North Carolina's 8th Congressional District election, 2026

← 2024
North Carolina's 8th Congressional District
General election
Election details
Filing deadline: December 19, 2025
Primary: Pending Primary runoff: Pending General: November 3, 2026
How to vote
Poll times: 6:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. Voting in North Carolina
Race ratings
Cook Political Report: Solid Republican DDHQ and The Hill: Pending Inside Elections: Solid Republican Sabato's Crystal Ball: Safe Republican
Ballotpedia analysis
U.S. Senate battlegrounds U.S. House battlegrounds Federal and state primary competitiveness Ballotpedia's Election Analysis Hub, 2026
See also
North Carolina's 8th Congressional District U.S. Senate • 1st • 2nd • 3rd • 4th • 5th • 6th • 7th • 8th • 9th • 10th • 11th • 12th • 13th • 14th North Carolina elections, 2026 U.S. Congress elections, 2026 U.S. Senate elections, 2026 U.S. House elections, 2026 Alabama U.S. House racesAlaska U.S. House raceArizona U.S. House racesArkansas U.S. House racesCalifornia U.S. House racesColorado U.S. House racesConnecticut U.S. House racesDelaware U.S. House raceFlorida U.S. House racesGeorgia U.S. House racesHawaii U.S. House racesIdaho U.S. House racesIllinois U.S. House racesIndiana U.S. House racesIowa U.S. House racesKansas U.S. House racesKentucky U.S. House racesLouisiana U.S. House racesMaine U.S. House racesMaryland U.S. House racesMassachusetts U.S. House racesMichigan U.S. House racesMinnesota U.S. House racesMississippi U.S. House racesMissouri U.S. House racesMontana U.S. House racesNebraska U.S. House racesNevada U.S. House racesNew Hampshire U.S. House racesNew Jersey U.S. House racesNew Mexico U.S. House racesNew York U.S. House racesNorth Carolina U.S. House racesNorth Dakota U.S. House raceOhio U.S. House racesOklahoma U.S. House racesOregon U.S. House racesPennsylvania U.S. House racesRhode Island U.S. House racesSouth Carolina U.S. House racesSouth Dakota U.S. House raceTennessee U.S. House racesTexas U.S. House racesUtah U.S. House racesVermont U.S. House raceVirginia U.S. House racesWashington U.S. House racesWest Virginia U.S. House racesWisconsin U.S. House racesWyoming U.S. House raceSubmit

All U.S. House districts, including the 8th Congressional District of North Carolina, are holding elections in 2026. The general election is November 3, 2026. To learn more about other elections on the ballot, click here.

Candidates and election results

Note: The following list includes official candidates only. Ballotpedia defines official candidates as people who:

• Register with a federal or state campaign finance agency before the candidate filing deadline
• Appear on candidate lists released by government election agencies

Note: At this time, Ballotpedia is combining all declared candidates for this election into one list under a general election heading. As primary election dates are published, this information will be updated to separate general election candidates from primary candidates as appropriate.

General election

The general election will occur on November 3, 2026.

General election for U.S. House North Carolina District 8

Incumbent Mark Harris, Justin Bunting, Kevin Clark, and Jesse Oppenheim are running in the general election for U.S. House North Carolina District 8 on November 3, 2026.

		Candidate
		Mark Harris (R)
	Submit photo	Justin Bunting (D)
	Submit photo	Kevin Clark (D)
		Jesse Oppenheim (D)

---

	Incumbents are bolded and underlined.
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Candidate profiles

This section includes candidate profiles that may be created in one of two ways: either the candidate completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey, or Ballotpedia staff may compile a profile based on campaign websites, advertisements, and public statements after identifying the candidate as noteworthy. For more on how we select candidates to include, click here.

Justin Bunting

Do you have a photo that could go here? Click here to submit it for this profile!

Party: Democratic Party

Incumbent: No

Political Office: None

Submitted Biography:  ""I’m a proud family man with a loving wife and five wonderful kids. For 13 years, I worked hard in the oil fields of the Midwest, gaining firsthand experience of the struggles and dedication of American workers. Eight years ago, I made North Carolina my home, where I owned and operated a house cleaning and painting business, contributing to the local community. During the COVID-19 outbreak, I worked at Walmart and delivered food for DoorDash to help support my family and serve others during challenging times. My journey is rooted in hard work, resilience, and a deep commitment to my family and community.""

---

Key Messages

To read this candidate's full survey responses, click here.

---

1. Gun Reform & Public Safety "Fighting for common-sense gun reform to protect our communities and schools. I will work tirelessly to ban machine guns, strengthen background checks, and ensure our children grow up in a safer America."

---

2. Affordable Housing for All "Lowering housing costs and tackling the affordable housing crisis head-on. Every family deserves access to safe, secure, and affordable homes without breaking their wallets."

---

3. Protecting Democracy & Equal Rights "Championing democracy and standing up for everyone’s rights. From supporting disability rights to fighting for gender equity and protecting women’s health decisions, I will always prioritize fairness and justice for all."

Jesse Oppenheim

Party: Democratic Party

Incumbent: No

Political Office: None

Submitted Biography:  "I’m Jesse Oppenheim, a husband, a father, and an attorney who’s spent his career solving complex problems and standing up for what’s right. I I’m not a career politician. I’ve led legal departments, advised executives, and worked at the intersection of healthcare and technology to help make systems more efficient and accessible. Now I’m stepping up to serve because I believe our district, and our country, deserve leaders who listen, show up, and deliver results with integrity. My family and I live in Charlotte, where I’ve been deeply involved in the local community for years. I’ve chaired nonprofit boards, stayed active in my community, and mentored young professionals. I know what it’s like to balance a demanding job with raising a family, and I know how much government decisions affect our daily lives. I’m running for Congress to bring common sense back to Washington. That means fighting for affordable healthcare, protecting democracy, rebuilding infrastructure, and making sure working families aren’t left behind. I’m running because I believe we can do better, and I’m ready to prove it."

---

Key Messages

To read this candidate's full survey responses, click here.

---

End Congressional Stock Trading. I’m running to restore trust in government and that starts with banning members of Congress from trading individual stocks. Too many politicians treat public office like a path to private profit. I’ve spent my career building accountability into complex systems, and I believe in holding leaders to the same rules as everyone else. This isn’t a partisan issue. It’s a common-sense reform supported by Americans across the political spectrum. If you’re making laws, you shouldn’t be making stock picks. I’m not running to play the game, I’m running to change the rules.

---

Fix healthcare so it works for real people. I’m General Counsel to a medical billing software company, trying to assist patients and doctors navigate one of the most complex, and expensive, systems in America. I’ve seen how red tape and bad policy hurt patients and providers alike. In Congress, I’ll fight for affordable, accessible healthcare that puts people first, starting with expanding Medicaid, capping drug prices, and protecting rural hospitals from closure. No one should go broke to see a doctor or lose their job because they got sick.

---

Invest in infrastructure and opportunity. From crumbling roads to unreliable internet, too many communities in our district are being held together with duct tape and prayers. I’m running to bring real investment back home, into roads, bridges, school buildings, clean water, and broadband. Infrastructure isn’t just about concrete, it’s about opportunity. Good schools, safe streets, and strong local economies start with the basics. I’ve spent my career solving problems, cutting through red tape, and making systems work. In Congress, I’ll fight to bring those same skills to rebuild what’s been neglected for far too long.

Voting information

See also: Voting in North Carolina

Ballotpedia will publish the dates and deadlines related to this election as they are made available.

Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey responses

Ballotpedia asks all federal, state, and local candidates to complete a survey and share what motivates them on political and personal levels. The section below shows responses from candidates in this race who completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Survey responses from candidates in this race

Click on a candidate's name to visit their Ballotpedia page.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

Expand all | Collapse all

Please list below 3 key messages of your campaign. What are the main points you want voters to remember about your goals for your time in office?

Justin Bunting (D)

1. Gun Reform & Public Safety

"Fighting for common-sense gun reform to protect our communities and schools. I will work tirelessly to ban machine guns, strengthen background checks, and ensure our children grow up in a safer America."

2. Affordable Housing for All

"Lowering housing costs and tackling the affordable housing crisis head-on. Every family deserves access to safe, secure, and affordable homes without breaking their wallets."

3. Protecting Democracy & Equal Rights

"Championing democracy and standing up for everyone’s rights. From supporting disability rights to fighting for gender equity and protecting women’s health decisions, I will always prioritize fairness and justice for all."

Jesse Oppenheim (D)

End Congressional Stock Trading.

I’m running to restore trust in government and that starts with banning members of Congress from trading individual stocks. Too many politicians treat public office like a path to private profit. I’ve spent my career building accountability into complex systems, and I believe in holding leaders to the same rules as everyone else. This isn’t a partisan issue. It’s a common-sense reform supported by Americans across the political spectrum. If you’re making laws, you shouldn’t be making stock picks. I’m not running to play the game, I’m running to change the rules.

Fix healthcare so it works for real people.

I’m General Counsel to a medical billing software company, trying to assist patients and doctors navigate one of the most complex, and expensive, systems in America. I’ve seen how red tape and bad policy hurt patients and providers alike. In Congress, I’ll fight for affordable, accessible healthcare that puts people first, starting with expanding Medicaid, capping drug prices, and protecting rural hospitals from closure. No one should go broke to see a doctor or lose their job because they got sick.

Invest in infrastructure and opportunity.

From crumbling roads to unreliable internet, too many communities in our district are being held together with duct tape and prayers. I’m running to bring real investment back home, into roads, bridges, school buildings, clean water, and broadband. Infrastructure isn’t just about concrete, it’s about opportunity. Good schools, safe streets, and strong local economies start with the basics. I’ve spent my career solving problems, cutting through red tape, and making systems work. In Congress, I’ll fight to bring those same skills to rebuild what’s been neglected for far too long.

What areas of public policy are you personally passionate about?

Justin Bunting (D)

*Gun Safety:

Advocating for common-sense gun reform.

Supporting legislation to ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.

Addressing gun violence prevention in schools and communities.

• Affordable Housing:

Fighting to lower housing costs.

