North Carolina's 9th Congressional District election, 2018
- General election: Nov. 6
- Voter registration deadline: Oct. 12
- Early voting: Oct. 17 - Nov. 3
- Absentee voting deadline: Nov. 6
- Online registration: No
- Same-day registration: No
- Voter ID: No
- Poll times: 6:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m.
2020 →
← 2016
|
North Carolina's 9th Congressional District |
---|
Democratic primary Republican primary General election |
Election details |
Filing deadline: February 28, 2018 |
Primary: May 8, 2018 Primary runoff: July 17, 2018 (if needed) General: November 6, 2018 Pre-election incumbent: Robert Pittenger (Republican) |
How to vote |
Poll times: 6:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. Voting in North Carolina |
Race ratings |
Cook Political Report: Toss-up Inside Elections: Toss-up Sabato's Crystal Ball: Lean Democratic |
Ballotpedia analysis |
U.S. Senate battlegrounds U.S. House battlegrounds Federal and state primary competitiveness Ballotpedia's Election Analysis Hub, 2018 |
See also |
1st • 2nd • 3rd • 4th • 5th • 6th • 7th • 8th • 9th • 10th • 11th • 12th • 13th North Carolina elections, 2018 U.S. Congress elections, 2018 U.S. Senate elections, 2018 U.S. House elections, 2018 |
Pastor Mark Harris (R), businessman Dan McCready (D), and Jeff Scott (L) ran in the general election on November 6, 2018, to represent North Carolina's 9th Congressional District. Following a hearing on alleged ballot tampering and election fraud, the state Board of Elections did not certify the election results and voted unanimously to call for a new election on February 21, 2019.[1] Click here for a timeline of events following the aftermath of the election and here for coverage of the 2019 special election.
All 435 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives were up for election in 2018. The Democratic Party gained a net total of 40 seats, winning control of the chamber. This race was identified as a 2018 battleground that might have affected partisan control of the U.S. House in the 116th Congress. Heading into the election, the Republican Party was in the majority holding 235 seats to Democrats' 193 seats, with seven vacant seats. Democrats needed to win 23 GOP-held seats in 2018 to win control of the House. From 1918 to 2016, the president’s party lost an average of 29 seats in midterm elections.
Pittenger, who was first elected in 2012, won re-election in 2016 by 16 percentage points, while Donald Trump won the district by 11.6 percentage points in the presidential election.[2] Heading into the election, forecasters tracked by Ballotpedia said the race was a toss-up or slightly favored Democrats.
North Carolina's 9th Congressional District is located in the southern portion of the state and includes all or parts of Mecklenburg, Union, Anson, Richmond, Scotland, Robeson, Bladen, and Cumberland counties.[3]
For more information about the Democratic primary, click here.
For more information about the Republican primary, click here.
Aftermath
February 2019
- February 21, 2019: After four days of hearings on alleged ballot tampering, the state Board of Elections called for a new election.[1]
- February 18-20, 2019: The board was expected to vote on whether to certify the election or call for a new one after holding a public hearing.[4] The hearings continued to a fourth day, instead.
- February 12, 2019: Harris and McCready filed briefings with the election board. Harris argued a new election should not be called because any alleged technical irregularity found during the investigation, like ballot harvesting, would not have altered the outcome of the election. McCready argued a new election should be called because ballots were illegally harvested, tampered with, and likely discarded, tainting the entire election.[5]
January 2019
- January 31, 2019: Gov. Roy Cooper (D) appointed five new members to the state Board of Elections: Stella Anderson (D), David Black (R), Jeff Carmon III (D), Bob Cordle (D), and Ken Raymond (R).[6]
- January 26, 2019: The McCready campaign announced it had raised $500,000 for a possible new election since mid-December.[7]
- January 22, 2019: Wake County Superior Court Judge Paul Ridgeway denied Harris' request to certify the election results while the investigation into alleged election fraud was pending.[8]
- January 3, 2019: Harris was not sworn in to the 116th Congress.
- January 2, 2019: The evidentiary hearing scheduled for January 11, 2019, was postponed because there was no board in place to subpoena witnesses or hold hearings.[9]
- January 1, 2019: Incumbent Robert Pittenger (R) said that he would not run in a new primary if one were called following the investigation into irregularities during the 2018 election.[10]
December 2018
- December 28, 2018:
- The North Carolina State Board of Elections was dissolved at noon. At the time, it was unclear whether an interim board would be appointed to serve until a new board came together on January 31, 2019, according to state law. Harris filed an emergency petition to have the election results certified before the board dissolved, but an emergency session to consider the petition was not called.[11]
- The incoming U.S. House majority leader, Steny Hoyer (D), said in a statement that Democrats would object to Harris being seated on January 3, 2019.[12]
- December 27, 2018: A panel of three state judges ruled to dissolve the state board of elections. The decision was connected to an earlier court ruling that declared the structure of the board unconstitutional. The court had previously ruled to delay dissolving the board so it could continue investigating alleged fraud related to the election, but on December 27, judges ruled to dissolve it, stating that the board had failed to provide reasons for delaying its evidentiary hearing until January 11, 2019.[11][13]
- December 17, 2018: The North Carolina Republican Party released a resolution calling on the North Carolina State Board of Elections to produce evidence that the alleged voting irregularities would have changed the outcome of the race or immediately certify the results.[14]
- December 14, 2018: The North Carolina State Board of Elections announced it would hold a public evidentiary hearing on January 11, 2019, delaying the initially planned hearing set to be held by December 21, 2018.[15]
- December 11, 2018: Robin Hayes, the chairman of the North Carolina Republican Party, called for a new election if allegations that early votes in the race were improperly viewed were true. He said, “This action by election officials would be a fundamental violation of the sense of fair play, honesty, and integrity that the Republican Party stands for. We can never tolerate the state putting its thumb on the scale. The people involved in this must be held accountable and should it be true, this fact alone would likely require a new election."[16]
- December 6, 2018: The editorial board of the The Charlotte Observer called for a new election. The board wrote, "Unless new evidence somehow clears the clouds hanging over this election, the Board of Elections should toss out the 9th District results.[17]
- December 1, 2018: North Carolina State Board of Elections Chairman Andy Penry resigned from office following a complaint from Wake County Republican Chairman Charles Hellwig saying Penry had made social media posts critical of President Donald Trump (R) and other Republicans. Penry said in a statement announcing his resignation, "The investigation should be free of attempts at distraction and obstruction so that the truth can be revealed. I will not allow myself to be used as an instrument of distraction in this investigation."[18]
November 2018
- November 30, 2018: The North Carolina State Board of Elections reconvened and voted, 7-2, for an evidentiary hearing on the irregularities before December 21, 2018.[19]
- November 28, 2018: Bobby Ludlum, the chairman of the Bladen County Board of Elections, said that the chief investigator for the North Carolina Board of Elections collected absentee by mail ballot request forms and their return envelopes from Bladen County, which partially sits in the 9th District, after the election.[20]
- November 27, 2018: The North Carolina State Board of Elections, which is composed of four Democrats, four Republicans, and one independent member, voted unanimously not to certify the results in the 9th Congressional District. Vice Chairman Joshua Malcolm, who made the motion to delay certification, cited a law saying the board could "take any other action necessary to assure that an election is determined without taint of fraud or corruption and without irregularities that may have changed the result of an election."[21]
Candidates and election results
General election
General election for U.S. House North Carolina District 9
No candidate won the general election for U.S. House North Carolina District 9 on November 6, 2018.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
![]() | Mark Harris (R) | 49.3 | 139,246 | |
![]() | Dan McCready (D) | 48.9 | 138,341 | |
Jeff Scott (L) | 1.8 | 5,130 |
Vote totals may be incomplete for this race. | ||||
Total votes: 282,717 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for U.S. House North Carolina District 9
Dan McCready defeated Christian Cano in the Democratic primary for U.S. House North Carolina District 9 on May 8, 2018.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Dan McCready | 82.8 | 38,098 |
![]() | Christian Cano | 17.2 | 7,922 |
Total votes: 46,020 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- Maria Warren (D)
Republican primary election
Republican primary for U.S. House North Carolina District 9
Mark Harris defeated incumbent Robert Pittenger and Clarence Goins in the Republican primary for U.S. House North Carolina District 9 on May 8, 2018.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Mark Harris | 48.5 | 17,302 |
![]() | Robert Pittenger | 46.2 | 16,474 | |
![]() | Clarence Goins | 5.2 | 1,867 |
Total votes: 35,643 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Libertarian primary election
Libertarian primary for U.S. House North Carolina District 9
Jeff Scott advanced from the Libertarian primary for U.S. House North Carolina District 9 on May 8, 2018.
Candidate | ||
✔ | Jeff Scott |
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Candidate profiles
Party: Democratic
Incumbent: No
Political office: None
Biography: McCready joined the U.S. Marine Corps after college and served in Iraq in 2007. He later attended Harvard Business School, worked for McKinsey & Company, and founded a solar energy company.[22]
- McCready highlighted his military experience and said he would put country over party in Congress by working with Democrats and Republicans to balance the budget and preserve Social Security and Medicare.[23]
- McCready said he would fight against career politicians and special interests in Congress who he said threatened the American Dream and working families.[24]
- McCready highlighted his Christian faith, which he said he found while serving in the military, and said he was serving a higher power.[23][24]
Party: Republican
Incumbent: No
Political office: None
Biography: Harris was born in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. He received his bachelor's degree in political science from Appalachian State University and master's degree in divinity and Ph.D. in Christian leadership from Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary. Harris’ career experience includes working as a pastor.[25]
- Harris said that it was time for a new approach to politics where legislators serve a limited amount of time before coming home to live under the laws they passed. He said career politicans prevented the Republican Party from enacting its preferred policies.[26][27]
- Harris said he was a people-focused representative who would be guided by his Christian faith and family while in Congress.[26][27]
Party: Libertarian
Incumbent: No
Political office: None
Biography: Scott received degrees in economics and statistics from San Francisco State University. He has been an adjunct scholar at the Mises Institute of Auburn, Alabama. A financial technology consultant, Scott worked for Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, Wells Fargo Bank, Visa, and Bank of America. His professional experience includes 30 years in business intelligence, banking, and the financial sector, including working as an economist with Federal Home Loan Bank.[28][29]
- Scott said he was anti-war, anti-corruption, and anti-surveillance. Among other policies, he said he would work to limit U.S. involvement in foreign conflicts, advocate for a balanced federal budget, and act to penalize the misuse of prviate information by government agencies.[30]
- Scott said the two-party system in Washington, D.C. had increased federal debt, jeopardized elements of the Bill of Rights, and failed in its "efforts to police the world."[30]
Polls
- See also: Ballotpedia's approach to covering polls
U.S. House of Representatives 9th Congressional District, general election | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poll | Poll sponsor | Dan McCready (D) | Mark Harris (R) | Other/Undecided | Margin of error | Sample size | |||||||||||||
Siena College (October 26-30) | New York Times | 44% | 45% | 11% | +/-5.0 | 505 | |||||||||||||
SurveyUSA (October 2-4) | Civitas Institute | 45% | 41% | 14% | +/-4.7 | 556 | |||||||||||||
Siena College (October 1-5) | New York Times | 42% | 47% | 11% | +/-4.9 | 502 | |||||||||||||
Civitas Institute (July 5-8) | N/A | 43% | 36% | 21% | +/-4.6 | 543 | |||||||||||||
AVERAGES | 43.5% | 42.25% | 14.25% | +/-4.8 | 526.5 | ||||||||||||||
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org. |
Campaign contributions
The chart below contains data from financial reports submitted to the Federal Election Commission.
Name | Party | Receipts* | Disbursements** | Cash on hand | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dan McCready | Democratic Party | $6,671,757 | $6,333,918 | $337,839 | As of December 31, 2018 |
Mark Harris | Republican Party | $2,163,825 | $2,141,861 | $21,964 | As of December 31, 2018 |
Jeff Scott | Libertarian Party | $0 | $0 | $0 | Data not available*** |
Source: Federal Elections Commission, "Campaign finance data," 2018. This product uses the openFEC API but is not endorsed or certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
* According to the FEC, "Receipts are anything of value (money, goods, services or property) received by a political committee." |
Satellite spending
Satellite spending, commonly referred to as outside spending, describes political spending not controlled by candidates or their campaigns; that is, any political expenditures made by groups or individuals that are not directly affiliated with a candidate. This includes spending by political party committees, super PACs, trade associations, and 501(c)(4) nonprofit groups.[31][32][33]
This section lists satellite spending in this race reported by news outlets in alphabetical order. If you are aware of spending that should be included, please email us.
- Club for Growth launched a $435,000 television ad campaign opposing Dan McCready on October 24.[34]
- The House Majority PAC had spent $315,000 opposing Mark Harris as of August 28, including this negative ad.[35]
- The League of Conservation Voters launched a $677,000 television ad campaign opposing Mark Harris on October 16.
- The National Republican Congressional Committee announced it would spend $800,000 supporting Mark Harris on October 25.[36]
- Patriot Majority PAC disclosed $640,000 in spending to oppose Mark Harris on October 9.
- Democratic donor Tom Steyer pledged to spend $1 million to flip this seat.[37]
- VoteVets disclosed $560,000 in spending to oppose Mark Harris on October 27.
Race ratings
- See also: Race rating definitions and methods
Ballotpedia provides race ratings from four outlets: The Cook Political Report, Inside Elections, Sabato's Crystal Ball, and DDHQ/The Hill. Each race rating indicates if one party is perceived to have an advantage in the race and, if so, the degree of advantage:
- Safe and Solid ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge and the race is not competitive.
- Likely ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge, but an upset is possible.
- Lean ratings indicate that one party has a small edge, but the race is competitive.[38]
- Toss-up ratings indicate that neither party has an advantage.
Race ratings are informed by a number of factors, including polling, candidate quality, and election result history in the race's district or state.[39][40][41]
Race ratings: North Carolina's 9th Congressional District election, 2018 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Race tracker | Race ratings | ||||||||
October 30, 2018 | October 23, 2018 | October 16, 2018 | October 9, 2018 | ||||||
The Cook Political Report | Toss-up | Toss-up | Toss-up | Toss-up | |||||
Inside Elections with Nathan L. Gonzales | Toss-up | Tilt Republican | Tilt Republican | Tilt Republican | |||||
Larry J. Sabato's Crystal Ball | Lean Democratic | Lean Democratic | Lean Democratic | Lean Democratic | |||||
Note: Ballotpedia updates external race ratings every two weeks throughout the election season. |
District analysis
- See also: The Cook Political Report's Partisan Voter Index
- See also: FiveThirtyEight's elasticity scores
The 2017 Cook Partisan Voter Index for this district was R+7, meaning that in the previous two presidential elections, this district's results were 7 percentage points more Republican than the national average. This made North Carolina's 9th Congressional District the 175th most Republican nationally.[42]
FiveThirtyEight's September 2018 elasticity score for states and congressional districts measured "how sensitive it is to changes in the national political environment." This district's elasticity score was 0.90. This means that for every 1 point the national political mood moved toward a party, the district was expected to move 0.90 points toward that party.[43]
Noteworthy endorsements
This section lists noteworthy endorsements issued in this election, including those made by high-profile individuals and organizations, cross-party endorsements, and endorsements made by newspaper editorial boards. It also includes a bulleted list of links to official lists of endorsements for any candidates who published that information on their campaign websites. Please note that this list is not exhaustive. If you are aware of endorsements that should be included, please click here.
Noteworthy general election endorsements | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Endorsement | McCready (D) | Harris (R) | Scott (L) | |||
Individuals | ||||||
President Donald Trump (R)[44] | ✔ | |||||
Vice President Mike Pence (R)[45] | ✔ | |||||
Former Bank of America Chaiman Hugh McColl[46] | ✔ | |||||
Christian Cano (D)[47] | ✔ |
Click here to see a list of endorsements in the May 8 Republican primary | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Timeline
- October 30, 2018: A New York Times/Siena College poll showed Harris with 45 percent and McCready with 44 percent. The margin of error was 5.0 percentage points.
- October 27, 2018: VoteVets disclosed $560,000 in spending to oppose Mark Harris.
- October 26, 2018: President Donald Trump (R) campaigned for Mark Harris.[53]
- October 25, 2018: The National Republican Congressional Committee announced it would spend $800,000 supporting Mark
- October 24, 2018: Club for Growth launched a $435,000 television ad campaign opposing Dan McCready.
- October 22, 2018: Dan McCready loaned his campaign an additional $500,000.[54]
- October 16, 2018: The League of Conservation Voters launched a $677,000 television ad campaign opposing Mark Harris.
- October 9, 2018: Patriot Majority PAC disclosed $640,000 in spending to oppose Mark Harris.
- October 9, 2018: Donald Trump Jr. and Kimberly Guilfoyle, the vice chair of America First, held a fundraiser for Harris.[55]
- October 9, 2018: A SurveyUSA poll commissioned by the Civitas Institute found McCready leading Harris 45-41. The margin of error was 4.7 percentage points.
- October 8, 2018: Karen Pence, the wife of Vice President Mike Pence (R), appeared at an event in support of Harris.[45]
- October 5, 2018: A Siena College/New York Times poll showed Harris leading McCready 47-42. The margin of error was 4.9 percentage points.
- July 29, 2018: The House Majority PAC released an ad opposing Mark Harris.
- June 29, 2018: The National Republican Congressional Committee added Harris to its "Young Guns" program, which identifies Republican candidates in competitive races who have met certain financial and campaign benchmarks.[56]
Campaign advertisements
This section shows advertisements released in this race. Ads released by campaigns and, if applicable, satellite groups are embedded or linked below. If you are aware of advertisements that should be included, please email us.
Dan McCready
Support
|
|
|
In Congress, I'll do what I did in business - work with Republicans and Democrats to get the job done. Proud to have the endorsement of North Carolina's greatest business leader, Hugh McColl. pic.twitter.com/mKZfKySwHv
— Dan McCready for NC (@McCreadyForNC) October 24, 2018
Oppose
|
|
|
Mark Harris
Support
|
|
Oppose
|
|
|
Campaign tactics and strategies
Harris' sermon on gender
Opposition research group American Bridge 21st Century published a sermon Harris delivered in May 2013, where Harris discussed "God's plan for biblical womanhood" and said scripture described women as helpers. He questioned whether teaching girls independence as an ultimate goal was healthy for society.[57]
"This doesn’t mean that you can’t be a woman going to the office, can’t be a woman carrying a briefcase, doesn’t mean you can’t be a woman sitting at an executive board table," Harris said. "But what it does mean, is that who you are ma'am, you must understand your core calling."[57]
The Harris campaign responded to the sermon's release in a statement, saying, "Within the proper context, Mark absolutely stands by his personal statements and his admonition to young ladies that they can do anything they want to do and be anything that want to be while encouraging them to remember there is no higher calling than to be a mother and wife just as young men should be encouraged to remember there is no higher calling than to be a husband and father."[57]
McCready said in a statement that man was created in God's image. He continued, "That means men and women are equally valuable and equally capable and should be treated as such in their homes, careers, and in society. Mr. Harris' comments suggest otherwise."[57]
Campaign themes
Dan McCready
McCready’s campaign website stated the following:
“ |
Cleaning up our Broken Politics Dan will work to overturn Citizens United. He will fight to rid our politics of dark and corporate money, which is the worst part of our broken political system. It’s poisoning our democracy and silencing the voices of regular people. Dan will push back against gerrymandering. Through partisan redistricting, politicians are deciding who gets elected, not the voters. Both parties have done it, and both parties were wrong. It’s time that the voters get back the right to elect their representatives. Dan will fight for independent redistricting commissions, not politicians, to draw district lines. Standing up for our Seniors Creating Good Jobs from Cities to Small Towns Dan will fight for North Carolina community colleges and job training programs to receive our district’s fair share of federal funding. Too many workers in North Carolina need jobs, but too many companies can’t find the workers they need. Dan will work to open up new pathways to opportunity that go beyond four-year college and rethink education so people can learn the technical and trade skills for the good-paying middle-class jobs of today and tomorrow. Dan will fight for rural jobs. The main streets of North Carolina’s towns used to be filled with cars, but now far too many parking spaces are empty. Trade deals have benefited the rich and powerful but devastated North Carolina families. Dan will fight to protect our local communities from the adverse effects of trade, and he will personally recruit CEOs to move their companies to rural North Carolina. Achieving Affordable and Accessible Healthcare Dan knows we have to fix our broken and unaffordable healthcare system once and for all with common-sense solutions that lower out-of-control costs while maintaining quality coverage. That means standing up to big drug companies to lower prescription costs, strengthening Medicare, and fighting to stop insurance companies from raising premiums year after year and kicking people off their coverage. Fixing the Budget, Taxes, and Regulation Dan will fight to simplify the tax code and cut taxes more for middle-class families, not just the ultra-wealthy. Today, if you don’t have money or a lobbyist, the deck is stacked against you. But that’s not what America is about. Our country is built on the promise that if you work hard and play by the rules, you can get ahead. Dan will fight for middle-class tax cuts and policies to level the playing field for hardworking North Carolinians. As a small business owner, Dan understands the burden of needless regulations on small businesses, contractors, and entrepreneurs. He will fight to streamline cumbersome regulations so North Carolinians can start and grow companies and hire more workers. Investing in Teachers and Education North Carolina built a reputation over decades as a leader in education and the leader of the New South, but now the politicians are undermining education. Teachers are having to work two jobs and pay for school supplies out of their own pockets. Dan will fight for teacher pay, early childhood education, and alternatives to four-year degrees like community college and job training programs that equip North Carolinians for the jobs of tomorrow without mountains of debt. Protecting our Veterans Dan is no stranger to advocating for veterans. After he went to business school on the GI Bill, he gave away a portion of his company’s sales each year to veterans. Veterans will have no stronger advocate than Dan on health care, mental health, education, jobs, and the transition to civilian life. Fighting for the Lumbee Tribe Protecting North Carolina’s Air and Water Keeping our Families Safe The problem in Washington right now is not that politicians are doing the wrong thing to prevent gun violence, it’s that they’re barely doing anything at all. That has to change. Dan will fight for common-sense and bipartisan gun violence prevention, comprehensive background checks, and closing the gun show and online loopholes that allow guns to fall into the hands of domestic terrorists, domestic abusers, and the mentally ill. Keeping Americans Safe Defending Women’s Rights Protecting the Rights of All Americans When politicians try to kick Dreamers out of the country who were brought here as children, or separate four-year-old children from their parents at the border, that’s un-American. Dan knows we need a comprehensive and bipartisan immigration reform that respects our laws and secures our border, but also upholds our values. Dan knows that everyone, straight or gay, deserves equality under the law. Everyone deserves equal opportunity no matter their race, gender, sexual orientation, or country of origin. [58] |
” |
—Dan McCready’s campaign website (2018)[59] |
Mark Harris
Harris' campaign website stated the following:
“ |
Education Term Limits Taxation Terrorism Immigration Obamacare National Defense Military 2nd Amendment The Role of the Federal Government Pro Life and Pro Family Religious Liberty Career Politicians |
” |
—Mark Harris’ campaign website (2018)[60] |
