New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District election (September 11, 2018 Democratic primary)
- General election: Nov. 6
- Voter registration deadline: Oct. 23
- Early voting: N/A
- Absentee voting deadline: Varies by locality
- Online registration: No
- Same-day registration: Yes
- Voter ID: Photo ID required
- Poll times: In general, polling places open between 6:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. Eastern Time
2020 →
← 2016
|
New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District |
---|
Democratic primary Republican primary General election |
Election details |
Filing deadline: June 15, 2018 |
Primary: September 11, 2018 General: November 6, 2018 Pre-election incumbent: Carol Shea-Porter (Democrat) |
How to vote |
Poll times: Varies by municipality Voting in New Hampshire |
Race ratings |
Cook Political Report: Likely Democratic Inside Elections: Lean Democratic Sabato's Crystal Ball: Likely Democratic |
Ballotpedia analysis |
U.S. Senate battlegrounds U.S. House battlegrounds Federal and state primary competitiveness Ballotpedia's Election Analysis Hub, 2018 |
See also |
1st • 2nd New Hampshire elections, 2018 U.S. Congress elections, 2018 U.S. Senate elections, 2018 U.S. House elections, 2018 |
Executive Councilor Chris Pappas won the Democratic primary for New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District against 10 other candidates on September 11. Pappas received 42 percent of the vote. Former Assistant Secretary of Veterans Affairs Maura Sullivan was second with 30 percent.
Following the retirement of Carol Shea-Porter (D), the Democratic Party nominated a new candidate for the first time since 2006 for New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District general election. The district changed party hands five times between 2006 and 2016, alternating between Shea-Porter and Republican Frank Guinta. The general election was expected to be competitive, and the seat was targeted by both parties following Shea-Porter's retirement.
A total of 11 candidates filed to run. Campaign finance and healthcare policy emerged as prominent issues in the race.
Sullivan was the fundraising leader, reporting $1.8 million in contributions through August 22 and $810,319 in cash on hand. Sullivan was endorsed by EMILY's List, VoteVets, and With Honor Fund.[1]
Pappas was second in fundraising through August 22, with $823,674 raised and $348,453 in cash on hand. He was backed by the National Education Association-New Hampshire in March; the move was called a key endorsement in the race by local news source WMUR.[2] He also had support from U.S. Sens. Maggie Hassan (D) and Jeanne Shaheen (D).
State Rep. Mindi Messmer was backed by Brand New Congress and the New Hampshire House Progressive Caucus, as well as two Republican state representatives.[3] She raised a total of $87,114 through August 22.
Naomi Andrews, Shea-Porter’s former chief of staff, received the incumbent’s endorsement.[4] Andrews was about even with Messmer in fundraising.
Pappas and Sullivan faced criticism from some challengers, including Messmer and Andrews, regarding the sources and the size of their campaign contributions.[5][6] Pappas said he would not accept corporate PAC money and emphasized that 70 percent of his contributions came from within the state, distinguishing himself from Sullivan, almost all of whose individual contributions came from those outside New Hampshire.[7] Sullivan responded to such criticism by saying that many of her supporters were gained through her service in the Marines and the Obama administration.[8][9] Messmer and Andrews pledged not to accept money from certain groups, such as lobbyists or corporate PACs.
Sullivan also faced criticism from her challengers for not living in New Hampshire until 2017, to which she responded that she spent a lot of time in the state throughout her life.[10]
Candidates diverged on healthcare policy. Those who supported an option to buy into Medicare—including Andrews, Pappas, and Sullivan—argued that the priority was to prevent the repeal of the Affordable Care Act and to expand on it. Candidates like Messmer who supported a single-payer system (such as Medicare for all) argued that a Medicare buy-in option would not go far enough.[9]
The other candidates in the race were Paul Cardinal, state Rep. Mark S. Mackenzie, William Martin, Deaglan McEachern, Terence O'Rourke, Levi Sanders, and Lincoln Soldati.
Five candidates ran in the Republican primary.
Election results
The following candidates ran in the Democratic primary for U.S. House New Hampshire District 1 on September 11, 2018.
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for U.S. House New Hampshire District 1
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Chris Pappas | 42.2 | 26,875 |
![]() | Maura Sullivan | 30.4 | 19,313 | |
![]() | Mindi Messmer | 9.7 | 6,142 | |
![]() | Naomi Andrews | 7.1 | 4,508 | |
![]() | Lincoln Soldati | 3.1 | 1,982 | |
![]() | Deaglan McEachern | 2.7 | 1,709 | |
![]() | Levi Sanders | 1.8 | 1,141 | |
![]() | Mark S. Mackenzie | 1.2 | 746 | |
Terence O'Rourke | 1.0 | 656 | ||
![]() | Paul Cardinal ![]() | 0.5 | 317 | |
William Martin | 0.4 | 230 |
Total votes: 63,619 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Candidates
Top Candidates
The candidates below were selected based on campaign financing, media mentions, and/or endorsements. They are listed in alphabetical order.
Naomi Andrews
Andrews served as either Carol Shea-Porter's chief of staff or her campaign manager for more than 10 years, and she was endorsed by the outgoing incumbent. She has a B.A. in international studies and a J.D.[11]
Andrews emphasized her experience working in the 1st District and said that her work alongside Shea-Porter established her record of supporting veterans, families, and small businesses, among others. She named campaign finance reform as her top campaign issue.[12] Her campaign site stated that she "will never accept corporate PAC or DC lobbyist money."[13]
Her other policy priorities included a $15 minimum wage, allowing people to buy into Medicare, and reducing student loan interest rates.[14]
Mindi Messmer
Messmer was elected to the state House of Representatives in 2016. She has a background in geology and environmental science. She earned an M.S. in clinical and translational science in May 2018.
Messmer touted her role in notifying state health officials about a higher-than-normal rate of childhood cancer in one area of New Hampshire in 2014 and her membership on the Task Force on the Seacoast Cancer Cluster, created by Gov. Maggie Hassan (D) in 2016.[15]
Messmer emphasized her background as a scientist, saying she was not a typical politician. She pointed to her role in the state House getting bills passed related to clean drinking water and cancer prevention. In addition to environmental policy, her priorities included single-payer healthcare and a $15 minimum wage. She also supported campaign finance reform, saying on her campaign site, "I am not accepting money from any PACs or special interest groups."[16] She was backed by the New Hampshire House Progressive Caucus and both Democratic and Republican members of the state legislature.
Chris Pappas
Pappas became a member of the New Hampshire Executive Council representing District 4 in 2013. At the time of the election, he was also the co-owner of his family's restaurant. Prior to serving on the Executive Council, Pappas was a two-term state representative and two-term treasurer of Hillsborough County. He obtained a B.A. in government.[17]
Pappas emphasized his role on the Executive Council in expanding Medicaid in New Hampshire, voting to maintain funding for Planned Parenthood, and making insurance coverage available for substance abuse treatment.[18]
Allowing people to buy into Medicare, opposing restrictions on abortion, and tuition-free public college were among his policy priorities. He also said he supported a $12 an hour minimum wage.[19] Pappas pledged not to accept corporate PAC money. His endorsers included Planned Parenthood Action Fund, the state chapter of the National Education Association, and U.S. Sens. Maggie Hassan (D) and Jeanne Shaheen (D).[20]
Maura Sullivan
Sullivan touted her background as a former Marine captain and as assistant secretary of Veterans Affairs under Pres. Barack Obama, saying her experience would enable her "to take on Donald Trump when he irresponsibly threatens our national security," according to her campaign site.[21]
She also served as assistant to the secretary of defense and as senior advisor to the secretary of the Navy. She obtained a B.A. in economics and history, an M.B.A., and an M.P.A.[22]
Sullivan supported allowing people to buy into Medicare, guaranteed paid family leave, and a $15 minimum wage, among other policy priorities.[23] She was endorsed by VoteVets, With Honor, EMILY's List, and former Health and Human Services Sec. Kathleen Sebelius (D).
List of all candidates
Democratic primary candidates
- Naomi Andrews
- Paul Cardinal
- Mark S. Mackenzie
- William Martin
- Deaglan McEachern
- Mindi Messmer
- Terence O'Rourke
- Chris Pappas ✔
- Levi Sanders
- Lincoln Soldati
- Maura Sullivan
= candidate completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey
Endorsements
Know of an endorsement? Email us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
Democratic candidate endorsements | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Endorsement | Andrews | Pappas | Sullivan[24] | Messmer[3] | |
National figures | |||||
Former Health and Human Services Sec. Kathleen Sebelius[25] | ✔ | ||||
Former EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy | ✔ | ||||
Federal officials | |||||
Sen. Maggie Hassan (D)[26] | ✔ | ||||
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D)[27] | ✔ | ||||
Rep. Carol Shea-Porter (D) | ✔ | ||||
Rep. Gwen Moore (D-Wis.)[28] | ✔ | ||||
Rep. Annie Kuster[29] | ✔ | ||||
Rep. Seth Moulton (D)[30] | ✔ | ||||
State figures | |||||
Former Gov. John Lynch (D) | ✔ | ||||
New Hampshire House Progressive Caucus | ✔ | ||||
State Rep. Donna Ellis | ✔ | ||||
State Rep. Jim McConnell (R) | ✔ | ||||
State Rep. Phil Bean (R) | ✔ | ||||
State Rep. Mike Edgar (D) | ✔ | ||||
State Sen. David Watters (D) | ✔ | ||||
State Sen. Donna Soucy (D) | ✔ | ||||
State Sen. Kevin Cavanaugh (D) | ✔ | ||||
State Sen. Lou D’Allesandro (D) | ✔ | ||||
Former NH House Speaker Terie Norelli[31] | ✔ | ||||
Local figures | |||||
Manchester Mayor Joyce Craig[32] | ✔ | ||||
The Conway Daily Sun[33] | ✔ | ||||
Organizations | |||||
Seacoast Huddle | ✔ | ||||
EMILY's List[34] | ✔ | ||||
Serve America | ✔ | ||||
New Politics | ✔ | ||||
With Honor Fund | ✔ | ||||
Brand New Congress | ✔ | ||||
Women for Justice | ✔ | ||||
Victory Fund | ✔ | ||||
Unions | |||||
American Federation of Teachers-New Hampshire[35] | ✔ | ||||
National Education Association-New Hampshire[2] | ✔ | ||||
Teamsters Local 633 [36] | ✔ | ||||
PACs | |||||
Giffords PAC[37] | ✔ | ||||
Women Under Forty PAC | ✔ | ||||
VoteVets | ✔ | ||||
End Citizens United PAC[38] | ✔ | ||||
Planned Parenthood Action Fund[39] | ✔ |
Campaign themes and policy stances
Naomi Andrews
The following was found on the candidate's 2018 campaign website.
