New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District election (September 11, 2018 Republican primary)
- General election: Nov. 6
- Voter registration deadline: Oct. 23
- Early voting: N/A
- Absentee voting deadline: Varies by locality
- Online registration: No
- Same-day registration: Yes
- Voter ID: Photo ID required
- Poll times: In general, polling places open between 6:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. Eastern Time
2020 →
← 2016
|
New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District |
---|
Democratic primary Republican primary General election |
Election details |
Filing deadline: June 15, 2018 |
Primary: September 11, 2018 General: November 6, 2018 Pre-election incumbent: Carol Shea-Porter (Democrat) |
How to vote |
Poll times: Varies by municipality Voting in New Hampshire |
Race ratings |
Cook Political Report: Likely Democratic Inside Elections: Lean Democratic Sabato's Crystal Ball: Likely Democratic |
Ballotpedia analysis |
U.S. Senate battlegrounds U.S. House battlegrounds Federal and state primary competitiveness Ballotpedia's Election Analysis Hub, 2018 |
See also |
1st • 2nd New Hampshire elections, 2018 U.S. Congress elections, 2018 U.S. Senate elections, 2018 U.S. House elections, 2018 |
Former South Hampton Police Chief Eddie Edwards won the September 11 Republican primary. He received 48 percent of the vote. State Sen. Andy Sanborn was second with 42 percent.
New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District flipped five times between 2006 and 2016, and the competitive 2018 race for the seat was targeted by both parties following the announced retirement of Rep. Carol Shea-Porter (D).
Five Republican candidates ran in the race, including Sanborn and Edwards. Both had high-profile endorsements. Their campaigns focused on who had the most conservative credentials and on criticizing elements of each other's personal and work histories.
Edwards’ backers included former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.), former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, and Fred Doucette, former co-chair of Donald Trump’s New Hampshire campaign. Sanborn was endorsed by Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Trump’s former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, among others.
Edwards highlighted his history as director of the state Liquor Commission Enforcement Division, as police chief of South Hampton, and as the owner of a regulatory compliance consulting business. His campaign website said he “has seen the waste of government from the inside.”[1] Edwards described himself as “a true conservative who understands the values of honesty and integrity.”[2]
Sanborn emphasized his experience in the state legislature, saying he had a record of lowering taxes. He said referring to Edwards, “My proven conservative record puts me head and shoulders above my opponent, a lifelong government bureaucrat turned lobbyist.”[2]
Both candidates accused each other of turning the race negative and dishonestly representing each other's histories.[3]
Edwards criticized Sanborn over allegations that he made an inappropriate comment to an aide in 2013, while Sanborn responded, “No complaint was ever filed, no policy was ever broken.”[4] On August 16, Edwards was barred from participating in a party-sponsored debate after refusing to pledge to endorse Sanborn if Sanborn won the primary; Edwards cited the 2013 comment as part of his reason for refusing to make the pledge.[5] Sanborn had signed the pledge to endorse the primary winner. Read more below.
Sanborn criticized his main challenger over a settlement Edwards reached with the state in 2013 regarding a complaint alleging that he experienced racial discrimination at the Liquor Commission. Sanborn emphasized that the settlement stipulated that Edwards could no longer work for the commission.[2]
Election results
The following candidates ran in the Republican primary for U.S. House New Hampshire District 1 on September 11, 2018.
Republican primary election
Republican primary for U.S. House New Hampshire District 1
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Eddie Edwards | 48.0 | 23,510 |
![]() | Andy Sanborn | 41.6 | 20,364 | |
![]() | Andy Martin ![]() | 4.2 | 2,072 | |
Michael Callis | 2.6 | 1,254 | ||
Jeff Denaro | 2.0 | 963 | ||
Bruce Crochetiere | 1.6 | 766 |
Total votes: 48,929 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- Mark Hounsell (R)
Note: Bruce Crochetiere withdrew from the race in July but still appeared on the ballot.
Candidates
Top candidates
Party: Republican
Incumbent: No
Political office: None
Biography: Edwards was the chief of police for the town of South Hampton from 2013 to 2014 and director of the New Hampshire Liquor Commission Enforcement Division from 2005 to 2013. He founded Eddie Edwards Consulting, which works with small businesses on regulatory compliance. Edwards is a Navy veteran. He graduated from the FBI National Academy and holds a Bachelor of Business Administration from Northcentral University.[6][7]
- Edwards said that bringing integrity and character to Washington was the primary message of his campaign.[8] In relation to inappropriate remarks Sanborn allegedly made to an aide in 2013, Edwards said Sanborn lacked integrity.[9]
- Edwards highlighted his work on the issue of substance abuse during his time in law enforcement and his private sector work helping small businesses navigate regulations.[10]
- Edwards called himself a conservative outsider and Sanborn a career politician.[11]
Party: Republican
Incumbent: No
Political office: New Hampshire State Senate
Biography: Sanborn was first elected to the New Hampshire State Senate in 2010. He served as chairman of the Senate Commerce, Health and Human Services, and Ways and Means committees. He is also a restaurant owner. Sanborn earned a bachelor's degree in finance, economics, and marketing from New England College.[12][13]
- Sanborn said that he had been called the "conservative conscience of the Senate," pointing to his record of sponsoring bills to lower business and personal taxes.[12][14]
- Sanborn described himself as a political outsider, saying he entered politics due to his experience with government regulations as a business owner.[12] He said his continuing work in his restaurant kept him in touch with the state's residents and their priorities.[15]
- Sanborn emphasized that he is a fourth-generation New Hampshirite, contrasting himself with Edwards, who grew up in Georgia.[12]
List of all candidates
Republican primary candidates
Did not make the ballot:
= candidate completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey
Endorsements
Republican candidate endorsements | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Endorsement | Sanborn[16] | Edwards[17] | ||
Federal officials | ||||
Sen. Rand Paul (R)[18] | ✔ | |||
Sen. Ted Cruz (R)[19] | ✔ | |||
National figures | ||||
Former Sen. Bob Smith (R)[20] | ✔ | |||
Former Sen. Rick Santorum (R)[21] | ✔ | |||
Former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R)[22] | ✔ | |||
Former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski | ✔ | |||
State figures | ||||
Former NH Republican Party Chair Jeanie Forrester | ✔ | |||
52 state representatives | ✔ | |||
16 former state representatives | ✔ | |||
State Sen. Harold French | ✔ | |||
State Sen. Sharon Carson (R) | ✔ | |||
State Sen. Regina Birdsell (R) | ✔ | |||
Former NH Republican Party Vice Chairman Cliff Hurst | ✔ | |||
Former state Rep. Katherine Prudhomme-O'Brien (R) | ✔ | |||
Former co-chair of Trump's NH campaign Fred Doucette[23] | ✔ | |||
New Hampshire Union Leader | ✔ | |||
Local figures | ||||
Vice Chair, Bedford GOP Matt Pitaro | ✔ | |||
Epping Board of Selectmen Vice Chairman Bob Jordan | ✔ | |||
The Conway Daily Sun[24] | ✔ | |||
Weirs Times | ✔ | |||
PACs | ||||
Gun Owners of America | ✔ | |||
With Honor Fund | ✔ |
Campaign themes and policy stances
Eddie Edwards
The following was taken from Edwards' 2018 campaign website.
