Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

New Hampshire bills look to judicial evaluation through either ballot or review board

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The Judicial Update


July 29, 2011

Concord, New Hampshire: The New Hampshire Legislature will be considering two new bills in the next session which would create checks on the judiciary through citizen action. The first bill, constitutional amendment CACR 11, would create elections for judges, replacing the current appointment system. Currently New Hampshire is one of three states that appoint judges for life, though unlike the similar federal judicial system, New Hampshire has a mandatory retirement at 70. The other bill, HB 344, would establish judicial reviews through a citizens commission. Currently the state conducts judicial reviews every three years. The reviews are conducted by state officials through surveys and are kept privileged from release and fail to mention individual judges. The new system would open up the reviews to citizens. Rep. Robert H. Rowe, R-Amherst, chairs the House Judiciary Committee in the New Hampshire House of Representatives explained the need for these two bills, stating "If a judge's job performance is bad, there is no way to remove the judge except by impeachment or address instituted by the Legislature, and this process is lengthy and expensive."[1]

See also

Footnotes