New Mexico Amendment 1, Allow School Elections to Be Held with Other Nonpartisan Elections Measure (2014)
| New Mexico Amendment 1 | |
|---|---|
| Election date |
|
| Topic Local government officials and elections and Public education governance |
|
| Status |
|
| Type Legislatively referred constitutional amendment |
Origin |
New Mexico Amendment 1 was on the ballot as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment in New Mexico on November 4, 2014. It was approved.
A "yes" vote supported allowing school elections to be held at the same time as nonpartisan elections, rather than requiring them to be held separately from all other elections. |
A "no" vote opposed allowing school elections to be held at the same time as nonpartisan elections, thereby maintaining the requirement that school elections be held separately from all other elections. |
Election results
|
New Mexico Amendment 1 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
| 258,673 | 57.68% | |||
| No | 189,783 | 42.32% | ||
-
- Results are officially certified.
- Source
Text of measure
Ballot title
The official ballot text appeared as follows:[1]
| “ | 1. A Joint Resolution proposing to amend Article 7, Section 1 of the Constitution of New Mexico to provide that school elections shall be held at different times from partisan elections.
|
” |
Constitutional changes
- See also: Article VII, New Mexico Constitution
The measure would have amended Section 1 of Article VII of the Constitution of New Mexico to read:[3]
A. Every citizen of the United States who is over the age of twenty-one years and has resided in New Mexico twelve months, in the county ninety days, and in the precinct in which [he] the person offers to vote thirty days, next preceding the election, except idiots, insane persons and persons convicted of a felonious or infamous crime unless restored to political rights, shall be qualified to vote at all elections for public officers. The legislature may enact laws providing for absentee voting by qualified electors. All school elections shall be held at different times from [other] partisan elections.
B. The legislature shall have the power to require the registration of the qualified electors as a requisite for voting and shall regulate the manner, time and places of voting. The legislature shall enact such laws as will secure the secrecy of the ballot and the purity of elections and guard against the abuse of elective franchise. Not more than two members of the board of registration and not more than two judges of election shall belong to the same political party at the time of their appointment.[2]
Support
Supporters
Officials
Senate
Amendment 1 received unanimous support in the New Mexico Senate.[4]
House
In the New Mexico House of Representatives, the following state representatives voted to place the amendment on the ballot:[5]
- Rep. Thomas Taylor (R-1)
- Rep. James R.J. Strickler (R-2)
- Rep. Sharon E. Clahchischilliage (R-4)
- Rep. Sandra Jeff (D-5)
- Rep. Eliseo Alcon (D-6)
- Rep. Kelly K. Fajardo (R-7)
- Rep. Alonzo Baldonado (R-8)
- Rep. Henry Saavedra (D-10)
- Rep. Rick Miera (D-11)
- Rep. Ernest Chavez, Sr. (D-12)
- Rep. Emily A. Kane (D-15)
- Rep. Antonio Maestas (D-16)
- Rep. Edward Sandoval (D-17)
- Rep. Gail Chasey (D-18)
- Rep. James Smith (R-22)
- Rep. Paul A. Pacheco (R-23)
- Rep. Elizabeth L. Thomson (D-24)
- Rep. Georgene Louis (D-26)
- Rep. Larry Larranaga (R-27)
- Rep. Thomas Anderson (R-29)
- Rep. Nathaniel Gentry (R-30)
- Rep. William Rehm (R-31)
- Rep. Dona Irwin (D-32)
- Rep. Bill McCamely (D-33)
- Rep. Mary Helen Garcia (D-34)
- Rep. Jeff Steinborn (D-35)
- Rep. Phillip M. Archuleta (D-36)
- Rep. Terry McMillan (R-37)
- Rep. Dianne Hamilton (R-38)
- Rep. Rodolpho Martinez (D-39)
- Rep. Nick Salazar (D-40)
- Rep. Roberto Gonzales (D-42)
- Rep. Jim Trujillo (D-45)
- Rep. Carl P. Trujillo (D-46)
- Rep. Brian Egolf, Jr. (D-47)
- Rep. Stephen P. Easley (D-50)
- Rep. Yvette Herrell (R-51)
- Rep. Doreen Y. Gallegos (D-52)
- Rep. William Gray (R-54)
- Rep. Zachary Cook (R-56)
- Rep. Candy Spence Ezzell (R-58)
- Rep. Nora Espinoza (R-59)
- Rep. David M. Gallegos (R-61)
- Rep. Donald Bratton (R-62)
- Rep. George Dodge Jr. (D-63)
- Rep. Anna Crook (R-64)
- Rep. James Roger Madalena, Jr. (D-65)
- Rep. Bob Wooley (R-66)
- Rep. Dennis Roch (R-67)
- Rep. Monica C. Youngblood (R-68)
- Rep. W. Ken Martinez (D-69)
Arguments
The New Mexico Legislative Council Service provided arguments for and against the constitutional amendment. The following were the council's arguments in support:
| “ | 1. Separate school elections no longer necessary. The reason for the prohibition against holding school elections in conjunction with other elections no longer exists. Women have had the right to vote in all public elections in New Mexico since 1920. 2. May increase voter participation. 3. May lower costs for school districts. |
” |
| —New Mexico Legislative Council Service[3] | ||
Opposition
Opponents
Officials
House
In the New Mexico House of Representatives, the following state representatives voted against placing the amendment on the ballot:[5]
- Rep. Miguel Garcia (D-14)
- Rep. Sheryl Williams Stapleton (D-19)
- Rep. Mimi Stewart (D-21)
- Rep. Debbie Rodella (D-41)
- Rep. Nate Cote (D-53)
- Rep. Cathrynn Brown (R-55)
- Rep. Tomas E. Salazar (D-70)
Arguments
The New Mexico Legislative Council Service provided arguments for and against the constitutional amendment. The following were the council's arguments against:
| “ | 1. Does not allow school elections during regular November general elections; may be unfairly combined with other elections. The proposed amendment is too limited. It continues the prohibition against holding school elections in conjunction with partisan elections; however, the regular November general elections are always partisan elections. Therefore:
2. Diluted focus. 3. Diluted impact of knowledgeable voters. 4. Ballots too long and confusing. |
” |
| —New Mexico Legislative Council Service[3] | ||
Path to the ballot
- See also: Amending the New Mexico Constitution
According to Article XIX of the New Mexico Constitution, a simple majority was required in the legislature to refer the amendment to the ballot. HJR 2 was approved in the New Mexico House on February 14, 2013.[5] The amendment was approved in the New Mexico Senate on March 16, 2013.[4]
House vote
February 14, 2013 House vote
| New Mexico HJR 2 House Vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
| 50 | 87.72% | |||
| No | 7 | 12.28% | ||
Senate vote
March 16, 2013 Senate vote
| New Mexico HJR 2 Senate Vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
| 40 | 100.00% | |||
| No | 0 | 0.00% | ||
Similar measures
See also
External links
Additional reading
Footnotes
- ↑ New Mexico Secretary of State, "Constitutional Amendments," accessed April 3, 2014
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid<ref>tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid<ref>tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 New Mexico Legislative Council Service, "Summary of and Arguments For and Against the Constitutional Amendments Proposed by the Legislature in 2013 and 2014," accessed September 11, 2014
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 New Mexico Legislature, "HJR 2 Final Senate Passage," accessed April 3, 2014
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 New Mexico Legislature, "HJR 2 Final House Passage," accessed April 3, 2014
State of New Mexico Santa Fe (capital) | |
|---|---|
| Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2026 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
| Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |