Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District election, 2020 (September 8 Republican primary)
- Primary date: Sept. 8
- Primary type: Semi-closed
- Registration deadline(s): Sept. 1
- Online registration: No
- Same-day registration: Yes
- Early voting starts: N/A
- Absentee/mail voting deadline(s): Sept. 8 (received)
- Voter ID: Photo ID
- Poll times: Varies by locality
2022 →
← 2018
|
New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District |
---|
Democratic primary Republican primary General election |
Election details |
Filing deadline: June 12, 2020 |
Primary: September 8, 2020 General: November 3, 2020 Pre-election incumbent: Chris Pappas (Democratic) |
How to vote |
Poll times: Varies by municipality Voting in New Hampshire |
Race ratings |
Inside Elections: Likely Democratic Sabato's Crystal Ball: Likely Democratic |
Ballotpedia analysis |
U.S. Senate battlegrounds U.S. House battlegrounds Federal and state primary competitiveness Ballotpedia's Election Analysis Hub, 2020 |
See also |
U.S. Senate • 1st • 2nd New Hampshire elections, 2020 U.S. Congress elections, 2020 U.S. Senate elections, 2020 U.S. House elections, 2020 |
Matt Mowers won New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District Republican primary on September 8, 2020. With 75% of precincts reporting, he had received 60% of the vote. Matt Mayberry was second with 26%. Three other candidates ran. The incumbent, Chris Pappas (D), was first elected in 2018. Two independent outlets rated the general election as Likely Democratic as of the primary.
Matt Mowers had worked as the executive director of the New Hampshire Republican State Committee, an official in the 2016 Trump presidential campaign, and, leading up to the primary, as a senior White House advisor in the State Department.[1] In an interview with Seacoast Media Group, Mowers said his key issues included addressing drug and opioid addiction by increasing funding for treatment facilities and building a wall at the southern border, reducing government spending and taxes, and supporting trade agreements that would increase employment.[2]
Matt Mayberry is a veteran of the Air Force and a businessman who, leading up to the election, worked at Carlisle Capital. Mayberry’s previous political experience included serving as a Dover city councilor, a school board member, and as the chairperson for the New Hampshire Commission on Human Rights.[3][4] Mayberry said his key campaign issues included supporting firearm ownership, supporting veterans’ access to resources, and increasing funding for infrastructure.[5]
Michael Callis, Jeff Denaro, and Kevin Rondeau were also running in the primary.
As of June 30, Mowers had reported $571,870 in fundraising and $131,644 in spending, while Mayberry had reported $151,651 in fundraising and $78,430 in spending.[6] Mowers received noteworthy primary endorsements from President Donald Trump (R) and U.S. House Minority Leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), while Mayberry received endorsements from Rep. Pete King (R-N.Y.) and former Governor of Arkansas Mike Huckabee (R).[7][8]
Jeff Denaro, Matt Mayberry, and Matt Mowers all completed Ballotpedia’s Candidate Connection Survey. Click here to see their answers.
This page focuses on New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District Republican primary. For more in-depth information on the district's Democratic primary and the general election, see the following pages:
- New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District election, 2020 (September 8 Democratic primary)
- New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District election, 2020
Election procedure changes in 2020
Ballotpedia provided comprehensive coverage of how election dates and procedures changed in 2020. While the majority of changes occurred as a result of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, some changes occurred for other reasons.
New Hampshire modified its primary election process as follows:
- Voting procedures: Any voter may request an absentee ballot based on concerns related to COVID-19. Voters could submit one absentee ballot application for both the primary and general elections.
For a full timeline about election modifications made in response to the COVID-19 outbreak, click here.
Candidates and election results
Republican primary election
Republican primary for U.S. House New Hampshire District 1
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Matt Mowers ![]() | 59.3 | 41,100 |
![]() | Matt Mayberry ![]() | 26.6 | 18,479 | |
![]() | Kevin Rondeau | 6.1 | 4,203 | |
Jeff Denaro ![]() | 3.9 | 2,723 | ||
Michael Callis | 3.9 | 2,703 | ||
Other/Write-in votes | 0.2 | 132 |
Total votes: 69,340 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- William Fowler (R)
Candidate profiles
This section includes candidate profiles created in one of two ways. Either the candidate completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey or Ballotpedia staff created a profile after identifying the candidate as noteworthy.[9] Ballotpedia staff compiled profiles based on campaign websites, advertisements, and public statements.
Party: Republican Party
Incumbent: No
Political Office: None
Submitted Biography: "I am a Union Mechanic. Farther of 2 wonderful girls. Happily married to my wife for 23 years. I am an ordinary citizen who is unhappy that our National debt is too high, the Opioid epidemic is not getting any better and the democrats keep trying to make our country a welfare state."
This information was current as of the candidate's run for U.S. House New Hampshire District 1 in 2020.
Party: Republican Party
Incumbent: No
Political Office:
Dover School Board (2009-2011)
Dover City Council (1999-2001; 2003-2005)
Submitted Biography: "Decorated Air Force Veteran... Former NHGOP Vice Chair... Successful Businessman... Avid Community Volunteer... NH Human Rights Commissioner... Matt Mayberry is a very busy man. Matt Mayberry proudly served his country in the US Air Force, joining right out of High School. He was awarded his squadron's Airman of the Year Award for his handling of an in-flight emergency and the contributions he made to the community of Charleston South Carolina. Since retiring from the Air Force, Matt has become an active community volunteer in his Hometown of Dover, NH, particularly within NH's Veteran community. A life-long Republican, Matt is a former vice chair of the NHGOP. In 2016, Matt chaired an RNC initiative to identify and mobilize over 10,000 NH veterans to vote. He was selected as an alternate delegate to the national RNC conventions of Senator John McCain and again in 2016 and 2020 for President Donald Trump. Matt is a 2 time winner of the Norris Cotton Republican of the Year Award in Strafford County. He is a former 3-term Dover City Councilor and Dover School Board Member. In 2018, he was named Chairman of the New Hampshire Human Rights Commission by Governor Chris Sununu."
This information was current as of the candidate's run for U.S. House New Hampshire District 1 in 2020.
Party: Republican Party
Incumbent: No
Political Office: None
Submitted Biography: "Matt Mowers has spent his career fighting for freedom and conservative values. Mowers served as a Senior White House Advisor and diplomat in President Trump's Department of State. Previously Matt served as a Senior official on the historic Trump-Pence campaign and subsequent transition team. Matt lives in Bedford and is married to Cassie Spodak."
This information was current as of the candidate's run for U.S. House New Hampshire District 1 in 2020.
Campaign finance
This section contains campaign finance figures from the Federal Election Commission covering all candidate fundraising and spending in this election.[10] It does not include information on fundraising before the current campaign cycle or on spending by satellite groups. The numbers in this section are updated as candidates file new campaign finance reports. Candidates for Congress are required to file financial reports on a quarterly basis, as well as two weeks before any primary, runoff, or general election in which they will be on the ballot and upon the termination of any campaign committees.[11] The chart below contains data from financial reports submitted to the Federal Election Commission.
Name | Party | Receipts* | Disbursements** | Cash on hand | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Michael Callis | Republican Party | $0 | $0 | $0 | Data not available*** |
Jeff Denaro | Republican Party | $0 | $0 | $0 | Data not available*** |
Matt Mayberry | Republican Party | $197,507 | $197,507 | $0 | As of December 31, 2020 |
Matt Mowers | Republican Party | $1,766,754 | $1,758,300 | $8,454 | As of December 31, 2020 |
Kevin Rondeau | Republican Party | $0 | $0 | $0 | Data not available*** |
Source: Federal Elections Commission, "Campaign finance data," . This product uses the openFEC API but is not endorsed or certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
* According to the FEC, "Receipts are anything of value (money, goods, services or property) received by a political committee." |
Primaries in New Hampshire
A primary election is an election in which registered voters select a candidate that they believe should be a political party's candidate for elected office to run in the general election. They are also used to choose convention delegates and party leaders. Primaries are state-level and local-level elections that take place prior to a general election. New Hampshire uses a semi-closed primary system. Unaffiliated voters may vote in the primary, but in order to do so, they have to choose a party before voting. This changes their status from unaffiliated to affiliated with that party unless they fill out a card to return to undeclared status.[12][13][14]
For information about which offices are nominated via primary election, see this article.
General election race ratings
- See also: Race rating definitions and methods
Ballotpedia provides race ratings from four outlets: The Cook Political Report, Inside Elections, Sabato's Crystal Ball, and DDHQ/The Hill. Each race rating indicates if one party is perceived to have an advantage in the race and, if so, the degree of advantage:
- Safe and Solid ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge and the race is not competitive.
- Likely ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge, but an upset is possible.
- Lean ratings indicate that one party has a small edge, but the race is competitive.[15]
- Toss-up ratings indicate that neither party has an advantage.
Race ratings are informed by a number of factors, including polling, candidate quality, and election result history in the race's district or state.[16][17][18]
Race ratings: New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District election, 2020 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Race tracker | Race ratings | ||||||||
November 3, 2020 | October 27, 2020 | October 20, 2020 | October 13, 2020 | ||||||
The Cook Political Report | Likely Democratic | Likely Democratic | Likely Democratic | Likely Democratic | |||||
Inside Elections with Nathan L. Gonzales | Likely Democratic | Likely Democratic | Likely Democratic | Likely Democratic | |||||
Larry J. Sabato's Crystal Ball | Likely Democratic | Likely Democratic | Likely Democratic | Likely Democratic | |||||
Note: Ballotpedia updates external race ratings every week throughout the election season. |
District analysis
- See also: The Cook Political Report's Partisan Voter Index
- See also: FiveThirtyEight's elasticity scores
The 2017 Cook Partisan Voter Index for this district was R+2, meaning that in the previous two presidential elections, this district's results were 2 percentage points more Republican than the national average. This made New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District the 225th most Republican nationally.[19]
FiveThirtyEight's September 2018 elasticity score for states and congressional districts measured "how sensitive it is to changes in the national political environment." This district's elasticity score was 1.19. This means that for every 1 point the national political mood moved toward a party, the district was expected to move 1.19 points toward that party.[20]
District represented by a Democrat in 2020 and won by Donald Trump in 2016
This district was one of 30 Democratic-held U.S. House districts up in 2020 that Donald Trump (R) won in the 2016 presidential election. Most were expected to be among the House's most competitive elections in 2020.
2020 Democratic-held U.S. House districts won by Donald Trump in 2016 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | Incumbent | Ran in 2020? | 2018 congressional margin | 2016 presidential margin | 2012 presidential margin | ||||||||
Arizona's 1st | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+7.7 | Trump+1.1 | Romney+2.5 | ||||||||
Georgia's 6th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+1.0 | Trump+1.5 | Romney+23.3 | ||||||||
Illinois' 14th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+5.0 | Trump+3.9 | Romney+10 | ||||||||
Illinois' 17th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+24.2 | Trump+0.7 | Obama+17 | ||||||||
Iowa's 1st | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+5.1 | Trump+3.5 | Obama+13.7 | ||||||||
Iowa's 2nd | ![]() |
Retired | Democrats+5.2 | Trump+4.1 | Obama+13.1 | ||||||||
Iowa's 3rd | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+2.2 | Trump+3.5 | Obama+4.2 | ||||||||
Maine's 2nd | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+1.3 | Trump+10.3 | Obama+8.6 | ||||||||
Michigan's 8th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+3.8 | Trump+6.7 | Romney+3.1 | ||||||||
Michigan's 11th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+6.7 | Trump+4.4 | Romney+5.4 | ||||||||
Minnesota's 2nd | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+5.5 | Trump+1.2 | Obama+0.1 | ||||||||
Minnesota's 7th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+4.3 | Trump+30.8 | Romney+9.8 | ||||||||
Nevada's 3rd | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+9.1 | Trump+1.0 | Obama+0.8 | ||||||||
New Hampshire's 1st | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+8.6 | Trump+1.6 | Obama+1.6 | ||||||||
New Jersey's 3rd | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+1.3 | Trump+6.2 | Obama+4.6 | ||||||||
New Jersey's 5th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+13.7 | Trump+1.1 | Romney+3.0 | ||||||||
New Jersey's 11th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+14.6 | Trump+0.9 | Romney+5.8 | ||||||||
New Mexico's 2nd | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+1.9 | Trump+10.2 | Romney+6.8 | ||||||||
New York's 11th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+6.5 | Trump+9.8 | Obama+4.3 | ||||||||
New York's 18th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+10.9 | Trump+1.9 | Obama+4.3 | ||||||||
New York's 19th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+5.2 | Trump+6.8 | Obama+6.2 | ||||||||
New York's 22nd | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+1.8 | Trump+15.5 | Romney+0.4 | ||||||||
Oklahoma's 5th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+1.4 | Trump+13.4 | Romney+18.4 | ||||||||
Pennsylvania's 8th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+9.3 | Trump+9.6 | Obama+11.9 | ||||||||
Pennsylvania's 17th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+12.5 | Trump+2.6 | Romney+4.5 | ||||||||
South Carolina's 1st | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+1.4 | Trump+13.1 | Romney+18.1 | ||||||||
Utah's 4th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+0.3 | Trump+6.7 | Romney+37.0 | ||||||||
Virginia's 2nd | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+2.2 | Trump+3.4 | Romney+2.3 | ||||||||
Virginia's 7th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+1.9 | Trump+6.5 | Romney+10.5 | ||||||||
Wisconsin's 3rd | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+19.3 | Trump+4.5 | Obama+11 | ||||||||
Source: Sabato's Crystal Ball and Daily Kos |
Click here to see the five U.S. House districts represented by a Republican in 2020 and won by Hillary Clinton in 2016.
Pivot Counties
- See also: Pivot Counties by state
Three of 10 New Hampshire counties—30 percent—are Pivot Counties. Pivot Counties are counties that voted for Barack Obama (D) in 2008 and 2012 and for Donald Trump (R) in 2016. Altogether, the nation had 206 Pivot Counties, with most being concentrated in upper midwestern and northeastern states.
Counties won by Trump in 2016 and Obama in 2012 and 2008 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County | Trump margin of victory in 2016 | Obama margin of victory in 2012 | Obama margin of victory in 2008 | ||||
Coos County, New Hampshire | 8.89% | 17.54% | 18.19% | ||||
Hillsborough County, New Hampshire | 0.20% | 1.12% | 3.73% | ||||
Sullivan County, New Hampshire | 2.58% | 13.27% | 17.93% |
In the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton (D) won New Hampshire with 46.8 percent of the vote. Donald Trump (R) received 46.5 percent. In presidential elections between 1789 and 2016, New Hampshire voted Republican 50 percent of the time and Democratic 31 percent of the time. In the five presidential elections between 2000 and 2016, New Hampshire voted Democratic with the exception of the 2000 presidential election.[21]
Presidential results by legislative district
The following table details results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections by state Senate districts in New Hampshire. Click [show] to expand the table. The "Obama," "Romney," "Clinton," and "Trump" columns describe the percent of the vote each presidential candidate received in the district. The "2012 Margin" and "2016 Margin" columns describe the margin of victory between the two presidential candidates in those years. The "Party Control" column notes which party held that seat heading into the 2018 general election. Data on the results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections broken down by state legislative districts was compiled by Daily Kos.[22][23]
In 2012, Barack Obama (D) won 12 out of 24 state Senate districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 17.3 points. In 2016, Hillary Clinton (D) won 10 out of 24 state Senate districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 14.5 points. Clinton won two districts controlled by Republicans heading into the 2018 elections. |
In 2012, Mitt Romney (R) won 12 out of 24 state Senate districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 5.6 points. In 2016, Donald Trump (R) won 14 out of 24 state Senate districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 9.6 points. Trump won two districts controlled by Democrats heading into the 2018 elections. |
2016 presidential results by state Senate District | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | Obama | Romney | 2012 Margin | Clinton | Trump | 2016 Margin | Party Control |
1 | 57.08% | 41.61% | D+15.5 | 44.99% | 49.68% | R+4.7 | D |
2 | 52.51% | 45.89% | D+6.6 | 43.98% | 50.44% | R+6.5 | R |
3 | 49.12% | 49.88% | R+0.8 | 43.80% | 51.18% | R+7.4 | R |
4 | 58.08% | 40.29% | D+17.8 | 54.34% | 39.58% | D+14.8 | D |
5 | 67.21% | 31.61% | D+35.6 | 64.56% | 30.85% | D+33.7 | D |
6 | 48.32% | 50.55% | R+2.2 | 38.68% | 55.72% | R+17 | R |
7 | 51.70% | 47.17% | D+4.5 | 41.20% | 53.79% | R+12.6 | R |
8 | 51.06% | 47.42% | D+3.6 | 43.59% | 50.95% | R+7.4 | R |
9 | 47.73% | 51.10% | R+3.4 | 47.84% | 46.80% | D+1 | R |
10 | 65.04% | 33.59% | D+31.4 | 57.23% | 37.63% | D+19.6 | D |
11 | 47.67% | 50.89% | R+3.2 | 46.41% | 48.12% | R+1.7 | R |
12 | 47.21% | 51.36% | R+4.1 | 45.98% | 48.45% | R+2.5 | R |
13 | 58.98% | 39.69% | D+19.3 | 55.28% | 39.78% | D+15.5 | D |
14 | 43.11% | 55.81% | R+12.7 | 40.93% | 53.97% | R+13 | R |
15 | 63.57% | 35.25% | D+28.3 | 58.03% | 36.71% | D+21.3 | D |
16 | 48.95% | 50.02% | R+1.1 | 47.69% | 47.37% | D+0.3 | D |
17 | 48.55% | 49.99% | R+1.4 | 39.58% | 54.99% | R+15.4 | R |
18 | 51.23% | 47.52% | D+3.7 | 46.10% | 48.85% | R+2.7 | D |
19 | 42.34% | 56.47% | R+14.1 | 39.59% | 55.53% | R+15.9 | R |
20 | 53.77% | 44.65% | D+9.1 | 49.28% | 45.21% | D+4.1 | D |
21 | 65.10% | 33.62% | D+31.5 | 64.73% | 29.61% | D+35.1 | D |
22 | 40.70% | 58.37% | R+17.7 | 37.33% | 58.66% | R+21.3 | R |
23 | 47.62% | 51.11% | R+3.5 | 44.05% | 50.72% | R+6.7 | R |
24 | 48.37% | 50.73% | R+2.4 | 47.82% | 47.78% | D+0 | R |
Total | 52.17% | 46.57% | D+5.6 | 47.60% | 47.22% | D+0.4 | - |
Source: Daily Kos |
Presidential results by legislative district
