Nicholas Begich

Nicholas Begich (Republican Party) is a member of the U.S. House, representing Alaska's At-Large Congressional District. He assumed office on January 3, 2025. His current term ends on January 3, 2027.

Begich (Republican Party) is running for re-election to the U.S. House to represent Alaska's At-Large Congressional District. He declared candidacy for the 2026 election.^[source]

Biography

Nicholas Begich was born in Anchorage, Alaska, and lives in Chugiak. Begich received a bachelor of business administration in entrepreneurship from Baylor University in 1999 and an M.B.A. from Indiana University-Bloomington in 2002. Begich's career experience includes founding FarShore Partners, a technology development company, and co-founding Dashfire, which invests in startups. Begich completed a fellowship with the Club for Growth. He co-chaired the Alaska Republican Party's Finance Committee and Rep. Don Young's (R-Alaska) 2020 re-election campaign.^[1]^[2]^[3]

Committee assignments

U.S. House

2025-2026

Begich was assigned to the following committees:^[Source]

Elections

2026

Note: At this time, Ballotpedia is combining all declared candidates for this election into one list under a general election heading. As primary election dates are published, this information will be updated to separate general election candidates from primary candidates as appropriate.

General election

The general election will occur on November 3, 2026.

General election for U.S. House Alaska At-large District

Incumbent Nicholas Begich and John Brendan Williams are running in the general election for U.S. House Alaska At-large District on November 3, 2026.

		Candidate
		Nicholas Begich (R)
	Submit photo	John Brendan Williams (D)

	Incumbents are bolded and underlined.
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Endorsements

Begich received the following endorsements. To send us additional endorsements, click here.

President Donald Trump (R)

2024

General election

General election for U.S. House Alaska At-large District

Select round:

The ranked-choice voting election was won by Nicholas Begich in round 3 . The results of Round are displayed below. To see the results of other rounds, use the dropdown menu above to select a round and the table will update.

	Incumbents are bolded and underlined. The results have been certified. Source	Total votes: 329,493
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

Matthew Salisbury (R)
Nancy Dahlstrom (R)

Nonpartisan primary election

Nonpartisan primary for U.S. House Alaska At-large District

The following candidates ran in the primary for U.S. House Alaska At-large District on August 20, 2024.

		Candidate	%	Votes
✔		Mary Peltola (D)	50.9	55,166
✔		Nicholas Begich (R)	26.6	28,803
✔		Nancy Dahlstrom (R)	19.9	21,574
✔		Matthew Salisbury (R)	0.6	652
		John Howe (Alaskan Independence Party)	0.6	621
		Eric Hafner (D)	0.4	467
	Submit photo	Gerald Heikes (R)	0.4	424
		Lady Donna Dutchess (Nonpartisan)	0.2	195
		David Ambrose (Nonpartisan)	0.1	154
		Richard Grayson (No Labels Party)	0.1	143
	Submit photo	Richard Mayers (Undeclared)	0.1	119
	Submit photo	Samuel Claesson (Nonpartisan)	0.1	89

	Incumbents are bolded and underlined. The results have been certified. Source	Total votes: 108,407
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Endorsements

Begich received the following endorsements.

Former President Donald Trump (Republican Party, Conservative Party)

Pledges

Begich signed the following pledges.

U.S. Term Limits

2022

Regular election

General election

General election for U.S. House Alaska At-large District

Select round:

The ranked-choice voting election was won by Mary Peltola in round 3 . The results of Round are displayed below. To see the results of other rounds, use the dropdown menu above to select a round and the table will update.

	Incumbents are bolded and underlined. The results have been certified. Source	Total votes: 264,589
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

Sherry Strizak (Independent)
Tara Sweeney (R)

Nonpartisan primary election

Nonpartisan primary for U.S. House Alaska At-large District

The following candidates ran in the primary for U.S. House Alaska At-large District on August 16, 2022.

		Candidate	%	Votes
✔		Mary Peltola (D)	36.8	70,295
✔		Sarah Palin (R)	30.2	57,693
✔		Nicholas Begich (R)	26.2	50,021
✔		Tara Sweeney (R)	3.8	7,195
		Chris Bye (L)	0.6	1,189
		J.R. Myers (L)	0.3	531
		Robert Lyons (R)	0.2	447
	Submit photo	Jay Armstrong (R)	0.2	403
	Submit photo	Brad Snowden (R)	0.2	355
		Randy Purham (R)	0.2	311
		Lady Donna Dutchess (Independent)	0.1	270
	Submit photo	Sherry Strizak (Independent)	0.1	252
		Robert Ornelas (American Independent Party)	0.1	248
	Submit photo	Denise Williams (R)	0.1	242
		Gregg Brelsford (Independent)	0.1	241
	Submit photo	David Hughes (Independent)	0.1	238
	Submit photo	Andrew Phelps (Independent)	0.1	222
	Submit photo	Tremayne Wilson (Independent)	0.1	194
	Submit photo	Sherry Mettler (Independent)	0.1	191
	Submit photo	Silvio Pellegrini (Independent)	0.1	187
	Submit photo	Ted Heintz (Independent)	0.1	173
	Submit photo	Davis LeBlanc Jr. (R)	0.1	117

	Incumbents are bolded and underlined. The results have been certified. Source	Total votes: 191,015
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

Special election

Note: The state did not release vote totals for individual write-in candidates. Certified write-in candidates are listed below without vote totals.

United States House of Representatives special election in Alaska, 2022 (June 11 top-four primary)

General election

General election for U.S. House Alaska At-large District

Select round:

The ranked-choice voting election was won by Mary Peltola in round 2 . The results of Round are displayed below. To see the results of other rounds, use the dropdown menu above to select a round and the table will update.

	There were no incumbents in this race. The results have been certified. Source	Total votes: 188,582
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

Al Gross (Independent)

Nonpartisan primary election

Special nonpartisan primary for U.S. House Alaska At-large District

The following candidates ran in the special primary for U.S. House Alaska At-large District on June 11, 2022.