Promoting fair housing policies.

Supporting initiatives to combat homelessness.

• Veterans’ Affairs:

Ensuring comprehensive healthcare for veterans.

Expanding mental health resources for those who served.

Jesse Oppenheim (D)

I’m drawn to public policy that protects people from being crushed by systems they can’t control, whether it’s the healthcare maze, a rigged economy, or a government that feels out of touch. I’m especially focused on ethics in government, affordable healthcare, and preparing for the impact of AI and automation on working families. I believe in practical solutions, not performative politics. I want to make it easier for people to live with dignity. Policy should be about solving problems and I’m running to do just that.

Is there a book, essay, film, or something else you would recommend to someone who wants to understand your political philosophy?

Jesse Oppenheim (D)

I’d recommend the film Dave, the 1993 film where Kevin Kline plays a regular guy who ends up impersonating the President and accidentally starts doing the job better. It reminds us that government should be about people, not power. That honesty matters. That budgets reflect values. And that public service should actually serve the public. I don’t think politics needs more performance or partisanship. It needs more common sense, decency, and humility. That movie captured something I still believe: the right person doesn’t need to be perfect. They just need to care enough to try.

What characteristics or principles are most important for an elected official?

Justin Bunting (D)

1. Integrity: Upholding honesty and transparency in all decisions and actions. An elected official must prioritize the truth and act in the public's best interest.

2. Accountability: Being responsible for decisions, actions, and policies, and ensuring the public is informed about government activities.

3. Empathy: Understanding and addressing the diverse needs and concerns of constituents while showing genuine care for their well-being.

4. Leadership: Demonstrating the ability to inspire, guide, and unite people toward achieving common goals.

5. Commitment to Equity: Advocating for fairness and equality across all communities, ensuring that all voices are heard and respected.

6. Work Ethic: Consistently showing dedication, effort, and persistence in serving the community and tackling challenges.

7. Problem-Solving Skills: Approaching complex issues with a practical and solutions-oriented mindset, focusing on what works best for constituents.

8. Collaboration: Working across party lines and with diverse groups to create policies that benefit everyone.

9. Vision: Having a clear and forward-thinking plan for improving the lives of the community and the nation.

10. Resilience: Remaining strong and focused in the face of adversity or criticism, staying true to the mission of public service.

Jesse Oppenheim (D)

Elected officials should lead with integrity, humility, and a sense of responsibility to the people they serve, not to special interests or their own careers. That means showing up, listening more than talking, and doing the hard, unglamorous work of governing. It means telling the truth, even when it’s not popular, and making decisions based on what’s right, not what’s politically convenient. Public service isn’t about building a brand or chasing clicks. It’s about solving problems, earning trust, and remembering that the job belongs to the people, not the person in the seat. Elected officials are public servants and they need to focus on the 2nd word in that phrase.

What qualities do you possess that you believe would make you a successful officeholder?

Justin Bunting (D)

I believe the qualities I possess that would make me a successful officeholder are integrity, a strong work ethic, empathy, and a commitment to public service.

Integrity is fundamental to ensuring trust and transparency in office. I believe in making decisions based on principles and what’s best for the people, not on personal gain or party politics.

A strong work ethic drives my dedication to hard work, research, and thoughtful decision-making. I understand that representing people means long hours, thorough analysis, and constantly staying engaged with both the challenges and opportunities that come with public service.

Empathy allows me to understand the concerns and needs of diverse communities. I listen to people, respect their views, and work toward solutions that reflect the values and priorities of those I serve, regardless of political affiliation.

Lastly, my commitment to public service means that I am focused on delivering positive change. I am passionate about advocating for policies that will improve the lives of my constituents, from healthcare to economic justice, and I am driven by a desire to make a real difference in the world.

These qualities, combined with my ability to build partnerships and work collaboratively, would enable me to be an effective and responsible officeholder.

Jesse Oppenheim (D)

I believe my curiosity and work ethic will make me a successful Congressman. I don’t pretend to have all the answers, but I do know how to show up, do the work, and solve problems that matter. I take responsibility seriously. I listen. I ask hard questions. And I try to focus on what’s real, not what looks good in a press release. I believe government should work for people, and that it’s our job to prove it, not just say it. That means understanding systems, following through, and being honest about what’s possible and what needs to change. I’m running because I believe Congress needs fewer performers and more grown-ups, people who understand systems, who tell the truth, and who aren’t afraid to do the work it takes to govern.

What do you believe are the core responsibilities for someone elected to this office?

Justin Bunting (D)

1. Representing the People:

Serve as the voice of constituents by listening to their concerns and advocating for their needs in Congress.

Maintain open communication through town halls, surveys, and regular updates.

2. Legislating Thoughtfully:

Propose and vote on legislation that reflects the district’s values and priorities.

Work across party lines to pass meaningful reforms that benefit everyone.

3. Ensuring Accountability:

Oversee government agencies to ensure ethical and efficient operations.

Fight corruption and misuse of power to protect democracy.

4. Securing Resources:

Advocate for federal funding to improve infrastructure, education, and job creation.

Collaborate with local and state officials to address pressing issues.