“ |
Create Good, High-Paying Jobs for New Hampshire
Cut Taxes and Pass Meaningful Tax Reform
Reduce College Costs and Address the Student Loan Crisis
Strengthen National Security and Provide for Our Veterans
Fight the Scourge of Opioid Addiction and Abuse
Protect the Second Amendment Granite Staters can be assured that I will never advocate for stricter federal gun laws that would take power away from the state and will always stand with New Hampshire citizens in defense of the Second Amendment. Fight Illegal Immigration and Build the Wall Stand for the Sanctity of Life |
” |
—Eddie Edwards' campaign website (2018)[26] |
Andy Sanborn
Sanborn's campaign website presented his policy priorities in the form of video clips from a July 11 debate. The videos are below.[27]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campaign finance
The reports below were obtained from the Federal Election Commission.
Name | Party | Receipts* | Disbursements** | Cash on hand | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Michael Callis | Republican Party | $0 | $0 | $0 | Data not available*** |
Bruce Crochetiere | Republican Party | $329,037 | $312,888 | $16,149 | As of December 31, 2018 |
Eddie Edwards | Republican Party | $1,268,155 | $1,217,272 | $50,884 | As of December 31, 2018 |
Andy Martin | Republican Party | $0 | $0 | $0 | Data not available*** |
Andy Sanborn | Republican Party | $882,961 | $882,961 | $0 | As of December 31, 2018 |
Source: Federal Elections Commission, "Campaign finance data," 2018. This product uses the openFEC API but is not endorsed or certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
* According to the FEC, "Receipts are anything of value (money, goods, services or property) received by a political committee." |
Campaign tactics and strategies
Campaign advertisements
Eddie Edwards
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edwards released his first TV ad on September 4.
|
Andy Sanborn
|
Sanborn's attack mailers, Edwards' complaint
Three weeks ahead of the primary, Sanborn's campaign sent out mailers claiming that Edwards opposed President Donald Trump and questioning his position on gun restrictions. Edwards filed a complaint with the state's attorney general because the mailers did not disclose who was sending them. Sanborn's campaign said the omission was an oversight and that it accounted for the error in a document filed with the Federal Election Commission.
Edwards' campaign said that the contents of the mailer were untrue, while Sanborn's campaign maintained they were factually accurate.[28]
Debates and forums
Five candidates participated in a debate on September 6, 2018, hosted by WMUR, Saint Anselm College, and the New Hampshire Union Leader. Watch a video of the debate here.
Noteworthy events
August 16, 2018: Edwards told to leave debate, would not pledge to endorse Sanborn if he won
Edwards and Sanborn were set to participate in a party-sponsored debate on August 16. On August 15, Edwards stated that he would not sign a pledge, required by the party, to support Sanborn should Sanborn win the primary. Edwards showed up to the debate but was asked to leave by state party chairman Wayne MacDonald when he would not sign the pledge.[29]
Edwards cited inappropriate remarks Sanborn allegedly made to an aide in 2013 as part of the reason he would not pledge to endorse him if Sanborn won the primary. In a statement, Edwards said, "No matter where I have been, I have made the same promise to every voter: I am running to bring honesty and integrity back to Congress. ... If Sen. Sanborn and I just had a different perspective on various policies, I would be more than happy to sign the pledge. However, that is not the case. What separates us is much more serious than policy disagreements.”[5]
Sanborn said in a statement, "The Republican Party is strongest when we are united and this race is about more than just my campaign."[5] Sanborn has referred to his 2013 remark as crass but has said that no complaints were filed or policies broken.[3]
Democratic district won by Donald Trump
This district was one of 13 Democratic-held U.S. House districts that Donald Trump (R) won in the 2016 presidential election.[30] Some were expected to be among the House's most competitive elections in 2018.
2018 election results in Democratic-held U.S. House districts won by Donald Trump in 2016 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | Incumbent | 2018 winner | 2018 margin | 2016 presidential margin | 2012 presidential margin |
Arizona's 1st | ![]() |
![]() |
D+7.7 | Trump+1.1 | Romney+2.5 |
Iowa's 2nd | ![]() |
![]() |
D+12.2 | Trump+4.1 | Obama+13.1 |
Illinois' 17th | ![]() |
![]() |
D+23.6 | Trump+0.7 | Obama+17.0 |
Minnesota's 1st | ![]() |
![]() |
R+0.4 | Trump+14.9 | Obama+1.4 |
Minnesota's 7th | ![]() |
![]() |
D+4.3 | Trump+30.8 | Romney+9.8 |
Minnesota's 8th | ![]() |
![]() |
R+5.5 | Trump+15.6 | Obama+5.5 |
New Hampshire's 1st | ![]() |
![]() |
D+11.7 | Trump+1.6 | Obama+1.6 |
New Jersey's 5th | ![]() |
![]() |
D+11.7 | Trump+1.1 | Romney+3.1 |
Nevada's 3rd | ![]() |
![]() |
D+9.1 | Trump+1.0 | Obama+0.8 |
New York's 18th | ![]() |
![]() |
D+10.2 | Trump+1.9 | Obama+4.3 |
Pennsylvania's 8th | ![]() |
![]() |
D+9.2 | Trump+9.6 | Obama+11.9 |
Pennsylvania's 14th | ![]() |
![]() |
R+15.9 | Trump+29.0 | Romney+17.7 |
Wisconsin's 3rd | ![]() |
![]() |
D+19.4 | Trump+4.5 | Obama+11.0 |
Click here to see the 25 Republican-held U.S. House districts that Hillary Clinton (D) won.
Race ratings
- See also: Race rating definitions and methods
Race ratings: New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District election, 2018 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Race tracker | Race ratings | ||||||||
October 30, 2018 | October 23, 2018 | October 16, 2018 | October 9, 2018 | ||||||
The Cook Political Report | Likely Democratic | Likely Democratic | Likely Democratic | Likely Democratic | |||||
Inside Elections with Nathan L. Gonzales | Lean Democratic | Tilt Democratic | Tilt Democratic | Tilt Democratic | |||||
Larry J. Sabato's Crystal Ball | Likely Democratic | Likely Democratic | Lean Democratic | Lean Democratic | |||||
Note: Ballotpedia updates external race ratings every two weeks throughout the election season. |
District analysis
- See also: The Cook Political Report's Partisan Voter Index
- See also: FiveThirtyEight's elasticity scores
The 2017 Cook Partisan Voter Index for this district was R+2, meaning that in the previous two presidential elections, this district's results were 2 percentage points more Republican than the national average. This made New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District the 225th most Republican nationally.[33]
FiveThirtyEight's September 2018 elasticity score for states and congressional districts measured "how sensitive it is to changes in the national political environment." This district's elasticity score was 1.19. This means that for every 1 point the national political mood moved toward a party, the district was expected to move 1.19 points toward that party.[34]
Pivot Counties
- See also: Pivot Counties by state
Three of 10 New Hampshire counties—30 percent—are Pivot Counties. Pivot Counties are counties that voted for Barack Obama (D) in 2008 and 2012 and for Donald Trump (R) in 2016. Altogether, the nation had 206 Pivot Counties, with most being concentrated in upper midwestern and northeastern states.
Counties won by Trump in 2016 and Obama in 2012 and 2008 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County | Trump margin of victory in 2016 | Obama margin of victory in 2012 | Obama margin of victory in 2008 | ||||
Coos County, New Hampshire | 8.89% | 17.54% | 18.19% | ||||
Hillsborough County, New Hampshire | 0.20% | 1.12% | 3.73% | ||||
Sullivan County, New Hampshire | 2.58% | 13.27% | 17.93% |
In the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton (D) won New Hampshire with 46.8 percent of the vote. Donald Trump (R) received 46.5 percent. In presidential elections between 1789 and 2016, New Hampshire voted Republican 50 percent of the time and Democratic 31 percent of the time. In the five presidential elections between 2000 and 2016, New Hampshire voted Democratic with the exception of the 2000 presidential election.[35]
Presidential results by legislative district
The following table details results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections by state Senate districts in New Hampshire. Click [show] to expand the table. The "Obama," "Romney," "Clinton," and "Trump" columns describe the percent of the vote each presidential candidate received in the district. The "2012 Margin" and "2016 Margin" columns describe the margin of victory between the two presidential candidates in those years. The "Party Control" column notes which party held that seat heading into the 2018 general election. Data on the results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections broken down by state legislative districts was compiled by Daily Kos.[36][37]
In 2012, Barack Obama (D) won 12 out of 24 state Senate districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 17.3 points. In 2016, Hillary Clinton (D) won 10 out of 24 state Senate districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 14.5 points. Clinton won two districts controlled by Republicans heading into the 2018 elections. |
In 2012, Mitt Romney (R) won 12 out of 24 state Senate districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 5.6 points. In 2016, Donald Trump (R) won 14 out of 24 state Senate districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 9.6 points. Trump won two districts controlled by Democrats heading into the 2018 elections. |
2016 presidential results by state Senate District | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | Obama | Romney | 2012 Margin | Clinton | Trump | 2016 Margin | Party Control |
1 | 57.08% | 41.61% | D+15.5 | 44.99% | 49.68% | R+4.7 | D |
2 | 52.51% | 45.89% | D+6.6 | 43.98% | 50.44% | R+6.5 | R |
3 | 49.12% | 49.88% | R+0.8 | 43.80% | 51.18% | R+7.4 | R |
4 | 58.08% | 40.29% | D+17.8 | 54.34% | 39.58% | D+14.8 | D |
5 | 67.21% | 31.61% | D+35.6 | 64.56% | 30.85% | D+33.7 | D |
6 | 48.32% | 50.55% | R+2.2 | 38.68% | 55.72% | R+17 | R |
7 | 51.70% | 47.17% | D+4.5 | 41.20% | 53.79% | R+12.6 | R |
8 | 51.06% | 47.42% | D+3.6 | 43.59% | 50.95% | R+7.4 | R |
9 | 47.73% | 51.10% | R+3.4 | 47.84% | 46.80% | D+1 | R |
10 | 65.04% | 33.59% | D+31.4 | 57.23% | 37.63% | D+19.6 | D |
11 | 47.67% | 50.89% | R+3.2 | 46.41% | 48.12% | R+1.7 | R |
12 | 47.21% | 51.36% | R+4.1 | 45.98% | 48.45% | R+2.5 | R |
13 | 58.98% | 39.69% | D+19.3 | 55.28% | 39.78% | D+15.5 | D |
14 | 43.11% | 55.81% | R+12.7 | 40.93% | 53.97% | R+13 | R |
15 | 63.57% | 35.25% | D+28.3 | 58.03% | 36.71% | D+21.3 | D |
16 | 48.95% | 50.02% | R+1.1 | 47.69% | 47.37% | D+0.3 | D |
17 | 48.55% | 49.99% | R+1.4 | 39.58% | 54.99% | R+15.4 | R |
18 | 51.23% | 47.52% | D+3.7 | 46.10% | 48.85% | R+2.7 | D |
19 | 42.34% | 56.47% | R+14.1 | 39.59% | 55.53% | R+15.9 | R |
20 | 53.77% | 44.65% | D+9.1 | 49.28% | 45.21% | D+4.1 | D |
21 | 65.10% | 33.62% | D+31.5 | 64.73% | 29.61% | D+35.1 | D |
22 | 40.70% | 58.37% | R+17.7 | 37.33% | 58.66% | R+21.3 | R |
23 | 47.62% | 51.11% | R+3.5 | 44.05% | 50.72% | R+6.7 | R |
24 | 48.37% | 50.73% | R+2.4 | 47.82% | 47.78% | D+0 | R |
Total | 52.17% | 46.57% | D+5.6 | 47.60% | 47.22% | D+0.4 | - |
Source: Daily Kos |
Presidential results by legislative district
The following table details results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections by state House districts in New Hampshire. Click [show] to expand the table. The "Obama," "Romney," "Clinton," and "Trump" columns describe the percent of the vote each presidential candidate received in the district. The "2012 Margin" and "2016 Margin" columns describe the margin of victory between the two presidential candidates in those years. Data on the results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections broken down by state legislative districts was compiled by Daily Kos.[38][39]
