Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

Nevada Question 2, Revising Language Related to Public Entities for Individuals with Mental Illness, Blindness, or Deafness Amendment (2024)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge-smaller use.png

U.S. Senate • U.S. House • State executive offices • State Senate • State Assembly • Supreme court • State ballot measures • Local ballot measures • School boards • Municipal • All other local • How to run for office
Flag of Nevada.png


Nevada Question 2
Flag of Nevada.png
Election date
November 5, 2024
Topic
Constitutional language
Status
Approveda Approved
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature

Nevada Question 2, the Revising Language Related to Public Entities for Individuals with Mental Illness, Blindness, or Deafness Amendment, was on the ballot in Nevada as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 5, 2024.[1] The ballot measure was approved.

A "yes" vote supported revising language in the state constitution related to public entities that benefit individuals with mental illness, blindness, or deafness.

A "no" vote opposed revising language in the state constitution related to public entities that benefit individuals with mental illness, blindness, or deafness.


Election results

Nevada Question 2

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

897,821 65.97%
No 463,218 34.03%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Overview

What did the amendment do?

See also: Text of measure

The amendment revised language in Article 13, Section 1 of the Nevada Constitution, which referred to public entities for individuals with mental illness, blindness, or deafness. As of 2024, Article 13, Section 1 described these entities as “institutions for the benefit of the insane, blind and deaf and dumb.” The amendment replaced the word institutions with entities and replaced insane, blind, deaf and dumb with persons with significant mental illness, persons who are blind or visually impaired, persons who are deaf or hard of hearing and persons with intellectual disabilities or developmental disabilities.[2]

Did other states change constitutional language related to mental illness?

See also: Other amendments changing constitutional language related to mental illness

In 1988, Washington voters approved a constitutional amendment that amended Section 3 of Article VI and Section 1 of Article XIII of the Washington Constitution, removing references to "idiots, insane, dumb, and defective youth". Voters approved the amendment by 81.37%-18.63% on November 8, 1988.

In 2024, there was measure on the North Dakota ballot that amended language used in the state constitution to describe certain state institutions such as changing "insane" to "individuals with mental illness", "feebleminded" to "individuals with developmental disabilities", and "deaf and dumb" to "deaf and hard of hearing." The amendment was placed on the ballot by the North Dakota State Legislature. The Senate approved the amendment unanimously on January 16, 2023. The amendment was approved unanimously in the House on March 22, 2023.[3]

How did this amendment get on the ballot?

See also: Path to the ballot

In order for the Nevada State Legislature to place a constitutional amendment on the ballot for voters to approve, it needs to pass each chamber of the legislature in two consecutive legislative sessions.

The amendment was introduced to the 2021-2022 legislative session as Assembly Joint Resolution 1 (AJR 1). On April 13, 2021, the Nevada State Assembly approved the amendment by 42-0, and on May 17, the Nevada State Senate approved the amendment by 21-0. On February 6, 2023, the amendment was returned from the secretary of state to the legislature. On March 29, 2023, the Assembly approved the measure by 41-0. On May 26, 2023, the Senate approved the measure by 20-0.

Text of measure

Ballot title

The official ballot title was as follows:[4]

Shall Section 1 of Article 13 of the Nevada Constitution be amended to: (1) revise the description of the persons who benefit from institutions that the State is required to foster and support; (2) replace the term “institutions” with “entities”; and (3) add entities for the benefit of persons with intellectual or developmental disabilities to the types of entities that the State is required to foster and support?[5]

Constitutional changes

See also: Article 13, Nevada Constitution

The measure amended section 1 of Article 13 of the state constitution. The following underlined text was added, and struck-through text would be deleted:[2]

Text of Section 1: Institutions for Insane, Blind, Deaf and Dumb to Be Fostered and Supported by State

1. Institutions Entities for the benefit of the Insane, Blind and Deaf and Dumb, persons with significant mental illness, persons who are blind or visually impaired, persons who are deaf or hard of hearing and persons with intellectual disabilities or developmental disabilities, and such other benevolent institutions entities as the public good may require, shall be fostered and supported by the State, subject to such regulations as may be prescribed by law.[5]

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2024

Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The secretary of state wrote the ballot language for this measure.

The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 18, and the FRE is 23. The word count for the ballot title is 63.


Support

Supporters

Officials

Arguments

  • State Sen. Robin Titus: "I am aware that when the Nevada Constitution was written, different terminologies were used to describe persons with disabilities or a mental illness. However, more than 156 years after Nevada was admitted into the Union, it is time to give these words a more critical look. We should change them to contemporary language that is not deemed to be discriminatory or narrow."

Opposition

Opponents

Ballotpedia did not locate a campaign in opposition to the ballot measure.

Arguments

Ballotpedia did not locate arguments in opposition to the ballot measure.

Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Nevada ballot measures

Ballotpedia has not identified ballot measure committees registered to support or oppose the ballot measure.[6]

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Media editorials

See also: 2024 ballot measure media endorsements

Support

The following media editorial boards published an editorial supporting the ballot measure:

  • Las Vegas Sun Editorial Board: "Question 2 on the 2024 ballot seeks to modernize the Nevada Constitution by removing outdated and stigmatizing terms such as “insane,” “deaf” and “dumb,” and replacing them with more appropriate and inclusive language. The terminology in question has remained unchanged for 160 years, even as society and professional practices have evolved significantly. Today, such terms are widely considered offensive and inappropriate, particularly within legal, educational and social work settings. The initiative to amend this language is not merely a symbolic gesture; it represents a commitment to inclusivity and reflects the broader societal shift toward using respectful language that does not perpetuate stigma. Updating the terminology will help ensure that Nevada’s legal framework aligns with contemporary values and fosters a more compassionate society."


Opposition

Ballotpedia did not locate media editorial boards in opposition to the ballot measure.

Background

Other amendments changing constitutional language related to mental illness

North Dakota Constitutional Measure 1, Language Describing State Institutions Amendment (2024)

See also: North Dakota Constitutional Measure 1, Language Describing State Institutions Amendment (2024)

A constitutional amendment on the 2024 ballot in North Dakota would amend language used in the state constitution to describe certain state institutions such as changing "insane" to "individuals with mental illness", "feebleminded" to "individuals with developmental disabilities", and "deaf and dumb" to "deaf and hard of hearing." The amendment was placed on the ballot by the North Dakota State Legislature. The Senate approved the amendment unanimously on January 16, 2023. The amendment was approved unanimously in the House on March 22, 2023.[3]


Washington HJR 4231 (1988)

See also: Washington HJR 4231 (1988)

In 1988, Washington voters approved a constitutional amendment that amended Section 3 of Article VI and Section 1 of Article XIII of the Washington Constitution, removing references to "idiots, insane, dumb, and defective youth". Voters approved the amendment by 81.37%-18.63% on November 8, 1988.

Constitutional amendments in Nevada

In Nevada, the state legislature can propose amendments to the state constitution, and citizens can propose initiated constitutional amendments. Between 1995 and 2022, 65 constitutional amendments appeared on statewide ballots. Of that total, 41 were approved, and 24 were defeated. The following chart illustrates trends in constitutional amendments on the ballot in Nevada:

Constitutional amendments on the ballot in Nevada, 1995-2022
Total number Approved Percent approved Defeated Percent defeated Even-year average Even-year median Even-year minimum Even-year maximum
65 41 63.08% 24 36.92% 4.38 3 0 12

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Nevada Constitution

In Nevada, a majority vote is required in two successive sessions of the Nevada State Legislature to place an amendment on the ballot.

2021 legislative session

The amendment was introduced as Assembly Joint Resolution 1 (AJR 1). It was approved by the Assembly on April 13, 2021, in a vote of 42-0. It was also unanimously approved by the Senate in a vote of 21-0 on May 17.[1]

Vote in the Nevada State Assembly
April 13, 2021
Requirement: SImple majority vote of all members in each chamber in two sessions
Number of yes votes required: 22  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total4200
Total percent100.0%0.0%0.0%
Democrat2600
Republican1600

Vote in the Nevada State Senate
May 17, 2021
Requirement: SImple majority vote of all members in each chamber in two sessions
Number of yes votes required: 11  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total2100
Total percent100.0%0.0%0.0%
Democrat1200
Republican900

2023 legislative session

The amendment was returned from the secretary of state to the Nevada State Legislature on February 6, 2023. On March 29, 2023, the Assembly approved the measure by 41-0. On May 26, 2023, the Senate approved the measure by 20-0.[7]

Vote in the Nevada State Assembly
March 29, 2023
Requirement: SImple majority vote of all members in each chamber in two sessions
Number of yes votes required: 22  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total4101
Total percent97.6%0%2.3%
Democrat2701
Republican1400

Vote in the Nevada State Senate
May 26, 2023
Requirement: SImple majority vote of all members in each chamber in two sessions
Number of yes votes required: 11  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total2001
Total percent95.2%0%4.7%
Democrat1300
Republican701

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Nevada

See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Nevada.

How to vote in Nevada


See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Nevada State Legislature, "AJR 1," accessed May 18, 2021
  2. 2.0 2.1 Nevada Legislature, "AJR 1 Text," accessed May 30, 2023
  3. 3.0 3.1 North Dakota State Legislature, "SCR 4001," accessed January 17, 2023
  4. Nevada Secretary of State, "Statewide Ballot Questions," accessed September 13, 2024
  5. 5.0 5.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content
  6. Nevada Secretary of State, "Campaign Finance," accessed June 27, 2023
  7. Nevada State Legislature, "AJR 1 in 81st Session," accessed April 4, 2023
  8. Nevada Revised Statutes, "Title 24, Chapter 293, Section 273," accessed April 17, 2023
  9. ACLU of Nevada, "Know Your Voting Rights - Voting in Nevada," accessed April 17, 2023
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 Nevada Secretary of State, “Elections,” accessed October 3, 2024
  11. Nevada Secretary of State, “Registering to Vote,” accessed April 17, 2023
  12. Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles, “Voter Registration,” accessed April 17, 2023
  13. The Nevada Independent, “The Indy Explains: How does Nevada verify a voter's eligibility?” April 23, 2017
  14. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  15. Nevada Revised Statutes, "NRS 293.277 Conditions for entitlement of person to vote; forms of identification to identify registered voter." accessed April 17, 2023