“ |
Economic Security and Dignity Naomi supports an increase in the minimum wage to $15/hour, raised in stages. A higher minimum wage means a stronger economy, as 89% of those who would benefit from an increase are age 20 or older, and most are women. Raising the minimum wage helps working families make ends meet, and it drives economic growth for local businesses. No one who works full-time should have to live in poverty. Naomi will always advocate for a robust social safety net, including through the Supplementation Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly referred to as “food stamps”), Social Security, fuel subsidies, and other benefits. She will never support the type of work requirements passed by the House’s version of the Farm Bill this year because we know that the overwhelming majority of beneficiaries who can work already do. Those who do not are young children, elderly, or disabled, and need help. With average benefits at just $1.40 per meal, SNAP support is already insufficient, and many beneficiaries run out of food purchased through the program in the second or third week of the month. This is unacceptable. All Americans should have the opportunity to advance economically, to contribute their talents to our great country. Struggling members of our society and the homeless should always occupy a prominent place in our priorities and deserve a government that connects them with stable housing and employment opportunities, along with physical and mental health services. As FDR said in 1939, “In our personal ambitions we are individualists. But in our seeking for economic and political progress as a nation, we all go up, or else all go down, as one people.” We can’t leave our fellow Americans behind. Women’s Health Care and Economic Security Naomi is a strong advocate of women’s health care and reproductive rights (“pro-choice”). These rights fall under the umbrella of the general right to privacy, along with other medical and end-of-life decisions. All people have the right to make their own decisions about their health care, without government intrusion or interference. In the 111th Congress (2009-2010), Naomi and the office team worked on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) with Congresswoman Shea-Porter. The ACA’s provisions to protect women’s rights include:
Naomi is committed to prioritizing women’s economic security as much as we prioritize our rights to health care. A woman earns only 78 cents for every $1 of a man’s wages. This is unacceptable. Passing legislation that mandates equal pay for equal work is a crucial step to treat women and the families they support fairly. Cybersecurity Given the success of that influence operation, we should be hardening our election systems against hacking and going low-tech to paper ballots, which cannot be hacked. These cyber attacks also present a dangerous national security threat if state-level attackers get into systems that run our critical infrastructure (e.g., electric grid, energy sector, transportation), our space architecture (satellites controlling communication and GPS), or our military defense systems. We need to take steps to harden these systems by increasing resilience and redundancy, or by developing alternatives that have inherent resilience. Improving the Economy It's time to raise the minimum wage in increments to a livable wage, to give low-income workers more money to spend, which will then stimulate the local economy. The Democratic Congress raised the minimum wage in 2007, when they controlled the House, and it's time to act again. We can raise the minimum wage in increments, to help business adjust, and as always, exempt farmers and small family businesses. This is a responsible approach that provides businesses with the time to plan and adjust. We have to do this--it is simply impossible to live on $7.25/hour. Also, higher education must be affordable so people are able to prepare themselves to work and earn in the new economy without drowning themselves and their families in debt. We need to strive for energy independence, and encourage the development of green energy, with all the new jobs the new technology will support. Finally, we have to fix our tax code. Our system punishes the middle class and small businesses, and gives unfair tax advantages to the wealthiest corporations and individuals. Gun Violence Prevention In the Granite State, we have a culture of responsible gun ownership. I grew up in Epping and for some of my friends’ families, venison was an important staple to get them through the winter. But there are many steps Congress can take to help reduce the amount of gun violence in our country. No one law will stop all of the violence, but Congress has a moral obligation to take what steps it can in order to lessen the bloodshed. Inaction is unconscionable and the current lack of positive action must not be allowed to continue. In Congress, I will fight to implement those common-sense proposals. I commit to joining the Gun Violence Taskforce on day one. All gun purchases, except for gifts between immediate family members, should require a background check. We must stop the gun show loophole. Additionally, the national background check system should be strengthened, and include all relevant information from those who report to it. Right now it’s like saying only 1 in 4 people need to go through TSA at an airport. Lastly, law enforcement most have the ability to take firearms away from those who have shown they might be a danger to themselves and others. It is frightening and appalling that our schools have become targets. The best way to create safe schools is through prevention. In many cases, the children or teens who feel the need to bring guns to school are themselves the victims of bullying, harassment, and discrimination, or have mental health issues. If schools worked to shut down hateful behavior or gave students the mental health support they need, that could help prevent violence. There should also be an organized effort to get reports from teachers or students who notice students who threaten violence to others, or are obsessed by guns and shootings. This on-the-ground effort can actually be more effective than an FBI tipline. Students expelled from school for bringing guns to school or making threats should get the help they clearly need, and not just be left to plot revenge. Schools also need to make their exterior walls, doors, and windows more difficult for a shooter to break through. As I stated above, we cannot fix this problem with legislation alone. But these proposals, along with the grit and determination showed by students around the country, will make a world of difference. National Security Global Security To make our way safely and effectively in the current challenging threat environment, Naomi believes that we have to acknowledge that, while terrorism remains a serious threat, we have re-entered a world with hostile peer competitors like Russia and China, and we must be vigilant and prepared. What does this threat environment look like? International security experts say that the threat environment today is complex, interconnected, and volatile. Russia has become a malign international actor that invaded Ukraine, annexed part of its territory (Crimea), and is trying to destabilize Ukraine militarily. It is attacking all the western democracies, trying to incite instability and to break up the NATO alliance and the European Union. China is the greater long-term strategic threat, and it basically claims the entire South China Sea, an essential sea lane, as its own, despite neighboring countries’ counter-claims and the fact that the UN Commission on the Law of the Sea found China’s claims invalid. China has no use for the rule-based international order that has been keeping us from world war since 1945. China's ultimate objective is to replace us as the dominant power first in the Asia-Pacific region and then the world. North Korea continues to be a wild card, with its unstable, unpredictable leader, nuclear arsenal, and long-range missiles. Now that President Trump has pulled the US out of the Iran deal, Iran could restart its nuclear program at any time. According to the Defense Department, climate change is also a national security threat and “may act as an accelerant of instability or conflict, placing a burden to respond on civilian institutions and militaries around the world” (2010 Quadrennial Defense Review). Naomi is committed to our system of alliances and other global organizations and treaties, and our continuing leadership role in world affairs. US withdrawal and isolationism in the 1920s did not protect us from WWII, and that devastating war taught us the lesson that we must stay globally engaged to prevent conflicts and use diplomacy to defuse crises. The international structure of the UN, NATO, and other alliances that the US established after WWII has prevented another world war. It is more important than ever to preserve this rule-based international order to keep the peace. Finally, we need to sign and adhere to the Paris agreement on climate change and become a leader on fighting climate change, which is a different kind of national security threat. US/Russia Relations Naomi favors tough sanctions against Russia, for deterrence. Our intelligence community found that Russia directed a cyber attack against the 2016 US election. When Russia interfered in our election, the basis of our republic, they crossed a line. It has taken time and many deliberate Russian provocations to get where we are—where US-Russia relations have degraded to the point that they are as bad as during the Cold War. Naomi believes we must hold Russia accountable for its malign actions and cyber/information warfare in Europe—e.g., its 2014 attack on Ukraine, which stole Crimea, and continuing support for violent insurgency in Ukraine, its threatening military maneuvers and posture, its support for a murderous dictator in Syria, which increases destabilizing refugee flows into Europe, and its efforts to promote fascist political parties in European nations and to sow dissension within NATO and the European Union. She supports the new, more far-reaching sanctions that will be imposed on Russia on Aug 22, triggered by treaty obligations in response to Russia’s use of chemical weapons in the attempted poisoning of a British resident and his daughter in the UK. She opposes President Trump's signing statement issued for the FY2019 National Defense Authorization Act, in which he refuses to carry out the provision that bans him from recognizing Russia’s sovereignty over Crimea. Opioid/Drug Crisis Environment Naomi has always been passionate about protecting our environment and fighting climate change. She loves the outdoors. She camps, skis, swims, runs marathons, and has climbed all 48 4,000-ft mountains in New Hampshire, always inspired by the beauty of nature. But she knows that sea levels are rising, the planet is warming, pollinators are in trouble, and so are we. In Congress, Naomi will fight for sane environmental policies that will support renewable energy and provide greater oversight so Americans have safe water, clean air, and fewer pesticides in our food and our environment. She will fight to protect endangered species and to punish polluters. She believes we must work together to produce clean, alternative and renewable energy to fight climate change. She is calling for an Apollo-type program for energy independence to hasten our progress toward that goal. Health Care, Medicare, Social Security She also knows that our seniors paid for and earned their Medicare and Social Security benefits, and she will fight to preserve and strengthen these successful programs. Medicare: The first step would be to save money by efficiencies in Medicare Part D, the prescription drug benefit. If Medicare could negotiate the price of prescription drugs – as do other agencies such as the VA – it would save billions over the next ten years. But a Republican Congress actually passed a law prohibiting Medicare from negotiating the prices to save taxpayers money. Naomi will support legislation to change this. She also thinks it's necessary to step up oversight as well, and wants to increase the number of auditors and improve technology to crack down on waste, fraud, and abuse. In addition, the long-term viability of the program depends on containing the rise in health care costs. The ACA significantly slowed that rise. Unfortunately, the actions taken by the Trump Administration and Congress have worsened the outlook for the trust fund. Social Security: It is unfair for the wealthy to pay only on the first $128,400 of their income, while most Americans, who make far less, pay on their entire income. This also hurts the financial stability of Social Security. Therefore, the cap of $128,400 must be eliminated to secure this earned benefit for future generations. This is a simple and fair fix. Education She wants to reduce the interest rates for school loans, allow families to deduct the interest, and provide more money for grants and loans, as well as protecting loan forgiveness for public service. These steps will help families earn higher wages, which will help grow our economy. She also supports reinvigorating work-study programs and encouraging states to fund public universities more generously. After all, we all have a stake in our nation's future. These steps will help families earn higher wages, which will help grow our economy. Veterans Veterans have spent significant time away from their families and friends. They have missed the everyday routine of their workplaces and their communities, and special events such as births and funerals, weddings and graduations. They have missed the comforts of home and the support of loved ones. Too often, veterans face further difficulties when they return home. Some battle Post-Traumatic Stress, Traumatic Brain Injury, or other challenges, such as exposure to toxic chemicals. They deserve their benefits and the best medical care. New Hampshire’s veterans live in the only state without a full-service hospital or access to similar services at a military facility. That is why Naomi will re-introduce Carol Shea-Porter’s legislation, the Veterans Health Equity Act, to require the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to restore the VA Medical Center in Manchester, New Hampshire to a full-service VA hospital, or provide our veterans with comparable in-state care through local health care providers. Naomi will continue to fight for equal care for New Hampshire’s veterans. Democracy New Hampshire's Granny D, who marched across the country for campaign finance reform, often told us that, “Democracy isn’t something we have, it’s something we do.” And while this is a responsibility we all share, our elected officials have a special obligation to be good stewards of our democratic norms and institutions. The freedom of the press, the rule of law, and the separation of powers are all fundamental to our democracy. These are not partisan principles, they are American values. Even in times of political polarization, we should be able to unite around these common values. Yet, we have seen increasing attempts by some in power to undermine our free press by deriding them as “fake news” or “enemies of the people”; to undermine the judiciary and disregard ethics and anti-corruption standards; and to disregard the oversight role of the Executive branch by the Legislative branch, such as Congress relinquishing its responsibility to authorize the war. These are in direct conflict with the very principles that underpin our democracy. Naomi knows that public office is a public trust, and she strongly believes in respect; respect for each other and respect for our institutions. “Keeping the republic” relies on respect and civility and vigorous participation in our democracy. She will work to protect everyone's right to vote.[40] |
” |
—Naomi Andrews' campaign website (2018)[14] |
Mindi Messmer
The following was found on the candidate's 2018 campaign website.
