutes which, on July 1, 2024, require an employer to pay a minimum wage of $11 per hour worked, if the employer offers certain health benefits to nonexempt employees, or $12 per hour worked, if the employer does not offer such health benefits to nonexempt employees, unless the Legislature amends those existing statutes to conform to this ballot measure before that date.

A “Yes” vote would, effective July 1, 2024: (1) add provisions in the Nevada Constitution establishing the State’s minimum wage that employers must pay to nonexempt employees at a rate of $12 per hour worked, subject to any applicable increases above that $12 rate provided by federal law or enacted by the Legislature; (2) remove the existing provisions in the Nevada Constitution setting different rates for the minimum wage based on whether the employer offers certain health benefits to such employees; and (3) remove the existing provisions in the Nevada Constitution for adjusting the minimum wage based on applicable increases in the cost of living, with caps on the cost-of-living increases for the adjusted rates.

A “No” vote would: (1) keep the State’s existing minimum wage, subject to any applicable increases or decreases provided by federal law or enacted by the Legislature; (2) keep the existing provisions in the Nevada Constitution setting different rates for the minimum wage based on whether the employer offers certain health benefits to nonexempt employees; and (3) keep the existing provisions in the Nevada Constitution for adjusting the minimum wage based on the greater of applicable increases in the federal minimum wage or applicable increases in the cost of living, with caps on the cost-of-living increases for the adjusted rates. [5]

Constitutional changes

See also: Article 15, Nevada Constitution

The measure would amend Section 16 of Article 15 of the Nevada Constitution. The following underlined text would be added, and struck-through text would be deleted:[1] Note: Use your mouse to scroll over the below text to see the full text.

Text of Section 16: Payment of Minimum Compensation to Employees

A. Each 1. Except as otherwise provided in this section, beginning July 1, 2024, each employer shall pay a wage to each employee of not less than the hourly rates set forth in this section. The rate shall be five dollars and fifteen cents ($5.15) twelve dollars ($12) per hour worked. , if the employer provides health benefits as described herein, or six dollars and fifteen cents ($6.15) per hour if the employer does not provide such benefits. Offering health benefits within the meaning of this section shall consist of making health insurance available to the employee for the employee and the employee’s dependents at a total cost to the employee for premiums of not more than 10 percent of the employee’s gross taxable income from the employer. These rates of wages shall be adjusted by the amount of increases in

2. If, at anytime, the amount of the federal minimum wage over $5.15 per hour, or, if greater, by the cumulative increase in the cost of living. The cost of living increase shall be measured by the percentage increase as of December 31 in any year over the level as of December 31, 2004 of the Consumer Price Index (All Urban Consumers, U.S. City Average) as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor or the successor index or federal agency. No CPI adjustment for any one-year period may be greater than 3%. The Governor or the State agency designated by the Governor shall publish a bulletin by April 1 of each year announcing the adjusted rates, which shall take effect the following July 1. Such bulletin will be made available to all employers and to any other person who has filed with the Governor or the designated agency a request to receive such notice but lack of notice shall not excuse noncompliance with this section. An employer shall provide written notification of the rate adjustments to each of its employees and make the necessary payroll adjustments by July 1 following the publication of the bulletin. is greater than twelve dollars ($12) per hour worked, each employer must pay a wage to each employee of not less than the hourly rate established for the federal minimum wage.

3. The legislature may establish by a law a minimum wage that an employer must pay to each employee that is greater than the hourly rate required by this section.

4. Tips or gratuities received by employees shall not be credited as being any part of or offset against the wage rates required by this section.

B. The

5. Except as otherwise provided in this section, the provisions of this section may not be waived by agreement between an individual employee and an his or her employer. All of the provisions of this section, or any part hereof, may be waived in a bona fide collective bargaining agreement, but only if the waiver is explicitly set forth in such agreement in clear and unambiguous terms. Unilateral implementation of terms and conditions of employment by either party to a collective bargaining relationship shall not constitute, or be permitted, as a waiver of all or any part of the provisions of this section.

6.An employer shall not, in any manner, discharge, reduce the compensation of or otherwise discriminate against any employee for using any civil remedies to enforce this section or otherwise asserting his or her rights under this section.

7.An employee claiming violation of this section may is entitled to bring an action against his or her employer in the courts of this State to enforce the provisions of this section and shall be entitled to all remedies available under the law or in equity appropriate to remedy any violation of this section, including but not limited to back pay, damages, reinstatement or injunctive relief. An employee who prevails in any action to enforce this section shall be awarded his or her reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.

C. 8. As used in this section, “employee”:

a. "Employee" means any person who is employed by an employer as defined herein but does not include an employee who is under eighteen (18) years of age, employed by a nonprofit organization for after school or summer employment or as a trainee for a period not longer than ninety (90) days.

b.“Employer” means any individual, proprietorship, partnership, joint venture, corporation, limited liability company, trust, association, or other entity that may employ individuals or enter into contracts of employment.

D.9. If any provision of this section is declared illegal, invalid or inoperative, in whole or in part, by the final decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions and all portions not declared illegal, invalid or inoperative shall remain in full force or effect, and no such determination shall invalidate the remaining sections or portions of the sections of this section.[5]

Full text

The full text is available here.

Support

Supporters

Officials

Organizations

  • Battle Born Progress

Arguments

  • Assembly Speaker Jason Frierson (D): "The distinction between minimum wage depending on whether or not there is health care has been included in the Nevada constitution for some time. ... It’s important to note that Nevada is the only state that has this distinction. We’ve had numerous conversations in an attempt to define what health care benefits need to be in order to qualify. It’s an unusual way to calculate minimum wage and distinguish between minimum wage rates. We believe it’s time to make that change so Nevada can remain competitive to our surrounding states."
  • Annette Magnus, the executive director of Battle Born Progress: "AJR10 is critical because businesses have been abusing the provision of connecting healthcare with the minimum wage. We have heard story after story where businesses are able to pay $1.00 less than the current minimum wage in the state simply because they offer unaffordable garbage healthcare plans that employees rarely opt into because of cost. ... AJR10 also puts the legislature in a position so that you, as our elected officials, can continue to improve people’s lives by ensuring that the minimum wage is raised to continue meeting increased costs of living instead of going through an intense process to make modifications."

Opposition

Opponents

Political Parties

Organizations

  • Americans for Prosperity - Nevada
  • Las Vegas Metro Chamber of Commerce
  • Nevada Families for Freedom

Arguments

  • Marcos Lopez, legislative liaison for Americans for Prosperity - Nevada: "AJR10 would lead to decreased economic opportunity for the very people it is intended to help. There is a strong body of research indicating that minimum wage policies reduce overall employment and have no negligible impacts on reducing poverty. No matter how well intended, a significant increase to the Nevada minimum wage would undermine individual opportunity for tens of thousands of Nevada residents to earn a living while offering a positive short-term impact for very few current workers."
  • Nevada Families for Freedom: "The minimum wage is designed for entry level jobs which will be eliminated depriving young people of work experience and opportunities. Higher minimum wage laws hurt the very people they are supposed to help including minorities, low skill workers and teenagers."

Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Nevada ballot measures

If you are aware of a committee registered to support or oppose this amendment, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Polls

See also: Nevada ballot measure polls
Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
Nevada Equal Rights Amendment (2022)
Poll
Dates
Sample size
Margin of error
Support
Oppose
Undecided
Suffolk University 8/14/22-8/17/22 500 LV ± 4.4% 70.8% 20.2% 7.8%
Question: "Another ballot initiative would change how Nevada’s minimum wage is handled. It closely mirrors existing state law but would allow the State Legislature to increase the minimum wage and would never let the state’s minimum wage fall below the federal minimum wage. At this point, do you strongly support, somewhat support, somewhat oppose, or strongly oppose this ballot initiative?"
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Background

Assembly Bill 456 (2019)

In the 2019 state legislative session, the Nevada State Legislature passed Assembly Bill 456 (AB 456), which enacted a minimum wage increase according to the following tiers and schedule:[2]


Effective date Rate for employees with employer health benefits Rate for employees without employer health benefits
July 1, 2020 $8.00 $9.00
July 1, 2021 $8.75 $9.75
July 1, 2022 $9.50 $10.50
July 1, 2023 $10.25 $11.25
July 1, 2024 $11.00 $12.00

Minimum wage on the ballot in Nevada

See also: Question 6 (2004) and Question 6 (2006)

In Nevada, initiated constitutional amendments need to be approved in two consecutive even-numbered election years. In 2004, Nevadans first approved Question 6 by a vote of 68.4% to 31.6%. The amendment added a new section to the Nevada Constitution that required employers to pay employees $5.15 per hour worked if the employer provides health benefits or $6.15 per hour worked if the employer does not provide health benefits. The amendment tied the minimum wage to annual inflation increases but limited any annual increase to 3%. The amendment received final approval in 2006 by a vote of 68.7% to 31.3%.

2021 minimum wages

The average state minimum wage in 2021 is about $9.59, up from $9.17 in 2020.

The highest statewide minimum wages are:

  • $14.00 in California,
  • $13.69 in Washington, and
  • $13.50 in Massachusetts.

In Washington, D.C., the minimum wage is $15 per hour. The lowest minimum wages based on state law are $5.15 in Georgia and Wyoming, which is lower than the federal government's requirement. In those states the federal minimum wage of $7.25 supersedes state law for most types of employees. Twenty (20) states use the federal minimum wage rate of $7.25.

The map below shows 2021 state minimum wages.

Outcomes of minimum wage measures, 1988-2020

From 1996 to 2021, there were 26 minimum wage increase measures on the ballot. Voters approved 24 (92.31%) and rejected two (7.69%).[6]

As of 2021, the last time that voters rejected a minimum wage increase measure was in 1996, when measures were defeated in Missouri and Montana.

The following chart shows election outcomes for minimum wage increase ballot measures from 1996 to 2021.

Measures to increase state minimum wages (1996-2021)
Year State Measure Wage Type Yes votes (%) No votes (%) Outcome
2020 Florida Amendment 2 $15.00 (2026) Initiative 60.82% 39.18% Approveda
2018 Arkansas Issue 5 $11.00 (2021) Initiative 68.46% 31.54% Approveda
2018 Missouri Proposition B $12.00 (2023) Initiative 62.34% 37.66% Approveda
2016 Arizona Proposition 206 $12.00 (2020) Initiative 58.33% 41.67% Approveda
2016 Colorado Amendment 70 $12.00 (2020) Initiative 55.36% 44.64% Approveda
2016 Maine Question 4 $12.00 (2020) Initiative 55.50% 44.50% Approveda
2016 Washington Initiative 1433 $13.50 (2020) Initiative 57.42% 42.58% Approveda
2014 Alaska Measure 3 $9.75 (2016) Initiative 69.35% 30.65% Approveda
2014 Arkansas Issue 5 $8.50 (2017) Initiative 65.94% 34.06% Approveda
2014 Nebraska Initiative 425 $9.00 (2016) Initiative 59.47% 40.53% Approveda
2014 South Dakota Measure 18 $8.50 (2015) Initiative 55.05% 44.95% Approveda
2013 New Jerseu Question 2 $8.25 (2014) Referral 61.26% 38.74% Approveda
2006 Arizona Proposition 2022 $6.75 (2007) Initiative 65.37% 34.63% Approveda
2006 Colorado Initiative 42 $6.85 (2007) Initiative 53.30% 46.70% Approveda
2006 Missouri Proposition B $6.50 (2007) Initiative 75.94% 24.06% Approveda
2006 Montana I-151 $6.50 (2007) Initiative 72.69% 27.31% Approveda
2006 Nevada Question 6 $6.15 (2006)[7] Initiative 68.71% 31.29% Approveda
2006 Ohio Amendment 2 $6.85 (2007) Initiative 56.65% 43.35% Approveda
2004 Florida Amendment 5 $6.15 (2005) Initiative 71.25% 28.75% Approveda
2004 Nevada Question 6 $6.15 (2006)[7] Initiative 68.4% 31.6% Approveda
2002 Oregon Measure 25 $6.90 (2003) Initiative 51.3% 48.7% Approveda
1998 Washington Initiative 688 $6.50 (2000) Initiative 66.1% 33.9% Approveda
1996 California Proposition 210 $5.75 (1998) Initiative 61.45% 38.55% Approveda
1996 Missouri Proposition A $6.75 (1999)[8] Initiative 28.70% 71.30% Defeatedd
1996 Montana I-121 $6.25 (2000) Initiative 43.53% 56.47% Defeatedd
1996 Oregon Measure 36 $6.50 (1999) Initiative 56.85% 43.15% Approveda