The following table details results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections by state House districts in New Hampshire. Click [show] to expand the table. The "Obama," "Romney," "Clinton," and "Trump" columns describe the percent of the vote each presidential candidate received in the district. The "2012 Margin" and "2016 Margin" columns describe the margin of victory between the two presidential candidates in those years. Data on the results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections broken down by state legislative districts was compiled by Daily Kos.[24][25]
In 2012, Barack Obama (D) won 145 out of 204 state House districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 17.8 points. In 2016, Hillary Clinton (D) won 101 out of 204 state House districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 17.1 points. |
In 2012, Mitt Romney (R) won 59 out of 204 state House districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 9.9 points. In 2016, Donald Trump (R) won 103 out of 204 state House districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 12.9 points. |
2016 presidential results by state House district | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | Obama | Romney | 2012 Margin | Clinton | Trump | 2016 Margin | |
Belknap 01 | 47.46% | 51.84% | R+4.4 | 41.87% | 52.77% | R+10.9 | |
Belknap 02 | 46.40% | 52.80% | R+6.4 | 42.19% | 53.44% | R+11.3 | |
Belknap 03 | 50.13% | 49.12% | D+1 | 41.17% | 53.63% | R+12.5 | |
Belknap 04 | 50.96% | 47.74% | D+3.2 | 40.81% | 53.63% | R+12.8 | |
Belknap 05 | 39.96% | 59.36% | R+19.4 | 33.77% | 61.51% | R+27.7 | |
Belknap 06 | 48.93% | 49.86% | R+0.9 | 34.78% | 59.94% | R+25.2 | |
Belknap 07 | 46.68% | 52.03% | R+5.4 | 35.69% | 58.71% | R+23 | |
Belknap 08 | 41.99% | 57.14% | R+15.2 | 34.37% | 60.64% | R+26.3 | |
Belknap 09 | 49.75% | 49.36% | D+0.4 | 39.17% | 55.61% | R+16.4 | |
Carroll 01 | 58.26% | 40.88% | D+17.4 | 58.42% | 36.24% | D+22.2 | |
Carroll 02 | 57.17% | 41.74% | D+15.4 | 51.38% | 43.34% | D+8 | |
Carroll 03 | 53.57% | 45.22% | D+8.4 | 47.18% | 47.02% | D+0.2 | |
Carroll 04 | 43.34% | 55.99% | R+12.7 | 41.37% | 54.11% | R+12.7 | |
Carroll 05 | 43.94% | 54.76% | R+10.8 | 34.06% | 60.82% | R+26.8 | |
Carroll 06 | 43.25% | 55.98% | R+12.7 | 44.09% | 51.27% | R+7.2 | |
Carroll 07 | 56.15% | 42.76% | D+13.4 | 51.38% | 43.15% | D+8.2 | |
Carroll 08 | 43.65% | 55.37% | R+11.7 | 37.59% | 57.58% | R+20 | |
Cheshire 01 | 62.12% | 36.66% | D+25.5 | 54.70% | 40.36% | D+14.3 | |
Cheshire 02 | 59.89% | 38.83% | D+21.1 | 49.80% | 45.21% | D+4.6 | |
Cheshire 03 | 57.10% | 41.06% | D+16 | 49.26% | 45.18% | D+4.1 | |
Cheshire 04 | 75.94% | 21.82% | D+54.1 | 65.04% | 28.47% | D+36.6 | |
Cheshire 05 | 74.61% | 23.83% | D+50.8 | 66.72% | 28.02% | D+38.7 | |
Cheshire 06 | 67.57% | 30.51% | D+37.1 | 62.54% | 32.32% | D+30.2 | |
Cheshire 07 | 67.19% | 31.87% | D+35.3 | 63.21% | 31.63% | D+31.6 | |
Cheshire 08 | 63.94% | 35.07% | D+28.9 | 61.89% | 33.11% | D+28.8 | |
Cheshire 09 | 59.26% | 39.39% | D+19.9 | 52.52% | 41.42% | D+11.1 | |
Cheshire 10 | 62.89% | 35.35% | D+27.5 | 52.36% | 42.38% | D+10 | |
Cheshire 11 | 48.01% | 50.30% | R+2.3 | 39.80% | 55.03% | R+15.2 | |
Cheshire 12 | 56.74% | 41.97% | D+14.8 | 46.33% | 48.76% | R+2.4 | |
Cheshire 13 | 62.73% | 35.11% | D+27.6 | 47.48% | 46.86% | D+0.6 | |
Cheshire 14 | 53.77% | 44.72% | D+9.1 | 46.11% | 48.28% | R+2.2 | |
Cheshire 15 | 59.64% | 38.76% | D+20.9 | 48.12% | 46.72% | D+1.4 | |
Cheshire 16 | 69.64% | 28.86% | D+40.8 | 63.80% | 30.82% | D+33 | |
Coos 01 | 45.75% | 53.10% | R+7.4 | 33.24% | 61.94% | R+28.7 | |
Coos 02 | 59.73% | 39.44% | D+20.3 | 38.56% | 56.30% | R+17.7 | |
Coos 03 | 68.97% | 30.07% | D+38.9 | 49.89% | 45.09% | D+4.8 | |
Coos 04 | 52.02% | 46.23% | D+5.8 | 40.86% | 53.95% | R+13.1 | |
Coos 05 | 54.56% | 44.03% | D+10.5 | 43.52% | 51.03% | R+7.5 | |
Coos 06 | 63.76% | 35.20% | D+28.6 | 50.28% | 45.25% | D+5 | |
Coos 07 | 55.43% | 43.24% | D+12.2 | 41.07% | 53.66% | R+12.6 | |
Grafton 01 | 56.23% | 42.31% | D+13.9 | 47.66% | 47.01% | D+0.7 | |
Grafton 02 | 55.51% | 43.14% | D+12.4 | 48.07% | 46.79% | D+1.3 | |
Grafton 03 | 56.47% | 41.99% | D+14.5 | 47.08% | 47.04% | D+0 | |
Grafton 04 | 49.27% | 49.32% | R+0.1 | 37.35% | 56.42% | R+19.1 | |
Grafton 05 | 57.16% | 41.24% | D+15.9 | 50.51% | 43.23% | D+7.3 | |
Grafton 06 | 51.70% | 46.75% | D+4.9 | 45.15% | 48.62% | R+3.5 | |