“ |
HEALTHCARE ENVIRONMENT ECONOMIC JUSTICE IMMIGRATION EDUCATION CAMPAIGN FINANCE |
” |
—Mindi Messmer's campaign website (2018)[16] |
Chris Pappas
The following was found on the candidate's 2018 campaign website.
“ |
HEALTHCARE As a member of the Executive Council, Chris worked with then-Governor Maggie Hassan and provided the pivotal vote to begin implementing the state’s Medicaid expansion program which now insures more than 50,000 Granite Staters. As a business owner, he provided health insurance to his employees long before it was required by the ACA, because it’s the right thing to do. Chris will oppose efforts to play politics with Americans’ health care and will look for opportunities to improve access, lower out of pocket costs, and make coverage universal. In Congress, Chris will:
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH AND FAMILY PLANNING As a member of the New Hampshire House, Chris earned a 100% pro-choice voting record and opposed legislation that would have interfered with a woman’s fundamental right to control her own body. In Congress, Chris will:
EDUCATION New Hampshire students have one of highest burdens of student loan debt as the cost of college continues to skyrocket. Parents working to put their kids through college or students paying their own way should not be saddled with unbearable debt. Chris will work to make college more affordable and to ensure it is within reach of each and every student, regardless of their zip code or family income. In Congress, Chris will:
JOBS AND THE ECONOMY As an employer, Chris has seen first-hand the importance in investing in the workforce and providing good wages and benefits. The Puritan Backroom restaurant has provided health care coverage for decades and offers paid time off to employees. Chris will always fight for policies that respect and empower workers and allow them to achieve their full economic potential. New Hampshire’s economy is driven by small businesses— over 96% of our employers are small businesses. Chris understands first-hand what it’s like to meet payroll and the importance of providing the best customer experience possible to keep folks coming back through the doors. He will fight to ensure that our small businesses have what they need to succeed. In Congress, Chris will:
OUR ENVIRONMENT Chris is a staunch supporter of developing New Hampshire's renewable energy portfolio. On the Executive Council, he has worked to secure investments for solar, wind, biomass, hydro, and geothermal projects across New Hampshire. As renewable energy technology improves and New Hampshire attracts more jobs in solar, Chris knows we must maintain incentives and tax credits to nurture the clean energy revolution that is underway. Climate change is not only real, it is an existential threat to the future of our planet, and we must take bold action to prevent its economic and environmental impacts here and around the globe. As this President implements policies that desecrate our environment, open spaces, air, and coastlines, Chris believes we must forcefully resist. Trump's decision to pull us out of the Paris Climate Agreement is a dangerous step that takes us backwards in our fight to curb emissions; his decision to end the Clean Power Plan undermines strategies to reduce emissions and harms air quality in New Hampshire. Proposals to allow private companies to drill for oil off the coast of New Hampshire are equally reckless and irresponsible. As the Environmental Protection Agency is now run by an agent of the fossil fuel industry, it's more important than ever for Congress to step up its oversight and hold the administration accountable. Chris will work to prevent lasting environmental damage from the Trump presidency and help put our country back on the path of protection and conservation. CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM Over 70% of Chris Pappas's campaign donors are from New Hampshire. The "Homegrown Campaign Pledge" is part of his comprehensive platform to "Get Money out of Politics" and restore decency and integrity in Washington by putting power back in the hands of the people. Chris has also pledged not to accept corporate PAC money. Pappas's full plan to curb the corrupting influence of money in politics also includes support for:
FIGHTING THE OPIOID CRISIS There is no more urgent issue in New Hampshire than the opioid crisis, which claimed 466 lives in 2017 and cuts across geographic and demographic lines. There are years of work ahead to end this crisis that has hit the Granite State harder than almost any other place in the country. As a member of the Executive Council, Chris helped implement Medicaid Expansion which provides addiction treatment services to thousands of our friends and neighbors. He fought for increased funding for treatment, prevention, and recovery. He also supported giving law enforcement the tools it needs to disrupt trafficking, take drugs off the streets, and keep our communities safe through Operation Granite Hammer. As a member of Congress, Chris is ready to continue these fights and work in a bipartisan fashion to support our state’s efforts to combat this crisis. In Congress, Chris will:
VETERANS HEALTH
IMMIGRATION
COMMON SENSE GUN SAFETY MEASURES Chris believes we can take steps to save lives and keep our communities safe while maintaining the culture of hunting and responsible gun ownership that exists in New Hampshire. There is no need to choose between preserving that tradition and passing common sense gun safety measures that will allow us to live without fear of tragic gun violence. Chris is working to lift up the voices of young people who have become active around gun violence issues. He was the first candidate in this race to be designated as a Mom’s Demand Action Gun Sense Candidate and has been endorsed by the Pride Fund to End Gun Violence as well as the Gabby Giffords PAC: Courage to Fight Gun Violence. In Congress, Chris will:
LGBTQ+ EQUALITY Organizations like Planned Parenthood and the Equality Health Center provide the LGBTQ community with affordable, non-judgmental health services. In 2017, Chris successfully fought for additional funds for these organizations to provide STI counseling and testing, but much more needs to be done to provide services and ensure every LGBTQ American can live a full, open life. In Congress, Chris will:
INFRASTRUCTURE New Hampshire has diverse transportation needs but receives the least amount of federal highway aid of any state in the country. Chris knows we need leadership in Washington that will help us modernize our infrastructure and improve our state’s public safety and quality of life. FOREIGN POLICY Congress must provide a check and balance on the Trump Administration and assert its role in shaping U.S. foreign policy and the use of military force. Chris believes we must strengthen our traditional alliances and demand that the State Department be rebuilt in a way that restores American diplomacy on the world stage. He knows that military force should always be used as a last resort and believes the administration must be required to seek authorization from Congress for further military incursions in the Middle East.[40] |
” |
—Chris Pappas' campaign website (2018)[20] |
Maura Sullivan
The following was found on the candidate's 2018 campaign website.