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Nevada Constitution

In Nevada, a majority vote is required in two successive sessions of the Nevada State Legislature to place an amendment on the ballot.

The amendment was introduced as Assembly Joint Resolution 10 (AJR 10) during the 2019 legislative session. The amendment passed in the Nevada State Legislature along party lines with Democrats in the majority and Republicans in the minority. The State Assembly passed the amendment in a vote of 28-12 with one Republican member excused while the Nevada State Senate passed the amendment in a vote of 12-8 with one Democratic member excused.[2]

During the 2021 legislative session, the State Assembly passed the amendment along party lines with a vote of 26 Democrats in favor and 16 Republicans opposed. The Senate passed the amendment largely along party lines with a vote of 13-8, with one Republican joining the Democratic majority.[9]

2019 legislative session

Vote in the Nevada State Assembly
May 28, 2019
Requirement: SImple majority vote of all members in each chamber in two sessions
Number of yes votes required: 21  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total28121
Total percent68.3%29.3%2.4%
Democrat2800
Republican0121

Vote in the Nevada State Senate
May 31, 2019
Requirement: SImple majority vote of all members in each chamber in two sessions
Number of yes votes required: 11  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total1281
Total percent57.1%38.1%4.8%
Democrat1201
Republican080

2021 legislative session

Vote in the Nevada State Assembly
April 12, 2021
Requirement: SImple majority vote of all members in each chamber in two sessions
Number of yes votes required: 21  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total26160
Total percent61.9%38.1%0.0%
Democrat2600
Republican0160

Vote in the Nevada State Senate
May 14, 2021
Requirement: SImple majority vote of all members in each chamber in two sessions
Number of yes votes required: 11  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total1380
Total percent61.9%38.1%0.0%
Democrat1200
Republican180

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Nevada

Click "Show" to learn more about voter registration, identification requirements, and poll times in Nevada.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Nevada State Legislature, "AJR 10" accessed June 4, 2019
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Nevada Labor Department, "2020 Minimum Wage Bulletin," accessed November 9, 2020
  3. Nevada Current, "Senate Committee Hearing Debates Nevadas Minimum Wage Distinction," accessed September 9, 2021
  4. Nevada State Legislature, "Testimony by Americans for Prosperity," accessed September 9, 2021
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content
  6. Note: In 2014, voters approved an advisory question on increasing the minimum wage in Illinois. As this question was nonbinding, the measure is not counted here.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Question 6 provided that employers to compensate employees $5.15 per hour when the employer provides health benefits or $6.15 per hour when the employer does not provide health benefits.
  8. Proposition A would have also added 15 cents to the minimum wage each year beginning in 2000.
  9. Nevada State Legislature, "AJR 10 Vote (2021)," accessed May 17, 2021
  10. Nevada Revised Statutes, "Title 24, Chapter 293, Section 273," accessed October 17, 2019
  11. ACLU of Nevada, "Know Your Voting Rights - Every Vote Counts," accessed October 17, 2019
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 Nevada Secretary of State, “Elections,” accessed October 3, 2019
  13. Nevada Secretary of State, “Registering to Vote,” accessed October 3, 2019
  14. The Nevada Independent, “Automatic voter registration implementation date unclear, elections officials say,” December 12, 2018
  15. The Nevada Independent, “The Indy Explains: How does Nevada verify a voter's eligibility?,” April 23, 2017
  16. Nevada Revised Statutes, "NRS 293.277 Conditions for entitlement of person to vote; forms of identification to identify registered voter." accessed October 4, 2019