Grafton 07 | 57.00% | 41.53% | D+15.5 | 47.57% | 46.50% | D+1.1 | |
Grafton 08 | 61.78% | 35.86% | D+25.9 | 54.67% | 39.40% | D+15.3 | |
Grafton 09 | 49.70% | 48.19% | D+1.5 | 39.56% | 54.92% | R+15.4 | |
Grafton 10 | 63.69% | 34.82% | D+28.9 | 57.32% | 36.93% | D+20.4 | |
Grafton 11 | 55.83% | 42.54% | D+13.3 | 44.53% | 50.08% | R+5.5 | |
Grafton 12 | 75.45% | 23.59% | D+51.9 | 83.78% | 13.02% | D+70.8 | |
Grafton 13 | 69.10% | 29.83% | D+39.3 | 69.06% | 25.96% | D+43.1 | |
Grafton 14 | 55.96% | 42.63% | D+13.3 | 47.82% | 46.92% | D+0.9 | |
Grafton 15 | 53.44% | 45.07% | D+8.4 | 42.84% | 51.13% | R+8.3 | |
Grafton 16 | 53.66% | 44.75% | D+8.9 | 44.86% | 49.31% | R+4.5 | |
Grafton 17 | 54.23% | 43.87% | D+10.4 | 45.46% | 48.95% | R+3.5 | |
Hillsborough 01 | 53.91% | 44.52% | D+9.4 | 41.15% | 52.79% | R+11.6 | |
Hillsborough 02 | 45.04% | 53.39% | R+8.3 | 34.84% | 58.30% | R+23.5 | |
Hillsborough 03 | 55.71% | 42.71% | D+13 | 50.65% | 43.64% | D+7 | |
Hillsborough 04 | 52.03% | 45.45% | D+6.6 | 45.21% | 48.16% | R+2.9 | |
Hillsborough 05 | 44.94% | 53.99% | R+9.1 | 43.76% | 50.72% | R+7 | |
Hillsborough 06 | 45.98% | 52.78% | R+6.8 | 43.05% | 52.01% | R+9 | |
Hillsborough 07 | 36.81% | 62.40% | R+25.6 | 44.10% | 51.38% | R+7.3 | |
Hillsborough 08 | 51.56% | 47.69% | D+3.9 | 54.56% | 40.73% | D+13.8 | |
Hillsborough 09 | 53.82% | 44.85% | D+9 | 52.41% | 42.08% | D+10.3 | |
Hillsborough 10 | 64.03% | 33.59% | D+30.4 | 61.46% | 32.94% | D+28.5 | |
Hillsborough 11 | 61.78% | 36.57% | D+25.2 | 54.11% | 39.60% | D+14.5 | |
Hillsborough 12 | 64.39% | 33.48% | D+30.9 | 55.45% | 38.05% | D+17.4 | |
Hillsborough 13 | 48.29% | 50.93% | R+2.6 | 44.88% | 50.40% | R+5.5 | |
Hillsborough 14 | 56.55% | 42.10% | D+14.4 | 50.88% | 44.09% | D+6.8 | |
Hillsborough 15 | 48.02% | 50.96% | R+2.9 | 42.88% | 52.66% | R+9.8 | |
Hillsborough 16 | 55.49% | 43.03% | D+12.5 | 48.76% | 46.48% | D+2.3 | |
Hillsborough 17 | 54.49% | 43.95% | D+10.5 | 49.12% | 45.52% | D+3.6 | |
Hillsborough 18 | 57.60% | 40.55% | D+17.1 | 51.61% | 41.96% | D+9.7 | |
Hillsborough 19 | 52.92% | 45.61% | D+7.3 | 50.14% | 44.56% | D+5.6 | |
Hillsborough 20 | 41.52% | 57.38% | R+15.9 | 39.16% | 55.40% | R+16.2 | |
Hillsborough 21 | 46.21% | 52.42% | R+6.2 | 43.71% | 50.48% | R+6.8 | |
Hillsborough 22 | 46.63% | 52.02% | R+5.4 | 51.38% | 44.50% | D+6.9 | |
Hillsborough 23 | 50.33% | 48.21% | D+2.1 | 46.87% | 47.29% | R+0.4 | |
Hillsborough 24 | 64.73% | 34.18% | D+30.5 | 63.90% | 30.29% | D+33.6 | |
Hillsborough 25 | 38.57% | 59.75% | R+21.2 | 33.32% | 60.92% | R+27.6 | |
Hillsborough 26 | 42.55% | 55.51% | R+13 | 43.31% | 49.72% | R+6.4 | |
Hillsborough 27 | 44.58% | 54.24% | R+9.7 | 49.22% | 44.96% | D+4.3 | |
Hillsborough 28 | 51.78% | 47.12% | D+4.7 | 51.52% | 43.49% | D+8 | |
Hillsborough 29 | 53.71% | 44.69% | D+9 | 52.87% | 42.10% | D+10.8 | |
Hillsborough 30 | 57.36% | 41.22% | D+16.1 | 55.20% | 39.35% | D+15.9 | |
Hillsborough 31 | 70.29% | 28.25% | D+42 | 61.76% | 33.21% | D+28.5 | |
Hillsborough 32 | 50.35% | 48.70% | D+1.7 | 49.00% | 45.82% | D+3.2 | |
Hillsborough 33 | 60.50% | 38.18% | D+22.3 | 54.90% | 40.48% | D+14.4 | |
Hillsborough 34 | 59.45% | 39.25% | D+20.2 | 53.46% | 41.66% | D+11.8 | |
Hillsborough 35 | 56.22% | 42.24% | D+14 | 54.27% | 40.42% | D+13.9 | |
Hillsborough 36 | 54.01% | 45.00% | D+9 | 53.85% | 41.74% | D+12.1 | |
Hillsborough 37 | 42.88% | 56.00% | R+13.1 | 38.52% | 56.84% | R+18.3 | |
Hillsborough 38 | 53.54% | 44.49% | D+9 | 44.99% | 48.80% | R+3.8 | |
Hillsborough 39 | 45.62% | 53.01% | R+7.4 | 39.87% | 54.44% | R+14.6 | |
Hillsborough 40 | 47.23% | 51.49% | R+4.3 | 46.70% | 47.55% | R+0.9 | |
Hillsborough 41 | 40.44% | 58.57% | R+18.1 | 46.70% | 48.92% | R+2.2 | |
Hillsborough 42 | 55.11% | 43.57% | D+11.5 | 55.35% | 39.45% | D+15.9 | |
Hillsborough 43 | 56.66% | 41.95% | D+14.7 | 50.52% | 43.99% | D+6.5 | |
Hillsborough 44 | 48.03% | 50.78% | R+2.8 | 43.34% | 51.77% | R+8.4 | |
Hillsborough 45 | 54.81% | 43.58% | D+11.2 | 50.20% | 44.16% | D+6 | |
Merrimack 01 | 53.02% | 45.41% | D+7.6 | 42.32% | 52.96% | R+10.6 | |
Merrimack 02 | 54.31% | 44.00% | D+10.3 | 36.73% | 57.34% | R+20.6 | |
Merrimack 03 | 55.56% | 43.47% | D+12.1 | 39.58% | 55.04% | R+15.5 | |
Merrimack 04 | 55.42% | 43.81% | D+11.6 | 52.24% | 42.61% | D+9.6 | |
Merrimack 05 | 53.31% | 45.83% | D+7.5 | 55.48% | 40.29% | D+15.2 | |
Merrimack 06 | 57.05% | 41.42% | D+15.6 | 51.32% | 42.38% | D+8.9 | |