Social media
Twitter accounts
Tweets by Dan McCready Tweets by Mark Harris
Facebook accounts
Click the icons below to visit the candidates' Facebook pages.
Pivot Counties
- See also: Pivot Counties by state
Six of 100 North Carolina counties—6 percent—are Pivot Counties. Pivot Counties are counties that voted for Barack Obama (D) in 2008 and 2012 and for Donald Trump (R) in 2016. Altogether, the nation had 206 Pivot Counties, with most being concentrated in upper midwestern and northeastern states.
Counties won by Trump in 2016 and Obama in 2012 and 2008 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County | Trump margin of victory in 2016 | Obama margin of victory in 2012 | Obama margin of victory in 2008 | ||||
Bladen County, North Carolina | 9.39% | 1.97% | 2.07% | ||||
Gates County, North Carolina | 9.07% | 4.11% | 5.22% | ||||
Granville County, North Carolina | 2.49% | 4.54% | 6.58% | ||||
Martin County, North Carolina | 0.43% | 4.65% | 4.64% | ||||
Richmond County, North Carolina | 9.74% | 2.95% | 1.50% | ||||
Robeson County, North Carolina | 4.27% | 17.41% | 13.78% |
In the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump (R) won North Carolina with 49.8 percent of the vote. Hillary Clinton (D) received 46.2 percent. In presidential elections between 1792 and 2016, North Carolina voted Democratic 53.5 percent of the time and Republican 25 percent of the time. In the five presidential elections between 2000 and 2016, North Carolina voted Republican all five times with the exception of the 2008 presidential election.[61]
Presidential results by legislative district
The following table details results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections by state House districts in North Carolina. Click [show] to expand the table. The "Obama," "Romney," "Clinton," and "Trump" columns describe the percent of the vote each presidential candidate received in the district. The "2012 Margin" and "2016 Margin" columns describe the margin of victory between the two presidential candidates in those years. The "Party Control" column notes which party held that seat heading into the 2018 general election. Data on the results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections broken down by state legislative districts was compiled by Daily Kos.[62][63]
In 2012, Barack Obama (D) won 40 out of 120 state House districts in North Carolina with an average margin of victory of 38.3 points. In 2016, Hillary Clinton (D) won 44 out of 120 state House districts in North Carolina with an average margin of victory of 36.4 points. Clinton won three districts controlled by Republicans heading into the 2018 elections. |
In 2012, Mitt Romney (R) won 80 out of 120 state House districts in North Carolina with an average margin of victory of 22.7 points. In 2016, Donald Trump (R) won 76 out of 120 state House districts in North Carolina with an average margin of victory of 27.7 points. Trump won five districts controlled by Democrats heading into the 2018 elections. |
2016 presidential results by state House district | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | Obama | Romney | 2012 Margin | Clinton | Trump | 2016 Margin | Party Control |
1 | 39.07% | 59.75% | R+20.7 | 32.23% | 64.86% | R+32.6 | R |
2 | 45.36% | 53.77% | R+8.4 | 41.98% | 55.70% | R+13.7 | R |
3 | 39.50% | 59.71% | R+20.2 | 37.03% | 60.71% | R+23.7 | R |
4 | 34.52% | 64.80% | R+30.3 | 32.81% | 65.32% | R+32.5 | R |
5 | 66.40% | 33.04% | D+33.4 | 60.73% | 37.68% | D+23.1 | D |
6 | 41.31% | 57.70% | R+16.4 | 37.74% | 59.79% | R+22 | R |
7 | 61.12% | 38.34% | D+22.8 | 59.67% | 38.69% | D+21 | D |
8 | 44.59% | 54.67% | R+10.1 | 44.25% | 53.51% | R+9.3 | R |
9 | 43.79% | 55.31% | R+11.5 | 44.05% | 52.81% | R+8.8 | R |
10 | 32.61% | 66.71% | R+34.1 | 31.37% | 66.58% | R+35.2 | R |
11 | 62.10% | 35.81% | D+26.3 | 65.41% | 29.85% | D+35.6 | D |
12 | 57.29% | 42.15% | D+15.1 | 53.64% | 44.58% | D+9.1 | D |
13 | 31.14% | 67.96% | R+36.8 | 28.23% | 69.48% | R+41.2 | R |
14 | 39.87% | 59.05% | R+19.2 | 35.26% | 61.20% | R+25.9 | R |
15 | 34.90% | 63.92% | R+29 | 28.94% | 67.59% | R+38.7 | R |
16 | 36.25% | 62.86% | R+26.6 | 31.07% | 66.35% | R+35.3 | R |
17 | 36.26% | 62.94% | R+26.7 | 32.62% | 65.00% | R+32.4 | R |
18 | 62.39% | 36.46% | D+25.9 | 56.14% | 40.55% | D+15.6 | D |
19 | 40.85% | 57.94% | R+17.1 | 41.19% | 55.45% | R+14.3 | R |
20 | 39.49% | 59.33% | R+19.8 | 40.58% | 55.60% | R+15 | R |
21 | 65.25% | 34.32% | D+30.9 | 62.68% | 35.99% | D+26.7 | D |
22 | 43.73% | 55.60% | R+11.9 | 39.83% | 58.67% | R+18.8 | D |
23 | 62.89% | 36.74% | D+26.2 | 60.17% | 38.60% | D+21.6 | D |
24 | 74.47% | 25.04% | D+49.4 | 72.60% | 25.66% | D+46.9 | D |
25 | 38.23% | 60.96% | R+22.7 | 35.91% | 61.84% | R+25.9 | R |
26 | 38.98% | 59.91% | R+20.9 | 37.76% | 59.07% | R+21.3 | R |
27 | 66.33% | 33.28% | D+33 | 62.75% | 36.15% | D+26.6 | D |
28 | 32.52% | 66.58% | R+34.1 | 28.54% | 69.16% | R+40.6 | R |
29 | 85.11% | 14.02% | D+71.1 | 88.12% | 9.63% | D+78.5 | D |
30 | 70.85% | 28.07% | D+42.8 | 77.30% | 19.61% | D+57.7 | D |
31 | 82.65% | 16.65% | D+66 | 83.75% | 14.17% | D+69.6 | D |
32 | 65.02% | 34.58% | D+30.4 | 61.76% | 36.76% | D+25 | D |
33 | 81.34% | 17.53% | D+63.8 | 81.09% | 15.94% | D+65.2 | D |
34 | 62.78% | 35.76% | D+27 | 67.28% | 28.80% | D+38.5 | D |
35 | 44.44% | 54.51% | R+10.1 | 47.51% | 49.16% | R+1.7 | R |
36 | 44.86% | 53.90% | R+9 | 50.19% | 45.86% | D+4.3 | R |
37 | 42.89% | 55.76% | R+12.9 | 44.58% | 51.08% | R+6.5 | R |
38 | 78.90% | 20.26% | D+58.6 | 78.47% | 19.01% | D+59.5 | D |
39 | 57.12% | 41.74% | D+15.4 | 57.85% | 38.85% | D+19 | D |
40 | 46.18% | 52.52% | R+6.3 | 52.39% | 43.60% | D+8.8 | D |
41 | 50.04% | 48.63% | D+1.4 | 57.26% | 38.74% | D+18.5 | D |
42 | 73.16% | 26.19% | D+47 | 71.85% | 25.66% | D+46.2 | D |
43 | 67.66% | 31.73% | D+35.9 | 64.79% | 32.77% | D+32 | D |
44 | 51.66% | 47.45% | D+4.2 | 50.97% | 45.97% | D+5 | D |
45 | 43.67% | 55.55% | R+11.9 | 39.47% | 57.82% | R+18.3 | R |
46 | 42.45% | 56.86% | R+14.4 | 35.55% | 63.04% | R+27.5 | R |
47 | 58.64% | 40.32% | D+18.3 | 45.40% | 52.38% | R+7 | D |
48 | 67.88% | 31.42% | D+36.5 | 60.08% | 38.08% | D+22 | D |
49 | 46.75% | 52.19% | R+5.4 | 54.02% | 42.19% | D+11.8 | D |
50 | 57.85% | 40.99% | D+16.9 | 58.33% | 38.67% | D+19.7 | D |
51 | 40.42% | 58.52% | R+18.1 | 36.86% | 60.20% | R+23.3 | R |
52 | 36.18% | 63.11% | R+26.9 | 34.94% | 62.15% | R+27.2 | R |
53 | 40.43% | 58.68% | R+18.2 | 37.83% | 59.61% | R+21.8 | R |
54 | 52.55% | 46.52% | D+6 | 53.78% | 43.36% | D+10.4 | D |
55 | 39.63% | 59.55% | R+19.9 | 33.67% | 64.12% | R+30.5 | R |
56 | 76.58% | 21.93% | D+54.7 | 81.22% | 15.78% | D+65.4 | D |
57 | 73.72% | 25.56% | D+48.2 | 73.89% | 23.97% | D+49.9 | D |
58 | 77.83% | 21.42% | D+56.4 | 78.39% | 19.21% | D+59.2 | D |
59 | 40.94% | 58.07% | R+17.1 | 43.10% | 54.02% | R+10.9 | R |
60 | 78.79% | 20.56% | D+58.2 | 77.66% | 20.26% | D+57.4 | D |
61 | 41.22% | 57.90% | R+16.7 | 43.79% | 53.30% | R+9.5 | R |
62 | 43.41% | 55.66% | R+12.2 | 46.55% | 50.23% | R+3.7 | R |
63 | 43.77% | 55.31% | R+11.5 | 43.91% | 53.48% | R+9.6 | R |
64 | 41.50% | 57.66% | R+16.2 | 40.64% | 56.88% | R+16.2 | R |
65 | 39.24% | 59.93% | R+20.7 | 34.18% | 63.90% | R+29.7 | R |
66 | 50.14% | 49.07% | D+1.1 | 44.86% | 52.75% | R+7.9 | D |
67 | 31.16% | 67.81% | R+36.6 | 25.66% | 72.18% | R+46.5 | R |
68 | 36.03% | 63.07% | R+27 | 36.68% | 59.73% | R+23.1 | R |
69 | 36.47% | 62.53% | R+26.1 | 34.32% | 62.55% | R+28.2 | R |
70 | 25.89% | 73.02% | R+47.1 | 22.47% | 75.21% | R+52.7 | R |
71 | 73.71% | 25.48% | D+48.2 | 72.37% | 24.90% | D+47.5 | D |
72 | 70.87% | 28.46% | D+42.4 | 72.50% | 24.96% | D+47.5 | D |
73 | 25.05% | 73.49% | R+48.4 | 19.25% | 78.41% | R+59.2 | R |
74 | 39.29% | 59.69% | R+20.4 | 40.06% | 56.70% | R+16.6 | R |
75 | 42.46% | 56.51% | R+14.1 | 44.27% | 52.43% | R+8.2 | R |
76 | 32.63% | 66.25% | R+33.6 | 26.49% | 71.30% | R+44.8 | R |
77 | 37.74% | 61.25% | R+23.5 | 32.03% | 65.52% | R+33.5 | R |
78 | 24.09% | 74.93% | R+50.8 | 19.67% | 78.28% | R+58.6 | R |
79 | 33.69% | 65.34% | R+31.7 | 33.43% | 63.34% | R+29.9 | R |
80 | 26.50% | 72.43% | R+45.9 | 22.95% | 74.61% | R+51.7 | R |
81 | 31.87% | 67.00% | R+35.1 | 25.84% | 71.60% | R+45.8 | R |
82 | 41.86% | 57.06% | R+15.2 | 43.08% | 53.51% | R+10.4 | R |
83 | 40.29% | 58.67% | R+18.4 | 38.03% | 59.11% | R+21.1 | R |
84 | 34.47% | 64.56% | R+30.1 | 29.74% | 68.05% | R+38.3 | R |
85 | 29.12% | 69.71% | R+40.6 | 22.21% | 75.83% | R+53.6 | R |
86 | 38.15% | 60.64% | R+22.5 | 30.31% | 67.09% | R+36.8 | R |
87 | 31.49% | 67.12% | R+35.6 | 23.47% | 74.16% | R+50.7 | R |
88 | 45.63% | 53.22% | R+7.6 | 54.80% | 40.57% | D+14.2 | D |
89 | 32.82% | 66.05% | R+33.2 | 26.16% | 71.32% | R+45.2 | R |
90 | 30.65% | 68.17% | R+37.5 | 23.14% | 74.57% | R+51.4 | R |
91 | 35.21% | 63.69% | R+28.5 | 28.79% | 68.75% | R+40 | R |
92 | 52.61% | 46.42% | D+6.2 | 55.42% | 40.77% | D+14.7 | D |
93 | 42.77% | 55.22% | R+12.5 | 41.58% | 54.48% | R+12.9 | R |
94 | 29.16% | 69.58% | R+40.4 | 22.48% | 75.35% | R+52.9 | R |
95 | 34.05% | 64.95% | R+30.9 | 30.76% | 66.16% | R+35.4 | R |
96 | 36.56% | 62.36% | R+25.8 | 33.21% | 63.78% | R+30.6 | R |
97 | 30.07% | 68.92% | R+38.9 | 24.95% | 72.61% | R+47.7 | R |
98 | 43.13% | 55.96% | R+12.8 | 47.37% | 48.84% | R+1.5 | R |
99 | 82.32% | 17.15% | D+65.2 | 80.97% | 16.82% | D+64.1 | D |
100 | 73.70% | 25.10% | D+48.6 | 73.96% | 22.47% | D+51.5 | D |
101 | 74.92% | 24.37% | D+50.6 | 75.11% | 22.40% | D+52.7 | D |
102 | 83.35% | 15.90% | D+67.4 | 80.04% | 16.78% | D+63.3 | D |
103 | 44.46% | 54.49% | R+10 | 47.72% | 49.05% | R+1.3 | R |
104 | 43.47% | 55.67% | R+12.2 | 52.29% | 43.74% | D+8.5 | R |
105 | 42.40% | 56.77% | R+14.4 | 49.86% | 46.71% | D+3.1 | R |
106 | 85.84% | 13.48% | D+72.4 | 84.91% | 13.08% | D+71.8 | D |
107 | 80.29% | 18.93% | D+61.4 | 78.80% | 18.56% | D+60.2 | D |
108 | 38.42% | 60.50% | R+22.1 | 34.04% | 63.24% | R+29.2 | R |
109 | 40.80% | 58.27% | R+17.5 | 37.73% | 59.48% | R+21.7 | R |
110 | 35.30% | 63.74% | R+28.4 | 30.10% | 67.87% | R+37.8 | R |
111 | 35.81% | 63.24% | R+27.4 | 29.81% | 68.35% | R+38.5 | R |
112 | 32.80% | 66.12% | R+33.3 | 24.47% | 73.43% | R+49 | R |
113 | 37.58% | 61.29% | R+23.7 | 34.83% | 62.59% | R+27.8 | R |
114 | 73.38% | 25.18% | D+48.2 | 73.93% | 23.07% | D+50.9 | D |
115 | 48.12% | 50.52% | R+2.4 | 47.29% | 49.54% | R+2.2 | D |
116 | 43.61% | 55.12% | R+11.5 | 44.41% | 52.24% | R+7.8 | D |
117 | 36.77% | 62.07% | R+25.3 | 35.57% | 61.42% | R+25.8 | R |
118 | 41.50% | 57.02% | R+15.5 | 32.52% | 64.60% | R+32.1 | R |
119 | 47.93% | 50.40% | R+2.5 | 40.80% | 55.45% | R+14.7 | R |
120 | 30.12% | 68.56% | R+38.4 | 23.73% | 73.79% | R+50.1 | R |
Total | 48.48% | 50.53% | R+2 | 46.76% | 50.46% | R+3.7 | - |
Source: Daily Kos |
District history
2016
Heading into the election, Ballotpedia rated this race as safely Republican. Incumbent Robert Pittenger (R) defeated Christian Cano (D) in the general election on November 8, 2016. Pittenger defeated Mark Harris and Todd Johnson in the Republican primary. A recount was required in the Republican primary, after which Pittenger led Harris by 133 votes. Harris then conceded the race. The primary election took place on June 7, 2016.[64][65]
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | ![]() |
58.2% | 193,452 | |
Democratic | Christian Cano | 41.8% | 139,041 | |
Total Votes | 332,493 | |||
Source: North Carolina State Board of Elections |
Candidate | Vote % | Votes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
35% | 9,299 | ||
Mark Harris | 34.4% | 9,165 | ||
Todd Johnson | 30.6% | 8,142 | ||
Total Votes | 26,606 | |||
Source: North Carolina State Board of Elections |
2014
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | ![]() |
93.9% | 163,080 | |
Write-in | Shawn Eckles | 1.4% | 2,369 | |
Write-in | Write-in (miscellaneous) | 4.7% | 8,219 | |
Total Votes | 173,668 | |||
Source: North Carolina State Board of Elections |
State overview
Partisan control
This section details the partisan control of federal and state positions in North Carolina heading into the 2018 elections.
Congressional delegation
- Following the 2016 elections, Republicans held both U.S. Senate seats in North Carolina.
- Republicans held 10 of 13 U.S. House seats in North Carolina.
State executives
- As of May 2018, Democrats held five of 18 state executive positions, Republicans held five, and the remaining eight positions were officially nonpartisan.
- The governor of North Carolina was Democrat Roy Cooper.
State legislature
- Republicans controlled both chambers of the General Assembly of North Carolina. They had a 75-45 majority in the state House and a 35-15 majority in the state Senate.
Trifecta status
- North Carolina was under divided government, meaning that the two parties shared control of the state government. Roy Cooper (D) served as governor, while Republicans controlled the state legislature.
2018 elections
- See also: North Carolina elections, 2018
North Carolina held elections for the following offices in 2018:
- Thirteen U.S. House seats
- All 50 state Senate seats
- All 120 state House seats
- State Supreme Court
- Intermediate appellate courts
- Local judges
- School boards
- Municipal government
Demographics
Demographic data for North Carolina | ||
---|---|---|
North Carolina | U.S. | |
Total population: | 10,035,186 | 316,515,021 |
Land area (sq mi): | 48,618 | 3,531,905 |
Race and ethnicity** | ||
White: | 69.5% | 73.6% |
Black/African American: | 21.5% | 12.6% |
Asian: | 2.5% | 5.1% |
Native American: | 1.2% | 0.8% |
Pacific Islander: | 0.1% | 0.2% |
Two or more: | 2.4% | 3% |
Hispanic/Latino: | 8.8% | 17.1% |
Education | ||
High school graduation rate: | 85.8% | 86.7% |
College graduation rate: | 28.4% | 29.8% |
Income | ||
Median household income: | $46,868 | $53,889 |
Persons below poverty level: | 20.5% | 11.3% |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, "American Community Survey" (5-year estimates 2010-2015) Click here for more information on the 2020 census and here for more on its impact on the redistricting process in North Carolina. **Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here. |
As of July 2017, North Carolina had a population of approximately 10,273,419 people, with its three largest cities being Charlotte (pop. 842,051 million), Raleigh (pop. 458,880), and Greensboro (pop. 287,027).[66]
State election history
This section provides an overview of federal and state elections in North Carolina from 2000 to 2016. All data comes from the North Carolina State Board of Elections.
Historical elections
Presidential elections, 2000-2016
This chart shows the results of the presidential election in North Carolina every year from 2000 to 2016.
Election results (President of the United States), North Carolina 2000-2016 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | First-place candidate | First-place candidate votes (%) | Second-place candidate | Second-place candidate votes (%) | Margin of victory (%) |
2016 | ![]() |
49.83% | ![]() |
46.17% | 3.66% |
2012 | ![]() |
50.39% | ![]() |
48.35% | 2.04% |
2008 | ![]() |
49.70% | ![]() |
49.38% | 0.32% |
2004 | ![]() |
56.02% | ![]() |
43.58% | 12.44% |
2000 | ![]() |
56.03% | ![]() |
43.2% | 12.83% |
U.S. Senate elections, 2002-2016
This chart shows the results of U.S. Senate races in North Carolina from 2002 to 2016. Every state has two Senate seats, and each seat goes up for election every six years. The terms of the seats are staggered so that roughly one-third of the seats are up every two years.
Election results (U.S. Senator), North Carolina 2000-2016 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | First-place candidate | First-place candidate votes (%) | Second-place candidate | Second-place candidate votes (%) | Margin of victory (%) |
2016 | ![]() |
51.06% | ![]() |
45.37% | 5.69% |
2014 | ![]() |
48.82% | ![]() |
47.26% | 1.56% |
2010 | ![]() |
54.81% | ![]() |
43.05% | 11.76% |
2008 | ![]() |
52.65% | ![]() |
44.18% | 8.47% |
2004 | ![]() |
51.60% | ![]() |
47.02% | 4.58% |
2002 | ![]() |
53.56% | ![]() |
44.96% | 0.92% |
Gubernatorial elections, 2000-2016
This chart shows the results of the five gubernatorial elections held between 2000 and 2016. Gubernatorial elections are held every four years in North Carolina.
Election results (Governor), North Carolina 2000-2016 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | First-place candidate | First-place candidate votes (%) | Second-place candidate | Second-place candidate votes (%) | Margin of victory (%) |
2016 | ![]() |
49.02% | ![]() |
48.80% | 0.22% |
2012 | ![]() |
54.6% | ![]() |
43.2% | 11.4% |
2008 | ![]() |
50.27% | ![]() |
46.88% | 5.34% |
2004 | ![]() |
55.62% | ![]() |
42.88% | 12.74% |
2000 | ![]() |
52.02% | ![]() |
46.26% | 5.76% |
Congressional delegation, 2000-2016
This chart shows the number of Democrats and Republicans who were elected to represent North Carolina in the U.S. House from 2000 to 2016. Elections for U.S. House seats are held every two years.
Trifectas, 1992-2017
A state government trifecta occurs when one party controls both chambers of the state legislature and the governor's office.
North Carolina Party Control: 1992-2025
Fourteen years of Democratic trifectas • Four years of Republican trifectas
Scroll left and right on the table below to view more years.