		Candidate	%	Votes
✔		Sarah Palin (R)	27.0	43,601
✔		Nicholas Begich (R)	19.1	30,861
✔		Al Gross (Independent)	12.6	20,392
✔		Mary Peltola (D)	10.1	16,265
		Tara Sweeney (R)	5.9	9,560
		Santa Claus (Independent)	4.7	7,625
		Christopher Constant (D)	3.9	6,224
		Jeff Lowenfels (Independent)	3.7	5,994
		John B. Coghill (R)	2.4	3,842
		Josh Revak (R)	2.3	3,785
	Submit photo	Andrew Halcro (Independent)	1.9	3,013
		Adam Wool (D)	1.7	2,730
	Submit photo	Emil Notti (D)	1.1	1,777
		Chris Bye (L)	0.6	1,049
	Submit photo	Mike Milligan (D)	0.4	608
		John Howe (Alaskan Independence Party)	0.2	380
	Submit photo	Laurel Foster (Independent)	0.2	338
		Stephen Wright (R)	0.2	332
	Submit photo	Jay Armstrong (R)	0.2	286
		J.R. Myers (L)	0.2	285
		Gregg Brelsford (Independent)	0.2	284
	Submit photo	Ernest Thomas (D)	0.1	199
		Robert Lyons (R)	0.1	197
	Submit photo	Otto Florschutz (R)	0.1	193
	Submit photo	Maxwell Sumner (R)	0.1	133
	Submit photo	Richard Trotter (R)	0.1	121
	Submit photo	Anne McCabe (Independent)	0.1	118
	Submit photo	John Callahan (R)	0.1	114
		Arlene Carle (Independent)	0.1	107
	Submit photo	Tim Beck (Independent)	0.1	96
	Submit photo	Thomas Gibbons (R)	0.1	94
	Submit photo	Sherry Mettler (Independent)	0.1	92
		Lady Donna Dutchess (Independent)	0.1	87
		Robert Ornelas (American Independent Party)	0.1	83
	Submit photo	Ted Heintz (L)	0.0	70
	Submit photo	Silvio Pellegrini (Independent)	0.0	70
	Submit photo	Karyn Griffin (Independent)	0.0	67
	Submit photo	David Hughes (Independent)	0.0	54
	Submit photo	Don Knight (Independent)	0.0	46
	Submit photo	Jo Woodward (R)	0.0	44
	Submit photo	Jason Williams (Independent)	0.0	37
	Submit photo	Robert Brown (Independent)	0.0	36
	Submit photo	Dennis Aguayo (Independent)	0.0	31
		William Hibler (Independent)	0.0	25
	Submit photo	Bradley Welter (R)	0.0	24
	Submit photo	David Thistle (Independent)	0.0	23
	Submit photo	Brian Beal (Independent)	0.0	19
	Submit photo	Mikel Melander (R)	0.0	17

	There were no incumbents in this race. The results have been certified. Source	Total votes: 161,428
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

Jesse Sumner (R)
Breck Craig (Independent)
Richard Morris (Independent)

2016

Incumbent Amy Demboski defeated Nicholas Begich in the election for Seat A in District 2 of the Anchorage City Council.^[4]

Anchorage City Council District 2, Seat A Election, 2016
Candidate	Vote %	Votes
Amy Demboski Incumbent	57.72%	4,414
Nicholas Begich	41.69%	3,188
Write-in votes	0.59%	45
Total Votes (100 percent of precincts reporting)		7,647
Source: Municipality of Anchorage, "Election Summary Report," April 26, 2016

Campaign themes

2026

Ballotpedia survey responses

Nicholas Begich has not yet completed Ballotpedia's 2026 Candidate Connection survey. If you are Nicholas Begich, click here to fill out Ballotpedia's 2026 Candidate Connection survey.

Who fills out Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey?

Any candidate running for elected office, at any level, can complete Ballotpedia's Candidate Survey. Completing the survey will update the candidate's Ballotpedia profile, letting voters know who they are and what they stand for. More than 22,000 candidates have taken Ballotpedia's candidate survey since we launched it in 2015. Learn more about the survey here.

You can ask Nicholas Begich to fill out this survey by using the button below.

2024

Nicholas Begich did not complete Ballotpedia's 2024 Candidate Connection survey.

Campaign website

Begich’s campaign website stated the following:

“

AMERICAN ENERGY FIRST
Alaska’s resources are critical to America’s energy security, mineral security, and national security. Failing to develop these resources leaves the nation’s future to the whims of rivals and adversaries who do not have America’s best interests in mind.

We must pursue an all-of-the-above development strategy for Alaskan resources as a basis for restoring domestic, vertically integrated supply chains that will drive U.S. manufacturing, enhance job creation, and deliver generational prosperity. To do this, we must make an articulate and persuasive case for Alaska both within Congress. Alaska’s oil and gas resources are a critical part of America’s energy mix and help to ensure that American families and businesses have the energy needed to heat homes, drive to and from work, operate factories, and more. Without robust domestic energy production, Americans are gambling with the future. With the right leadership, however, Alaska will provide reliable domestic oil and gas production for decades to come.

PROTECTING ALASKAN JOBS
Alaskan fisheries form a foundational component of America’s food supply, providing delicious and healthy sources of protein for families across America. People across the world travel to our State to enjoy this resource in our sport fisheries, and the tourism that follows powers small businesses from guide services, to hotels, to aviation, and more. Alaskan fisheries provide important food security in Alaska as well as a source of subsistence upon which both rural and urban Alaskans rely. Whether subsistence, commercial, or sport, each fishery use is important for Alaska and for America as a whole, and as a result it is crucial that we properly balance these interests to ensure a maximum sustainable yield. Limiting bycatch and overfishing; investing in ongoing research focused on ocean food chains, currents, population variance, genetics; and predator monitoring and control will all help ensure that Alaska’s fisheries remain reliable and predictable sources of sustenance, enjoyment, and revenue for generations to come. Alaska’s timber industry was once a thriving component of our economy. However, radical environmental activism has nearly eliminated what was once a major Alaskan job creator. Smart, rotational timber leases must be restored to Southeast Alaska and opened up elsewhere throughout the state. Such actions reduce wildfire risk, provide potential for value-added industry, help diversify Alaska’s economic base and bring important cash inflows to the people of Alaska. Alaska's critical minerals offer a promising frontier for economic growth, security, and environmental stewardship. From rare earths to precious metals, our state holds vast resources, vital for high-tech industries, green technologies, and a secure domestic supply chain.

As Alaskans, we responsibly set global standards for practices that respect our lands, waters, and wildlife. Alaska’s mining renaissance will not only create jobs, but it will also propel Alaska into a pivotal role: ensuring domestic production capabilities for key industries and driving America towards a future of independence and prosperity.

PROTECTING OUR FREEDOM
The Second Amendment ensures one of the most critical freedoms for Americans: the right to keep and bear arms. Our nation’s founders understood this right to be foundational to the creation of our Republic as without an armed citizenry, we would have had no ability to win the fight for self-determination. Numerous examples exist today wherein despotic governments have turned on their people, secure in the knowledge that their citizens would be able to mount little in the way of response. Whether it be for defense of tyrannical governance, national security, personal defense, or hunting, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Under the 10th Amendment, “the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” This important provision ensures that the Federal government does not exceed its constitutional authority in administering laws and resultant regulations. A textualist, originalist interpretation of the Constitution ensures the courts remain strictly adherent to the letter and intent of the law.

EDUCATING THE FUTURE
In spite of years of effort and substantial funding, Alaska’s schools consistently rank among the worst in the country. As a result, young Alaskans are deprived of the skills needed to succeed in years that follow. Parents must have the opportunity to place their children in the educational environment that best meets their needs and gives those children the best chance at success. To do this, we must encourage healthy competition among schools inclusive of public, private, and homeschool options and ensure that funding follows the student.

Further, any federal education funding should come in the form of block grants to the states, allowing a greater level of local control over how such funds are deployed in the classroom. Parents deserve the right to transparent dialogue with educators regarding their child's learning and emotional needs. Schools, bestowed with the trust of parents to educate and nurture their children, must honor this responsibility. Open communication among the teacher, student, and parent is vital to the educational experience and outcomes. We must ensure our classrooms are centered on teaching the core skills necessary for student success.

MAKING HEALTHCARE AFFORDABLE
Alaska has some of the world’s highest healthcare costs. Reforms are needed to drive down the cost of healthcare. Political rhetoric isn’t going to do it. It’s going to require commitment, tenacity, and hard work. We need to explore price and cost innovations around direct primary care and preventative medicine while protecting patient-doctor relationships.

We can find cost savings by increasing competition, negotiating prescription drug prices, and tightening work requirements for able-bodied Medicaid recipients.

NATIONAL SECURITY
Alaska is a critical component of America’s national security strategy. Whether it’s Alaska’s geographic position as the gateway to Arctic access, early warning for missile defense, or our training grounds for cold weather combat, Alaska enhances the ability for American forces to fight and win in the 21st century.

With more 5th generation fighters now positioned in Alaska than any other single location on earth, Alaska is poised to support America’s defense missions both at home and in the Pacific. We must continue to stress the importance of Alaska as a key to ensuring domestic tranquility.

PROTECTING FINANCIAL SOVEREIGNTY
In the face of the continued debasement of traditional fiat currencies like the US Dollar, cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and metals such as gold and silver serve as an alternative safe haven asset class. Core aspects of many cryptocurrencies including programmed scarcity, transaction speed, immutability, and distributed ledgers contribute to a financial system that is more resilient, protects against counterfeiting, and ultimately, serves as a defense against the continuous erosion of Americans’ wealth through inflation. These features not only facilitate a more efficient and transparent economic framework but also put financial control squarely back into the hands of citizens, restoring power to the individual rather than centralized institutions. My endorsement by HODLPAC in 2022 underscores a shared vision for a financial system that prioritizes accessibility, security, and individual sovereignty. I am committed to fostering an environment where cryptocurrency thrives, free from the heavy hand of central control. My aim is to advocate for a regulatory landscape that nurtures innovation and supports the continued development of the cryptocurrency landscape. Importantly, Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) represent a concerning move towards greater financial surveillance and control by central authorities, undermining the very principles of privacy, autonomy, and decentralization that cryptocurrencies stand for. I oppose CBDCs as they centralize power rather than democratize it, threatening to compromise the individual freedom and privacy that is foundational to our financial sovereignty. By supporting financial innovation within the private marketplace, we can ensure a future where economic power and privacy are restored to the people, safeguarding our collective wealth against the well-known vulnerabilities of traditional monetary systems. ^[5]

”

—Nicholas Begich’s campaign website (2024)^[6]

Interview with Alaska Beacon

Begich highlighted the following themes in an interview with Alaska Beacon. The questions from Alaska Beacon are bolded and Begich's responses follow below.^[7]

“

Biggest need: What’s Alaska’s biggest need, and how would you address it?
Alaska's most pressing need is to address the high cost of living that affects all residents, particularly those in rural areas. The cost of living in Alaska is significantly higher than the national average, primarily due to factors such as the high cost of shipping, limited infrastructure, and the restricted availability of jobs in certain sectors. To tackle this challenge, a multi-faceted approach is essential, focusing on reducing shipping costs, expanding infrastructure, increasing resource-based job opportunities, and opening more areas for development.

Reducing the Cost of Shipping One of the primary drivers of high costs in Alaska is the expense associated with shipping goods to the state. The Jones Act, a federal law that mandates goods shipped between U.S. ports be transported on American-built and -flagged vessels, significantly increases the cost of shipping to Alaska. This legislation restricts competition and leads to higher transportation costs, which are ultimately passed on to consumers. Advocating for an exemption from the Jones Act for Alaska could reduce shipping costs, making everyday items more affordable for Alaskans.

Expanding Infrastructure: Roads and Rail Infrastructure development is critical in reducing the cost of living. Currently, much of rural Alaska relies on air shipment for the delivery of groceries and other essentials, which is extremely costly. Expanding the road and rail network in Alaska would reduce the reliance on air transport and lower the cost of goods. Building more roads and rail lines would improve connectivity between rural and urban areas, making it easier and cheaper to transport goods across the state. This expansion would also create jobs and stimulate economic growth, further alleviating the cost of living.

Improving Availability of Resource Jobs Alaska is rich in natural resources, yet many regions struggle with unemployment and limited job opportunities. By improving access to resource-based jobs, we can provide stable, well-paying employment for Alaskans. This involves supporting industries such as oil, gas, mining, fishing, and timber and ensuring they can operate efficiently and sustainably. Reducing regulatory burdens and providing incentives for companies to invest in these sectors will create more job opportunities, boost local economies, and help lower the cost of living.

Opening More of the State to Development Much of Alaska's land remains undeveloped, which limits economic opportunities. By opening more areas of the state to responsible development, we can stimulate growth and reduce costs. This includes not only resource extraction but also the development of housing, businesses, and infrastructure. Ensuring that development is done sustainably and with respect for the environment and local communities is crucial. Encouraging public-private partnerships can also help fund these development projects, spreading the financial burden and maximizing benefits for residents.

Conclusion Addressing the high cost of living in Alaska requires a comprehensive strategy that tackles the root causes of high expenses. By reducing the cost of shipping through Jones Act reform, expanding infrastructure to decrease reliance on costly air transport, improving access to resource-based jobs, and opening more of the state to development, we can make Alaska more affordable and improve the quality of life for all residents. This multifaceted approach will not only reduce costs but also create jobs, stimulate economic growth, and build a more prosperous Alaska today and for generations to come.

Improvements: What improvements to Alaskans’ day-to-day lives can you make from the House of Representatives?
As a member of the House of Representatives, one of my goals will be to enhance the day-to-day lives of Alaskans through strategic initiatives focused on infrastructure development, tax reduction, regulatory reform, and energy affordability. These efforts will drive economic growth and improve the quality of life for all residents.

Infrastructure Development: Roads, Rail, Bridges, and Tunnels Expanding and improving our transportation infrastructure is essential for reducing costs and enhancing connectivity. Projects like the Juneau Access Road and the road to Cordova are just a couple of the potential enhancements that can drastically improve access to disconnected communities, reduce reliance on expensive air and ferry services, and lower the cost of goods and services. Projects like the Ambler District Road will facilitate access to valuable mineral resources, creating jobs and boosting depressed local economies, while roads to rural hubs like Nome will significantly enhance the connectivity of remote communities.

In addition to road projects, the Alaska to Alberta (A2A) Railway Project continues to represent a significant opportunity to link Alaska to the North American rail network. This will improve trade and transportation options, opening new economic opportunities for Alaskans.

Bridges and tunnels are also critical components of our infrastructure strategy. The Knik Arm Bridge, discussed for decades, continues to provide an opportunity to connect Anchorage to the ever-growing Matanuska-Susitna Valley, reducing congestion, enhancing safety, and promoting development. As tunnels become an increasingly feasible alternative, even in geologically active zones, they should be studied and considered to increase the speed and feasibility of infrastructure development. Improving access to Gravina Island in Ketchikan is another much needed key project that can greatly reduce that community’s cost of living by feasibly opening land in that area for development.

The recent Supreme Court decision to overturn Chevron deference should allow Alaska to move more quickly in the deployment of new infrastructure, as it reduces the bureaucratic hurdles that have previously slowed down such projects.

Keeping Taxes Low and Reducing Burdensome Regulations Maintaining low taxes is crucial for fostering a business-friendly environment that attracts investment and supports job creation. By advocating for tax policies that keep more money in the pockets of Alaskans, we can stimulate economic activity and improve the financial well-being of families. Reducing unnecessarily burdensome regulations will also eliminate obstacles that hinder economic growth. Streamlining regulations and cutting red tape will make it easier for businesses to operate, innovate, and expand in Alaska. This includes reducing Alaska-specific regulations that often add political risk for potential investors considering Alaskan projects.

Lowering the Cost of Energy Energy affordability is a significant concern for Alaskans, and I am committed to supporting initiatives that reduce energy costs. Developing a natural gas pipeline from the North Slope will provide a stable and affordable source of energy, benefiting both households and employers. Additionally, expanding hydroelectric projects throughout Alaska will capitalize on one of our most abundant and renewable energy sources. This will not only lower energy costs but reduce pressure on traditional energy and support greater levels of energy independence.

Conclusion Through strategic infrastructure development, tax reduction, regulatory reform, and energy affordability initiatives, we can make meaningful improvements to the day-to-day lives of Alaskans. These efforts will drive economic growth, enhance connectivity, and improve the overall quality of life, creating a brighter and more prosperous future for our great state.

Oil: How long will oil be central to Alaska’s economy, and what, if anything, should the state’s Congressional delegation be doing now to prepare for a post-oil future?
Oil and gas will continue to be crucial to Alaska's economy for the next 50-100 years. These industries provide a substantial portion of the state's revenue and employment, making them indispensable in the near and long term. However, it is essential to recognize that the global energy landscape is evolving, and Alaska must proactively prepare for a future where oil may play a less dominant role.

Diversifying and Expanding the Resource Sector To ensure the state's economic stability and growth in a post-oil future, Alaska's Congressional delegation should focus on several key strategies. Revitalizing Alaska's mining industry is a priority. Alaska is rich in natural resources beyond oil and gas, with significant deposits of base metals, precious metals, rare earth elements, and other critical minerals essential for America's supply chain and national defense. By investing in and expanding the mining sector, we can create new jobs, diversify the economy, and reduce dependence on oil revenues. Streamlining permitting processes and reducing regulatory hurdles will attract investment in mining projects, and encouraging public-private partnerships can also help fund the development of infrastructure needed to support mining activities.

Investing in Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Investing in renewable energy and energy efficiency is another crucial step. Alaska has immense potential for renewable energy, particularly hydroelectric power. Expanding hydroelectric projects will not only lower energy costs but also promote sustainability and energy independence. Additionally, investing in other renewable energy sources such as geothermal can further diversify the energy mix and reduce the pressure presently being placed on traditional energy, particularly in Southeast Alaska.

Supporting Technological Innovation and Workforce Development Supporting technological advancements and workforce development is essential for Alaska's future. Encouraging research and development in new technologies for energy production and transport will keep Alaska at the forefront of the energy industry. Promoting innovation in various industrial processes can make resource development more efficient and economically viable. Additionally, investing in education and training programs to equip Alaskans with the skills needed for jobs in emerging industries is crucial. This includes not only the mining and energy sectors but also technology, healthcare, and other growing fields. Partnerships with universities, technical schools, and industry can create targeted programs to develop a skilled workforce ready to meet future demands.

Strengthening Infrastructure and Leveraging Alaska's Unique Position Strengthening infrastructure and leveraging Alaska's unique global position are also key components of this strategy. Continuing to improve transportation infrastructure, such as roads, rail, bridges, and ports, will support economic diversification and enhance connectivity among communities. Alaska's unique global position makes it a strategic hub for shipping goods between North America, Asia, and Europe. Enhancing port facilities and transportation links will capitalize on this advantage, boosting trade and economic activity. Investing in digital infrastructure, including broadband internet, will facilitate innovation and attract businesses to Alaska.

Conclusion While oil and gas will remain central to Alaska's economy for the foreseeable future, it is imperative to prepare for a post-oil future by diversifying the resource sector, investing in energy infrastructure that leverages Alaska’s natural advantages in hydroelectric and geothermal potential, supporting technological innovation, and strengthening in-state infrastructure. By taking these proactive steps, Alaska can ensure a resilient and prosperous economy in the years ahead.

Directed spending: Do you support the use of congressionally directed spending for Alaska, why or why not?
No, I do not support the use of congressionally directed spending for Alaska. This approach often leads to inefficient allocation of resources and can result in projects that do not fully address the unique needs of our state. Instead, I support congressionally-mandated access to Alaska's lands and resources. This will allow us to harness our abundant natural resources responsibly and stimulate economic growth from within.

Additionally, I support the use of block grants to Alaska. These grants empower our state legislature to allocate funds as needed, addressing specific local priorities and ensuring that investments are made in areas where they are most effective. This flexibility is crucial for Alaska, which has historically missed out on significant investments like those provided by the National Interstate and Defense Highways Act. By granting us the autonomy to direct our funds, we can better catch up with the infrastructure and development seen in the lower 48 states, ultimately benefiting all Alaskans.