Merrimack 07 | 55.87% | 42.59% | D+13.3 | 46.94% | 47.59% | R+0.6 | |
Merrimack 08 | 55.46% | 42.48% | D+13 | 44.76% | 49.92% | R+5.2 | |
Merrimack 09 | 50.97% | 47.80% | D+3.2 | 40.54% | 54.47% | R+13.9 | |
Merrimack 10 | 63.13% | 36.11% | D+27 | 62.90% | 32.80% | D+30.1 | |
Merrimack 11 | 66.72% | 32.13% | D+34.6 | 53.64% | 39.79% | D+13.9 | |
Merrimack 12 | 64.23% | 34.54% | D+29.7 | 51.69% | 42.78% | D+8.9 | |
Merrimack 13 | 64.82% | 33.92% | D+30.9 | 59.43% | 34.64% | D+24.8 | |
Merrimack 14 | 71.14% | 27.32% | D+43.8 | 64.85% | 29.65% | D+35.2 | |
Merrimack 15 | 71.15% | 26.95% | D+44.2 | 60.00% | 32.93% | D+27.1 | |
Merrimack 16 | 67.43% | 31.63% | D+35.8 | 64.52% | 30.86% | D+33.7 | |
Merrimack 17 | 62.62% | 35.84% | D+26.8 | 52.25% | 43.40% | D+8.8 | |
Merrimack 18 | 60.79% | 37.53% | D+23.3 | 58.77% | 37.30% | D+21.5 | |
Merrimack 19 | 57.25% | 42.28% | D+15 | 55.71% | 39.72% | D+16 | |
Merrimack 20 | 52.29% | 46.38% | D+5.9 | 44.45% | 50.14% | R+5.7 | |
Merrimack 21 | 47.97% | 50.53% | R+2.6 | 35.38% | 58.70% | R+23.3 | |
Merrimack 22 | 53.02% | 45.27% | D+7.8 | 39.89% | 54.91% | R+15 | |
Merrimack 23 | 49.49% | 49.60% | R+0.1 | 48.35% | 46.77% | D+1.6 | |
Merrimack 24 | 45.11% | 53.94% | R+8.8 | 42.90% | 52.75% | R+9.9 | |
Merrimack 25 | 54.44% | 44.00% | D+10.4 | 44.63% | 50.27% | R+5.6 | |
Merrimack 26 | 53.45% | 45.27% | D+8.2 | 40.95% | 53.87% | R+12.9 | |
Merrimack 27 | 67.60% | 31.09% | D+36.5 | 59.08% | 35.11% | D+24 | |
Merrimack 28 | 59.88% | 38.97% | D+20.9 | 55.54% | 40.14% | D+15.4 | |
Merrimack 29 | 49.62% | 48.82% | D+0.8 | 36.85% | 57.47% | R+20.6 | |
Rockingham 01 | 49.30% | 48.93% | D+0.4 | 40.91% | 53.66% | R+12.7 | |
Rockingham 02 | 43.25% | 55.32% | R+12.1 | 39.04% | 55.08% | R+16 | |
Rockingham 03 | 45.86% | 52.73% | R+6.9 | 35.92% | 58.92% | R+23 | |
Rockingham 04 | 38.97% | 59.98% | R+21 | 35.98% | 58.88% | R+22.9 | |
Rockingham 05 | 43.30% | 55.72% | R+12.4 | 42.48% | 52.23% | R+9.8 | |
Rockingham 06 | 47.02% | 51.58% | R+4.6 | 40.35% | 54.61% | R+14.3 | |
Rockingham 07 | 35.86% | 63.20% | R+27.3 | 40.03% | 55.08% | R+15 | |
Rockingham 08 | 41.71% | 57.35% | R+15.6 | 37.96% | 58.25% | R+20.3 | |
Rockingham 09 | 50.52% | 47.82% | D+2.7 | 41.05% | 53.47% | R+12.4 | |
Rockingham 10 | 42.18% | 56.03% | R+13.8 | 35.62% | 58.73% | R+23.1 | |
Rockingham 11 | 44.96% | 53.52% | R+8.6 | 44.81% | 49.59% | R+4.8 | |
Rockingham 12 | 41.51% | 57.26% | R+15.8 | 33.53% | 61.60% | R+28.1 | |
Rockingham 13 | 40.58% | 58.29% | R+17.7 | 37.33% | 58.03% | R+20.7 | |
Rockingham 14 | 39.31% | 59.79% | R+20.5 | 37.74% | 57.86% | R+20.1 | |
Rockingham 15 | 43.64% | 55.14% | R+11.5 | 36.47% | 58.63% | R+22.2 | |
Rockingham 16 | 41.21% | 57.42% | R+16.2 | 42.69% | 51.74% | R+9 | |
Rockingham 17 | 59.63% | 39.06% | D+20.6 | 57.87% | 35.55% | D+22.3 | |
Rockingham 18 | 58.43% | 40.65% | D+17.8 | 59.62% | 35.53% | D+24.1 | |
Rockingham 19 | 49.84% | 49.51% | D+0.3 | 53.39% | 41.28% | D+12.1 | |
Rockingham 20 | 44.63% | 54.16% | R+9.5 | 37.41% | 58.83% | R+21.4 | |
Rockingham 21 | 50.08% | 49.04% | D+1 | 48.75% | 47.26% | D+1.5 | |
Rockingham 22 | 47.95% | 51.10% | R+3.1 | 49.79% | 46.16% | D+3.6 | |
Rockingham 23 | 52.14% | 46.98% | D+5.2 | 52.47% | 43.00% | D+9.5 | |
Rockingham 24 | 50.12% | 49.39% | D+0.7 | 56.35% | 38.89% | D+17.5 | |
Rockingham 25 | 68.89% | 29.87% | D+39 | 66.32% | 28.45% | D+37.9 | |
Rockingham 26 | 72.98% | 25.74% | D+47.2 | 73.61% | 21.74% | D+51.9 | |
Rockingham 27 | 64.85% | 34.27% | D+30.6 | 63.53% | 32.39% | D+31.1 | |
Rockingham 28 | 60.02% | 38.86% | D+21.2 | 59.97% | 35.44% | D+24.5 | |
Rockingham 29 | 69.59% | 29.22% | D+40.4 | 72.61% | 22.24% | D+50.4 | |
Rockingham 30 | 68.27% | 30.52% | D+37.8 | 68.59% | 26.51% | D+42.1 | |
Rockingham 31 | 54.36% | 44.74% | D+9.6 | 54.56% | 41.21% | D+13.4 | |
Rockingham 32 | 44.67% | 53.82% | R+9.2 | 39.48% | 54.75% | R+15.3 | |
Rockingham 33 | 42.89% | 55.59% | R+12.7 | 37.94% | 56.69% | R+18.8 | |
Rockingham 34 | 39.95% | 59.03% | R+19.1 | 37.53% | 57.94% | R+20.4 | |
Rockingham 35 | 42.24% | 56.45% | R+14.2 | 39.98% | 54.75% | R+14.8 | |
Rockingham 36 | 56.73% | 42.29% | D+14.4 | 57.60% | 36.89% | D+20.7 | |
Rockingham 37 | 48.04% | 50.95% | R+2.9 | 44.51% | 51.58% | R+7.1 | |
Strafford 01 | 48.75% | 50.13% | R+1.4 | 35.25% | 60.22% | R+25 | |
Strafford 02 | 51.40% | 47.54% | D+3.9 | 36.35% | 57.58% | R+21.2 | |