Year | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 00 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Governor | R | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | R | R | R | R | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D |
Senate | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
House | D | D | D | R | R | R | R | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
See also
- North Carolina's 9th Congressional District election (May 8, 2018 Democratic primary)
- North Carolina's 9th Congressional District election (May 8, 2018 Republican primary)
- United States House of Representatives elections in North Carolina, 2018
- United States House of Representatives elections, 2018
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Twitter, "Associated Press," February 21, 2019
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' presidential results by congressional district for the 2016 and 2012 elections," accessed November 20, 2017
- ↑ General Assembly of North Carolina, "2016 Contingent Congressional Plan - Corrected*," accessed September 28, 2018
- ↑ The State, "Decision on new election expected this month in 9th district fraud investigation," February 4, 2019
- ↑ WSOC TV, "McCready, Harris file new briefings ahead of next week's hearings," February 13, 2019
- ↑ WSOC, "Cooper appoints 5 members to new Board of Elections; 3 from Charlotte area," January 31, 2019
- ↑ Charlotte Observer, "With key Democrats’ help, Dan McCready has raised big money for possible new election," January 26, 2019
- ↑ News & Observer, "Judge denies Mark Harris request to certify his win despite election fraud investigation," January 22, 2019
- ↑ Associated Press, "Hearing into North Carolina ballot fraud claims postponed," January 2, 2019
- ↑ Roll Call, "Rep. Robert Pittenger Won’t Run Even if ‘Ballot Harvesting’ Probe Causes Primary Do-Over," January 2, 2019
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 The Charlotte Observer, "9th District chaos: Cooper plans interim elections board, Harris asks to be named winner," December 28, 2018
- ↑ Politico, "House leader: Dems won't seat candidate in unresolved race," December 28, 2018
- ↑ FOX 46, "NC State Board of Elections to be dissolved Friday, 9th District investigation in limbo," December 27, 2018
- ↑ WBTV, "NCGOP calls on elections board to immediately produce evidence or certify results in NC-09 race," December 17, 2018
- ↑ The News & Observer, "NC elections board delays hearing on 9th Congressional District irregularities," December 14, 2018
- ↑ Politico, "N.C. GOP says fresh misconduct allegation should trigger new House election," December 11, 2018
- ↑ Charlotte Observer, "Hold a new election in NC’s tainted 9th District," December 6, 2018
- ↑ Charlotte News & Observer, "Amidst social media controversy, NC Board of Elections chair resigns," December 2, 2018
- ↑ Twitter, "Joe Bruno," November 30, 2018
- ↑ WFAE, "NC Elections Investigator Seized Bladen County Absentee Ballot Forms," November 28, 2018
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedcertify
- ↑ Dan McCready for Congress, "Meet Dan," accessed September 17, 2018
- ↑ 23.0 23.1 YouTube, "Dan McCready for Congress," accessed August 21, 2018
- ↑ 24.0 24.1 Dan McCready for Congress, "Home," accessed September 17, 2018
- ↑ Mark Harris for Congress, "Meet Mark," accessed April 28, 2018
- ↑ 26.0 26.1 Mark Harris for Congress "Meet Mark," accessed September 17, 2018
- ↑ 27.0 27.1 YouTube, "Mark Harris for Congress," accessed September 17, 2018
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedsurvey
- ↑ Anna Wendland, "Email communication with Jeff Scott", August 24, 2017
- ↑ 30.0 30.1 Libertarian Party of Mecklenberg County, "Jeff Scott for US Congress 2018," accessed November 1, 2018
- ↑ OpenSecrets.org, "Outside Spending," accessed September 22, 2015
- ↑ OpenSecrets.org, "Total Outside Spending by Election Cycle, All Groups," accessed September 22, 2015
- ↑ National Review.com, "Why the Media Hate Super PACs," November 6, 2015
- ↑ Club For Growth, "Club for Growth Action Unveils New TV Ad in NC-09," October 24, 2018
- ↑ ProPublica, "NC-9 outside spending," accessed September 16, 2018
- ↑ Twitter, "Brian Murphy on October 25, 2018"
- ↑ Charlotte Observer, "Billionaire wants to turn NC congressional seats blue: 'A fight for the soul of America,'" April 17, 2018
- ↑ Inside Elections also uses Tilt ratings to indicate an even smaller advantage and greater competitiveness.
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Nathan Gonzalez," April 19, 2018
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Kyle Kondik," April 19, 2018
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Charlie Cook," April 22, 2018
- ↑ Cook Political Report, "Introducing the 2017 Cook Political Report Partisan Voter Index," April 7, 2017
- ↑ FiveThirtyEight, "Election Update: The Most (And Least) Elastic States And Districts," September 6, 2018
- ↑ Twitter, "Donald Trump on October 26, 2018"
- ↑ 45.0 45.1 Twitter, "Mike Pence on October 8, 2018"
- ↑ Twitter, "Dan McCready on October 24, 2018
- ↑ Constant Contact, "NC09 Country Over Party Endorsement of Jeff Scott (L) For Congress," accessed June 16, 2018
- ↑ The Richmond Observer, "Former Congresswoman Sue Myrick Pledges Support for Mark Harris, not Pittenger, in Upcoming Primary Election," December 1, 2017
- ↑ 49.00 49.01 49.02 49.03 49.04 49.05 49.06 49.07 49.08 49.09 49.10 49.11 49.12 49.13 49.14 49.15 49.16 49.17 49.18 49.19 49.20 49.21 49.22 49.23 49.24 49.25 49.26 49.27 49.28 49.29 49.30 49.31 49.32 49.33 49.34 49.35 49.36 The Richmond Observer, "Former Congresswoman Sue Myrick Pledges Support for Mark Harris, not Pittenger, in Upcoming Primary Election," accessed March 23, 2018
- ↑ Robert Pittenger campaign website "Congressman Chris Collins Endorses Congressman Robert Pittenger," accessed April 7, 2018
- ↑ Robert Pittenger Campaign Website, "Pittenger Endorsed by National Right to Life,"January 18, 2018
- ↑ WSOCTV "Huckabee stumps for Charlotte pastor running against Pittenger," November 15, 2017
- ↑ WECT, "President Trump heading to Charlotte for campaign rally next week," October 19, 2018
- ↑ ProPublica, "Receipts by Mc Cready For Congress for Filing 1280563," accessed October 25, 2018
- ↑ McClatchy DC, "Trump Jr. to campaign in North Carolina, Georgia," October 2, 2018
- ↑ NRCC, "NRCC Names First Round of 'Young Guns.'" June 29, 2018
- ↑ 57.0 57.1 57.2 57.3 ABC News, "NC congressional candidate once questioned whether careers were 'healthiest pursuit' for women," July 5, 2018
- ↑ 58.0 58.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Dan McCready for Congress, “Issues,” accessed September 16, 2018
- ↑ Mark Harris for Congress, “Issues,” accessed September 16, 2018
- ↑ 270towin.com, "North Carolina," accessed June 1, 2017
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' statewide election results by congressional and legislative districts," July 9, 2013
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' 2016 presidential results for congressional and legislative districts," February 6, 2017
- ↑ North Carolina State Board of Elections, "June Primary Candidates," accessed March 27, 2016
- ↑ The Charlotte Observer, "Recount confirms Robert Pittenger’s win in the 9th District," June 20, 2016
- ↑ United States Census Bureau, "American FactFinder," accessed April 3, 2018