Obstacles: What would you do to remove or prevent procedural obstacles in the US House over the next two years?
I do not believe that it should be easy to bypass debate or process in the U.S. House. Lawmaking is challenging by design, and it requires people to work together to achieve a consensus that reflects the values and best interests of the constituents representatives have been elected to represent. Tough decisions need to be made, and this requires diligent work and commitment from lawmakers. Less time should be spent on vacations and recesses and more time in committee and on the floor, debating issues and doing the people's business. By dedicating more time to substantive discussions and thorough deliberation, we can create a legislative process that is more transparent, effective, and solutions-driven. This approach ensures that all voices are heard and that the resulting laws are well-considered and beneficial to the American people.

Abortion/contraceptives: What actions should Congress take on abortion and contraceptives?
Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs, the issue of abortion has been returned to the states. However, certain national policy continues to be relevant. For example, the Hyde Amendment is a longstanding federal policy that ensures federal dollars are not used to fund abortion. I support this amendment, particularly in light of the Supreme Court’s decision under Dobbs. Under the post-Dobbs framework, it’s important that we promote national policies that will accelerate adoption processes, support crisis pregnancy centers which provide important information to those considering abortion, and implement parental notification when minors are attempting to obtain an abortion. It’s critical that people stay engaged on this important issue and ensure that candidates, ready and willing to implement commonsense policies that protect human rights at each stage of human development, are elected to legislative positions in state government.

Fisheries: How should Congress and the federal government address the state’s growing fisheries crisis?
The growing fisheries crisis in Alaska requires immediate and decisive action from Congress and the federal government. As a representative committed to the well-being of Alaska's fishing families, my approach is grounded in the principles of direct representation and community-driven policy.

Fishing Families First A member of Congress must represent the people, not special interests and their armies of DC lobbyists. My commitment to Alaska's fishing families is unwavering, and my approach to solving this crisis is to put their voices at the forefront of fish policy. After hearing from constituents, witnessing the waste caused by bycatch, understanding the damage inflicted by the Seattle-based trawl fleet, and recognizing the influence of financial interests, it is clear that Alaska's fish policy in Congress must come directly from the people. The fishing community has the greatest knowledge of how best to address this issue, and it is their insights and expertise that should guide policy development. This community-driven approach ensures that the policies enacted are reflective of the needs and perspectives of those most affected by the fisheries crisis.

Commitments to Alaskan Fishing Families 1. No Financial Ties to the Trawl Fleet: I will not accept funds from the trawl fleet. If such funds are inadvertently accepted, they will be promptly returned upon notification. 2. Protection of Seabed Ecosystems: we must end practices that lead to the destruction of our seabed ecosystems. This includes advocating for regulations that protect these vital habitats from harmful fishing practices. 3. Long-term goal of Elimination of Bycatch: Our long-term goal must be to eliminate bycatch. This will require the development of innovative fishing techniques, stricter enforcement of limits, and increased accountability for those who violate these rules. 4. Acceleration of Disaster Declarations and Associated Compensation: delays in payments to fishing operations and delays of the declarations themselves have been quite costly to Alaskan families reliant on the industry. These must be accelerated and I will work to address this in Congress. 5. Review of MSA Regulations and the NPFMC: The MSA and its delegated authorities to the NPFMC must be periodically reviewed to confirm that the effect of enacted policies is producing a sustainable fishery and consistent yield for all major categories of user groups to the extent possible. 6. Stand Against the Sale of Farmed and GMO Fish: Support legislation that identifies and reduces the prevalence of farmed or GMO fish available in the marketplace. These fish are often deceptively labeled and may present risks to public health. 7. Ensure that U.S. Territorial Waters are Properly Patrolled: Ensuring that limits of Territorial Waters are patrolled and where possible, extended, will help reduce the increasingly common practice of foreign trawl fleet operators taking Alaskan fish.

By prioritizing direct representation and community-driven policy, we can address the fisheries crisis in a way that truly benefits Alaska's fishing families. This approach will ensure that the people’s voice is heard in Washington, D.C., and that the interests of Alaskans are placed above those of outside special interests. Together, we can develop and implement policies that protect our fisheries, support sustainable practices, and secure the healthy and reliable future of Alaska's fishing industry.

Land management: What’s the best way to handle land management conflicts between the federal government and the state?
What’s the best way to handle land management conflicts between the federal government and the state? The best way to handle land management conflicts between the federal government and the state of Alaska is to convey more lands to state control, allowing for greater local management and decision-making. The recent Supreme Court decision to overturn Chevron deference, which had previously required courts to defer to federal agencies' interpretations of ambiguous laws, provides a significant opportunity. This change means that courts will now have more authority to interpret laws independently, reducing the power of federal agencies and potentially curbing federal overreach in land management disputes. This shift can help Alaska assert more control over its lands and resources.

One practical solution to these conflicts is the creation of an "Alaska Access Package." This package would aim to resolve land access issues by establishing clear, unambiguous guidelines for traversing federal lands to access state lands. It would ensure that Alaskans have the necessary routes and permissions to develop and utilize state lands effectively, without being hindered by federal regulations. Such a package would promote collaboration between state and federal governments, streamline access procedures, and ultimately support the responsible and sustainable development of Alaska's resources.

Tribes: How would you rate the federal government’s interactions with Alaska Native tribes, and what, if anything, should be changed?
I would rate the federal government’s interactions with Alaska Native tribes as very poor. There are numerous critical issues that highlight this inadequacy. Many tribes are still awaiting conveyances and land selections, with some tribes excluded from the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) altogether. For instance, Eklutna continues to wait for lands presently held by federal entities to be conveyed to their corporation as promised. Additionally, Alaska Native Vietnam Veterans have not received the land selections promised to them, and tragically, many of these veterans have passed away before receiving their rightful land. Moreover, the Interior Department Secretary has failed to engage with North Slope community leaders before enacting regulations and making resource development decisions that dramatically impact their future opportunities. This lack of consultation and fulfillment of promises represents a significant failure in the federal government’s duty to Alaska Native tribes.

To address these issues, we must adopt a course of action that is consistent with a conservative and small government approach while recognizing our intergovernmental responsibilities. First, Congress should expedite the completion of all outstanding land conveyances and selections to Alaska Native tribes, including those previously excluded from ANCSA. Additionally, lands held by federal entities that are designated for conveyance to tribes, such as those for Eklutna, should be promptly transferred or negotiated in a way that achieves a positive and permanent resolution. A special initiative should be launched to ensure that Alaska Native Vietnam Veterans or their families receive their promised land selections without further delay. Lastly, the Interior Department must reevaluate their process for consultation with Alaska Native leadership prior to closing development opportunities to communities. This approach ensures that all tribes receive the lands and opportunities promised to them, upholds the principles of local control and self-governance, and fosters a more respectful and effective relationship between the federal government and Alaska Native tribes. Notably, the end of Chevron deference should diminish the latitude of federal agencies to stop Alaskan Native tribes from exercising their rights and accessing their resources under the law.