“ |
Health care Our health care system is in critical condition, and worsening daily, thanks to Trump’s reckless dismantling of key provisions that make our health care system work. Whether you are the father of four on the Seacoast who pays $1,600 per month in premiums, the non-profit leader whose employer-based insurance costs over 50% of her take-home pay, the small business owner who explained to me how every year his insurance costs more and provides less, or the business owner in North Conway who cannot access the mental health care she needs, it is clear that our health care system just isn’t working. I have talked to countless Granite Staters in similar situations – hard working people who play by all the rules but have been left behind by this system. In the Marines, we held steadfast to a common commitment to each other: leave no one behind. It is time our government makes the same promise to all of us and stands up for the hard-working families of New Hampshire. Since President Trump ended the Affordable Care Act’s insurance subsidies last year, hard working Americans who are enrolled in the marketplace have seen their health care premiums spike nearly 40% on average. In New Hampshire alone, premiums have increased 78% from 2017 to 2018. Additionally, the Trump Administration has also threatened to eliminate coverage for children with pre-existing conditions. As your Congresswoman, I will fight to improve access to quality, affordable health care while decreasing costs and fighting tirelessly to protect coverage for people with pre-existing conditions. We can achieve these goals if we:
Economic Opportunity As your Congresswoman, I will fight to:
Additionally, we can support programs for those who are ineligible for public housing on the one hand and those whose incomes do not allow them to pay for decent housing on the other. We can also work to bring in more federal grant money to support at-risk homeless populations, by supporting social services throughout our state. Gun Violence Prevention This is unacceptable. But like many, I have a growing hope that we have reached an inflection point. In the wake of the Parkland and Sante Fe tragedies, a new generation of young people from all across our country, outraged at the failure of political leaders to act, have taken a stand and demanded comprehensive gun safety reforms in our country. On the 19th anniversary of Columbine, I was proud to stand with students at Spaulding High School in Rochester as they took democracy into their own hands to protest gun violence. Their leadership inspires me – but they shouldn’t have to lead on this issue. Ten-year-olds should be shooting hoops with their next-door neighbors, or at the movies eating popcorn, not doing “active shooter” drills at their schools and asking adults whether they will be safe at school. It is time for Congress to do something about the epidemic of gun violence in our country. I have a lot of experience with weapons from my time as a Marine Corps Officer and Iraq Veteran. And as your Congresswoman I will do everything in my power to help pass the following legislative measures that have broad bipartisan support: 1. Pass Universal Background Checks. 97% of Americans support requiring background checks on all gun purchases, whether they’re over the Internet, at gun shows, in newspaper ads, or friend and family transfers. This is one of the most important steps Congress can take to curb gun violence in our country. 2. Ban the Sale of Assault Weapons and High Capacity Magazines. Since Congress let the 1994 federal assault weapons ban lapse in 2004, gun violence has been on the rise in America. The madman who opened fire from a hotel window in Las Vegas, killing 58 and wounding 851, was able to buy his military grade weapons and massacre-sized magazines perfectly legally. It is time Congress once again banned the sale of assault weapons and massacre sized magazines so we can prevent future tragedies like Parkland, Las Vegas, the Texas Church, Orlando Pulse Nightclub, and so many more. The weapons of war and magazines we used in Iraq have no place in our communities. 3. Ban Bump Stocks. Congress should immediately ban the sale of bump stocks, a low cost accessory that converts a semi-automatic weapon into a fully automatic weapon. 4. Close the Boyfriend Loophole. Federal law prohibits individuals found guilty of domestic violence from purchasing a gun. But, it does not prevent romantic partners who do not share a child or live with their victim from owning a gun. So, Congress must close the boyfriend loophole and ensure that individuals convicted of domestic violence cannot legally buy a gun. 5. No Fly, No Buy. If an individual is too dangerous to board an airplane even after a pat down and a trip through a metal detector, he/she should not be able to buy a gun either. Pure common sense alone dictates that anyone on the FBI’s “No Fly List” should not be able to purchase a firearm. Congress needs to pass legislation that would prevent such individuals from buying guns, while providing a review process for those who may be on the list in error. 6. Oppose Concealed Carry Reciprocity. I will oppose any and all efforts to pass Concealed Carry Reciprocity laws, unless other jurisdiction has as strong or stronger gun laws. Finally, as a candidate and as your Congresswoman, I will never, ever accept a single cent from the National Rifle Association or from gun lobbyists. Education We can fix that. Here’s how: Universal Pre-K: In Congress, I will work to create a partnership with the states to fund and support full day Pre-K. Studies show children who attend preschool graduate high school at a higher rate, earn higher incomes, and live healthier lives as adults. That is a huge social benefit. That is why I support universal pre-k to level the playing field for all our students at an early age. Make Higher Education Affordable to All: By 2020, 35 percent of job openings in America will require a bachelor’s degree while another 30 percent will require an associate degree or some type of certificate. One of our top economic priorities as a nation should be developing the most highly trained workforce in the world. We can only do that by making higher education and specialized vocational training more affordable without saddling our students with mountains of debt. In order to make higher education more affordable for all, as your Congresswoman, I will fight for:
Environment In the Obama Administration, I was proud to work for Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus on the Navy’s Great Green Fleet initiative. This program piloted new energy and environmental practices by testing new uses of biofuels, energy efficiency, and clean energy in military operations. The Navy now sources 12% of its energy from renewable sources. In Congress, I will fight to:
Veterans We all share a commitment to our Veterans, servicemembers, and their families. As a former Marine Corps Captain and Iraq War Veteran, I have been advocating and fighting for my fellow Veterans, servicemembers, and military families since I left active duty -- as a graduate student and later as an appointee in the Obama Administration, first at the VA and then at the Pentagon. I will always keep fighting for those serving in the military, Veterans, and military families, and I will continue to do so as your Congresswoman. In the Obama Administration, I saw firsthand the vital work that is done to support our Veterans and servicemembers. I also saw the flaws in a system that is in need of reform. I have traveled to VA hospitals around our country, and have seen the VA’s centers of excellence, and know how to bring those resources here to the Manchester VA for our Granite State Veterans. Our servicemembers and their families should never have to worry about the support they need, the care they deserve, and that their families will be taken care of. I will make it my top priority in Congress to ensure we fully fund the programs that support our military servicemembers, Veterans, and their families.
And I will prioritize our Veterans here at home.
We must also preserve the ability for those who are called to serve to be able to continue to serve. The Trump Administration’s assault on transgender servicemembers is counter to who we are as a nation. I was proud to be part of the team at the Pentagon under President Obama that worked to ensure that anyone who can meet the military’s top standards can serve regardless of gender or sexual orientation.
As your member of Congress, I will continue to fight for Granite State servicemembers, Veterans, and their families. Women's Rights
I have seen how important it is to have a woman’s voice at the table when our national leaders meet to decide the fate of women’s health. I have been proud to be a voice at that table, and I will continue to use my experience to fight for women. I believe in a woman’s right to full and complete equality, which includes the right to make our own reproductive choices without government interference. I will always protect a woman’s right to choose and fight back against efforts to cut funding to organizations like Planned Parenthood that provide critical health care to women and men. The Affordable Care Act expanded health care access for women including annual wellness exams and cancer screenings, birth control, and maternity care. It is essential we protect these services as well. As your Congresswoman, I will support efforts to:
Opioid Epidemic Recently, I met a woman in Manchester whose nephew has struggled with addiction for 13 years after being prescribed opioids for a sports injury when he was seventeen years old. His story is all too common. When I was serving at the VA, under President Obama, I saw day in and day out the devastating effects of the opioid epidemic on our Veterans. Veterans are twice as likely as non-Veterans to die from accidental overdoses of these highly addictive painkillers. That is why I fought to ensure there was adequate treatment and prevention. As your Congresswoman, I will continue to lead on this issue. The battlegrounds of the opioid crisis are at the local and the state levels, but the federal government needs to play a larger role in supporting our local community-based organizations in battling this epidemic. And there is an opportunity for us to drive bipartisan legislation to roll back the opioid scourge once and for all, bringing together the states most affected, like ours, West Virginia, and Ohio - to lead the way to a lasting solution. In Congress, I will fight for prevention, treatment, and crisis management of the opioid epidemic here in New Hampshire and throughout our country. Prevention:
Treatment:
Crisis Management:
|
” |
—Maura Sullivan's campaign website (2018)[23] |
Debates and forums
September 5 debate
The 11 candidates participated in a debate on September 5. View coverage of the event here.
August 30 candidate forum
An August 30 forum featured all 11 candidates. See coverage of the forum here.
August 2 candidate forum
All 11 candidates attended an August 2, 2018, forum.
|
June 21 candidate forum
A forum was held on June 21, 2018, and 10 candidates attended. Click here for coverage of the event.
May 14 candidate forum
On May 14, 10 candidates participated in a forum. View a video of the event here.
April 18 candidate forum
A candidate forum was held on April 18, 2018. Eight candidates attended. Click here for coverage of the event.
Campaign finance
The chart below contains data from financial reports submitted to the Federal Election Commission.
Name | Party | Receipts* | Disbursements** | Cash on hand | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Naomi Andrews | Democratic Party | $102,751 | $101,781 | $969 | As of October 30, 2018 |
Mark S. Mackenzie | Democratic Party | $352,081 | $354,630 | $-482 | As of December 31, 2018 |
Deaglan McEachern | Democratic Party | $273,448 | $273,176 | $272 | As of December 31, 2018 |
Mindi Messmer | Democratic Party | $132,596 | $126,943 | $5,784 | As of December 31, 2018 |
Terence O'Rourke | Democratic Party | $17,848 | $16,749 | $1,251 | As of September 30, 2018 |
Chris Pappas | Democratic Party | $2,219,342 | $2,105,498 | $113,844 | As of December 31, 2018 |
Levi Sanders | Democratic Party | $42,117 | $27,983 | $-5,497 | As of December 31, 2018 |
Maura Sullivan | Democratic Party | $2,017,224 | $2,002,220 | $15,005 | As of December 31, 2018 |
Source: Federal Elections Commission, "Campaign finance data," 2018. This product uses the openFEC API but is not endorsed or certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
* According to the FEC, "Receipts are anything of value (money, goods, services or property) received by a political committee." |
Satellite spending
The following figures were current as of September 7.[41]
- VoteVets spent $289,181 on television and digital ads in support of Maura Sullivan.
- Equality PAC spent $223,315 on direct mail and digital advertising in support of Chris Pappas.
- With Honor Fund spent $517,012 on digital ads, mailings, and polling in support of Maura Sullivan.
- Women Vote!, a super PAC affiliated with EMILY's List, spent $150,097 on mailings in support of Maura Sullivan.
Campaign tactics and strategies
Campaign advertisements
Naomi Andrews
|
Andrews' campaign released a radio ad featuring Carol Shea-Porter, who endorsed Andrews, on September 5. Listen to the ad here.
Mindi Messmer
|
|
Chris Pappas
|
|
Maura Sullivan
|
|
|
|
VoteVets produced the following ad in support of Sullivan.
|
Pappas' and Sullivan's attack mailers
Within the final two weeks of the primary, Pappas and Sullivan both sent out mailers attacking one another. Sullivan's mailer said that Pappas was endorsed in 2016 by the National Federation of Independent Business, which supported repealing the ACA. The mailer read, "No real backbone. Not a real progressive."[42]
Pappas' mailer said that Sullivan received 96 percent of her campaign contributions from outside the state. It also said that $54,000 of her funds came from Bain Capital, and that this amount exceeded what she took in from New Hampshire.[42]
The LGBTQ Victory Fund and state Sen. David Watters, both Pappas supporters, issued statements critical of Sullivan's mailer, saying that the backbone comment was meant as a reference to Pappas being gay. Pappas called the mailer "beyond the pale." He also said, "I’ve demonstrated...backbone during the fights I’ve taken on at the State House, whether it’s standing up for women’s health, expanding Medicaid, going toe to toe with the governor when need be."[42]
Whitney Larsen, Sullivan's campaign manager, said in response to criticisms of the mailer, "The fact is, Chris Pappas welcomed with open arms the endorsement of the NFIB, which is a Koch Brothers front group that wanted to repeal Obamacare."[42]
Throughout her campaign, Sullivan responded to criticisms about contributions from outside New Hampshire by saying that she gained many of her supporters through her work in the Marines and the Obama administration.[8]
Democratic district won by Donald Trump
This district was one of 13 Democratic-held U.S. House districts that Donald Trump (R) won in the 2016 presidential election.[43] Some were expected to be among the House's most competitive elections in 2018.