In 2012, Barack Obama (D) won 145 out of 204 state House districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 17.8 points. In 2016, Hillary Clinton (D) won 101 out of 204 state House districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 17.1 points. |
In 2012, Mitt Romney (R) won 59 out of 204 state House districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 9.9 points. In 2016, Donald Trump (R) won 103 out of 204 state House districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 12.9 points. |
2016 presidential results by state House district | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | Obama | Romney | 2012 Margin | Clinton | Trump | 2016 Margin | |
Belknap 01 | 47.46% | 51.84% | R+4.4 | 41.87% | 52.77% | R+10.9 | |
Belknap 02 | 46.40% | 52.80% | R+6.4 | 42.19% | 53.44% | R+11.3 | |
Belknap 03 | 50.13% | 49.12% | D+1 | 41.17% | 53.63% | R+12.5 | |
Belknap 04 | 50.96% | 47.74% | D+3.2 | 40.81% | 53.63% | R+12.8 | |
Belknap 05 | 39.96% | 59.36% | R+19.4 | 33.77% | 61.51% | R+27.7 | |
Belknap 06 | 48.93% | 49.86% | R+0.9 | 34.78% | 59.94% | R+25.2 | |
Belknap 07 | 46.68% | 52.03% | R+5.4 | 35.69% | 58.71% | R+23 | |
Belknap 08 | 41.99% | 57.14% | R+15.2 | 34.37% | 60.64% | R+26.3 | |
Belknap 09 | 49.75% | 49.36% | D+0.4 | 39.17% | 55.61% | R+16.4 | |
Carroll 01 | 58.26% | 40.88% | D+17.4 | 58.42% | 36.24% | D+22.2 | |
Carroll 02 | 57.17% | 41.74% | D+15.4 | 51.38% | 43.34% | D+8 | |
Carroll 03 | 53.57% | 45.22% | D+8.4 | 47.18% | 47.02% | D+0.2 | |
Carroll 04 | 43.34% | 55.99% | R+12.7 | 41.37% | 54.11% | R+12.7 | |
Carroll 05 | 43.94% | 54.76% | R+10.8 | 34.06% | 60.82% | R+26.8 | |
Carroll 06 | 43.25% | 55.98% | R+12.7 | 44.09% | 51.27% | R+7.2 | |
Carroll 07 | 56.15% | 42.76% | D+13.4 | 51.38% | 43.15% | D+8.2 | |
Carroll 08 | 43.65% | 55.37% | R+11.7 | 37.59% | 57.58% | R+20 | |
Cheshire 01 | 62.12% | 36.66% | D+25.5 | 54.70% | 40.36% | D+14.3 | |
Cheshire 02 | 59.89% | 38.83% | D+21.1 | 49.80% | 45.21% | D+4.6 | |
Cheshire 03 | 57.10% | 41.06% | D+16 | 49.26% | 45.18% | D+4.1 | |
Cheshire 04 | 75.94% | 21.82% | D+54.1 | 65.04% | 28.47% | D+36.6 | |
Cheshire 05 | 74.61% | 23.83% | D+50.8 | 66.72% | 28.02% | D+38.7 | |
Cheshire 06 | 67.57% | 30.51% | D+37.1 | 62.54% | 32.32% | D+30.2 | |
Cheshire 07 | 67.19% | 31.87% | D+35.3 | 63.21% | 31.63% | D+31.6 | |
Cheshire 08 | 63.94% | 35.07% | D+28.9 | 61.89% | 33.11% | D+28.8 | |
Cheshire 09 | 59.26% | 39.39% | D+19.9 | 52.52% | 41.42% | D+11.1 | |
Cheshire 10 | 62.89% | 35.35% | D+27.5 | 52.36% | 42.38% | D+10 | |
Cheshire 11 | 48.01% | 50.30% | R+2.3 | 39.80% | 55.03% | R+15.2 | |
Cheshire 12 | 56.74% | 41.97% | D+14.8 | 46.33% | 48.76% | R+2.4 | |
Cheshire 13 | 62.73% | 35.11% | D+27.6 | 47.48% | 46.86% | D+0.6 | |
Cheshire 14 | 53.77% | 44.72% | D+9.1 | 46.11% | 48.28% | R+2.2 | |
Cheshire 15 | 59.64% | 38.76% | D+20.9 | 48.12% | 46.72% | D+1.4 | |
Cheshire 16 | 69.64% | 28.86% | D+40.8 | 63.80% | 30.82% | D+33 | |
Coos 01 | 45.75% | 53.10% | R+7.4 | 33.24% | 61.94% | R+28.7 | |
Coos 02 | 59.73% | 39.44% | D+20.3 | 38.56% | 56.30% | R+17.7 | |
Coos 03 | 68.97% | 30.07% | D+38.9 | 49.89% | 45.09% | D+4.8 | |
Coos 04 | 52.02% | 46.23% | D+5.8 | 40.86% | 53.95% | R+13.1 | |
Coos 05 | 54.56% | 44.03% | D+10.5 | 43.52% | 51.03% | R+7.5 | |
Coos 06 | 63.76% | 35.20% | D+28.6 | 50.28% | 45.25% | D+5 | |
Coos 07 | 55.43% | 43.24% | D+12.2 | 41.07% | 53.66% | R+12.6 | |
Grafton 01 | 56.23% | 42.31% | D+13.9 | 47.66% | 47.01% | D+0.7 | |
Grafton 02 | 55.51% | 43.14% | D+12.4 | 48.07% | 46.79% | D+1.3 | |
Grafton 03 | 56.47% | 41.99% | D+14.5 | 47.08% | 47.04% | D+0 | |
Grafton 04 | 49.27% | 49.32% | R+0.1 | 37.35% | 56.42% | R+19.1 | |
Grafton 05 | 57.16% | 41.24% | D+15.9 | 50.51% | 43.23% | D+7.3 | |
Grafton 06 | 51.70% | 46.75% | D+4.9 | 45.15% | 48.62% | R+3.5 | |
Grafton 07 | 57.00% | 41.53% | D+15.5 | 47.57% | 46.50% | D+1.1 | |
Grafton 08 | 61.78% | 35.86% | D+25.9 | 54.67% | 39.40% | D+15.3 | |
Grafton 09 | 49.70% | 48.19% | D+1.5 | 39.56% | 54.92% | R+15.4 | |
Grafton 10 | 63.69% | 34.82% | D+28.9 | 57.32% | 36.93% | D+20.4 | |
Grafton 11 | 55.83% | 42.54% | D+13.3 | 44.53% | 50.08% | R+5.5 | |
Grafton 12 | 75.45% | 23.59% | D+51.9 | 83.78% | 13.02% | D+70.8 | |
Grafton 13 | 69.10% | 29.83% | D+39.3 | 69.06% | 25.96% | D+43.1 | |
Grafton 14 | 55.96% | 42.63% | D+13.3 | 47.82% | 46.92% | D+0.9 | |
Grafton 15 | 53.44% | 45.07% | D+8.4 | 42.84% | 51.13% | R+8.3 | |
Grafton 16 | 53.66% | 44.75% | D+8.9 | 44.86% | 49.31% | R+4.5 | |
Grafton 17 | 54.23% | 43.87% | D+10.4 | 45.46% | 48.95% | R+3.5 | |
Hillsborough 01 | 53.91% | 44.52% | D+9.4 | 41.15% | 52.79% | R+11.6 | |
Hillsborough 02 | 45.04% | 53.39% | R+8.3 | 34.84% | 58.30% | R+23.5 | |
Hillsborough 03 | 55.71% | 42.71% | D+13 | 50.65% | 43.64% | D+7 | |
Hillsborough 04 | 52.03% | 45.45% | D+6.6 | 45.21% | 48.16% | R+2.9 | |
Hillsborough 05 | 44.94% | 53.99% | R+9.1 | 43.76% | 50.72% | R+7 | |
Hillsborough 06 | 45.98% | 52.78% | R+6.8 | 43.05% | 52.01% | R+9 | |
Hillsborough 07 | 36.81% | 62.40% | R+25.6 | 44.10% | 51.38% | R+7.3 | |
Hillsborough 08 | 51.56% | 47.69% | D+3.9 | 54.56% | 40.73% | D+13.8 | |
Hillsborough 09 | 53.82% | 44.85% | D+9 | 52.41% | 42.08% | D+10.3 | |
Hillsborough 10 | 64.03% | 33.59% | D+30.4 | 61.46% | 32.94% | D+28.5 | |
Hillsborough 11 | 61.78% | 36.57% | D+25.2 | 54.11% | 39.60% | D+14.5 | |
Hillsborough 12 | 64.39% | 33.48% | D+30.9 | 55.45% | 38.05% | D+17.4 | |
Hillsborough 13 | 48.29% | 50.93% | R+2.6 | 44.88% | 50.40% | R+5.5 | |
Hillsborough 14 | 56.55% | 42.10% | D+14.4 | 50.88% | 44.09% | D+6.8 | |
Hillsborough 15 | 48.02% | 50.96% | R+2.9 | 42.88% | 52.66% | R+9.8 | |
Hillsborough 16 | 55.49% | 43.03% | D+12.5 | 48.76% | 46.48% | D+2.3 | |
Hillsborough 17 | 54.49% | 43.95% | D+10.5 | 49.12% | 45.52% | D+3.6 | |
Hillsborough 18 | 57.60% | 40.55% | D+17.1 | 51.61% | 41.96% | D+9.7 | |
Hillsborough 19 | 52.92% | 45.61% | D+7.3 | 50.14% | 44.56% | D+5.6 | |
Hillsborough 20 | 41.52% | 57.38% | R+15.9 | 39.16% | 55.40% | R+16.2 | |
Hillsborough 21 | 46.21% | 52.42% | R+6.2 | 43.71% | 50.48% | R+6.8 | |
Hillsborough 22 | 46.63% | 52.02% | R+5.4 | 51.38% | 44.50% | D+6.9 | |
Hillsborough 23 | 50.33% | 48.21% | D+2.1 | 46.87% | 47.29% | R+0.4 | |
Hillsborough 24 | 64.73% | 34.18% | D+30.5 | 63.90% | 30.29% | D+33.6 | |
Hillsborough 25 | 38.57% | 59.75% | R+21.2 | 33.32% | 60.92% | R+27.6 | |
Hillsborough 26 | 42.55% | 55.51% | R+13 | 43.31% | 49.72% | R+6.4 | |
Hillsborough 27 | 44.58% | 54.24% | R+9.7 | 49.22% | 44.96% | D+4.3 | |
Hillsborough 28 | 51.78% | 47.12% | D+4.7 | 51.52% | 43.49% | D+8 | |
Hillsborough 29 | 53.71% | 44.69% | D+9 | 52.87% | 42.10% | D+10.8 | |
Hillsborough 30 | 57.36% | 41.22% | D+16.1 | 55.20% | 39.35% | D+15.9 | |
Hillsborough 31 | 70.29% | 28.25% | D+42 | 61.76% | 33.21% | D+28.5 | |
Hillsborough 32 | 50.35% | 48.70% | D+1.7 | 49.00% | 45.82% | D+3.2 | |
Hillsborough 33 | 60.50% | 38.18% | D+22.3 | 54.90% | 40.48% | D+14.4 | |
Hillsborough 34 | 59.45% | 39.25% | D+20.2 | 53.46% | 41.66% | D+11.8 | |
Hillsborough 35 | 56.22% | 42.24% | D+14 | 54.27% | 40.42% | D+13.9 | |
Hillsborough 36 | 54.01% | 45.00% | D+9 | 53.85% | 41.74% | D+12.1 | |
Hillsborough 37 | 42.88% | 56.00% | R+13.1 | 38.52% | 56.84% | R+18.3 | |
Hillsborough 38 | 53.54% | 44.49% | D+9 | 44.99% | 48.80% | R+3.8 | |
Hillsborough 39 | 45.62% | 53.01% | R+7.4 | 39.87% | 54.44% | R+14.6 | |
Hillsborough 40 | 47.23% | 51.49% | R+4.3 | 46.70% | 47.55% | R+0.9 | |
Hillsborough 41 | 40.44% | 58.57% | R+18.1 | 46.70% | 48.92% | R+2.2 | |
Hillsborough 42 | 55.11% | 43.57% | D+11.5 | 55.35% | 39.45% | D+15.9 | |
Hillsborough 43 | 56.66% | 41.95% | D+14.7 | 50.52% | 43.99% | D+6.5 | |
Hillsborough 44 | 48.03% | 50.78% | R+2.8 | 43.34% | 51.77% | R+8.4 | |
Hillsborough 45 | 54.81% | 43.58% | D+11.2 | 50.20% | 44.16% | D+6 | |
Merrimack 01 | 53.02% | 45.41% | D+7.6 | 42.32% | 52.96% | R+10.6 | |
Merrimack 02 | 54.31% | 44.00% | D+10.3 | 36.73% | 57.34% | R+20.6 | |
Merrimack 03 | 55.56% | 43.47% | D+12.1 | 39.58% | 55.04% | R+15.5 | |
Merrimack 04 | 55.42% | 43.81% | D+11.6 | 52.24% | 42.61% | D+9.6 | |
Merrimack 05 | 53.31% | 45.83% | D+7.5 | 55.48% | 40.29% | D+15.2 | |
Merrimack 06 | 57.05% | 41.42% | D+15.6 | 51.32% | 42.38% | D+8.9 | |
Merrimack 07 | 55.87% | 42.59% | D+13.3 | 46.94% | 47.59% | R+0.6 | |
Merrimack 08 | 55.46% | 42.48% | D+13 | 44.76% | 49.92% | R+5.2 | |
Merrimack 09 | 50.97% | 47.80% | D+3.2 | 40.54% | 54.47% | R+13.9 | |
Merrimack 10 | 63.13% | 36.11% | D+27 | 62.90% | 32.80% | D+30.1 | |
Merrimack 11 | 66.72% | 32.13% | D+34.6 | 53.64% | 39.79% | D+13.9 | |
Merrimack 12 | 64.23% | 34.54% | D+29.7 | 51.69% | 42.78% | D+8.9 | |
Merrimack 13 | 64.82% | 33.92% | D+30.9 | 59.43% | 34.64% | D+24.8 | |
Merrimack 14 | 71.14% | 27.32% | D+43.8 | 64.85% | 29.65% | D+35.2 | |
Merrimack 15 | 71.15% | 26.95% | D+44.2 | 60.00% | 32.93% | D+27.1 | |
Merrimack 16 | 67.43% | 31.63% | D+35.8 | 64.52% | 30.86% | D+33.7 | |
Merrimack 17 | 62.62% | 35.84% | D+26.8 | 52.25% | 43.40% | D+8.8 | |
Merrimack 18 | 60.79% | 37.53% | D+23.3 | 58.77% | 37.30% | D+21.5 | |
Merrimack 19 | 57.25% | 42.28% | D+15 | 55.71% | 39.72% | D+16 | |
Merrimack 20 | 52.29% | 46.38% | D+5.9 | 44.45% | 50.14% | R+5.7 | |
Merrimack 21 | 47.97% | 50.53% | R+2.6 | 35.38% | 58.70% | R+23.3 | |
Merrimack 22 | 53.02% | 45.27% | D+7.8 | 39.89% | 54.91% | R+15 | |
Merrimack 23 | 49.49% | 49.60% | R+0.1 | 48.35% | 46.77% | D+1.6 | |
Merrimack 24 | 45.11% | 53.94% | R+8.8 | 42.90% | 52.75% | R+9.9 | |
Merrimack 25 | 54.44% | 44.00% | D+10.4 | 44.63% | 50.27% | R+5.6 | |
Merrimack 26 | 53.45% | 45.27% | D+8.2 | 40.95% | 53.87% | R+12.9 | |
Merrimack 27 | 67.60% | 31.09% | D+36.5 | 59.08% | 35.11% | D+24 | |
Merrimack 28 | 59.88% | 38.97% | D+20.9 | 55.54% | 40.14% | D+15.4 | |
Merrimack 29 | 49.62% | 48.82% | D+0.8 | 36.85% | 57.47% | R+20.6 | |
Rockingham 01 | 49.30% | 48.93% | D+0.4 | 40.91% | 53.66% | R+12.7 | |
Rockingham 02 | 43.25% | 55.32% | R+12.1 | 39.04% | 55.08% | R+16 | |
Rockingham 03 | 45.86% | 52.73% | R+6.9 | 35.92% | 58.92% | R+23 | |
Rockingham 04 | 38.97% | 59.98% | R+21 | 35.98% | 58.88% | R+22.9 | |
Rockingham 05 | 43.30% | 55.72% | R+12.4 | 42.48% | 52.23% | R+9.8 | |
Rockingham 06 | 47.02% | 51.58% | R+4.6 | 40.35% | 54.61% | R+14.3 | |
Rockingham 07 | 35.86% | 63.20% | R+27.3 | 40.03% | 55.08% | R+15 | |
Rockingham 08 | 41.71% | 57.35% | R+15.6 | 37.96% | 58.25% | R+20.3 | |
Rockingham 09 | 50.52% | 47.82% | D+2.7 | 41.05% | 53.47% | R+12.4 | |
Rockingham 10 | 42.18% | 56.03% | R+13.8 | 35.62% | 58.73% | R+23.1 | |
Rockingham 11 | 44.96% | 53.52% | R+8.6 | 44.81% | 49.59% | R+4.8 | |
Rockingham 12 | 41.51% | 57.26% | R+15.8 | 33.53% | 61.60% | R+28.1 | |
Rockingham 13 | 40.58% | 58.29% | R+17.7 | 37.33% | 58.03% | R+20.7 | |
Rockingham 14 | 39.31% | 59.79% | R+20.5 | 37.74% | 57.86% | R+20.1 | |
Rockingham 15 | 43.64% | 55.14% | R+11.5 | 36.47% | 58.63% | R+22.2 | |
Rockingham 16 | 41.21% | 57.42% | R+16.2 | 42.69% | 51.74% | R+9 | |
Rockingham 17 | 59.63% | 39.06% | D+20.6 | 57.87% | 35.55% | D+22.3 | |
Rockingham 18 | 58.43% | 40.65% | D+17.8 | 59.62% | 35.53% | D+24.1 | |
Rockingham 19 | 49.84% | 49.51% | D+0.3 | 53.39% | 41.28% | D+12.1 | |
Rockingham 20 | 44.63% | 54.16% | R+9.5 | 37.41% | 58.83% | R+21.4 | |
Rockingham 21 | 50.08% | 49.04% | D+1 | 48.75% | 47.26% | D+1.5 | |
Rockingham 22 | 47.95% | 51.10% | R+3.1 | 49.79% | 46.16% | D+3.6 | |
Rockingham 23 | 52.14% | 46.98% | D+5.2 | 52.47% | 43.00% | D+9.5 | |
Rockingham 24 | 50.12% | 49.39% | D+0.7 | 56.35% | 38.89% | D+17.5 | |
Rockingham 25 | 68.89% | 29.87% | D+39 | 66.32% | 28.45% | D+37.9 | |
Rockingham 26 | 72.98% | 25.74% | D+47.2 | 73.61% | 21.74% | D+51.9 | |
Rockingham 27 | 64.85% | 34.27% | D+30.6 | 63.53% | 32.39% | D+31.1 | |
Rockingham 28 | 60.02% | 38.86% | D+21.2 | 59.97% | 35.44% | D+24.5 | |
Rockingham 29 | 69.59% | 29.22% | D+40.4 | 72.61% | 22.24% | D+50.4 | |
Rockingham 30 | 68.27% | 30.52% | D+37.8 | 68.59% | 26.51% | D+42.1 | |
Rockingham 31 | 54.36% | 44.74% | D+9.6 | 54.56% | 41.21% | D+13.4 | |
Rockingham 32 | 44.67% | 53.82% | R+9.2 | 39.48% | 54.75% | R+15.3 | |
Rockingham 33 | 42.89% | 55.59% | R+12.7 | 37.94% | 56.69% | R+18.8 | |
Rockingham 34 | 39.95% | 59.03% | R+19.1 | 37.53% | 57.94% | R+20.4 | |
Rockingham 35 | 42.24% | 56.45% | R+14.2 | 39.98% | 54.75% | R+14.8 | |
Rockingham 36 | 56.73% | 42.29% | D+14.4 | 57.60% | 36.89% | D+20.7 | |
Rockingham 37 | 48.04% | 50.95% | R+2.9 | 44.51% | 51.58% | R+7.1 | |
Strafford 01 | 48.75% | 50.13% | R+1.4 | 35.25% | 60.22% | R+25 | |
Strafford 02 | 51.40% | 47.54% | D+3.9 | 36.35% | 57.58% | R+21.2 | |
Strafford 03 | 47.32% | 51.46% | R+4.1 | 40.59% | 54.50% | R+13.9 | |
Strafford 04 | 52.31% | 46.10% | D+6.2 | 45.48% | 47.28% | R+1.8 | |
Strafford 05 | 62.83% | 35.70% | D+27.1 | 62.31% | 31.50% | D+30.8 | |
Strafford 06 | 67.21% | 31.38% | D+35.8 | 66.91% | 26.94% | D+40 | |
Strafford 07 | 50.60% | 48.16% | D+2.4 | 40.65% | 53.40% | R+12.8 | |
Strafford 08 | 55.88% | 42.23% | D+13.6 | 45.29% | 48.25% | R+3 | |
Strafford 09 | 49.30% | 49.18% | D+0.1 | 42.00% | 52.05% | R+10 | |
Strafford 10 | 49.80% | 50.20% | R+0.4 | 39.95% | 53.81% | R+13.9 | |
Strafford 11 | 55.46% | 42.81% | D+12.6 | 44.20% | 50.19% | R+6 | |
Strafford 12 | 50.14% | 48.46% | D+1.7 | 40.49% | 54.35% | R+13.9 | |
Strafford 13 | 68.70% | 28.98% | D+39.7 | 66.80% | 26.28% | D+40.5 | |
Strafford 14 | 67.11% | 30.68% | D+36.4 | 64.57% | 29.05% | D+35.5 | |
Strafford 15 | 54.91% | 44.04% | D+10.9 | 57.11% | 37.82% | D+19.3 | |
Strafford 16 | 59.55% | 39.10% | D+20.4 | 57.02% | 37.26% | D+19.8 | |
Strafford 17 | 56.04% | 42.20% | D+13.8 | 52.96% | 41.40% | D+11.6 | |
Strafford 18 | 57.02% | 41.58% | D+15.4 | 49.53% | 44.78% | D+4.7 | |
Strafford 19 | 67.90% | 29.83% | D+38.1 | 65.66% | 27.70% | D+38 | |
Strafford 20 | 57.15% | 41.65% | D+15.5 | 57.07% | 37.55% | D+19.5 | |
Strafford 21 | 56.53% | 41.89% | D+14.6 | 51.26% | 43.07% | D+8.2 | |