Immigration: What should Congress be doing on immigration issues?
Congress needs to enact comprehensive immigration reform that secures our borders, respects the rule of law, and creates a fair process for those seeking to contribute to our country. This includes the construction of physical barriers on land and within waterways where applicable to prevent illegal crossings. Additionally, we must reinstitute the "Remain in Mexico Policy," which aligns with international norms for those seeking asylum, ensuring that asylum seekers remain in Mexico while their claims are processed in the United States.

Furthermore, it is crucial to return to the historical definition of a "Qualified Asylum Claim." Currently, many immigrants are classified as climate or economic refugees, which are not legitimate grounds for asylum. To manage asylum claims more effectively, we need to significantly increase the speed with which the judiciary hears these cases, as current wait times can reach up to five years. Addressing these issues promptly will restore order and fairness to our immigration system.

Another critical aspect of immigration reform is addressing the employment of illegal immigrants. Employers who hire illegal immigrants instead of American workers must be held accountable. Recent data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that all net new jobs in the past six years have gone to foreign-born workers. Ensuring that American jobs are prioritized for American citizens is essential for the nation's economic stability. By implementing these measures, Congress can create a robust legal immigration system that brings the best minds from around the world to work and contribute to our nation while ending illegal immigration.

Party: On what issues do you disagree with your party’s political platform? If you’re running as an independent, what party would you prefer to caucus with?
The platform is a moving target, changing with each convention. However, I am firmly committed to principles of smaller and more limited government, greater personal freedom, and increased local determination. I believe we are best served when the innovation economy is thriving. I oppose the seemingly endless push toward foreign conflict and the underlying set of interventionist policies that often lead us there. I believe we must do all we can to preserve our representative form of government as a constitutional republic, without regard to party.

Additionally, I support many of the core values typically associated with my party, such as energy independence, protecting jobs, and promoting financial sovereignty. I also believe in an immigration system that attracts the best minds to our nation legally while addressing the issue of illegal immigration. Additionally, I believe we are best served through local control in education, providing greater competition and choice for parents, and healthcare reforms focused on affordability and innovation. These are pragmatic policies designed to enhance the well-being and prosperity of all Alaskans.

Ultimately, I stand by principles that prioritize the needs of our citizens over party ideology. My commitment to a constitutional republic means advocating for policies that empower individuals, foster economic growth, and ensure government accountability. Regardless of party platforms, I remain dedicated to representing the best interests of my constituents and promoting a prosperous and free society.

Israel-Palestine: What should the United States do to resolve the Israel-Palestine conflict?
The United States should fully support Israel with intelligence and arms to help eliminate Hamas and other regional terrorist threats. This military support is crucial for Israel's defense and stability, ensuring that it can effectively counteract those who seek to undermine its security. By providing advanced intelligence and weaponry, the U.S. can aid Israel in neutralizing immediate threats and maintaining a strategic advantage in the region.

Additionally, the U.S. should reinstitute sanctions targeting state sponsors of terrorism, preventing them from fueling efforts to destabilize or overthrow Israel. These sanctions would cut off financial and material support to terrorist organizations, significantly hindering their operations and reducing their capacity to launch attacks. By combining military support with economic pressure, the U.S. can help ensure Israel's security and contribute to a more stable and peaceful region, reinforcing the commitment to Israel's right to defend itself and its sovereignty.

Transgender issues: How should the federal government handle issues affecting transgender Alaskans?
The federal government should handle issues affecting transgender Alaskans the same as any other Alaskan.

Climate refugees: How much risk does Alaska face from climate-change-driven refugees?
Alaska faces minimal risk from climate-change-driven refugees. First, asylum claims do not cover those displaced by changes in the climate. Second, the idea that climate change will cause significant refugee movements directly to Alaska hasn’t been supported by the migration patterns of the more than 10 million migrants who have entered the nation over the past several years. While addressing the impact of a changing climate is important, framing the possibility of a climate refugee crisis specifically impacting Alaska does not seem likely.

Biden administration: Alaska’s two senators have said the Biden administration is waging a “war on Alaska” with various executive orders. Do you agree with that assessment, and what, if anything, should be done?
Yes, I agree with that assessment. One of Joe Biden's first votes in Congress in 1973 was against the Trans-Alaska pipeline. Imagine an Alaska without this critical infrastructure: no Permanent Fund Dividend (PFD), no permanent fund to support government funding, dramatically higher taxes, a higher cost of living, fewer jobs, and far less development. The Biden administration has now issued more than 65 executive orders specifically targeting Alaska, impacting our ability to responsibly develop our natural resources.

When the administration issues order after order shutting down the world's most responsible resource development jurisdiction in favor of regions with far fewer standards and poor track records, it becomes clear this is not about protecting the environment but achieving a political outcome for the left. These actions undermine Alaska's economic stability and growth, prioritizing political agendas over the welfare of Alaskans.

The recent end of Chevron deference, which allowed federal agencies to interpret ambiguous laws with little oversight, is a significant win for Alaska. This "cubicle lawmaking" stifled our state's ability to develop its resources by imposing bureaucratic red tape. Now, with courts having more authority to interpret laws independently, Alaska has a better chance of pushing back against federal overreach.

To permanently protect our rights and ensure responsible development, we need an "Alaska Plan"—a comprehensive legislative act that pushes back against executive fiat. This plan would codify our right to develop Alaska's resources responsibly, ensuring that future administrations cannot easily dismantle the economic foundations critical to our state's prosperity. By enacting such legislation, we can secure Alaska's future and ensure that our resources benefit the people of our great state.^[5]

”

2022

Regular election

Nicholas Begich did not complete Ballotpedia's 2022 Candidate Connection survey.

Campaign website

Begich's campaign website stated the following:

“

Ensuring Prosperity through Resource Independence:

Alaska’s resources are critical to America’s energy security, mineral security, and national security. Failing to develop these resources leaves the nation’s future to the whims of rivals and adversaries who do not have America’s best interests in mind. We must pursue an all-of-the-above development strategy for Alaskan resources as a basis for restoring domestic, vertically integrated supply chains that will drive U.S. manufacturing, enhance job creation, and deliver generational prosperity. To do this, we must make an articulate and persuasive case for Alaska both within Congress.

Bringing Back American Energy Security:

Alaska’s oil and gas resources are a critical part of America’s energy mix and help to ensure that American families and businesses have the energy needed to heat homes, drive to and from work, operate factories, and more. Without robust domestic energy production, Americans place their future in the hands of rivals and adversaries. With the right leadership, however, Alaska will provide strong oil and gas production for decades to come.

Embracing Alaska’s National Security Role:

Alaska is a critical component of America’s national security strategy. Whether it’s Alaska’s geographic position as the gateway to Arctic access, early warning for missile defense, or our training grounds for cold weather combat, Alaska enhances the ability for American forces to fight and win in the 21st century. With more 5th generation fighters now positioned in Alaska than any other single location on earth, Alaska is posed to support America’s defense missions both at home and in the Pacific. We must continue to stress the importance of Alaska as a key to ensuring domestic tranquility.

Supporting Our Veterans:

The men and women who have served our country have my utmost respect. We must ensure that our men and women who serve and have served for our country have greater access to healthcare and that the promises made to our veterans during their service are kept after that service is complete. Further, we must continue to reform the Veterans Administration to ensure that it is operating efficiently and effectively for the veterans it serves.

Developing Our Critical Minerals:

Rare earths, critical minerals, base metals, and precious metals: Alaska has it all! However, overregulation and extraordinarily burdensome permitting processes unnecessarily push the cost and time to market for new mines to the point of unprofitability. As a result, America willfully engages in a form of “environmental arbitrage”; that is, encouraging minerals development in international jurisdictions with little environmental framework and extreme working conditions. Rather than export this work, we must make domestic minerals development a national priority and in so doing, restore the raw materials foundation of our domestic production.

Driving Down Alaskan Energy Costs:

Alaska has been blessed with incredible energy resources, yet Alaskans continue to suffer from higher than necessary energy costs. As a result, not only is the already high cost of living driven even higher, but we are often unable to economically add value to the resources we extract. Actions by the Biden Administration threaten to exacerbate this issue as federal leases are withdrawn and permitting processes become increasingly expensive and complex. More must be done to harness Alaskan energy, whether that be oil, gas, hydro, small nuclear, geothermal, wind, and even solar. Only through an aggressive, clear and comprehensive energy policy that embraces the traditional energy supply chain will Alaska reach its full potential as a resource and production state.

Restoring Alaska’s Timber Industry:

Alaska’s timber industry was once a thriving component of our economy. However, radical environmental activism has nearly eliminated what was once a major Alaskan job creator. Smart, rotational timber leases must be restored to Southeast Alaska and opened up elsewhere throughout the state. Such actions reduce wildfire risk, provide potential for value-added industry, help diversify Alaska’s economic base and bring important cash inflows to the people of Alaska.

Ensuring Sustainable Fisheries:

Alaskan fisheries form a foundational component of America’s food supply, providing delicious and healthy sources of protein for families across America. People across Alaska and even the world travel to our State to enjoy this resource in our sport fisheries, and the tourism that flows powers small businesses from aviation to guide services, to hotels, to aviation, and more. Importantly, Alaskan fisheries provide important food security in Alaska as well as a source of subsistence upon which both rural and urban Alaskans rely. Each of these uses is important for Alaska and for America as a whole, and as a result it is crucial that we properly balance harvests and these interests to ensure a maximum sustainable yield. Limiting bycatch and overfishing; investing in ongoing research focused on ocean food chains, currents, population variance, genetics; and predator monitoring and control will all help ensure that Alaska’s fisheries remain reliable and predictable sources of sustenance, enjoyment, and revenue for Alaskans.

Securing our Second Amendment Freedoms:

The Second Amendment ensures one of the most critical freedoms for Americans: the right to keep and bear arms. Our nation’s founders understood this right to be foundational to the creation of our Republic as without an armed citizenry, we would have had no ability to win the fight for self-determination. Numerous examples exist today wherein despotic governments have turned on their people, secure in the knowledge that their citizens would be able to mount little in the way of response. Whether it be for defense of tyrannical governance, national security, personal defense, or hunting, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Focusing Education on the Student:

In spite of years of effort and substantial funding, Alaska’s schools consistently rank among the worst in the country. As a result, young Alaskans are deprived of the skills needed to succeed in years that follow. Parents must have the opportunity to place their children in the educational environment that best meets their needs and gives those children the best chance at success. To do this, we must encourage healthy competition among schools inclusive of public, private, and homeschool options and ensure that funding follows the student (e.g. vouchers). Further, any federal education funding should come in the form of block grants to the states, allowing a greater level of local control over how such funds are deployed in the classroom.

Enhancing Alaska’s Tourism Appeal:

Whether you’re a cheechako or an old sourdough, Alaska is full of wonder, intrigue, and mystique. Millions of people around the world come to Alaska each year to experience Alaska first hand. This generates a great deal of economic activity: jobs, small businesses, new products, and connections that can last a lifetime. Tourism has been an important part of Alaska’s economy for over 100 years, but today it’s critical to Alaskans. Exciting developments continue across Alaska from Southeastern “port-experiences” to one-of-a-kind cabins in the Interior. Through these investments we are developing a more robust and diversified private sector base in Alaska. However, over the past several years, we have seen what government overreach and the heavy hand of distant policymaking can do to this industry, and as such we must have a leader in the House who can advocate common sense policy that will ensure our State remains open for people around the world to enjoy.

Lowering Healthcare Costs for Alaskans:

Alaska has some of the world’s highest healthcare costs. Reforms are needed to drive down the cost of healthcare. Political rhetoric isn’t going to do it. It’s going to require commitment, tenacity, and hard work. We need to explore price and cost innovations around direct primary care and preventative medicine while protecting patient-doctor relationships. We can find cost savings by increasing competition, negotiating prescription drug prices, and tightening work requirements for able-bodied Medicaid recipients.

Protecting American Freedom from Judicial Activism:

Under the 10th Amendment, “the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” This important provision ensures that the Federal government does not exceed its constitutional authority in administering laws and resultant regulations. A textualist, originalist interpretation of the Constitution ensures the courts remain strictly adherent to the letter and intent of the law.^[5]

”

—Nick Begich's campaign website (2022)^[8]

Special election

Nicholas Begich did not complete Ballotpedia's 2022 Candidate Connection survey.

Campaign finance summary

Note: The finance data shown here comes from the disclosures required of candidates and parties. Depending on the election or state, this may represent only a portion of all the funds spent on their behalf. Satellite spending groups may or may not have expended funds related to the candidate or politician on whose page you are reading this disclaimer. Campaign finance data from elections may be incomplete. For elections to federal offices, complete data can be found at the FEC website. Click here for more on federal campaign finance law and here for more on state campaign finance law.

Nicholas Begich campaign contribution history
Year	Office	Status	Contributions	Expenditures
2026*	U.S. House Alaska At-large District	Candidacy Declared general	$1,627,709	$465,028
2024*	U.S. House Alaska At-large District	Won general	$2,810,468	$2,747,372
2022	U.S. House Alaska At-large District	Lost general	$1,640,060	$1,598,826
2022	U.S. House Alaska At-large District	Won general	$1,640,060	$1,598,826
Grand total			$7,718,297	$6,410,052
Sources: OpenSecrets, Federal Elections Commission *This product uses the openFEC API but is not endorsed or certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
* Data from this year may not be complete

Notable endorsements

See also: Ballotpedia: Our approach to covering endorsements

This section displays endorsements this individual made in elections within Ballotpedia's coverage scope. Know of one we missed? Click here to let us know.