2018 election results in Democratic-held U.S. House districts won by Donald Trump in 2016 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | Incumbent | 2018 winner | 2018 margin | 2016 presidential margin | 2012 presidential margin |
Arizona's 1st | ![]() |
![]() |
D+7.7 | Trump+1.1 | Romney+2.5 |
Iowa's 2nd | ![]() |
![]() |
D+12.2 | Trump+4.1 | Obama+13.1 |
Illinois' 17th | ![]() |
![]() |
D+23.6 | Trump+0.7 | Obama+17.0 |
Minnesota's 1st | ![]() |
![]() |
R+0.4 | Trump+14.9 | Obama+1.4 |
Minnesota's 7th | ![]() |
![]() |
D+4.3 | Trump+30.8 | Romney+9.8 |
Minnesota's 8th | ![]() |
![]() |
R+5.5 | Trump+15.6 | Obama+5.5 |
New Hampshire's 1st | ![]() |
![]() |
D+11.7 | Trump+1.6 | Obama+1.6 |
New Jersey's 5th | ![]() |
![]() |
D+11.7 | Trump+1.1 | Romney+3.1 |
Nevada's 3rd | ![]() |
![]() |
D+9.1 | Trump+1.0 | Obama+0.8 |
New York's 18th | ![]() |
![]() |
D+10.2 | Trump+1.9 | Obama+4.3 |
Pennsylvania's 8th | ![]() |
![]() |
D+9.2 | Trump+9.6 | Obama+11.9 |
Pennsylvania's 14th | ![]() |
![]() |
R+15.9 | Trump+29.0 | Romney+17.7 |
Wisconsin's 3rd | ![]() |
![]() |
D+19.4 | Trump+4.5 | Obama+11.0 |
Click here to see the 25 Republican-held U.S. House districts that Hillary Clinton (D) won.
Race ratings
- See also: Race rating definitions and methods
Race ratings: New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District election, 2018 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Race tracker | Race ratings | ||||||||
October 30, 2018 | October 23, 2018 | October 16, 2018 | October 9, 2018 | ||||||
The Cook Political Report | Likely Democratic | Likely Democratic | Likely Democratic | Likely Democratic | |||||
Inside Elections with Nathan L. Gonzales | Lean Democratic | Tilt Democratic | Tilt Democratic | Tilt Democratic | |||||
Larry J. Sabato's Crystal Ball | Likely Democratic | Likely Democratic | Lean Democratic | Lean Democratic | |||||
Note: Ballotpedia updates external race ratings every two weeks throughout the election season. |
Pivot Counties
- See also: Pivot Counties by state
Three of 10 New Hampshire counties—30 percent—are Pivot Counties. Pivot Counties are counties that voted for Barack Obama (D) in 2008 and 2012 and for Donald Trump (R) in 2016. Altogether, the nation had 206 Pivot Counties, with most being concentrated in upper midwestern and northeastern states.
Counties won by Trump in 2016 and Obama in 2012 and 2008 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County | Trump margin of victory in 2016 | Obama margin of victory in 2012 | Obama margin of victory in 2008 | ||||
Coos County, New Hampshire | 8.89% | 17.54% | 18.19% | ||||
Hillsborough County, New Hampshire | 0.20% | 1.12% | 3.73% | ||||
Sullivan County, New Hampshire | 2.58% | 13.27% | 17.93% |
In the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton (D) won New Hampshire with 46.8 percent of the vote. Donald Trump (R) received 46.5 percent. In presidential elections between 1789 and 2016, New Hampshire voted Republican 50 percent of the time and Democratic 31 percent of the time. In the five presidential elections between 2000 and 2016, New Hampshire voted Democratic with the exception of the 2000 presidential election.[46]
Presidential results by legislative district
The following table details results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections by state Senate districts in New Hampshire. Click [show] to expand the table. The "Obama," "Romney," "Clinton," and "Trump" columns describe the percent of the vote each presidential candidate received in the district. The "2012 Margin" and "2016 Margin" columns describe the margin of victory between the two presidential candidates in those years. The "Party Control" column notes which party held that seat heading into the 2018 general election. Data on the results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections broken down by state legislative districts was compiled by Daily Kos.[47][48]
In 2012, Barack Obama (D) won 12 out of 24 state Senate districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 17.3 points. In 2016, Hillary Clinton (D) won 10 out of 24 state Senate districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 14.5 points. Clinton won two districts controlled by Republicans heading into the 2018 elections. |
In 2012, Mitt Romney (R) won 12 out of 24 state Senate districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 5.6 points. In 2016, Donald Trump (R) won 14 out of 24 state Senate districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 9.6 points. Trump won two districts controlled by Democrats heading into the 2018 elections. |
2016 presidential results by state Senate District | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | Obama | Romney | 2012 Margin | Clinton | Trump | 2016 Margin | Party Control |
1 | 57.08% | 41.61% | D+15.5 | 44.99% | 49.68% | R+4.7 | D |
2 | 52.51% | 45.89% | D+6.6 | 43.98% | 50.44% | R+6.5 | R |
3 | 49.12% | 49.88% | R+0.8 | 43.80% | 51.18% | R+7.4 | R |
4 | 58.08% | 40.29% | D+17.8 | 54.34% | 39.58% | D+14.8 | D |
5 | 67.21% | 31.61% | D+35.6 | 64.56% | 30.85% | D+33.7 | D |
6 | 48.32% | 50.55% | R+2.2 | 38.68% | 55.72% | R+17 | R |
7 | 51.70% | 47.17% | D+4.5 | 41.20% | 53.79% | R+12.6 | R |
8 | 51.06% | 47.42% | D+3.6 | 43.59% | 50.95% | R+7.4 | R |
9 | 47.73% | 51.10% | R+3.4 | 47.84% | 46.80% | D+1 | R |
10 | 65.04% | 33.59% | D+31.4 | 57.23% | 37.63% | D+19.6 | D |
11 | 47.67% | 50.89% | R+3.2 | 46.41% | 48.12% | R+1.7 | R |
12 | 47.21% | 51.36% | R+4.1 | 45.98% | 48.45% | R+2.5 | R |
13 | 58.98% | 39.69% | D+19.3 | 55.28% | 39.78% | D+15.5 | D |
14 | 43.11% | 55.81% | R+12.7 | 40.93% | 53.97% | R+13 | R |
15 | 63.57% | 35.25% | D+28.3 | 58.03% | 36.71% | D+21.3 | D |
16 | 48.95% | 50.02% | R+1.1 | 47.69% | 47.37% | D+0.3 | D |
17 | 48.55% | 49.99% | R+1.4 | 39.58% | 54.99% | R+15.4 | R |
18 | 51.23% | 47.52% | D+3.7 | 46.10% | 48.85% | R+2.7 | D |
19 | 42.34% | 56.47% | R+14.1 | 39.59% | 55.53% | R+15.9 | R |
20 | 53.77% | 44.65% | D+9.1 | 49.28% | 45.21% | D+4.1 | D |
21 | 65.10% | 33.62% | D+31.5 | 64.73% | 29.61% | D+35.1 | D |
22 | 40.70% | 58.37% | R+17.7 | 37.33% | 58.66% | R+21.3 | R |
23 | 47.62% | 51.11% | R+3.5 | 44.05% | 50.72% | R+6.7 | R |
24 | 48.37% | 50.73% | R+2.4 | 47.82% | 47.78% | D+0 | R |
Total | 52.17% | 46.57% | D+5.6 | 47.60% | 47.22% | D+0.4 | - |
Source: Daily Kos |
Presidential results by legislative district
The following table details results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections by state House districts in New Hampshire. Click [show] to expand the table. The "Obama," "Romney," "Clinton," and "Trump" columns describe the percent of the vote each presidential candidate received in the district. The "2012 Margin" and "2016 Margin" columns describe the margin of victory between the two presidential candidates in those years. Data on the results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections broken down by state legislative districts was compiled by Daily Kos.[49][50]
In 2012, Barack Obama (D) won 145 out of 204 state House districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 17.8 points. In 2016, Hillary Clinton (D) won 101 out of 204 state House districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 17.1 points. |
In 2012, Mitt Romney (R) won 59 out of 204 state House districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 9.9 points. In 2016, Donald Trump (R) won 103 out of 204 state House districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 12.9 points. |
2016 presidential results by state House district | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | Obama | Romney | 2012 Margin | Clinton | Trump | 2016 Margin | |
Belknap 01 | 47.46% | 51.84% | R+4.4 | 41.87% | 52.77% | R+10.9 | |
Belknap 02 | 46.40% | 52.80% | R+6.4 | 42.19% | 53.44% | R+11.3 | |
Belknap 03 | 50.13% | 49.12% | D+1 | 41.17% | 53.63% | R+12.5 | |
Belknap 04 | 50.96% | 47.74% | D+3.2 | 40.81% | 53.63% | R+12.8 | |
Belknap 05 | 39.96% | 59.36% | R+19.4 | 33.77% | 61.51% | R+27.7 | |
Belknap 06 | 48.93% | 49.86% | R+0.9 | 34.78% | 59.94% | R+25.2 | |
Belknap 07 | 46.68% | 52.03% | R+5.4 | 35.69% | 58.71% | R+23 | |
Belknap 08 | 41.99% | 57.14% | R+15.2 | 34.37% | 60.64% | R+26.3 | |
Belknap 09 | 49.75% | 49.36% | D+0.4 | 39.17% | 55.61% | R+16.4 | |
Carroll 01 | 58.26% | 40.88% | D+17.4 | 58.42% | 36.24% | D+22.2 | |
Carroll 02 | 57.17% | 41.74% | D+15.4 | 51.38% | 43.34% | D+8 | |
Carroll 03 | 53.57% | 45.22% | D+8.4 | 47.18% | 47.02% | D+0.2 | |
Carroll 04 | 43.34% | 55.99% | R+12.7 | 41.37% | 54.11% | R+12.7 | |
Carroll 05 | 43.94% | 54.76% | R+10.8 | 34.06% | 60.82% | R+26.8 | |
Carroll 06 | 43.25% | 55.98% | R+12.7 | 44.09% | 51.27% | R+7.2 | |
Carroll 07 | 56.15% | 42.76% | D+13.4 | 51.38% | 43.15% | D+8.2 | |
Carroll 08 | 43.65% | 55.37% | R+11.7 | 37.59% | 57.58% | R+20 | |
Cheshire 01 | 62.12% | 36.66% | D+25.5 | 54.70% | 40.36% | D+14.3 | |
Cheshire 02 | 59.89% | 38.83% | D+21.1 | 49.80% | 45.21% | D+4.6 | |
Cheshire 03 | 57.10% | 41.06% | D+16 | 49.26% | 45.18% | D+4.1 | |
Cheshire 04 | 75.94% | 21.82% | D+54.1 | 65.04% | 28.47% | D+36.6 | |
Cheshire 05 | 74.61% | 23.83% | D+50.8 | 66.72% | 28.02% | D+38.7 | |
Cheshire 06 | 67.57% | 30.51% | D+37.1 | 62.54% | 32.32% | D+30.2 | |
Cheshire 07 | 67.19% | 31.87% | D+35.3 | 63.21% | 31.63% | D+31.6 | |
Cheshire 08 | 63.94% | 35.07% | D+28.9 | 61.89% | 33.11% | D+28.8 | |
Cheshire 09 | 59.26% | 39.39% | D+19.9 | 52.52% | 41.42% | D+11.1 | |
Cheshire 10 | 62.89% | 35.35% | D+27.5 | 52.36% | 42.38% | D+10 | |
Cheshire 11 | 48.01% | 50.30% | R+2.3 | 39.80% | 55.03% | R+15.2 | |
Cheshire 12 | 56.74% | 41.97% | D+14.8 | 46.33% | 48.76% | R+2.4 | |
Cheshire 13 | 62.73% | 35.11% | D+27.6 | 47.48% | 46.86% | D+0.6 | |
Cheshire 14 | 53.77% | 44.72% | D+9.1 | 46.11% | 48.28% | R+2.2 | |
Cheshire 15 | 59.64% | 38.76% | D+20.9 | 48.12% | 46.72% | D+1.4 | |
Cheshire 16 | 69.64% | 28.86% | D+40.8 | 63.80% | 30.82% | D+33 | |
Coos 01 | 45.75% | 53.10% | R+7.4 | 33.24% | 61.94% | R+28.7 | |
Coos 02 | 59.73% | 39.44% | D+20.3 | 38.56% | 56.30% | R+17.7 | |
Coos 03 | 68.97% | 30.07% | D+38.9 | 49.89% | 45.09% | D+4.8 | |
Coos 04 | 52.02% | 46.23% | D+5.8 | 40.86% | 53.95% | R+13.1 | |
Coos 05 | 54.56% | 44.03% | D+10.5 | 43.52% | 51.03% | R+7.5 | |
Coos 06 | 63.76% | 35.20% | D+28.6 | 50.28% | 45.25% | D+5 | |
Coos 07 | 55.43% | 43.24% | D+12.2 | 41.07% | 53.66% | R+12.6 | |
Grafton 01 | 56.23% | 42.31% | D+13.9 | 47.66% | 47.01% | D+0.7 | |
Grafton 02 | 55.51% | 43.14% | D+12.4 | 48.07% | 46.79% | D+1.3 | |
Grafton 03 | 56.47% | 41.99% | D+14.5 | 47.08% | 47.04% | D+0 | |
Grafton 04 | 49.27% | 49.32% | R+0.1 | 37.35% | 56.42% | R+19.1 | |
Grafton 05 | 57.16% | 41.24% | D+15.9 | 50.51% | 43.23% | D+7.3 | |
Grafton 06 | 51.70% | 46.75% | D+4.9 | 45.15% | 48.62% | R+3.5 | |
Grafton 07 | 57.00% | 41.53% | D+15.5 | 47.57% | 46.50% | D+1.1 | |
Grafton 08 | 61.78% | 35.86% | D+25.9 | 54.67% | 39.40% | D+15.3 | |
Grafton 09 | 49.70% | 48.19% | D+1.5 | 39.56% | 54.92% | R+15.4 | |
Grafton 10 | 63.69% | 34.82% | D+28.9 | 57.32% | 36.93% | D+20.4 | |
Grafton 11 | 55.83% | 42.54% | D+13.3 | 44.53% | 50.08% | R+5.5 | |
Grafton 12 | 75.45% | 23.59% | D+51.9 | 83.78% | 13.02% | D+70.8 | |
Grafton 13 | 69.10% | 29.83% | D+39.3 | 69.06% | 25.96% | D+43.1 | |
Grafton 14 | 55.96% | 42.63% | D+13.3 | 47.82% | 46.92% | D+0.9 | |
Grafton 15 | 53.44% | 45.07% | D+8.4 | 42.84% | 51.13% | R+8.3 | |
Grafton 16 | 53.66% | 44.75% | D+8.9 | 44.86% | 49.31% | R+4.5 | |
Grafton 17 | 54.23% | 43.87% | D+10.4 | 45.46% | 48.95% | R+3.5 | |
Hillsborough 01 | 53.91% | 44.52% | D+9.4 | 41.15% | 52.79% | R+11.6 | |
Hillsborough 02 | 45.04% | 53.39% | R+8.3 | 34.84% | 58.30% | R+23.5 | |
Hillsborough 03 | 55.71% | 42.71% | D+13 | 50.65% | 43.64% | D+7 | |
Hillsborough 04 | 52.03% | 45.45% | D+6.6 | 45.21% | 48.16% | R+2.9 | |
Hillsborough 05 | 44.94% | 53.99% | R+9.1 | 43.76% | 50.72% | R+7 | |
Hillsborough 06 | 45.98% | 52.78% | R+6.8 | 43.05% | 52.01% | R+9 | |
Hillsborough 07 | 36.81% | 62.40% | R+25.6 | 44.10% | 51.38% | R+7.3 | |
Hillsborough 08 | 51.56% | 47.69% | D+3.9 | 54.56% | 40.73% | D+13.8 | |
Hillsborough 09 | 53.82% | 44.85% | D+9 | 52.41% | 42.08% | D+10.3 | |
Hillsborough 10 | 64.03% | 33.59% | D+30.4 | 61.46% | 32.94% | D+28.5 | |
Hillsborough 11 | 61.78% | 36.57% | D+25.2 | 54.11% | 39.60% | D+14.5 | |
Hillsborough 12 | 64.39% | 33.48% | D+30.9 | 55.45% | 38.05% | D+17.4 | |
Hillsborough 13 | 48.29% | 50.93% | R+2.6 | 44.88% | 50.40% | R+5.5 | |
Hillsborough 14 | 56.55% | 42.10% | D+14.4 | 50.88% | 44.09% | D+6.8 | |
Hillsborough 15 | 48.02% | 50.96% | R+2.9 | 42.88% | 52.66% | R+9.8 | |
Hillsborough 16 | 55.49% | 43.03% | D+12.5 | 48.76% | 46.48% | D+2.3 | |
Hillsborough 17 | 54.49% | 43.95% | D+10.5 | 49.12% | 45.52% | D+3.6 | |
Hillsborough 18 | 57.60% | 40.55% | D+17.1 | 51.61% | 41.96% | D+9.7 | |
Hillsborough 19 | 52.92% | 45.61% | D+7.3 | 50.14% | 44.56% | D+5.6 | |
Hillsborough 20 | 41.52% | 57.38% | R+15.9 | 39.16% | 55.40% | R+16.2 | |
Hillsborough 21 | 46.21% | 52.42% | R+6.2 | 43.71% | 50.48% | R+6.8 | |
Hillsborough 22 | 46.63% | 52.02% | R+5.4 | 51.38% | 44.50% | D+6.9 | |
Hillsborough 23 | 50.33% | 48.21% | D+2.1 | 46.87% | 47.29% | R+0.4 | |
Hillsborough 24 | 64.73% | 34.18% | D+30.5 | 63.90% | 30.29% | D+33.6 | |
Hillsborough 25 | 38.57% | 59.75% | R+21.2 | 33.32% | 60.92% | R+27.6 | |
Hillsborough 26 | 42.55% | 55.51% | R+13 | 43.31% | 49.72% | R+6.4 | |
Hillsborough 27 | 44.58% | 54.24% | R+9.7 | 49.22% | 44.96% | D+4.3 | |
Hillsborough 28 | 51.78% | 47.12% | D+4.7 | 51.52% | 43.49% | D+8 | |
Hillsborough 29 | 53.71% | 44.69% | D+9 | 52.87% | 42.10% | D+10.8 | |
Hillsborough 30 | 57.36% | 41.22% | D+16.1 | 55.20% | 39.35% | D+15.9 | |
Hillsborough 31 | 70.29% | 28.25% | D+42 | 61.76% | 33.21% | D+28.5 | |
Hillsborough 32 | 50.35% | 48.70% | D+1.7 | 49.00% | 45.82% | D+3.2 | |
Hillsborough 33 | 60.50% | 38.18% | D+22.3 | 54.90% | 40.48% | D+14.4 | |
Hillsborough 34 | 59.45% | 39.25% | D+20.2 | 53.46% | 41.66% | D+11.8 | |
Hillsborough 35 | 56.22% | 42.24% | D+14 | 54.27% | 40.42% | D+13.9 | |
Hillsborough 36 | 54.01% | 45.00% | D+9 | 53.85% | 41.74% | D+12.1 | |
Hillsborough 37 | 42.88% | 56.00% | R+13.1 | 38.52% | 56.84% | R+18.3 | |
Hillsborough 38 | 53.54% | 44.49% | D+9 | 44.99% | 48.80% | R+3.8 | |
Hillsborough 39 | 45.62% | 53.01% | R+7.4 | 39.87% | 54.44% | R+14.6 | |
Hillsborough 40 | 47.23% | 51.49% | R+4.3 | 46.70% | 47.55% | R+0.9 | |
Hillsborough 41 | 40.44% | 58.57% | R+18.1 | 46.70% | 48.92% | R+2.2 | |
Hillsborough 42 | 55.11% | 43.57% | D+11.5 | 55.35% | 39.45% | D+15.9 | |
Hillsborough 43 | 56.66% | 41.95% | D+14.7 | 50.52% | 43.99% | D+6.5 | |
Hillsborough 44 | 48.03% | 50.78% | R+2.8 | 43.34% | 51.77% | R+8.4 | |
Hillsborough 45 | 54.81% | 43.58% | D+11.2 | 50.20% | 44.16% | D+6 | |
Merrimack 01 | 53.02% | 45.41% | D+7.6 | 42.32% | 52.96% | R+10.6 | |
Merrimack 02 | 54.31% | 44.00% | D+10.3 | 36.73% | 57.34% | R+20.6 | |
Merrimack 03 | 55.56% | 43.47% | D+12.1 | 39.58% | 55.04% | R+15.5 | |
Merrimack 04 | 55.42% | 43.81% | D+11.6 | 52.24% | 42.61% | D+9.6 | |
Merrimack 05 | 53.31% | 45.83% | D+7.5 | 55.48% | 40.29% | D+15.2 | |
Merrimack 06 | 57.05% | 41.42% | D+15.6 | 51.32% | 42.38% | D+8.9 | |
Merrimack 07 | 55.87% | 42.59% | D+13.3 | 46.94% | 47.59% | R+0.6 | |
Merrimack 08 | 55.46% | 42.48% | D+13 | 44.76% | 49.92% | R+5.2 | |
Merrimack 09 | 50.97% | 47.80% | D+3.2 | 40.54% | 54.47% | R+13.9 | |
Merrimack 10 | 63.13% | 36.11% | D+27 | 62.90% | 32.80% | D+30.1 | |
Merrimack 11 | 66.72% | 32.13% | D+34.6 | 53.64% | 39.79% | D+13.9 | |
Merrimack 12 | 64.23% | 34.54% | D+29.7 | 51.69% | 42.78% | D+8.9 | |
Merrimack 13 | 64.82% | 33.92% | D+30.9 | 59.43% | 34.64% | D+24.8 | |
Merrimack 14 | 71.14% | 27.32% | D+43.8 | 64.85% | 29.65% | D+35.2 | |
Merrimack 15 | 71.15% | 26.95% | D+44.2 | 60.00% | 32.93% | D+27.1 | |
Merrimack 16 | 67.43% | 31.63% | D+35.8 | 64.52% | 30.86% | D+33.7 | |
Merrimack 17 | 62.62% | 35.84% | D+26.8 | 52.25% | 43.40% | D+8.8 | |
Merrimack 18 | 60.79% | 37.53% | D+23.3 | 58.77% | 37.30% | D+21.5 | |
Merrimack 19 | 57.25% | 42.28% | D+15 | 55.71% | 39.72% | D+16 | |
Merrimack 20 | 52.29% | 46.38% | D+5.9 | 44.45% | 50.14% | R+5.7 | |
Merrimack 21 | 47.97% | 50.53% | R+2.6 | 35.38% | 58.70% | R+23.3 | |
Merrimack 22 | 53.02% | 45.27% | D+7.8 | 39.89% | 54.91% | R+15 | |
Merrimack 23 | 49.49% | 49.60% | R+0.1 | 48.35% | 46.77% | D+1.6 | |
Merrimack 24 | 45.11% | 53.94% | R+8.8 | 42.90% | 52.75% | R+9.9 | |
Merrimack 25 | 54.44% | 44.00% | D+10.4 | 44.63% | 50.27% | R+5.6 | |
Merrimack 26 | 53.45% | 45.27% | D+8.2 | 40.95% | 53.87% | R+12.9 | |
Merrimack 27 | 67.60% | 31.09% | D+36.5 | 59.08% | 35.11% | D+24 | |
Merrimack 28 | 59.88% | 38.97% | D+20.9 | 55.54% | 40.14% | D+15.4 | |
Merrimack 29 | 49.62% | 48.82% | D+0.8 | 36.85% | 57.47% | R+20.6 | |
Rockingham 01 | 49.30% | 48.93% | D+0.4 | 40.91% | 53.66% | R+12.7 | |
Rockingham 02 | 43.25% | 55.32% | R+12.1 | 39.04% | 55.08% | R+16 | |
Rockingham 03 | 45.86% | 52.73% | R+6.9 | 35.92% | 58.92% | R+23 | |
Rockingham 04 | 38.97% | 59.98% | R+21 | 35.98% | 58.88% | R+22.9 | |
Rockingham 05 | 43.30% | 55.72% | R+12.4 | 42.48% | 52.23% | R+9.8 | |
Rockingham 06 | 47.02% | 51.58% | R+4.6 | 40.35% | 54.61% | R+14.3 | |
Rockingham 07 | 35.86% | 63.20% | R+27.3 | 40.03% | 55.08% | R+15 | |
Rockingham 08 | 41.71% | 57.35% | R+15.6 | 37.96% | 58.25% | R+20.3 | |
Rockingham 09 | 50.52% | 47.82% | D+2.7 | 41.05% | 53.47% | R+12.4 | |
Rockingham 10 | 42.18% | 56.03% | R+13.8 | 35.62% | 58.73% | R+23.1 | |
Rockingham 11 | 44.96% | 53.52% | R+8.6 | 44.81% | 49.59% | R+4.8 | |
Rockingham 12 | 41.51% | 57.26% | R+15.8 | 33.53% | 61.60% | R+28.1 | |
Rockingham 13 | 40.58% | 58.29% | R+17.7 | 37.33% | 58.03% | R+20.7 | |
Rockingham 14 | 39.31% | 59.79% | R+20.5 | 37.74% | 57.86% | R+20.1 | |
Rockingham 15 | 43.64% | 55.14% | R+11.5 | 36.47% | 58.63% | R+22.2 | |
Rockingham 16 | 41.21% | 57.42% | R+16.2 | 42.69% | 51.74% | R+9 | |
Rockingham 17 | 59.63% | 39.06% | D+20.6 | 57.87% | 35.55% | D+22.3 | |
Rockingham 18 | 58.43% | 40.65% | D+17.8 | 59.62% | 35.53% | D+24.1 | |
Rockingham 19 | 49.84% | 49.51% | D+0.3 | 53.39% | 41.28% | D+12.1 | |
Rockingham 20 | 44.63% | 54.16% | R+9.5 | 37.41% | 58.83% | R+21.4 | |
Rockingham 21 | 50.08% | 49.04% | D+1 | 48.75% | 47.26% | D+1.5 | |
Rockingham 22 | 47.95% | 51.10% | R+3.1 | 49.79% | 46.16% | D+3.6 | |
Rockingham 23 | 52.14% | 46.98% | D+5.2 | 52.47% | 43.00% | D+9.5 | |
Rockingham 24 | 50.12% | 49.39% | D+0.7 | 56.35% | 38.89% | D+17.5 | |
Rockingham 25 | 68.89% | 29.87% | D+39 | 66.32% | 28.45% | D+37.9 | |
Rockingham 26 | 72.98% | 25.74% | D+47.2 | 73.61% | 21.74% | D+51.9 | |
Rockingham 27 | 64.85% | 34.27% | D+30.6 | 63.53% | 32.39% | D+31.1 | |
Rockingham 28 | 60.02% | 38.86% | D+21.2 | 59.97% | 35.44% | D+24.5 | |
Rockingham 29 | 69.59% | 29.22% | D+40.4 | 72.61% | 22.24% | D+50.4 | |
Rockingham 30 | 68.27% | 30.52% | D+37.8 | 68.59% | 26.51% | D+42.1 | |
Rockingham 31 | 54.36% | 44.74% | D+9.6 | 54.56% | 41.21% | D+13.4 | |
Rockingham 32 | 44.67% | 53.82% | R+9.2 | 39.48% | 54.75% | R+15.3 | |
Rockingham 33 | 42.89% | 55.59% | R+12.7 | 37.94% | 56.69% | R+18.8 | |
Rockingham 34 | 39.95% | 59.03% | R+19.1 | 37.53% | 57.94% | R+20.4 | |
Rockingham 35 | 42.24% | 56.45% | R+14.2 | 39.98% | 54.75% | R+14.8 | |
Rockingham 36 | 56.73% | 42.29% | D+14.4 | 57.60% | 36.89% | D+20.7 | |
Rockingham 37 | 48.04% | 50.95% | R+2.9 | 44.51% | 51.58% | R+7.1 | |
Strafford 01 | 48.75% | 50.13% | R+1.4 | 35.25% | 60.22% | R+25 | |
Strafford 02 | 51.40% | 47.54% | D+3.9 | 36.35% | 57.58% | R+21.2 | |
Strafford 03 | 47.32% | 51.46% | R+4.1 | 40.59% | 54.50% | R+13.9 | |
Strafford 04 | 52.31% | 46.10% | D+6.2 | 45.48% | 47.28% | R+1.8 | |
Strafford 05 | 62.83% | 35.70% | D+27.1 | 62.31% | 31.50% | D+30.8 | |
Strafford 06 | 67.21% | 31.38% | D+35.8 | 66.91% | 26.94% | D+40 | |
Strafford 07 | 50.60% | 48.16% | D+2.4 | 40.65% | 53.40% | R+12.8 | |
Strafford 08 | 55.88% | 42.23% | D+13.6 | 45.29% | 48.25% | R+3 | |
Strafford 09 | 49.30% | 49.18% | D+0.1 | 42.00% | 52.05% | R+10 | |
Strafford 10 | 49.80% | 50.20% | R+0.4 | 39.95% | 53.81% | R+13.9 | |
Strafford 11 | 55.46% | 42.81% | D+12.6 | 44.20% | 50.19% | R+6 | |
Strafford 12 | 50.14% | 48.46% | D+1.7 | 40.49% | 54.35% | R+13.9 | |
Strafford 13 | 68.70% | 28.98% | D+39.7 | 66.80% | 26.28% | D+40.5 | |
Strafford 14 | 67.11% | 30.68% | D+36.4 | 64.57% | 29.05% | D+35.5 | |
Strafford 15 | 54.91% | 44.04% | D+10.9 | 57.11% | 37.82% | D+19.3 | |
Strafford 16 | 59.55% | 39.10% | D+20.4 | 57.02% | 37.26% | D+19.8 | |
Strafford 17 | 56.04% | 42.20% | D+13.8 | 52.96% | 41.40% | D+11.6 | |
Strafford 18 | 57.02% | 41.58% | D+15.4 | 49.53% | 44.78% | D+4.7 | |
Strafford 19 | 67.90% | 29.83% | D+38.1 | 65.66% | 27.70% | D+38 | |
Strafford 20 | 57.15% | 41.65% | D+15.5 | 57.07% | 37.55% | D+19.5 | |
Strafford 21 | 56.53% | 41.89% | D+14.6 | 51.26% | 43.07% | D+8.2 | |
Strafford 22 | 53.05% | 45.41% | D+7.6 | 42.70% | 51.12% | R+8.4 | |
Strafford 23 | 49.55% | 49.68% | R+0.1 | 41.01% | 52.90% | R+11.9 | |
Strafford 24 | 52.66% | 45.78% | D+6.9 | 42.27% | 52.35% | R+10.1 | |
Strafford 25 | 55.93% | 42.53% | D+13.4 | 51.10% | 42.01% | D+9.1 | |
Sullivan 01 | 59.33% | 39.57% | D+19.8 | 58.58% | 36.97% | D+21.6 | |
Sullivan 02 | 45.26% | 53.24% | R+8 | 42.16% | 52.60% | R+10.4 | |
Sullivan 03 | 61.19% | 36.84% | D+24.4 | 46.58% | 46.52% | D+0.1 | |
Sullivan 04 | 59.23% | 39.98% | D+19.2 | 45.68% | 48.73% | R+3 | |
Sullivan 05 | 60.21% | 38.24% | D+22 | 45.52% | 50.24% | R+4.7 | |
Sullivan 06 | 51.90% | 46.27% | D+5.6 | 36.91% | 57.77% | R+20.9 | |
Sullivan 07 | 51.89% | 46.60% | D+5.3 | 39.48% | 55.54% | R+16.1 | |
Sullivan 08 | 60.59% | 37.99% | D+22.6 | 44.93% | 50.02% | R+5.1 | |
Sullivan 09 | 53.91% | 44.67% | D+9.2 | 48.09% | 47.01% | D+1.1 | |
Sullivan 10 | 60.11% | 38.50% | D+21.6 | 45.88% | 48.62% | R+2.7 | |
Sullivan 11 | 55.93% | 42.60% | D+13.3 | 41.97% | 53.01% | R+11 | |
Total | 52.17% | 46.57% | D+5.6 | 47.60% | 47.22% | D+0.4 | |
Source: Daily Kos |
District analysis
- See also: The Cook Political Report's Partisan Voter Index
- See also: FiveThirtyEight's elasticity scores
The 2017 Cook Partisan Voter Index for this district was R+2, meaning that in the previous two presidential elections, this district's results were 2 percentage points more Republican than the national average. This made New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District the 225th most Republican nationally.[51]
FiveThirtyEight's September 2018 elasticity score for states and congressional districts measured "how sensitive it is to changes in the national political environment." This district's elasticity score was 1.19. This means that for every 1 point the national political mood moved toward a party, the district was expected to move 1.19 points toward that party.[52]
See also
- United States House of Representatives elections in New Hampshire, 2018
- United States House elections in New Hampshire (September 11, 2018 Democratic primaries)
- New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District election (September 11, 2018 Republican primary)
- United States House of Representatives elections, 2018
Footnotes
- ↑ Maura Sullivan 2018 campaign website, "Endorsers," accessed August 2, 2018
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 WMUR, "WMUR first: Pappas endorsed by NEA-NH in bid for Congress," March 16, 2018
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 ''Mindi Messmer for Congress, "Endorsements," accessed September 9, 2018
- ↑ WMUR 9, "Shea-Porter endorses former chief of staff Andrews in 1st Congressional District race," May 8, 2018
- ↑ NHPR, "Pappas, Sullivan On Defense At CD1 Democratic Primary Forum," August 31, 2018
- ↑ Concord Monitor, "On the issues: Crowded field in 11-candidate 1st Congressional District Democratic primary," September 4, 2018
- ↑ Laconia Daily Sun, "Sullivan gets more than 96 percent of individual contributions from out of state," August 23, 2018
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 The Eagle-Tribune, "More Women Run for Office in NH," September 2, 2018
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 Concord Monitor, "Front runners have to watch their backs in 1st Congressional Democratic race," September 1, 2018
- ↑ Seacoast Online, "Sullivan pushes back against ‘carpetbagger’ claims," February 14, 2018
- ↑ Naomi Andrews, "About Naomi," accessed September 6, 2018
- ↑ WMUR, "Naomi Andrews' top issue: Campaign finance reform," August 31, 2018
- ↑ Naomi Andrews, "About," accessed September 3, 2018
- ↑ 14.0 14.1 Naomi Andrews' campaign website, “Issues,” accessed September 3, 2018
- ↑ Mindi for Congress, "History," accessed September 3, 2018
- ↑ 16.0 16.1 Mindi Messmer's campaign website, “Issues,” accessed September 3, 2018
- ↑ Vote Smart, "Christopher Pappas' Biography," accessed September 3, 2018
- ↑ Chris Pappas, "About Chris," accessed September 3, 2018
- ↑ New Hampshire Public Radio, "Race for the 1st: A Conversation with Chris Pappas (D)," June 1, 2018
- ↑ 20.0 20.1 Chris Pappas' campaign website, “Issues,” accessed September 3, 2018
- ↑ Maura for NH, "Meet Maura," accessed September 3, 2018
- ↑ Vote Smart, "Maura Sullivan's Biography," accessed September 3, 2018
- ↑ 23.0 23.1 Maura for NH, “Priorities,” accessed September 3, 2018
- ↑ Maura for NH, "Endorsers," accessed September 9, 2018
- ↑ WMUR, "Pappas, Sullivan pick up big-name endorsements in 1st CD race," August 7, 2018
- ↑ New Hampshire Public Radio, "Hassan Endorses Pappas in Crowded CD1 Race," April 5, 2018
- ↑ Fosters, "Pappas gets Shaheen endorsement; rivals push back," August 3, 2018
- ↑ Naomi Andrews, "Press Release: Congresswoman Gwen Moore Endorses Naomi Andrews in New Hampshire’s First Congressional District," August 29, 2018
- ↑ NH Labor News, "Congresswoman Annie Kuster Endorses Chris Pappas For Congress In NH-01," July 23, 2018
- ↑ WMUR, "NH Primary Source: Congressman Seth Moulton backs Maura Sullivan in NH’s 1st Congressional District," May 24, 2018
- ↑ The Eagle-Tribune, "Endorsements pile up in 1st District race," August 5, 2018
- ↑ WMUR, "WMUR first: Manchester Mayor Craig endorses Pappas for Congress," Updated April 24, 2018
- ↑ The Conway Daily Sun, "Pappas, Edwards the logical choices," September 3, 2018
- ↑ WMUR, "EMILY’s List endorses Maura Sullivan in 1st District US House race," March 23, 2018
- ↑ Seacoast, "Teachers federation in NH endorses Chris Pappas for Congress," August 2, 2018
- ↑ Chris Pappas, "Granite State Teamsters Endorse Chris Pappas for Congress," November 2017
- ↑ WMUR, "Chris Pappas endorsed by Giffords gun control, gun safety PAC in 1st District race," May 8, 2018
- ↑ WMUR, "NH Primary Source: End Citizens United PAC endorses Pappas in NH01," August 2 2018
- ↑ WMUR, "Planned Parenthood Action Fund endorses Chris Pappas in NH-01," August 16, 2018
- ↑ 40.0 40.1 40.2 40.3 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ ProPublica, "New Hampshire’s 1st District House Race - 2018 cycle," accessed September 7, 2018
- ↑ 42.0 42.1 42.2 42.3 WMUR, "NH Primary Source: Pappas calls Sullivan 'no backbone' attack 'beyond the pale,'" September 6, 2018
- ↑ This figure includes Pennsylvania districts that were redrawn by the state Supreme Court in early 2018 and districts that flipped in special elections.
- ↑ The new 8th district was created in early 2018 due to court-ordered redistricting and most closely resembles the old 17th District held by Cartwright. Click here to read more.
- ↑ The new 14th district was created in early 2018 due to court-ordered redistricting and most closely resembles the old 18th District Lamb won in a March 2018 special election. Tim Murphy (R) won the old 18th District in the 2016 election. Click here to read more.
- ↑ 270towin.com, "New Hampshire," accessed June 1, 2017
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' statewide election results by congressional and legislative districts," July 9, 2013
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' 2016 presidential results for congressional and legislative districts," February 6, 2017
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' statewide election results by congressional and legislative districts," July 9, 2013
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' 2016 presidential results for congressional and legislative districts," February 6, 2017
- ↑ Cook Political Report, "Introducing the 2017 Cook Political Report Partisan Voter Index," April 7, 2017
- ↑ FiveThirtyEight, "Election Update: The Most (And Least) Elastic States And Districts," September 6, 2018