5. Protecting Rights and Freedoms:

Defend the rights of all citizens and promote justice and equality.

Champion policies that strengthen democracy and voting rights.

6. Promoting Economic Growth:

Support policies that create jobs, lower taxes for working families, and reduce the cost of living.

Back small businesses and entrepreneurs to help them thrive.

7. Leading with Integrity:

Always prioritize the needs of the people over personal or political gain.

Lead with empathy, ensuring decisions reflect the impact on families and individuals.

Jesse Oppenheim (D)

The core responsibilities of a member of Congress are to listen to their constituents, pass laws that improve people’s lives, and hold the federal government accountable. That means showing up and not just during campaign season. It means doing the work: writing legislation, building coalitions, and fighting for resources back home. It also means protecting our democracy, defending the rule of law, voting rights, and the peaceful transfer of power. This job isn’t about noise or headlines. It’s about representing people with integrity, solving problems, and earning trust every day.

What legacy would you like to leave?

Justin Bunting (D)

The legacy I would like to leave is one of steadfast commitment to fighting for democracy—ensuring that it remains strong, inclusive, and accessible for all. I want to be remembered for advocating for policies that protect the integrity of our democratic system and guarantee that every citizen's voice is heard and valued.

I aim to leave a legacy of political transparency and accountability, where government works for the people and operates with integrity. I want to ensure that future generations can trust their leaders to uphold democratic principles, protect voting rights, and fight against any attempts to undermine the democratic process.

Another key aspect of my legacy would be empowering citizens—encouraging active participation in the democratic process, promoting civic education, and ensuring that all Americans have the resources they need to engage in meaningful ways with their government.

Above all, I want to be remembered for my unwavering dedication to defending democracy against threats, both domestic and foreign. Whether fighting for fair elections, safeguarding civil liberties, or advocating for policies that strengthen the rule of law, my goal is to leave a nation where democracy is not just a value, but a living, thriving force that guarantees freedom and opportunity for all.

Jesse Oppenheim (D)

I don’t need buildings named after me or a statue on a lawn. I want my legacy to be that I helped make government work a little better for the people who needed it most. That I showed up, told the truth, and took the responsibility seriously. If I can help restore trust in public service, if I can help someone get healthcare, afford child care, or stay in their home when the system would’ve let them fall through the cracks, then I’ll feel like I did something worth doing. I want to be remembered not for the headlines, but for the people who felt heard, the communities that were served, and the work that actually got done.

What is the first historical event that happened in your lifetime that you remember? How old were you at the time?

Jesse Oppenheim (D)

I remember my mom taking me to vote for Michael Dukakis in 1988. I was just a little over three, but I remember the feeling of it being important, like we were doing something grown-up and serious. I have a clearer memory of my parents watching coverage of the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. I didn’t understand the full significance at the time, but I could tell it mattered, that the world was changing in a big way.

What was your very first job? How long did you have it?

Jesse Oppenheim (D)

My VERY first job was picking figs in my grandparents backyard in Jackson, Mississippi. My grandparents wanted to teach me the value of a dollar, but it mostly taught me the value of air conditioning once I got back inside! I guess it was a part-time job that I never really quit. At 96, my grandmother is still in Jackson and, when I go to visit, I sometimes still pick figs. She might owe me some back-pay though... Because she's my grandmother, I won't try to adjust for inflation.

If you could be any fictional character, who would you want to be?

Jesse Oppenheim (D)

I'm not ashamed of being a little bit of a nerd, so I'll go with Jean-Luc Picard of Star Trek: The Next Generation. He’s thoughtful, principled, and steady in a crisis. He listens, learns, and leads with integrity. He doesn’t confuse authority with ego. He earns respect by earning trust. Picard knows how to navigate conflict without rushing to escalate it. He holds the line when it matters, but he also knows when to challenge his own assumptions. He surrounds himself with people who are brilliant in their own right, and he knows his job isn’t to be the smartest in the room. It’s to make sure the right decision gets made, no matter where it comes from.

What was the last song that got stuck in your head?

Jesse Oppenheim (D)

I have a 4-and-a-half-year-old daughter, so Frozen is pretty much the soundtrack of my life. Even though I live in North Carolina, and, yes, I would like to build a snowman… after the 400th time hearing it, I’m starting to have second thoughts.

What qualities does the U.S. House of Representatives possess that makes it unique as an institution?

Jesse Oppenheim (D)

The House is meant to be the people’s chamber: closer to voters, quicker to respond, and more accountable. Every two years, Members have to face their constituents and explain what they’ve done. That level of accountability makes the House uniquely responsive, but it also demands a focus on real results, not just rhetoric. The House holds the power of the purse and plays a key role in oversight. It’s where the nation’s most urgent issues often surface first. I believe it should be a place where public service means listening, problem-solving, and earning trust every single day. That’s the kind of Member I intend to be.

Do you believe that it's beneficial for representatives to have previous experience in government or politics?

Justin Bunting (D)

I don't believe that it’s beneficial for representatives to have previous experience in government or politics. While experience can offer some advantages, it often comes with the baggage of partisanship, bureaucratic thinking, and an entrenched status quo. Fresh perspectives from individuals outside the political sphere can bring new ideas and a focus on real-world solutions, rather than the typical political gamesmanship.

New representatives without political experience may be more willing to challenge outdated systems, stand up to special interests, and prioritize the needs of their constituents over party loyalty. They can offer a clearer, more direct connection to the concerns of everyday people, untainted by the complexities of political careerism.

In my view, the most important qualities for a representative are integrity, a commitment to the public good, and the ability to listen and respond to the needs of the people. Political experience isn’t a prerequisite for effective leadership—it’s a willingness to serve, work collaboratively, and advocate for meaningful change that truly benefits the nation.

Jesse Oppenheim (D)

Sure, experience in government can be beneficial. It helps you understand the process and build relationships. But it’s not a requirement. What matters most is character, judgment, and a willingness to do the work. Some of the best leaders come from outside the political system because they bring fresh perspectives and real-world experience. I’ve spent my career as an attorney solving problems, navigating complex systems, and holding people accountable. Those skills translate directly to effective public service. Congress doesn’t need more insiders. It needs more people who know how to listen, lead, and get things done.

What do you perceive to be the United States’ greatest challenges as a nation over the next decade?

Justin Bunting (D)

As a Democratic candidate, I believe the United States faces several key challenges over the next decade that must be addressed:

1. Economic Inequality: The gap between the wealthy and others continues to widen. Tackling poverty, ensuring fair wages, and expanding economic opportunities are vital for creating a more equitable society.

2. Healthcare: Affordable healthcare is a pressing concern, with rising costs and disparities in access. Expanding coverage, improving care efficiency, and addressing mental health needs are top priorities.

3. Climate Change: Extreme weather, rising sea levels, and environmental degradation threaten public health and infrastructure. Investing in renewable energy, climate resilience, and sustainable practices is crucial.

4. Political Polarization: Deepening divisions make it harder to find common ground. Restoring trust in democratic institutions, fostering bipartisanship, and combating misinformation are necessary to move forward as a unified nation.

5. Technological Disruption: The rise of AI, automation, and other technologies will displace jobs and raise ethical issues. We must prepare the workforce, ensure responsible tech development, and protect civil liberties.

6. Immigration Reform: Comprehensive reform is needed to address border security, provide pathways to citizenship, and support immigrant communities with humane policies that reflect our values.

7. Global Relations: As global dynamics shift, we must navigate competition with China and Russia while advancing peace, democracy, and human rights.

8. Public Health: Beyond the pandemic, we must address opioid addiction, mental health crises, and ensure access to quality care for all Americans.

Jesse Oppenheim (D)

Our greatest challenges are trust, transition, and investment.

First, we have a crisis of trust. People don’t believe government works for them anymore, and that’s dangerous in a democracy. We’re struggling with truth itself. Misinformation and polarization are tearing us apart. If we can’t agree on basic facts, we can’t solve real problems. Second, we’re navigating massive transitions: AI, climate change, global instability, and the shifting nature of work. We need leaders who can manage change with foresight and integrity.

Third, we need serious investment in education, infrastructure, and clean energy. These will lay real foundations for opportunity, security, and a stronger future.

Do you believe that two years is the right term length for representatives?

Justin Bunting (D)

I believe that two years may not be the right term length for representatives. While it allows for frequent elections and accountability, it also creates a cycle of constant campaigning that can distract from actually governing. Representatives are often more focused on re-election efforts rather than making meaningful progress on important issues.

A longer term length would allow representatives to focus more on their responsibilities and create more continuity in policy-making. It would reduce the influence of short-term political pressures and provide time for thoughtful legislation and long-term planning.

However, any term length should come with strong mechanisms for accountability to ensure that representatives remain responsive to their constituents. Ultimately, the goal should be to balance the need for fresh voices with the stability required for effective governance.

Jesse Oppenheim (D)

Two years is a short term by design. The House is meant to be the chamber closest to the people, and frequent elections keep representatives directly accountable to their constituents. That said, the short term does make long-term policymaking harder. Members are under constant pressure to campaign instead of govern. I believe the way to make that work is by showing up, staying connected to the district, and focusing less on headlines and more on results. If the job requires re-earning voters’ trust every two years, then I’m ready to do the work it takes to earn it again and again.

What are your thoughts on term limits?

Justin Bunting (D)

I believe term limits are an essential tool to ensure fresh perspectives in government, reduce career politics, and keep our democracy vibrant. Elected office should be about serving the people, not building lifelong political careers.

Term limits promote accountability by preventing individuals from becoming entrenched in power and help reduce the influence of special interests over long-serving politicians. They encourage new leaders to step forward, bringing fresh ideas and energy to address the evolving needs of our communities.

However, it’s equally important to strike a balance. While term limits can prevent stagnation, we must also value the experience and expertise that some long-serving public servants bring. A fair system of term limits can ensure a healthy mix of institutional knowledge and new ideas, fostering a government that truly works for the people.

Jesse Oppenheim (D)

I understand why people support term limits. There’s real frustration with career politicians who lose touch with the people they represent. But in my view, we already have term limits. They’re called elections. Voters should have the right to choose who represents them, and that includes re-electing someone who’s doing the job well. The better fix isn’t an arbitrary cutoff. It’s ending practices that erode public trust, like congressional stock trading and gerrymandering. Let’s make the system more fair and accountable, and then trust voters to decide who stays and who goes. That’s how democracy should work.

Is there a particular representative, past or present, whom you want to model yourself after?

Jesse Oppenheim (D)

It’s a bit of an older example, but I’ve always admired Tip O’Neill, Speaker of the House from 1977 to 1987, who embodied a kind of leadership that feels increasingly rare today. O’Neill wasn’t flashy and he didn’t posture. He believed that politics was fundamentally about people and he governed that way. Speaker O’Neill showed that you could fight hard for your values and still work across the aisle without compromising your integrity. He had real policy disagreements with President Reagan, and yet the two men could work together when it mattered. That’s what governing in a democracy should look like.

Both sitting representatives and candidates for office hear many personal stories from the residents of their district. Is there a story that you’ve heard that you found particularly touching, memorable, or impactful?

Jesse Oppenheim (D)

I’ve heard a lot of stories while traveling the district, and I’ve been struck by how many working people feel like they’re doing everything right and still falling behind. It’s hard to pick just one. But one that’s stayed with me is a mother who relies on Medicaid to provide at-home care for her disabled daughter. Without that support, she’d have to leave her job to become a full-time caregiver. And without a job, she wouldn’t be able to afford any care at all. It’s a heartbreaking cycle, and a vivid reminder of why we need a government that puts people first.

Do you believe that compromise is necessary or desirable for policymaking?

Jesse Oppenheim (D)

Yes, I believe compromise is both necessary and desirable in policymaking because governing in a democracy means working with people you don’t always agree with. That doesn’t mean abandoning your values. It means knowing the difference between core principles and negotiating details. I’ve spent my legal career solving complex problems by building consensus among people with competing interests. The best outcomes aren’t always about winning arguments, they’re about delivering results. We need fewer grandstanders and more workhorses in Congress. I’m running to get things done, not just make a point.

The Constitution says that all bills for raising revenue must originate in the House. What role would this power play in your priorities if elected?

Jesse Oppenheim (D)

The power to establish how we spend money defines our national priorities. If elected, I’ll use that responsibility to fight for a budget that reflects the needs of real people, not special interests. That means investing in healthcare, infrastructure, education, and clean energy, not tax breaks for billionaires. A budget is more than numbers, it’s a statement of who we serve and what we value.

How should the U.S. House use its investigative powers?

Justin Bunting (D)

The U.S. House should use its investigative powers to uphold accountability, transparency, and the rule of law. These powers are vital in ensuring that the executive branch, private sector, and other institutions act in the best interests of the American people.

First, investigations should be conducted with a focus on uncovering the truth, rather than serving partisan interests. They should prioritize issues that have significant implications for the public, such as corruption, abuse of power, threats to national security, and violations of civil rights. Transparent hearings, with clear and accessible communication, will ensure the public stays informed and engaged.

Second, investigations should lead to actionable reforms and solutions. It’s not enough to merely expose wrongdoing or inefficiencies; the investigative process must result in legislative or regulatory changes that prevent future issues and improve systems.

Lastly, oversight should be a continual process. The U.S. House should use its investigative powers not just in times of crisis, but as a regular tool to ensure that government operates effectively, ethically, and with the best interests of the people in mind.

In sum, the House’s investigative powers should be wielded responsibly, with a focus on truth, transparency, and long-term solutions, to strengthen the trust between government and the American public.

Jesse Oppenheim (D)

The House’s investigative powers are critical to its role as a check on executive overreach and a guardian of public trust. Because of that, they should be used responsibly, guided by facts, not headlines. Investigations should hold people in power accountable, root out corruption, and ensure that taxpayer dollars are being used as intended. They should not be used to score political points, intimidate opponents, or manufacture outrage for cable news. We’ve seen too many congressional hearings devolve into partisan grandstanding or personal attacks. That does a disservice to the seriousness of the job, which distracts from the real work of identifying problems and finding solutions. Oversight shouldn’t be about gotcha moments. It should be about truth, transparency, and results.

What committees interest you?

Jesse Oppenheim (D)

I’m especially interested in committees focused on healthcare, economic fairness, and rural development. I’d be honored to serve on the Energy and Commerce Committee, which oversees healthcare policy, consumer protection, and broadband access. As General Counsel to a healthcare software company, I’d bring practical insight into how we can make the system work better for patients and providers. I’m also interested in the Agriculture Committee, which plays a vital role in supporting rural economies, food security, and infrastructure in districts like mine. Longer-term, I’d welcome the chance to help shape tax and budget policy to make government work for working people.

What are your views on financial transparency and government accountability?

Justin Bunting (D)

I firmly believe in financial transparency and government accountability as cornerstones of a healthy democracy. Taxpayers have a right to know how their hard-earned money is being spent, and public officials have a duty to ensure those funds are used efficiently, ethically, and for the benefit of the people.

To promote financial transparency, I support:

1. Open Budgets: Clear and accessible reporting on government spending at all levels to ensure transparency.

2. Audits and Oversight: Independent reviews of federal programs and agencies to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse.

3. Accessible Information: Simplifying government reports and making them easily available to the public.

• For government accountability, I advocate for:

1. Ethics Reforms: Stricter measures to prevent conflicts of interest among elected officials and government employees.

2. Whistleblower Protections: Safeguards for those who expose corruption or unethical practices.

3. Performance Metrics: Holding government programs accountable for achieving measurable results.

Government must serve the people, not special interests or political agendas. By prioritizing transparency and accountability, we can restore trust in our institutions and create a system that works for everyone.

Jesse Oppenheim (D)

I believe public trust is earned through transparency and accountability, especially when it comes to money and power. That’s why I support banning congressional stock trading, closing loopholes in campaign finance, and strengthening enforcement of ethics rules. Members of Congress should play by the same rules as everyone else and be held accountable when they don’t. In Congress, I’ll fight for stronger watchdogs, clearer disclosure laws, and a government that’s worthy of the people it serves.

You can ask candidates in this race to fill out the survey by clicking their names below:

• Kevin Clark
• Mark Harris

Campaign finance

Name	Party	Receipts*	Disbursements**	Cash on hand	Date
Mark Harris	Republican Party	$196,116	$104,968	$198,681	As of June 30, 2025
Justin Bunting	Democratic Party	$0	$0	$0	Data not available***
Kevin Clark	Democratic Party	$0	$0	$0	Data not available***
Jesse Oppenheim	Democratic Party	$0	$0	$0	Data not available***
Source: Federal Elections Commission, "Campaign finance data," 2026. This product uses the openFEC API but is not endorsed or certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC). * According to the FEC, "Receipts are anything of value (money, goods, services or property) received by a political committee." ** According to the FEC, a disbursement "is a purchase, payment, distribution, loan, advance, deposit or gift of money or anything of value to influence a federal election," plus other kinds of payments not made to influence a federal election. *** Candidate either did not report any receipts or disbursements to the FEC, or Ballotpedia did not find an FEC candidate ID.

General election race ratings

See also: Race rating definitions and methods

Ballotpedia provides race ratings from four outlets: The Cook Political Report, Inside Elections, Sabato's Crystal Ball, and DDHQ/The Hill. Each race rating indicates if one party is perceived to have an advantage in the race and, if so, the degree of advantage:

• Safe and Solid ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge and the race is not competitive.
• Likely ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge, but an upset is possible.
• Lean ratings indicate that one party has a small edge, but the race is competitive.
• Toss-up ratings indicate that neither party has an advantage.

Race ratings are informed by a number of factors, including polling, candidate quality, and election result history in the race's district or state.

Race ratings: North Carolina's 8th Congressional District election, 2026
Race tracker	Race ratings
	9/2/2025	8/26/2025	8/19/2025	8/12/2025
The Cook Political Report with Amy Walter	Solid Republican	Solid Republican	Solid Republican	Solid Republican
Decision Desk HQ and The Hill	Pending	Pending	Pending	Pending
Inside Elections with Nathan L. Gonzales	Solid Republican	Solid Republican	Solid Republican	Solid Republican
Larry J. Sabato's Crystal Ball	Safe Republican	Safe Republican	Safe Republican	Safe Republican
Note: Ballotpedia reviews external race ratings every week throughout the election season and posts weekly updates even if the media outlets have not revised their ratings during that week.

Ballot access

This section will contain information on ballot access related to this state's elections when it is available.

District history

The section below details election results for this office in elections dating back to 2020.

2024

See also: North Carolina's 8th Congressional District election, 2024

North Carolina's 8th Congressional District election, 2024 (March 5 Republican primary)

North Carolina's 8th Congressional District election, 2024 (March 5 Democratic primary)

General election

General election for U.S. House North Carolina District 8

Mark Harris defeated Justin Dues in the general election for U.S. House North Carolina District 8 on November 5, 2024.

		Candidate	%	Votes
✔		Mark Harris (R)	59.6	238,640
		Justin Dues (D)	40.4	161,709

---

	Incumbents are bolded and underlined. The results have been certified. Source	Total votes: 400,349
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

• Dan Bishop (R)

Democratic primary election

The Democratic primary election was canceled. Justin Dues advanced from the Democratic primary for U.S. House North Carolina District 8.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

• Keith Davenport (D)

Republican primary election

Republican primary for U.S. House North Carolina District 8

The following candidates ran in the Republican primary for U.S. House North Carolina District 8 on March 5, 2024.

		Candidate	%	Votes
✔		Mark Harris	30.4	24,764
		Allan Baucom	27.0	21,964
		John Bradford III	17.8	14,458
		Don Brown	10.5	8,519
		Leigh Brown	9.6	7,845
		Chris Maples	4.7	3,787

---

	There were no incumbents in this race. The results have been certified. Source	Total votes: 81,337
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

2022

See also: North Carolina's 8th Congressional District election, 2022

General election

General election for U.S. House North Carolina District 8

Incumbent Dan Bishop defeated Scott Huffman in the general election for U.S. House North Carolina District 8 on November 8, 2022.

		Candidate	%	Votes
✔		Dan Bishop (R)	69.9	183,998
		Scott Huffman (D)	30.1	79,192

---

	Incumbents are bolded and underlined. The results have been certified. Source	Total votes: 263,190
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

The Democratic primary election was canceled. Scott Huffman advanced from the Democratic primary for U.S. House North Carolina District 8.

Republican primary election

The Republican primary election was canceled. Incumbent Dan Bishop advanced from the Republican primary for U.S. House North Carolina District 8.

2020

See also: North Carolina's 8th Congressional District election, 2020

General election

General election for U.S. House North Carolina District 8

Incumbent Richard Hudson defeated Patricia Timmons-Goodson in the general election for U.S. House North Carolina District 8 on November 3, 2020.

		Candidate	%	Votes
✔		Richard Hudson (R)	53.3	202,774
		Patricia Timmons-Goodson (D)	46.7	177,781

---

	Incumbents are bolded and underlined. The results have been certified. Source	Total votes: 380,555
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

The Democratic primary election was canceled. Patricia Timmons-Goodson advanced from the Democratic primary for U.S. House North Carolina District 8.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

• Rodney Walker (D)

Republican primary election

The Republican primary election was canceled. Incumbent Richard Hudson advanced from the Republican primary for U.S. House North Carolina District 8.

District analysis

This section will contain facts and figures related to this district's elections when those are available.

See also

North Carolina	2026 primaries	2026 U.S. Congress elections
North Carolina congressional delegation Voting in North Carolina North Carolina elections: 2026 • 2025 • 2024 • 2023 • 2022 • 2021 • 2020 • 2019 • 2018	Democratic primary battlegrounds Republican primary battlegrounds U.S. Senate Democratic primaries U.S. Senate Republican primaries U.S. House Democratic primaries U.S. House Republican primaries	U.S. Congress elections U.S. Senate elections U.S. House elections Special elections Ballot access

External links

• Search Google News for this topic

Footnotes

[show]

North Carolina's current delegation to the United States Congress

Senators

Ted Budd (R)

Thom Tillis (R)

Representatives

District 1

Donald Davis (D)

District 2

Deborah Ross (D)

District 3

Gregory Murphy (R)

District 4

Valerie Foushee (D)

District 5

Virginia Foxx (R)

District 6

Addison McDowell (R)

District 7

David Rouzer (R)

District 8

Mark Harris (R)

District 9

Richard Hudson (R)

District 10

Pat Harrigan (R)

District 11

Chuck Edwards (R)

District 12

Alma Adams (D)

District 13

Brad Knott (R)

District 14

Timothy Moore (R)

Republican Party (12)

Democratic Party (4)

Ballotpedia

About

Overview • What people are saying • Support Ballotpedia • Contact • Contribute • Job opportunities

---

Executive: Leslie Graves, Founder and CEO • Gwen Beattie, Chief Operating Officer

Communications: Alison Graves, Director of Communications • Carley Allensworth • Abigail Campbell • Frank Festa • Sarah Groat • Nathaniel Harwood • Dillon Redmond • Erica Shumaker
External Relations: Geoff Pallay, Director of External Relations • Ken Carbullido, Vice President of Election Product and Technology Strategy • Ashley Fleming • Thomas Mardik • Hannah Nelson
Operations: Meghann Olshefski, Director of Operations • Amanda Herbert • Mandy Morris • Caroline Presnell • Kelly Rindfleisch
Tech: Matt Latourelle, Director of Technology Operations • Ryan Burch • Kirsten Corrao • Beth Dellea • Travis Eden • Tate Kamish • Margaret Kearney • Eric Lotto • Joseph Sanchez • Mary Susmitha

Contributors: Scott Rasmussen

---

Editorial Content

Josh Altic, Director of Content • Daniel Anderson, Associate Director of Elections & Data • Cory Eucalitto, Associate Director of Features • Ryan Byrne, Managing Editor of Ballot Measures • Mandy McConnell, Managing Editor of News • Doug Kronaizl, Managing Editor of Local Expansion • Abbey Smith, Managing Editor of Elections • Janie Valentine, Managing Editor of Law • Joel Williams. Managing Editor of Events • Andrew Bahl • Jaclyn Beran • Marielle Bricker • Joseph Brusgard • Emma Burlingame • Kelly Coyle • Jon Dunn • Thomas Ellis • Nicole Fisher • Joseph Greaney • Thomas Grobben • Jaime Healy-Plotkin • Brianna Hosea • Molly Kehoe • Tyler King • Glorie Martinez • Norm Leahy, Senior Editor • Nathan Maxwell • Jimmy McAllister • Brandon McCauley • Ellie Mikus • Ellen Morrissey • Mackenzie Murphy • Kaley Platek • Samantha Post • Adam Powell • Annelise Reinwald • Ethan Rice • Spencer Richardson • Victoria Rose • Briana Ryan • Myj Saintyl • Maddy Salucka • Emma Soukup • Alexis Thacker • Mina Vogel • Samuel Wonacott • Trenton Woodcox