Strafford 22 | 53.05% | 45.41% | D+7.6 | 42.70% | 51.12% | R+8.4 | |
Strafford 23 | 49.55% | 49.68% | R+0.1 | 41.01% | 52.90% | R+11.9 | |
Strafford 24 | 52.66% | 45.78% | D+6.9 | 42.27% | 52.35% | R+10.1 | |
Strafford 25 | 55.93% | 42.53% | D+13.4 | 51.10% | 42.01% | D+9.1 | |
Sullivan 01 | 59.33% | 39.57% | D+19.8 | 58.58% | 36.97% | D+21.6 | |
Sullivan 02 | 45.26% | 53.24% | R+8 | 42.16% | 52.60% | R+10.4 | |
Sullivan 03 | 61.19% | 36.84% | D+24.4 | 46.58% | 46.52% | D+0.1 | |
Sullivan 04 | 59.23% | 39.98% | D+19.2 | 45.68% | 48.73% | R+3 | |
Sullivan 05 | 60.21% | 38.24% | D+22 | 45.52% | 50.24% | R+4.7 | |
Sullivan 06 | 51.90% | 46.27% | D+5.6 | 36.91% | 57.77% | R+20.9 | |
Sullivan 07 | 51.89% | 46.60% | D+5.3 | 39.48% | 55.54% | R+16.1 | |
Sullivan 08 | 60.59% | 37.99% | D+22.6 | 44.93% | 50.02% | R+5.1 | |
Sullivan 09 | 53.91% | 44.67% | D+9.2 | 48.09% | 47.01% | D+1.1 | |
Sullivan 10 | 60.11% | 38.50% | D+21.6 | 45.88% | 48.62% | R+2.7 | |
Sullivan 11 | 55.93% | 42.60% | D+13.3 | 41.97% | 53.01% | R+11 | |
Total | 52.17% | 46.57% | D+5.6 | 47.60% | 47.22% | D+0.4 | |
Source: Daily Kos |
State overview
Partisan control
This section details the partisan control of federal and state positions in New Hampshire heading into the 2018 elections.
Congressional delegation
- Following the 2016 elections, Democrats held both U.S. Senate seats in New Hampshire.
- Democrats held both U.S. House seats in New Hampshire.
State executives
- As of May 2018, Republicans held three of 12 state executive positions (including the majority of the seats on the New Hampshire Executive Council), Democrats held one, and the remaining positions were officially nonpartisan.
- The governor of New Hampshire was Republican Chris Sununu. The state held an election for governor on November 6, 2018.
State legislature
- Republicans controlled both chambers of the New Hampshire General Court. They had a 212-167 majority in the state House and a 14-10 majority in the state Senate.
Trifecta status
- New Hampshire was a Republican trifecta, meaning that the Republican Party controlled the office of the governor, the state House, and the state Senate.
2018 elections
- See also: New Hampshire elections, 2018
New Hampshire held elections for the following positions in 2018:
- 18 U.S. House seats
- Governor
- Five state executive council seats
- 24 state Senate seats
- 400 state House seats
Demographics
Demographic data for New Hampshire | ||
---|---|---|
New Hampshire | U.S. | |
Total population: | 1,330,111 | 316,515,021 |
Land area (sq mi): | 8,953 | 3,531,905 |
Race and ethnicity** | ||
White: | 93.7% | 73.6% |
Black/African American: | 1.3% | 12.6% |
Asian: | 2.4% | 5.1% |
Native American: | 0.2% | 0.8% |
Pacific Islander: | 0% | 0.2% |
Two or more: | 1.8% | 3% |
Hispanic/Latino: | 3.2% | 17.1% |
Education | ||
High school graduation rate: | 92.3% | 86.7% |
College graduation rate: | 34.9% | 29.8% |
Income | ||
Median household income: | $66,779 | $53,889 |
Persons below poverty level: | 9.9% | 11.3% |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, "American Community Survey" (5-year estimates 2010-2015) Click here for more information on the 2020 census and here for more on its impact on the redistricting process in New Hampshire. **Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here. |
As of July 2016, New Hampshire's three largest cities were Manchester (pop. est. 111,196), Nashua (pop. est. 88,341), and Concord (pop. est. 43,019).[40][41]
State election history
This section provides an overview of federal and state elections in New Hampshire from 2000 to 2016. All data comes from the New Hampshire State Board of Elections.
Historical elections
Presidential elections, 2000-2016
This chart shows the results of the presidential election in New Hampshire every year from 2000 to 2016.
Election results (President of the United States), New Hampshire 2000-2016 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | First-place candidate | First-place candidate votes (%) | Second-place candidate | Second-place candidate votes (%) | Margin of victory (%) |
2016 | ![]() |
47.6% | ![]() |
47.2% | 0.4% |
2012 | ![]() |
52.0% | ![]() |
46.4% | 5.6% |
2008 | ![]() |
54.4% | ![]() |
44.7% | 9.7% |
2004 | ![]() |
50.2% | ![]() |
48.9% | 1.3% |
2000 | ![]() |
48.1% | ![]() |
46.9% | 1.2% |
U.S. Senate elections, 2000-2016
This chart shows the results of U.S. Senate races in New Hampshire from 2000 to 2016. Every state has two Senate seats, and each seat goes up for election every six years. The terms of the seats are staggered so that roughly one-third of the seats are up every two years.
Election results (U.S. Senator), New Hampshire 2000-2016 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | First-place candidate | First-place candidate votes (%) | Second-place candidate | Second-place candidate votes (%) | Margin of victory (%) |
2016 | ![]() |
48.0% | ![]() |
47.8% | 0.2% |
2014 | ![]() |
51.5% | ![]() |
48.2% | 3.3% |
2010 | ![]() |
60.2% | ![]() |
36.7% | 23.5% |
2008 | ![]() |
51.6% | ![]() |
45.3% | 6.3% |
2004 | ![]() |
66.2% | ![]() |
33.7% | 32.5% |
2002 | ![]() |
50.8% | ![]() |
46.4% | 4.4% |
Gubernatorial elections, 2000-2016
This chart shows the results of the four gubernatorial elections held between 2000 and 2016. Gubernatorial elections are held every two years in New Hampshire.
Election results (Governor), New Hampshire 2000-2016 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | First-place candidate | First-place candidate votes (%) | Second-place candidate | Second-place candidate votes (%) | Margin of victory (%) |
2016 | ![]() |
48.8% | ![]() |
46.6% | 2.2% |
2014 | ![]() |
52.5% | ![]() |
47.3% | 5.2% |
2012 | ![]() |
54.6% | ![]() |
42.5% | 12.1% |
2010 | ![]() |
52.6% | ![]() |
45.1% | 7.5% |
2008 | ![]() |
70.1% | ![]() |
27.6% | 42.5% |
2006 | ![]() |
74.0% | ![]() |
25.8% | 48.2% |
2004 | ![]() |
51.0% | ![]() |
48.9% | 2.1% |
2002 | ![]() |
58.7% | ![]() |
38.2% | 20.5% |
2000 | ![]() |
48.8% | ![]() |
43.8% | 5.0% |
Congressional delegation, 2000-2016
This chart shows the number of Democrats and Republicans who were elected to represent New Hampshire in the U.S. House from 2000 to 2016. Elections for U.S. House seats are held every two years.
Trifectas, 1992-2017
A state government trifecta occurs when one party controls both chambers of the state legislature and the governor's office.
New Hampshire Party Control: 1992-2025
Four years of Democratic trifectas • Fourteen years of Republican trifectas
Scroll left and right on the table below to view more years.
Year | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 00 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Governor | R | R | R | R | R | D | D | D | D | D | D | R | R | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
Senate | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | D | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | D | D | D | D | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | D | D | R | R | R | R | R |
House | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | D | D | D | D | R | R | D | D | R | R | R | R | D | D | R | R | R | R | R |
See also
- United States House of Representatives elections in New Hampshire, 2018
- United States House elections in New Hampshire (September 11, 2018 Republican primaries)
- New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District election (September 11, 2018 Democratic primary)
- United States House of Representatives elections, 2018
Footnotes
- ↑ Eddie Edwards for Congress, “Meet Eddie Edwards,” accessed August 15, 2018
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Seaoastonline.com, “Gloves come off in Edwards-Sanborn GOP Congress race,” August 4, 2018
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Seacoastonline.com, "Edwards, Sanborn, make case to New Castle Republicans," August 14, 2018
- ↑ WMUR, “GOP First Congressional district candidate raises questions about allegations against opponent,” July 11, 2018
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 Union Leader, "Edwards pulls out of 1st CD GOP debate over pledge to support opponent," August 15, 2018
- ↑ Vote Smart, "Eddie Edwards' Biography," accessed August 24, 2018
- ↑ Edwards for New Hampshire, "Meet Eddie Edwards," accessed August 24, 2018
- ↑ Edwards for New Hampshire, "Media," accessed August 24, 2018
- ↑ '"Seacoast Online, "Edwards, Sanborn, make case to New Castle Republicans," August 14, 2018
- ↑ Edwards for New Hampshire, "About," accessed August 24, 2018
- ↑ Seacoast Online, "Another View: Edwards on American values of hard work, self-reliance, and patriotism," August 6, 2018
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 Andy Sanborn for Congress, "About," accessed August 24, 2018
- ↑ Vote Smart, "Andy Sanborn's Biography," August 24, 2018
- ↑ Bill Track 50, "Andy Sanborn - (R) New Hampshire," accessed August 24, 2018
- ↑ New Hampshire Public Radio, "Race for the 1st: A Conversation with Andy Sanborn (R)," June 17, 2018
- ↑ Andy Sanborn for Congress, "Endorsements," accessed August 5, 2018
- ↑ Edwards for NH, "Home," August 5, 2018
- ↑ WMUR, "NH Primary Source: Sen. Rand Paul endorses Andy Sanborn for Congress in NH-01," June 27, 2018
- ↑ WMUR, "NH Primary Source: U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz backs Andy Sanborn in 1st District U.S. House race," August 7, 2018
- ↑ WMUR, "NH Primary Source: Republican congressional candidates Edwards, Negron pick up endorsements," July 26, 2018
- ↑ WMUR, "NH Primary Source: Santorum endorses Eddie Edwards for 1st District U.S. House seat," August 6, 2018
- ↑ NECN, "Rudy Giuliani Endorses Eddie Edwards in New Hampshire," August 1, 2018
- ↑ The Eagle-Tribune, "Endorsements pile up in 1st District race," August 4 2018
- ↑ The Conway Daily Sun, "Pappas, Edwards the logical choices," September 3, 2018
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Eddie Edwards' campaign website, “Issues,” accessed September 4, 2018
- ↑ Andy Sanborn's 2018 campaign website, "Principles," accessed September 4, 2018
- ↑ Associated Press, "Edwards Files Complaint With AG Over 'Illegal Mailer,'" August 29, 2018
- ↑ Union Leader, "GOP won't budge on unity pledge, so 1st CD debate a bust," August 16, 2018
- ↑ This figure includes Pennsylvania districts that were redrawn by the state Supreme Court in early 2018 and districts that flipped in special elections.
- ↑ The new 8th district was created in early 2018 due to court-ordered redistricting and most closely resembles the old 17th District held by Cartwright. Click here to read more.
- ↑ The new 14th district was created in early 2018 due to court-ordered redistricting and most closely resembles the old 18th District Lamb won in a March 2018 special election. Tim Murphy (R) won the old 18th District in the 2016 election. Click here to read more.
- ↑ Cook Political Report, "Introducing the 2017 Cook Political Report Partisan Voter Index," April 7, 2017
- ↑ FiveThirtyEight, "Election Update: The Most (And Least) Elastic States And Districts," September 6, 2018
- ↑ 270towin.com, "New Hampshire," accessed June 1, 2017
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' statewide election results by congressional and legislative districts," July 9, 2013
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' 2016 presidential results for congressional and legislative districts," February 6, 2017
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' statewide election results by congressional and legislative districts," July 9, 2013
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' 2016 presidential results for congressional and legislative districts," February 6, 2017
- ↑ New Hampshire Demographics, "New Hampshire Cities by Population," accessed September 5, 2018
- ↑ U.S. Census Bureau, "Quickfacts New Hampshire," accessed September 5, 2018