Personal finance disclosures

Members of the House are required to file financial disclosure reports. You can search disclosure reports on the House’s official website here.

Analysis

Below are links to scores and rankings Ballotpedia compiled for members of Congress. We chose analyses that help readers understand how each individual legislator fit into the context of the chamber as a whole in terms of ideology, bill advancement, bipartisanship, and more.

If you would like to suggest an analysis for inclusion in this section, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

119th Congress (2025-2027)

Rankings and scores for the 119th Congress

External links

Search Google News for this topic

Candidate

U.S. House Alaska At-large District

Officeholder

U.S. House Alaska At-large District

Personal

Footnotes

↑ Nick Begich's 2022 campaign website, "Meet Nick Begich," accessed June 27, 2022
↑ U.S. News & World Report, "Begich Announces US House Bid: 'Alaska Needs New Energy,'" October 28, 2021
↑ LinkedIn, "Nicholas Begich III," accessed July 1, 2022
↑ Municipality of Anchorage, "2016 Regular Municipal Election Candidates," accessed February 19, 2016
↑ ^5.0 ^5.1 ^5.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
↑ Nicholas Begich’s campaign website, “Solutions,” accessed July 29, 2024
↑ Alaska Beacon, “Alaska Congress U.S. House,” July 29, 2024
↑ Nick Begich for Congress, “Issues,” accessed October 11, 2022

Political offices
Preceded by Mary Peltola (D)	U.S. House Alaska At-large District 2025-Present	Succeeded by -

[show]

Alaska's current delegation to the United States Congress

Senators

Lisa Murkowski (R)

Daniel Sullivan (R)

Representatives

Nicholas Begich (R)

Republican Party (3)

[cochair-1] Nick Begich's 2022 campaign website, "Meet Nick Begich," accessed June 27, 2022

[cochair2-2] U.S. News & World Report, "Begich Announces US House Bid: 'Alaska Needs New Energy,'" October 28, 2021

[3] LinkedIn, "Nicholas Begich III," accessed July 1, 2022

[4] Municipality of Anchorage, "2016 Regular Municipal Election Candidates," accessed February 19, 2016

[quotedisclaimer-5] 5.0 ^5.1 ^5.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.

[6] Nicholas Begich’s campaign website, “Solutions,” accessed July 29, 2024

[7] Alaska Beacon, “Alaska Congress U.S. House,” July 29, 2024

[8] Nick Begich for Congress, “Issues,” accessed October 11, 2022

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

Candidate	%	Total Votes	Transfer	Round eliminated
Nicholas Begich	51.2	164,861	4,817	Won (3)
Mary Peltola	48.8	156,985	2,724	3
John Howe	0.0	0	-13,871	2
Eric Hafner	0.0	0	0	1

Candidate	%	Total Votes	Transfer	Round eliminated
Nicholas Begich	48.8	160,044	267	Won (3)
Mary Peltola	47.0	154,261	1,313	3
John Howe	4.2	13,871	661	2
Eric Hafner	0.0	0	-3,558	1

Candidate	%	Total Votes	Transfer	Round eliminated
Nicholas Begich	48.5	159,777	0	Won (3)
Mary Peltola	46.4	152,948	0	3
John Howe	4.0	13,210	0	2
Eric Hafner	1.1	3,558	0	1
Lady Donna Dutchess (Write-in)	0.0	0	0	1

	Candidate	%	Total Votes	Transfer	Round eliminated
	Mary Peltola	49.2	129,786	1,031	Won (3)
	Sarah Palin	26.3	69,399	1,069	3
	Nicholas Begich	24.5	64,499	1,994	3
	Chris Bye	0.0	0	-4,999	2
	David Ambrose (Write-in)	0.0	0	0	1
Submit photo	Jay Armstrong (Write-in)	0.0	0	0	1
Submit photo	Joe Bredar (Write-in)	0.0	0	0	1
	Lady Donna Dutchess (Write-in)	0.0	0	0	1
Submit photo	Sherry Mettler (Write-in)	0.0	0	0	1
	Robert Ornelas (Write-in)	0.0	0	0	1
Submit photo	Brad Snowden (Write-in)	0.0	0	0	1
Submit photo	Ernest Thomas (Write-in)	0.0	0	0	1

	Candidate	%	Total Votes	Transfer	Round eliminated
	Mary Peltola	51.5	91,266	15,467	Won (2)
	Sarah Palin	48.5	86,026	27,053	2
	Nicholas Begich	0.0	0	-53,810	1
	Chris Bye (Write-in)	0.0	0	0	1
	Lady Donna Dutchess (Write-in)	0.0	0	0	1
	Robert Ornelas (Write-in)	0.0	0	0	1
Submit photo	Sherry Strizak (Write-in)	0.0	0	0	1
	Tara Sweeney (Write-in)	0.0	0	0	1
Submit photo	Ernest Thomas (Write-in)	0.0	0	0	1

	v • e State of Alaska Juneau (capital)
Elections	What's on my ballot? \| Elections in 2025 \| How to vote \| How to run for office \| Ballot measures
Government	Who represents me? \| U.S. President \| U.S. Congress \| Federal courts \| State executives \| State legislature \| State and local courts \| Counties \| Cities \| School districts \| Public policy

Nicholas Begich

Biography

Committee assignments

U.S. House

2025-2026

Elections

2026

General election

General election for U.S. House Alaska At-large District

Endorsements

2024

General election

General election for U.S. House Alaska At-large District

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

Nonpartisan primary election

Nonpartisan primary for U.S. House Alaska At-large District

Endorsements

Pledges

2022

Regular election

General election

General election for U.S. House Alaska At-large District

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

Nonpartisan primary election

Nonpartisan primary for U.S. House Alaska At-large District

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

Special election

General election

General election for U.S. House Alaska At-large District

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

Nonpartisan primary election

Special nonpartisan primary for U.S. House Alaska At-large District

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

2016

Campaign themes

2026

Ballotpedia survey responses

2024

Campaign website

Interview with Alaska Beacon

2022

Regular election

Campaign website

Special election

Campaign finance summary

Notable endorsements

Personal finance disclosures

Analysis

119th Congress (2025-2027)

See also

External links

Footnotes

Information about voting

2025 Elections

2026 Elections

2024 Election analysis

Trending

Public Policy

Information for candidates

Get Engaged

Services

Additional analysis

SITE NAVIGATION