Strafford 03 | 47.32% | 51.46% | R+4.1 | 40.59% | 54.50% | R+13.9 | |
Strafford 04 | 52.31% | 46.10% | D+6.2 | 45.48% | 47.28% | R+1.8 | |
Strafford 05 | 62.83% | 35.70% | D+27.1 | 62.31% | 31.50% | D+30.8 | |
Strafford 06 | 67.21% | 31.38% | D+35.8 | 66.91% | 26.94% | D+40 | |
Strafford 07 | 50.60% | 48.16% | D+2.4 | 40.65% | 53.40% | R+12.8 | |
Strafford 08 | 55.88% | 42.23% | D+13.6 | 45.29% | 48.25% | R+3 | |
Strafford 09 | 49.30% | 49.18% | D+0.1 | 42.00% | 52.05% | R+10 | |
Strafford 10 | 49.80% | 50.20% | R+0.4 | 39.95% | 53.81% | R+13.9 | |
Strafford 11 | 55.46% | 42.81% | D+12.6 | 44.20% | 50.19% | R+6 | |
Strafford 12 | 50.14% | 48.46% | D+1.7 | 40.49% | 54.35% | R+13.9 | |
Strafford 13 | 68.70% | 28.98% | D+39.7 | 66.80% | 26.28% | D+40.5 | |
Strafford 14 | 67.11% | 30.68% | D+36.4 | 64.57% | 29.05% | D+35.5 | |
Strafford 15 | 54.91% | 44.04% | D+10.9 | 57.11% | 37.82% | D+19.3 | |
Strafford 16 | 59.55% | 39.10% | D+20.4 | 57.02% | 37.26% | D+19.8 | |
Strafford 17 | 56.04% | 42.20% | D+13.8 | 52.96% | 41.40% | D+11.6 | |
Strafford 18 | 57.02% | 41.58% | D+15.4 | 49.53% | 44.78% | D+4.7 | |
Strafford 19 | 67.90% | 29.83% | D+38.1 | 65.66% | 27.70% | D+38 | |
Strafford 20 | 57.15% | 41.65% | D+15.5 | 57.07% | 37.55% | D+19.5 | |
Strafford 21 | 56.53% | 41.89% | D+14.6 | 51.26% | 43.07% | D+8.2 | |
Strafford 22 | 53.05% | 45.41% | D+7.6 | 42.70% | 51.12% | R+8.4 | |
Strafford 23 | 49.55% | 49.68% | R+0.1 | 41.01% | 52.90% | R+11.9 | |
Strafford 24 | 52.66% | 45.78% | D+6.9 | 42.27% | 52.35% | R+10.1 | |
Strafford 25 | 55.93% | 42.53% | D+13.4 | 51.10% | 42.01% | D+9.1 | |
Sullivan 01 | 59.33% | 39.57% | D+19.8 | 58.58% | 36.97% | D+21.6 | |
Sullivan 02 | 45.26% | 53.24% | R+8 | 42.16% | 52.60% | R+10.4 | |
Sullivan 03 | 61.19% | 36.84% | D+24.4 | 46.58% | 46.52% | D+0.1 | |
Sullivan 04 | 59.23% | 39.98% | D+19.2 | 45.68% | 48.73% | R+3 | |
Sullivan 05 | 60.21% | 38.24% | D+22 | 45.52% | 50.24% | R+4.7 | |
Sullivan 06 | 51.90% | 46.27% | D+5.6 | 36.91% | 57.77% | R+20.9 | |
Sullivan 07 | 51.89% | 46.60% | D+5.3 | 39.48% | 55.54% | R+16.1 | |
Sullivan 08 | 60.59% | 37.99% | D+22.6 | 44.93% | 50.02% | R+5.1 | |
Sullivan 09 | 53.91% | 44.67% | D+9.2 | 48.09% | 47.01% | D+1.1 | |
Sullivan 10 | 60.11% | 38.50% | D+21.6 | 45.88% | 48.62% | R+2.7 | |
Sullivan 11 | 55.93% | 42.60% | D+13.3 | 41.97% | 53.01% | R+11 | |
Total | 52.17% | 46.57% | D+5.6 | 47.60% | 47.22% | D+0.4 | |
Source: Daily Kos |
District election history
2018
General election
General election for U.S. House New Hampshire District 1
Chris Pappas defeated Eddie Edwards and Dan Belforti in the general election for U.S. House New Hampshire District 1 on November 6, 2018.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Chris Pappas (D) | 53.6 | 155,884 |
![]() | Eddie Edwards (R) | 45.0 | 130,996 | |
![]() | Dan Belforti (L) | 1.4 | 4,048 |
Total votes: 290,928 (100.00% precincts reporting) | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for U.S. House New Hampshire District 1
The following candidates ran in the Democratic primary for U.S. House New Hampshire District 1 on September 11, 2018.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Chris Pappas | 42.2 | 26,875 |
![]() | Maura Sullivan | 30.4 | 19,313 | |
![]() | Mindi Messmer | 9.7 | 6,142 | |
![]() | Naomi Andrews | 7.1 | 4,508 | |
![]() | Lincoln Soldati | 3.1 | 1,982 | |
![]() | Deaglan McEachern | 2.7 | 1,709 | |
![]() | Levi Sanders | 1.8 | 1,141 | |
![]() | Mark S. Mackenzie | 1.2 | 746 | |
Terence O'Rourke | 1.0 | 656 | ||
![]() | Paul Cardinal ![]() | 0.5 | 317 | |
William Martin | 0.4 | 230 |
Total votes: 63,619 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Republican primary election
Republican primary for U.S. House New Hampshire District 1
The following candidates ran in the Republican primary for U.S. House New Hampshire District 1 on September 11, 2018.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Eddie Edwards | 48.0 | 23,510 |
![]() | Andy Sanborn | 41.6 | 20,364 | |
![]() | Andy Martin ![]() | 4.2 | 2,072 | |
Michael Callis | 2.6 | 1,254 | ||
Jeff Denaro | 2.0 | 963 | ||
Bruce Crochetiere | 1.6 | 766 |
Total votes: 48,929 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- Mark Hounsell (R)
Libertarian primary election
Libertarian primary for U.S. House New Hampshire District 1
Dan Belforti advanced from the Libertarian primary for U.S. House New Hampshire District 1 on September 11, 2018.
Candidate | ||
✔ | ![]() | Dan Belforti |
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- Dylan Robinson (L)
2016
New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District was a battleground district in 2016. Carol Shea-Porter (D) defeated incumbent Frank Guinta (R), Robert Lombardo (L), and businessman Shawn O'Connor (I) in the general election on November 8, 2016. This election marked the fourth contest between Guinta and Shea-Porter, who alternately won against one another in elections for this seat since 2010. Guinta defeated Republican challengers Jamieson Gradert, Rich Ashooh, Michael Callis, and Robert Risley in the Republican primary on September 13, 2016. He was a member of the NRCC's Patriot Program, which was designed to assist vulnerable Republican incumbents seeking re-election.[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Democratic | ![]() |
44.3% | 162,080 | |
Republican | Frank Guinta Incumbent | 43% | 157,176 | |
Independent | Shawn O'Connor | 9.5% | 34,735 | |
Independent | Brendan Kelly | 1.7% | 6,074 | |
Libertarian | Robert Lombardo | 1.5% | 5,507 | |
Total Votes | 365,572 | |||
Source: New Hampshire Secretary of State |
Candidate | Vote % | Votes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
46.6% | 26,400 | ||
Rich Ashooh | 45.3% | 25,678 | ||
Michael Callis | 4% | 2,243 | ||
Robert Risley | 2.4% | 1,347 | ||
Jamieson Gradert | 1.8% | 1,031 | ||
Total Votes | 56,699 | |||
Source: New Hampshire Secretary of State |
2014
The 1st Congressional District of New Hampshire held an election for the U.S. House of Representatives on November 4, 2014. Former Rep. Frank Guinta (R) defeated incumbent Rep. Carol Shea-Porter (D) in the general election.
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Democratic | Carol Shea-Porter Incumbent | 48.1% | 116,769 | |
Republican | ![]() |
51.7% | 125,508 | |
N/A | Scatter | 0.2% | 459 | |
Total Votes | 242,736 | |||
Source: New Hampshire Secretary of State |
2012
On November 6, 2012, Carol Shea-Porter (D) won election to the United States House. She defeated Frank Guinta (R) and Brendan Kelly (L) in the general election.
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | Frank Guinta Incumbent | 46% | 158,659 | |
Democratic | ![]() |
49.8% | 171,650 | |
Libertarian | Brandan Kelly | 4.2% | 14,521 | |
Total Votes | 344,830 | |||
Source: New Hampshire Secretary of State "Official Election Results, 2012 General Election" |
2010
On November 2, 2010, Frank Guinta won election to the United States House. He defeated Carol Shea-Porter (D) and Philip Hodson (L) in the general election.[38]
See also
- New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District election, 2020 (September 8 Democratic primary)
- New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District election, 2020
- United States House elections in New Hampshire, 2020 (September 8 Democratic primaries)
- United States House elections in New Hampshire, 2020 (September 8 Republican primaries)
- United States House Democratic Party primaries, 2020
- United States House Republican Party primaries, 2020
- United States House of Representatives elections, 2020
- U.S. House battlegrounds, 2020
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ Matt Mowers 2020 campaign website, "About," accessed August 26, 2020
- ↑ Seacoast Media Group, "1-on-1 with GOP congressional candidate Matt Mowers," August 9, 2020
- ↑ Matt Mayberry 2020 campaign website, "About," accessed August 26, 2020
- ↑ WMUR 9, "NH Primary Source: Republican Matt Mayberry says he'll run for 1st District US House seat," December 5, 2019
- ↑ WMUR 9, "Republican congressional candidate Matt Mayberry says he knows who to call to get things done," June 5, 2020
- ↑ Federal Election Commission, "New Hampshire - House District 01," accessed August 26, 2020
- ↑ Matt Mowers 2020 campaign website, "Mowers for Congress," accessed August 26, 2020
- ↑ Matt Mayberry 2020 campaign website, "Endorsements," accessed August 26, 2020
- ↑ Candidate Connection surveys completed before September 26, 2019, were not used to generate candidate profiles. In battleground primaries, Ballotpedia based its selection of noteworthy candidates on polling, fundraising, and noteworthy endorsements. In battleground general elections, all major party candidates and any other candidates with the potential to impact the outcome of the race were included.
- ↑ Fundraising by primary candidates can be found on the race's respective primary election page. Fundraising by general election candidates can be found on the race's general election page.
- ↑ Federal Election Commission, "2022 Quarterly Reports," accessed March 2, 2022
- ↑ NCSL,"State Primary Election Types," accessed April 25, 2023
- ↑ Ballotpedia research conducted December 26, 2013, through January 3, 2014, researching and analyzing various state websites and codes.
- ↑ New Hampshire Secretary of State,"Voting in Party Primaries," accessed April 25, 2023
- ↑ Inside Elections also uses Tilt ratings to indicate an even smaller advantage and greater competitiveness.
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Nathan Gonzalez," April 19, 2018
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Kyle Kondik," April 19, 2018
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Charlie Cook," April 22, 2018
- ↑ Cook Political Report, "Introducing the 2017 Cook Political Report Partisan Voter Index," April 7, 2017
- ↑ FiveThirtyEight, "Election Update: The Most (And Least) Elastic States And Districts," September 6, 2018
- ↑ 270towin.com, "New Hampshire," accessed June 1, 2017
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' statewide election results by congressional and legislative districts," July 9, 2013
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' 2016 presidential results for congressional and legislative districts," February 6, 2017
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' statewide election results by congressional and legislative districts," July 9, 2013
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' 2016 presidential results for congressional and legislative districts," February 6, 2017
- ↑ Roll Call, "Exclusive: NRCC Announces 12 Members in Patriot Program," February 13, 2015
- ↑ Politico, "Frank Guinta scandal splits New Hampshire Republicans," May 22, 2015
- ↑ New Hampshire Union Leader, "O'Connor names campaign team," March 24, 2015
- ↑ New Hampshire Union Leader, Former U.S. Rep. Carol Shea-Porter to run in 1st District election," September 19, 2015
- ↑ Politico, "Frank Guinta scandal splits New Hampshire Republicans," May 22, 2015
- ↑ Jamieson for Congress, "Home," accessed August 12, 2015
- ↑ Twitter, "John Distaso," accessed October 21, 2015
- ↑ WMUR9 ABC, "Innis: Guinta violations ‘major factor’ in bid for Congress," October 29, 2015
- ↑ New Hampshire Public Radio, "Republican Pam Tucker Enters 1st District Congressional Race," February 18, 2016
- ↑ WMUR 9, "1st CD candidate Shawn O’Connor changes affiliation, will run as independent," June 9, 2016
- ↑ New Hampshire Secretary of State, "State Primary - September 13, 2016," accessed June 13, 2016
- ↑ Politico, "New Hampshire House Primary Results," September 13, 2016
- ↑ U.S. Congress House Clerk, "Statistics of the Congressional Election of November 2, 2010," accessed March 28, 2013