New Mexico Urban County Charter, Amendment 4 (2014)
| |||||||||||||
|
The New Mexico Urban County Charter, Amendment 4 was on the November 4, 2014 ballot in New Mexico as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment, where it was approved. The measure allowed certain counties, based on size and population, to become “urban counties” by appointing a charter commission of not less than three persons, drafting an urban county charter and submitting the proposed charter to voters. A county would need to be less than 1,500 square miles in area and have a population of 300,000 in order to become an "urban county."[1]
If voters approve the charter by a majority, then the county becomes an “urban county.”[1]
An “urban county” is essentially a “home rule county,” which may exercise all legislative powers and perform all governmental functions not denied by law.[1]
The proposed amendment was sponsored in the New Mexico Legislature by Sen. Gerald Ortiz y Pino (D-12) as Senate Joint Resolution 22.[2]
Election results
Below are the official, certified election results:
New Mexico Amendment 4 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
![]() | 206,671 | 59.22% | ||
No | 142,336 | 40.78% |
Election results via: New Mexico Secretary of State
Text of measure
Constitutional changes
- See also: Article X, New Mexico Constitution
The measure amended Section 10 of Article X of the Constitution of New Mexico to read:[1]
- (1) the board of county commissioners shall
[by January 1, 2001]appoint a charter commission consisting of not less than three persons to draft a proposed urban county charter; - (2) the proposed charter shall provide for the form and organization of the urban county government and shall designate those officers that shall be elected and those officers and employees that shall perform the duties assigned by law to county officers; and
- (3) within one year after the appointment of the charter commission, the proposed charter shall be submitted to the qualified voters of the county and, if adopted by a majority of those
[voters]voting, the county shall become an urban county. If, at the election or any subsequent election, the proposed charter is not adopted, then, after at least one year has elapsed after the election, pursuant to this section another charter commission may be appointed and another proposed charter may be submitted to the qualified voters for approval or disapproval.
B. An urban county may exercise all legislative powers and perform all governmental functions not expressly denied [to municipalities, counties or urban counties] by general law or charter and may exercise all powers granted to and shall be subject to all limitations [granted to] placed on municipalities by Article 9, Section 12 of the constitution of New Mexico. This grant of powers shall not include the power to enact private or civil laws except as incident to the exercise of an independent municipal power, nor shall it include the power to provide for a penalty greater than the penalty provided for a misdemeanor. No tax imposed by the governing body of an urban county, except a tax authorized by general law, shall become effective until approved by a majority vote in the urban county.
C. A charter of an urban county shall only be amended in accordance with the provisions of the charter.
D. If the charter of an urban county provides for a governing body composed of members elected by districts, a member representing a district shall be a resident and elected by the registered qualified electors of that district.
E. The purpose of this section is to provide for maximum local self-government. A liberal construction shall be given to the powers of urban counties.
F. The provisions of this section shall be self-executing.[3]
Background
In 2000, New Mexicans approved Question 1, which allowed Bernalillo County to become an “urban county.” However, county voters rejected an urban county charter in 2001. The county is permitted to initiate the process again at any time.[1]
Question 1 did not provide for any other counties to become “urban,” not because the amendment was specific to Bernalillo County, but because the amendment contained a deadline. Bernalillo County was the only county at the deadline to meet geographic size and population requirements.
With the approval of 2014's Amendment 4 and the removal of the deadline, Valencia County and Curry County would be eligible to become "urban counties" if their populations ever hit 300,000.
Support
Arguments
The New Mexico Legislative Council Service provided arguments for and against the constitutional amendment. The following were the council's arguments in support:
“ | 1. Expands the number of counties eligible to acquire urban county status. Currently, every county in New Mexico except Bernalillo County is barred from becoming an urban county. If this amendment is adopted, any county that is less than 1,500 square miles in area and that has a population of at least 300,000 residents would become eligible to acquire urban county status. 2. Promotes greater self-government and reduces dependency on the state legislature. 3. Sets up a cautious approach to potentially improving local government. 4. Clarifies what constitutes a majority of voters. |
” |
—New Mexico Legislative Council Service[1] |
Opposition
Arguments
The New Mexico Legislative Council Service provided arguments for and against the constitutional amendment. The following were the council's arguments against:
“ | 1. Increases expenditure of public resources. This amendment would create potential for a waste of resources and an increase in expenditures. If a board of county commissioners chose to pursue the process of becoming an urban county, public resources would be used to create a charter commission, draft a charter and hold an election. If voters later reject the proposed urban county charter, those expenses will not have achieved what the commission sought. If voters approve the urban county, the county would be required to expend resources to modify the county government to carry out the provisions of the urban county charter. In both instances, passage of this amendment would increase public spending. 2. The contours defining the powers of an urban county are unclear. 3. May result in duplication and confusion. 4. Amendment would not immediately affect counties. |
” |
—New Mexico Legislative Council Service[1] |
Path to the ballot
- See also: Amending the New Mexico Constitution
According to Article XIX of the New Mexico Constitution, a simple majority was required in the legislature to refer the amendment to the ballot. SJR 22 was approved in the New Mexico Senate on February 19, 2014.[4] The amendment was approved in the New Mexico House on February 20, 2014.[5]
Senate vote
February 19, 2014 Senate vote
New Mexico SJR 22 Senate Vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
![]() | 37 | 94.87% | ||
No | 2 | 5.13% |
House vote
February 20, 2014 House vote
New Mexico SJR 22 House Vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
![]() | 55 | 85.94% | ||
No | 9 | 14.06% |
See also
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 New Mexico Legislative Council Service, "Summary of and Arguments For and Against the Constitutional Amendments Proposed by the Legislature in 2013 and 2014," accessed September 11, 2014
- ↑ New Mexico Legislature, "Status of SJR 22: Urban Counties & County Charters, CA," accessed April 3, 2014
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid<ref>
tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ New Mexico Legislature, "SJR 22 Final Senate Passage," accessed April 3, 2014
- ↑ New Mexico Legislature, "SJR 22 Final House Passage," accessed April 3, 2014
![]() |
State of New Mexico Santa Fe (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |