North Carolina's 9th Congressional District special election, 2019
- Primary election: May 14
- General election: September 10
- Voter registration deadline: August 16
- Early voting: August 21 - September 6
- Absentee voting deadline: September 3 (request), September 10 (return)
- Online registration: No
- Same-day registration: Yes
- Voter ID: No photo ID required
- Poll times: 6:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m.
117th →
← 115th
|
|
|
|
Regular election coverage |
2020 Congressional Elections 2020 U.S. Senate Elections 2020 U.S. House Elections |
State Sen. Dan Bishop (R) defeated Dan McCready (D), Jeff Scott (L), and Allen Smith (G) in the special election in North Carolina's 9th Congressional District on September 10, 2019.
Bishop described himself as a "pro-life, pro-gun, pro-wall" conservative and said McCready would fall in line with Democrats in Congress such as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rep. Ilhan Omar, and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who Bishop called radical socialists. Bishop said his record in the state legislature included helping pass a constitutional amendment requiring voter ID in 2018, lowering income taxes, and opposing sanctuary cities.
McCready campaigned on a promise to "always put country over party," saying he would pursue bipartisan legislation on healthcare, taxes, and education. McCready emphasized his plan to lower prescription drug prices. He criticized Bishop's sponsorship of House Bill 2, a law that required individuals to use bathrooms or changing rooms in schools and public agencies that corresponded with the sex on their birth certificates. The law was repealed in 2017.[1]
"The messages that Dan Bishop and Dan McCready are using will be mirrored by the messages of the national parties, ultimately, in 2020," North Carolina political strategist Lawrence Shaheen told the Washington Examiner.[2]
The special election saw more than $10.7 million in satellite spending, the second-highest total for a U.S. House special election. Georgia's 6th Congressional District special election in 2017 saw $27 million spent by satellite groups.[3]
McCready was unopposed in the Democratic primary. Bishop won the Republican primary against nine other candidates.[4] Click here for coverage of the primary.
The state board of elections called a new election following allegations of absentee ballot fraud in the 2018 race. Unofficial returns from the 2018 election showed Mark Harris (R) leading McCready, who was also the Democratic candidate in 2018, by 905 votes. Harris said he did not run again in 2019 due to health issues. Click here for more information on the aftermath of the 2018 election.[5]
North Carolina's 9th Congressional District is located in the southern portion of the state and includes all or parts of Mecklenburg, Union, Anson, Richmond, Scotland, Robeson, Bladen, and Cumberland counties.[6] Donald Trump (R) won the 2016 presidential election in the district by 12 percentage points.[7]
There were 10 special elections called during the 116th Congress. Eight were called for seats in the U.S. House, and two for seats in the U.S. Senate. From the 113th Congress to the 115th Congress, 40 special elections were held. For more data on historical congressional special elections, click here.
Candidates and election results
See also: North Carolina's 9th Congressional District special election, 2019
General election
Special general election for U.S. House North Carolina District 9
Dan Bishop defeated Dan McCready, Jeff Scott, and Allen Smith in the special general election for U.S. House North Carolina District 9 on September 10, 2019.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | Dan Bishop (R) | 50.7 | 96,573 | |
![]() | Dan McCready (D) | 48.7 | 92,785 | |
Jeff Scott (L) | 0.4 | 773 | ||
![]() | Allen Smith (G) | 0.2 | 375 |
Total votes: 190,506 (100.00% precincts reporting) | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Democratic primary election
The Democratic primary election was canceled. Dan McCready advanced from the special Democratic primary for U.S. House North Carolina District 9.
Republican primary election
Special Republican primary for U.S. House North Carolina District 9
The following candidates ran in the special Republican primary for U.S. House North Carolina District 9 on May 14, 2019.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | Dan Bishop | 47.7 | 14,405 | |
![]() | Stony Rushing | 19.5 | 5,882 | |
![]() | Matthew Ridenhour | 17.1 | 5,166 | |
![]() | Leigh Thomas Brown | 8.8 | 2,672 | |
![]() | Stevie Rivenbark ![]() | 3.0 | 906 | |
![]() | Fern Shubert | 1.4 | 438 | |
Chris Anglin | 1.3 | 382 | ||
![]() | Kathie Day | 0.6 | 193 | |
![]() | Gary M. Dunn ![]() | 0.3 | 105 | |
![]() | Albert Wiley Jr. | 0.2 | 62 |
Total votes: 30,211 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
Green primary election
The Green primary election was canceled. Allen Smith advanced from the special Green primary for U.S. House North Carolina District 9.
Libertarian primary election
The Libertarian primary election was canceled. Jeff Scott advanced from the special Libertarian primary for U.S. House North Carolina District 9.
Pivot county analysis
North Carolina's 9th Congressional District overlaps with three pivot counties: Bladen, Richmond, and Robeson. Pivot counties are those that Barack Obama (D) won in the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections and Donald Trump (R) won in the 2016 presidential election. The 9th District includes all of Richmond and Robeson counties and part of Bladen County. Compared to the 2018 unofficial results in the 9th District U.S. House election, Bladen and Robeson counties favored the same party in the 2019 House special election while Richmond switched from Democratic to Republican.
In the September 10 special election, Dan Bishop (R) won Bladen and Richmond counties, while Dan McCready (D) won Robeson County. In the 2018 general election for North Carolina's 9th District—the results of which were not certified after allegations of absentee ballot fraud—uncertified results showed McCready leading in Richmond and Robeson and Republican candidate Mark Harris leading in Bladen.
Turnout in the 2019 special election was lower than in the 2018 general election. In 2019, 11,064 fewer votes were tallied for McCready than in 2018. On the Republican side, 6,289 fewer votes were tallied for Bishop than for Harris.
The tables below show the two major-party candidates' percentages of the vote in 2018 and 2019 in the three pivot counties, margins of victory in terms of percentage points, and the total number of votes tallied for the two major-party candidates in 2018 and 2019.
Notes: Results of the 2018 election were not certified.
Percentages do not equal 100 because votes for minor-party candidates are not featured in the table.
Source: North Carolina State Board of Elections (2018) (2019)
Note: Results of the 2018 election were not certified.
Source: North Carolina State Board of Elections (2018) (2019)
The table below shows margins of victory in presidential elections between 2008 and 2016 in the three pivot counties.
Bladen and Robeson counties were the focus of absentee ballot fraud allegations in the 2018 election.[8]
Candidate profiles
The following candidates were selected as top candidates based on media coverage, endorsements, previously held offices, and fundraising performance. They are listed in alphabetical order by party.
Party: Democratic
Incumbent: No
Political office: None
Biography: McCready joined the U.S. Marine Corps after college and served in Iraq in 2007. He later attended Harvard Business School, worked for McKinsey & Company, and founded a solar energy company.[9]
- McCready highlighted his military experience and said he would work with Democrats and Republicans on affordable healthcare, cutting taxes for the middle class, and strengthening public schools.[10][11] McCready said he would fight against politicians who "put partisanship before people and special interests before families."[11]
- McCready highlighted his 10-point plan to lower prescription drug prices and criticized Bishop's voting record on the issue.[12]
Party: Republican
Incumbent: No
Political office: North Carolina State Senate (assumed office: 2017), North Carolina House of Representatives (2015-2017), Mecklenburg County Commission (2005-2009)
Biography: Bishop received his B.S. and J.D. from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He worked as a commercial litigator on shareholder and partner disputes, employment, construction, and bankruptcy law before holding elected office.[13]
- Bishop said his record included leading the effort to get the North Carolina Voter ID Amendment on the ballot in 2018, opposing abortion, reducing state income tax for 99 percent of North Carolina families, and voting to punish sanctuary cities.[14]
- Bishop released an ad contrasting himself with McCready and Democrats in Congress. "These crazy liberal clowns. The things they say. The way they act. What they believe. They’re not funny. They’re downright scary. ... I’ll go to Washington and fight these clowns for you," Bishop said in the ad.[15]
Noteworthy endorsements
This section lists noteworthy endorsements issued in this election, including those made by high-profile individuals and organizations, cross-party endorsements, and endorsements made by newspaper editorial boards. It also includes a bulleted list of links to official lists of endorsements for any candidates who published that information on their campaign websites. Please note that this list is not exhaustive. If you are aware of endorsements that should be included, please click here.
Click the links below to see endorsement lists published on candidate campaign websites, if available.
Noteworthy endorsements | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Endorsement | ![]() |
![]() | ||||
Elected officials | ||||||
President Donald Trump (R)[16] | ✔ | |||||
Individuals | ||||||
Former Vice President Joe Biden (D)[17] | ✔ | |||||
Former North Carolina Supreme Court Justice Bob Orr (R)[18] | ✔ | |||||
Organizations | ||||||
U.S. Chamber of Commerce[19] | ✔ |
Polls
- See also: Ballotpedia's approach to covering polls
North Carolina's 9th Congressional District special election, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poll | Poll sponsor | Bishop (R) | McCready (D) | Scott (L) | Smith (G) | Undecided | Margin of error | Sample size | |||||||||||
RRH Elections August 26-28, 2019 | N/A | 46% | 45% | 2% | 1% | 5% | +/-4 | 500 | |||||||||||
Harper Polling/Clarity Campaign Labs August 26-28, 2019 | Inside Elections | 42% | 46% | 2% | 1% | 8% | +/-4.2 | 551 | |||||||||||
JMC Analytics and Polling May 21-24, 2019 | N/A | 46% | 42% | 1% | 1% | 10% | +/-5.2 | 350 | |||||||||||
AVERAGES | 44.67% | 44.33% | 1.67% | 1% | 7.67% | +/-4.47 | 467 | ||||||||||||
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org. |
Click "show" to the right to see polls from the 2019 Republican primary. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Campaign finance
Satellite spending
Satellite spending, commonly referred to as outside spending, describes political spending not controlled by candidates or their campaigns; that is, any political expenditures made by groups or individuals that are not directly affiliated with a candidate. This includes spending by political party committees, super PACs, trade associations, and 501(c)(4) nonprofit groups.[20][21][22]
This section lists satellite spending in this race reported by news outlets in alphabetical order. If you are aware of spending that should be included, please email us.
- Club for Growth Action spent $147,000 toward the race through July 25, 2019. Part of the spending went toward a TV ad opposing McCready.
- The Committee to Defend the President announced August 27 it would spend $200,000 on a combination of TV and digital ads and get-out-the-vote efforts in support of Bishop and opposing McCready.[25]
- The Congressional Leadership Fund, a Republican super PAC, spent $1.2 million on ad reservations as of July 31.[23]
- The group also spent $150,000 on a field program "to persuade swing voters in Mecklenburg County and turn out mid-to-high propensity voters in Union County. CLF will rely on 100 people to knock on more than 75,000 doors," Roll Call reported on August 1.[26]
- End Citizens United, a political action committee that supports Democratic candidates, said it raised $100,000 for McCready, as of September 5, 2019.[27]
- Environmental Defense Fund Action and Environmental Defense Fund Action Votes committed a total of $800,000 to a TV ad supporting McCready and opposing Bishop. The ad began airing July 18, 2019.[28]
- House Majority Forward reported having spent $1.1 million on ads in support of McCready as of September 5.[29]
- League of Conservation Voters Victory Fund spent $250,000 on a digital ad and mailer campaign supporting McCready. Their digital ad was released August 21.[19]
- Stand Up Republic and American Values PAC said they would spend a combined $500,000 on digital, broadcast, cable, and radio ads in the district. The first ad, opposing Bishop, was released August 12. The groups were founded by Evan McMullin and Mindy Finn, former Republicans who ran for president and vice president as independents in 2016.[30]
- VoteVets reported a $200,000 ad buy supporting McCready and opposing Bishop. Their ad began airing August 7, 2019.[31]
DCCC and NRCC involvement
- The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) stated it was spending more than $2 million toward the race on such efforts as increasing voter turnout among African Americans and members of the Lumbee tribe, according to a memo released August 8 as reported by The Washington Post.[32]
- The National Republican Congressional Committee's (NRCC) independent expenditure arm had reserved $2.6 million in airtime for the election as of July 31, 2019.[23] NRCC released a TV ad opposing McCready July 31.
- The NRCC reported another $501,000 in independent expenditures on media between August 29 and September 4, totaling $3.1 million spent.[35]
Campaign advertisements
This section shows advertisements released in this race. Ads released by campaigns and, if applicable, satellite groups are embedded or linked below. If you are aware of advertisements that should be included, please email us.
Dan Bishop
Support
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Click here to view Bishop's Facebook ads.
Oppose
New ad from DCCC in #NC09. Part of a $528k broadcast buy airing from 8/16-9/2. pic.twitter.com/M3reIq4FO7
— Advertising Analytics (@Ad_Analytics) August 16, 2019
|
|
|
Dan McCready
Support
|
|
|
|
|
|
Click here to view McCready's Facebook ads.
Oppose
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campaign themes
The following campaign themes and policy positions were found on candidates' campaign websites.
Dan Bishop
“ |
Illegal Immigration Dan fully supports President Trump’s border wall. Second Amendment Dan is a gun owner who has been A rated and endorsed by the NRA. Life Dan is pro-life and will fight extremist Democrats’ to stop infanticide and late-term abortion on demand. Voter ID Dan believes requiring a photo ID to vote is common sense. He led the fight to put the successful Voter ID Constitutional Amendment on the ballot last November. Taxes Dan believes lower taxes and smaller government are better for families and better for our economy. Freedom and Faith Dan believes Christian values and the freedoms granted by our Constitution made America great. Supporting Our Military and National Defense We owe and immeasurable debt to our active duty military who stand in harms way to protect our freedoms, and all the veterans who have honorably served our nation. That means keeping the promises we make to them when they sign up to serve. In the State Senate, Dan took action to help North Carolinians who served our country in uniform. Among other reforms, he voted to protect Medicaid, ensure in-state tuition, and create job opportunities for our veterans, increase access to health care, exempt military retirement from the state income tax, and fund programs to help veterans in crisis. There’s always more that can be done for those who put themselves in harms way to protect our freedom. And Dan will do even more in Congress. Maintaining a strong national defense is a Constitutional mandate that must be upheld and, I believe, a moral obligation that must be met by Congress. Our elected leaders must follow the counsel of military leaders and make sure they have the resources and tools they need to protect our shining city on a hill and uphold the freedom and liberty that has made the United States the great hope of mankind.[36] |
” |
—Dan Bishop[37] |
Dan McCready
“ |
Lowering Healthcare and Prescription Drug Costs Dan has released a comprehensive Healthcare Plan to work across the aisle to lower healthcare costs and protect coverage. You can read his plan here. Dan’s plan has seven common-sense and non-partisan initiatives: protecting people with pre-existing conditions, standing up to Big Pharma to lower prescription drug prices, reaping the benefits of expanding Medicaid, saving rural healthcare, excluding primary care visits from deductibles, charging patients for quality of care instead of the number of procedures, and better caring for our veterans. Dan will also fight to protect the promise of Medicare against the proposed cuts. To lower prescription drug prices, Dan released a 10-point Plan to Lower Prescription Drug Costs. You can read his plan here. Dan’s plan includes ten bipartisan reforms to take on the high prices of U.S. prescription drugs by taking on Big Pharma and the costly middlemen, stopping foreign countries from taking advantage of us, and promoting lower-cost generic drugs. Lowering prescription drug prices shouldn’t be a partisan issue; a number of these reforms build on the work being done by the current administration. Strengthening our Public Schools But politicians are undermining our public schools by paying teachers too little and under-investing in our schools. Teachers are having to work two jobs and pay for school supplies out of their own pockets, and they are leaving North Carolina for better opportunities. Dan will fight to pay teachers their worth, lower class sizes, and fund early childhood education and alternatives to four-year college degrees — alternatives like community college and job training programs that equip North Carolinians for the jobs of tomorrow without mountains of debt. We must restore North Carolina’s reputation as a leader in education and the leader of the New South. Cutting Taxes for the Middle Class Taking on Money in Politics and our Broken System Dan will work to end gerrymandering. Through gerrymandering, politicians are deciding who gets elected, not the voters. Both parties have done it, and both parties were wrong. Dan will fight for reforms like assigning independent redistricting commissions, not politicians, the responsibility to draw district lines. Dan will fight for term limits in Congress. In the military, leaders follow an “up or out” system — if you aren’t moving up, if you aren’t leading, it’s time to go home. Dan believes Congressional leaders should be held to the same standard. Standing up for Medicare Creating Good Jobs from Cities to Small Towns Dan will fight for North Carolina community colleges and job training programs and to receive our district’s fair share of federal funding. Too many workers in North Carolina need jobs, and too many companies can’t find the workers they need. Dan will work to open up new pathways to opportunity that go beyond four-year college, and he will help rethink education so people can learn the technical and trade skills for the good-paying jobs of tomorrow. Dan will personally recruit CEOs to move their companies to rural North Carolina. Defending our Sacred Right to Vote Dan knows we can stop at nothing to ensure that voting is easy, accessible, and secure for every American. We must prevent cheating from ever happening again in North Carolina’s elections. And we must stand up to evil efforts to suppress the vote of African Americans and Native Americans Balancing the Budget Streamlining Regulations Leveling the Playing Field on Trade Fighting for the Lumbee Tribe Supporting our Veterans and Military Families Dan is no stranger to advocating for veterans. After he went to business school on the GI Bill, he gave away a portion of his company’s sales each year to veterans. Veterans will have no stronger advocate than Dan on health care, mental health, education, jobs, and the transition to civilian life. Dan knows that we must reform the VA healthcare system. Congress must also reassert its constitutional responsibility over war and veterans’ care. We need more young veterans in Congress to get that done. Securing our Border while Protecting our Values But we must uphold our values. When politicians try to break our government’s promise to Dreamers who were brought here as children or separate young children from their parents at the border, that’s un-American. Dan will fight to restore the DREAM Act and end family separations at the border. Abolishing agencies that serve vital functions like ICE will not fix our immigration system; instead Congress needs to fix our immigration laws and fund, improve, and support agencies to operate in a way that upholds human rights while completing their missions. Keeping our Families Safe The problem in Washington right now is not that politicians are doing the wrong thing to prevent gun violence, it’s that they’re barely doing anything at all. That has to change. Dan will fight for common-sense and bipartisan gun violence prevention, comprehensive background checks, and closing the gun show and online loopholes that allow guns to fall into the hands of domestic terrorists, domestic abusers, and the mentally ill. Defending Our Rights When it comes to women’s rights, Dan gets it. He’s the husband of a children’s attorney and the father of two daughters. Dan knows that any man who uses his position of power to take advantage of women must be brought to justice. That’s why, when reports surfaced of sexual assault cover-ups on Capitol Hill, Dan called for a full investigation into congressional leadership in both parties to find out who knew what and when. Dan supports a woman’s right to choose because he does not believe it’s the government’s job to get between a woman and her doctor. And he will fight for women to receive equal pay for equal work. Dan knows that everyone deserves equal opportunity no matter their gender, race, sexual orientation, or country of origin. And everyone, straight or gay, deserves equality under the law. Protecting North Carolina’s Air and Water Keeping Americans Safe |
” |
—Dan McCready[38] |
Jeff Scott
“ |
America’s Education America’s Security America’s Health Economic Development America’s Veterans Preserving Our Freedoms Under Constitutional Government Problemas En Español Mi plataforma es la paz, la prosperidad y la privacidad. Soy el único candidato contra la guerra, el único candidato anticorrupción, y el único candidato de antivigilancia en la competencia electoral. Me rompe el corazón presenciar la hostilidad que ha surgido en nuestra sociedad hacia los inmigrantes, cualquiera que sea su situación legal. En el pasado, nuestro país siempre habia dado la bienvenida a personas que se van o escapan de su país de origen para llegar a un lugar mejor. Muchos votantes en esta temporada electoral temen cómo los inmigrantes se adaptan a nuestra sociedad. También quieren respuestas de los líderes sobre cómo los inmigrantes se adaptan a nuestras instituciones sociales, como escuelas, hospitales e iglesias. Creo que nuestro gobierno debe actuar de una manera que respete a los seres humanos. Las víctimas deben tener representación y deben recibir un trato humano cuando sean detenidas. Prometo asegurarme de que nuestro sistema de inmigración regrese a sus raíces humanas y respete los derechos de las personas a lo largo de sus vidas. Los recién llegados deberían poder disfrutar de la oportunidades que todos damos por hecho. Si usted es un ciudadano, no tema votar. ¡Es su derecho! Gun Violence |
” |
—Jeff Scott[39] |
Allen Smith
“ |
Heathcare is a human right The United States is the richest, most powerful country on earth. And yet we are the only industrialized country without a national health program. We pay more for treatment and medicine. The out-of-pocket costs of medical care have a huge financial impact on millions of people, even those who have insurance. Medical debt is the leading cause of bankruptcy in our country. Nearly half of all Americans say they would have a difficult time paying an unexpected $500 medical bill. Access to affordable health insurance is simply not enough. Meanwhile, the insurance companies, big pharmaceutical companies, and for-profit hospital systems are raking in more profits than ever. It is time to give the people the care we all deserve. It’s time to stop throwing around words like “access” and “affordable” as qualifiers just to keep big businesses happy. Leading the way on big challenges is embedded in the fabric of our country’s history. We need to put that same caliber of leadership into a true universal, single-payer healthcare system. We can show everyone what it looks like when the most powerful country in the world puts the health and well-being of people above the pursuit of profits. Things I'll be fighting for
Protecting our planet Climate change is the most important social, economic, and environmental crisis that humanity has ever faced. You can see its effects in the news every day. Droughts are deeper, storms are stronger, wildfires burn for weeks on end, and that’s just a sampling of what we see every day. Climate change is destroying homes, eliminating people’s jobs and, too often, taking their lives too. The rapid acceleration of climate change over the past 50 years is due to unchecked industrialization and subsequent greenhouse gas emissions that our fossil-fuel economy has pumped into the atmosphere. The industries and practices that so many of us rely on to keep our daily lives running normally are the same ones that have set our planet on a catastrophic trajectory. Of course, they are not out to destroy the planet; they’re simply operating the way that our capitalist systems require them to operate. Not only do they provide many of the luxuries we often take for granted; they also employ entire communities, and the predictability of their profits helps maintain short-term stability in our economy. With such positive short-term benefits, it’s easy for us to overlook the significant negative impact these industries and their practices have on our environment, our economy, and the state of the world. And that is fundamentally the issue that has set us on a collision course with a global environmental collapse. We need to disrupt the broken systems that force us to destroy our planet for short-term financial gain. And we need to take action now. Not in a few years. Today. We need a real Green New Deal that will not only turn the tide on climate change, but which will revive the economy and make wars for oil obsolete. Things I'll be fighting for
Putting people over profits Corporations wield a disproportionate amount of power in our country. They have become too big and too influential over our laws, which have increasingly allowed them to exploit our people and destroy our environment, all with the primary goals of endless economic growth and generating larger and larger profits. Our governments use hefty tax breaks to sell out our communities to big businesses, touting wealthy executives as job creators and economic saviors. But jobs are only a means to an end for those of us who work for a living. More than jobs, we want financial stability and a feeling of fulfillment. We value not just material wealth, but the things which truly make life worth living — our time, our health, our relationships, our communities, and our environment. No human being should live for work or need to work to live. We are better than that. All business has a social contract with society and the environment. To create a just and enduring society, we need to create a system of commerce where every act is sustainable and restorable. We must change the fundamental design of corporations so that they generate profits, but not at the expense of the environment, human rights, public health, workers, or the communities in which the corporation operates. Our planet cannot afford business as usual any longer. Things I'll be fighting for
Creating a pro-worker economy Businesses and their leaders wield an increasingly dangerous amount of power in our economy. They dangle jobs in front of struggling communities and the politicians who represent them. They use the promise of job creation to justify bringing harmful industries to rural communities. They put workers in a position where they must choose between having a job and doing what is best for their community; and they force millions of citizens into doing work that is unfulfilling, socially harmful, or detrimental to the environment. We need measures in place to rebalance power between businesses and the workers who generate their profits. We need a variety of democratically-run small businesses and organizations. But a pro-worker economy isn’t just about commerce. There is plenty of work to do that enriches our communities without jeopardizing our future or widening the gap between the richest and poorest among us. We need to change the conversation from being about providing “jobs” to providing financial security, well-being, and meaningful livelihoods to everyone who is able to contribute. We all deserve a say in how things run. And we all deserve to benefit from the abundant resources in our society. Things I'll be fighting for
Rebuilding public education Our public education system has been the victim of a systematic dismantling. Because of tax cuts for the wealthy that have gutted huge amounts of funding, and because of privatization schemes that funnel money out of our public school system, many of our schools lack basic necessities, let alone the funding to give students what they need to succeed. We have painted ourselves into a corner by buying into the high-stakes testing industry, relying on outdated ways of measuring school performance, and trying to run our schools like businesses. Our overworked, underpaid teachers are marching in the streets for our kids, tirelessly advocating for their future. More students than ever come from low-income families, and our public schools can serve as a powerful lever of upward mobility if they can provide students the resources and support they need to thrive — inside and outside of their classrooms. Education is a lifelong journey. It’s not about reaching a destination. It’s about building momentum. It starts with high-quality early-childhood programs and continues through adulthood. Its goal shouldn’t be to mold young people into subservient consumers or employees but rather to arm them with the skills, knowledge, and spirit of inquiry they need to create the future they want for themselves. We shouldn’t treat higher education like a personal financial investment. Anyone who wants to go to a public college or vocational school shouldn’t have to pay for it themselves. That means it’s also time to cancel the huge debt owed to the federal government and predatory finance industry by student and parent borrowers. Things I'll be fighting for
Supporting our troops Our brave service members, who are required to carry out military policies, often with great hardship to themselves, their families, and even the risk of their lives, deserve our respect and our commitment to adequate compensation and benefits. The dangerous burden of fighting unnecessary, unending wars is disproportionately borne by families of lesser means and some of our most vulnerable citizens and residents. It is critical that we stop grooming high-schoolers for war. We must stop asking kids as young as 17 to be prepared to take the lives of people they’ll never know and live with the weight of it. Our first priority in foreign policy considerations is to create a future where war needs no workforce. We must ensure future generations not face the separations and sacrifices of war that we have. We must also take better care of those who have served and those who are currently serving. Things I'll be fighting for
Empowering women Democracy cannot work without equality for women. That means equal participation and equal representation. Women make up 51% of our population but only 24% of our federal legislators. It is critical that we disrupt the system of male domination, also known as the patriarchy, in all its forms, both subtle and overt. This includes oppression, inequality, and discrimination, as well as all forms of violence and exploitation against women and girls. The change the world is crying for cannot occur unless women's voices are heard. So many of the challenges we face with women’s policies stem from the fact that a bunch of men are trying to craft laws without any guidance or input from folks whose lives those laws impact. If we can create an environment where we elevate and empower women, where we turn their input into action, we can cut through the harmful rhetoric and make real progress on these important issues. Things I'll be fighting for
Re-engineering our justice system The United States has the highest incarceration and recidivism rates of industrialized countries. To put that in perspective, we have less than five percent of the world's population, but we lock up nearly a quarter of the world's prisoners. Mass incarceration in our country is an epidemic. It destroys lives and communities. Our justice system is too often inhumane, ineffective, and prohibitively expensive. It disproportionately affects people of color and assigns long prison terms to hundreds of thousands of perpetrators of victimless crimes, such as selling marijuana. Meanwhile, corporate, white collar, and environmental crime too often goes unpunished. We must take steps to prevent violent crime and address the legitimate needs of victims, while addressing the socio-economic root causes of crime and practicing policies that prevent recidivism. We need to divest ourselves from the private prison industry and instead invest in measures for rehabilitation and positive alternatives to mass incarceration. We need to end the failed war on drugs, and help rebuild the communities that it has destroyed. Things I'll be fighting for
Making government work Everyone deserves the opportunity to influence the government decisions that affect them. But our country suffers from a corrupt campaign finance system that enables corporate and wealthy elites to purchase political outcomes and an abundance of anti-democratic electoral, ballot access and debate rules designed to minimize participation and choice. Incumbent politicians and establishment candidates often talk about reforming our broken systems, but they fail to take meaningful action because they exploit these broken systems to get elected and maintain their positions of power. It’s time to get big money out of our elections. To do that, we need to fundamentally change the way our elections are financed and conducted. We also need to enact laws that end corruption and gerrymandering, open up our primaries, allow ranked-choice voting, and put an end to the legalized systems of bribery that corporate lobbying laws allow. Things I'll be fighting for
Humanizing our immigration system Our country needs a complete overhaul of its immigration laws. Our broken immigration system, combined with our trade policies and our destabilizing military activity around the world has created extreme social injustice. Millions of people are living and working in the U.S. with no legal status, making them subject to extreme exploitation and abuse. Immigration raids are terrorizing the immigrant community. Families are being broken up. Employer abuses of undocumented workers are rampant. In order to fix our system, we must implement immediate and long-term solutions that are practical, fair, and most importantly, humane. That includes a pathway to citizenship for current residents, domestic and foreign economic policies that protect people from exploitation and family destabilization, and measures that allow us to protect ourselves by verifying the identities of those who want to enter our country. Things I'll be fighting for
Taking care of each other Our constitution protects the freedoms and rights we have as citizens. It is the contract that empowers us to enjoy our liberty. For freedom and power to be sustainable, it’s imperative that we all exercise our rights responsibly. We have a duty to take care of each other. It balances our freedom to do as we please and also checks our power to trample the rights of others. Rest assured, the second amendment is not under attack. But the powerful, corrupt gun lobby is pouring money and influence into campaigns to mislead us and trick us into believing that any kind of reform to our gun laws is an outright ambush on our constitution. Reports show that nearly 40,000 people lose their lives to a firearm in our country every year. To put that number in perspective, it’s about one person every 13 minutes. It’s important to unpack this epidemic to better understand what is happening and how to prevent it. We need to implement a holistic approach that includes gun laws that nurture responsible gun ownership, resources and support to combat the social conditions that increase gun violence, and measures to keep guns out of the hands of those most likely to harm themselves or others with them. Things I'll be fighting for
Revolutionizing our infrastructure Our infrastructure is long overdue for improvements. In order to create a sustainable long-term future for our kids and their kids, we have to make a concerted effort to revolutionize the way we build our cities, roads, sidewalks, buildings, factories, parks, railways, and energy systems. This includes transitioning away from an automobile-centric design of our cities, neighborhoods, and roads. It also includes transitioning to 100% clean energy by 2030 with the help of a Green New Deal that will not only update our energy systems and infrastructure, but which will help provide financial stability to 20 million individuals and their families through stable, green jobs. Things I'll be fighting for
|
” |
—Allen Smith[40] |
Policy stances
Media outlets identified healthcare as a major issue in this race.[41][42]
Healthcare
Bishop and McCready took the following stances on healthcare issues. Positions below were compiled by The Charlotte Observer.[42]
Affordable Care Act
Bishop supported repealing the ACA but maintaining the elements of prohibiting insurers from denying coverage to people with pre-existing conditions and allowing young adults up to the age of 26 to be covered by parents' policies. Bishop called for more competition between insurers as a way of expanding coverage and lowering healthcare costs.
McCready supported maintaining and expanding on the ACA. He proposed adding catastrophic plans to encourage more young people to get coverage and charging patients based on healthcare outcomes as opposed to services received.
Medicaid expansion
Heading into the election, North Carolina was one of 14 states that had not expanded Medicaid under the ACA.
Bishop opposed Medicaid expansion in the state. He said that competition is the right answer and that the "wrong answer is bringing in more government to destroy the market even more."
McCready supported Medicaid expansion, saying, "It’s economically the right thing to do. It’s morally the right thing to do."
Prescription drug prices
Bishop supported indexing drug prices in the U.S. to prices in other countries, increasing transparency in pricing, and considering changes to patent rules that could make it easier for generic drugs to enter the market.
McCready released a 10-point plan that included enforcing a law allowing pharmacists to discuss lower-cost drugs with patients, regulating price increases on certain prescriptions, allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices, and allowing drug makers and buyers to negotiate prices based on health outcomes.
Medicare for All
Candidates took the following positions on a Medicare for All—a term describing various proposals to obtain or approach universal coverage through government-run health insurance, including single-payer proposals and public option proposals.
Bishop opposed Medicare for All, saying, "If Obamacare has been a disaster, that would be a thermonuclear disaster."
McCready opposed Medicare for All, saying, "I’m interested in things we can actually get done working with both sides of the aisle."
Debates and candidate forums
August 28, 2019
Bishop and McCready met for their only debate of the special election.
Video:
Coverage:
August 11, 2019
McCready, Scott, and Smith participated in a candidate forum hosted by the Fayetteville Branch of the NAACP and the Historic Thousands on Jones Street People’s Assembly Coalition.
Coverage:
Social media
Twitter accounts
This section includes Twitter feeds from the candidates where available.
Timeline
- September 12, 2019: Gerrit Lansing, founder of the online Republican fundraising platform WinRed, told Politico Morning Score that Bishop had raised more than $300,000 on the platform.[43]
- September 9, 2019: President Donald Trump held a rally in the 9th Congressional District in support of Bishop, who was in attendance. Vice President Mike Pence also campaigned for Bishop.[44][45]
- September 6-7, 2019: The early voting period was extended for four counties affected by Hurricane Dorian: Bladen, Cumberland, Robeson, and Scotland.[46]
- September 5, 2019:
- Both Bishop and McCready requested the state board of elections extend early voting following closures at some voting sites due to Hurricane Dorian.[47]
- End Citizens United, a political action committee that supports Democratic candidates, said it raised $100,000 for McCready.[27]
- August 29, 2019: Updated campaign finance reports showed that McCready had raised $5 million and Bishop, $2 million as of August 21, 2019.
- August 26-28, 2019: A poll sponsored by Inside Elections found McCready with 46 percent support and Bishop, 42 percent. The poll had a margin of error of +/- 4.2 percentage points. Another poll, by RRH elections, showed Bishop with 46 percent and McCready with 45 percent and had a margin of error of +/- 4 points.
- August 28, 2019: Donald Trump Jr. campaigned for Bishop at a fundraiser in North Carolina.[48]
- August 28, 2019: Bishop and McCready met for a debate.
- August 20, 2019: Karen Pence, wife of Vice President Mike Pence (R), spoke at a fundraiser for Dan Bishop.[49]
- August 17, 2019: The National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) and Bishop's campaign released a second ad together opposing McCready.
- August 16, 2019: The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) began airing an ad opposing Dan Bishop.
- August 11, 2019: McCready, Scott, and Smith participated in a candidate forum.
- August 8, 2019: The DCCC stated it was spending more than $2 million toward the race on such efforts as increasing voter turnout among African Americans and members of the Lumbee tribe, The Washington Post reported.[32]
- August 4, 2019: The NRCC and Bishop's campaign released an ad together.
- July 31, 2019: The NRCC's independent expenditure arm had reserved $2.6 million in airtime and began airing an ad opposing McCready.
- July 30, 2019: McCready released a TV ad criticizing Bishop's voting record on prescription drug prices.
- July 25, 2019: Club for Growth Action began airing a TV ad opposing McCready. The group spent $100,000 on the ad.
- July 18, 2019: Two groups affiliated with the Environmental Defense Fund began airing a TV ad supporting McCready and opposing Bishop. They committed $600,000 to the ad.
- July 17, 2019: Vice President Mike Pence spoke at a fundraiser for Dan Bishop in Fayetteville. The two discussed national security and Bishop's support for Trump, according to The Fayetteville Observer.[50] Bishop also spoke at a Trump rally in Greenville.[51]
- July 15, 2019: Fundraising reports covering through June 30 were published by the FEC. They showed McCready with a total of $3.4 million in contributions and $1.8 million in cash on hand; he raised $1.4 million between April 25 and June 30, 2019. Bishop had raised a total of $1.2 million with $344,000 on hand, and he raised $662,000 during the reporting period.
- June 3, 2019: Dan McCready (D) released his first TV ad of the special election.[52]
- May 24, 2019: A JMC poll found Bishop with 46 percent support and McCready with 42 percent support. The poll's margin of error was +/- 5.2 percentage points.
- May 23, 2019: McCready said he opposed beginning impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump (R).[53]
- May 16, 2019: Trump endorsed Dan Bishop (R) on Twitter.[54]
- May 15, 2019: Dan Bishop (R) released his first general election campaign ad set to air for two weeks as part of a $100,000 ad buy.[55]
District analysis
- See also: The Cook Political Report's Partisan Voter Index
- See also: FiveThirtyEight's elasticity scores
The 2017 Cook Partisan Voter Index for this district was R+8, meaning that in the previous two presidential elections, this district's results were 8 percentage points more Republican than the national average. This made North Carolina's 9th Congressional District the 170th-most Republican nationally.[56]
FiveThirtyEight's elasticity score for states and congressional districts measured "how sensitive it is to changes in the national political environment." Heading into the election, this district's elasticity score was 0.90. This means that for every 1 point the national political mood moved toward a party, the district was expected to move 0.90 points toward that party.[57]
Election history
2018
The election results from 2018 were not certified. Read more below.
General election
General election for U.S. House North Carolina District 9
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
![]() | Mark Harris (R) | 49.3 | 139,246 | |
![]() | Dan McCready (D) | 48.9 | 138,341 | |
Jeff Scott (L) | 1.8 | 5,130 |
Vote totals may be incomplete for this race. | ||||
Total votes: 282,717 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
2016
Heading into the election, Ballotpedia rated this race as safely Republican. Incumbent Robert Pittenger (R) defeated Christian Cano (D) in the general election on November 8, 2016. Pittenger defeated Mark Harris and Todd Johnson in the Republican primary. A recount was required in the Republican primary, after which Pittenger led Harris by 133 votes. Harris then conceded the race. The primary election took place on June 7, 2016.[58][59]
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | ![]() |
58.2% | 193,452 | |
Democratic | Christian Cano | 41.8% | 139,041 | |
Total Votes | 332,493 | |||
Source: North Carolina State Board of Elections |
Candidate | Vote % | Votes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
35% | 9,299 | ||
Mark Harris | 34.4% | 9,165 | ||
Todd Johnson | 30.6% | 8,142 | ||
Total Votes | 26,606 | |||
Source: North Carolina State Board of Elections |
2014
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | ![]() |
93.9% | 163,080 | |
Write-in | Shawn Eckles | 1.4% | 2,369 | |
Write-in | Write-in (miscellaneous) | 4.7% | 8,219 | |
Total Votes | 173,668 | |||
Source: North Carolina State Board of Elections |
Aftermath of the 2018 election
The 2019 special election was called after North Carolina's Board of Elections did not certify the results of the 2018 general election due to allegations of absentee ballot fraud. The following timeline reflects events that occurred in the aftermath of the 2018 general election.
February 2019
- February 21, 2019: After four days of hearings on alleged ballot tampering, the state Board of Elections called for a new election.[60]
- February 18-20, 2019: The board was expected to vote on whether to certify the election or call for a new one after holding a public hearing.[61] The hearings continued to a fourth day, instead.
- February 12, 2019: Harris and McCready filed briefings with the election board. Harris argued a new election should not be called because any alleged technical irregularity found during the investigation, like ballot harvesting, would not have altered the outcome of the election. McCready argued a new election should be called because ballots were illegally harvested, tampered with, and likely discarded, tainting the entire election.[62]
January 2019
- January 31, 2019: Gov. Roy Cooper (D) appointed five new members to the state Board of Elections: Stella Anderson (D), David Black (R), Jeff Carmon III (D), Bob Cordle (D), and Ken Raymond (R).[63]
- January 26, 2019: The McCready campaign announced it had raised $500,000 for a possible new election since mid-December.[64]
- January 22, 2019: Wake County Superior Court Judge Paul Ridgeway denied Harris' request to certify the election results while the investigation into alleged election fraud was pending.[65]
- January 3, 2019: Harris was not sworn in to the 116th Congress.
- January 2, 2019: The evidentiary hearing scheduled for January 11, 2019, was postponed because there was no board in place to subpoena witnesses or hold hearings.[66]
- January 1, 2019: Incumbent Robert Pittenger (R) said that he would not run in a new primary if one were called following the investigation into irregularities during the 2018 election.[67]
December 2018
- December 28, 2018:
- The North Carolina State Board of Elections was dissolved at noon. At the time, it was unclear whether an interim board would be appointed to serve until a new board came together on January 31, 2019, according to state law. Harris filed an emergency petition to have the election results certified before the board dissolved, but an emergency session to consider the petition was not called.[68]
- The incoming U.S. House majority leader, Steny Hoyer (D), said in a statement that Democrats would object to Harris being seated on January 3, 2019.[69]
- December 27, 2018: A panel of three state judges ruled to dissolve the state board of elections. The decision was connected to an earlier court ruling that declared the structure of the board unconstitutional. The court had previously ruled to delay dissolving the board so it could continue investigating alleged fraud related to the election, but on December 27, judges ruled to dissolve it, stating that the board had failed to provide reasons for delaying its evidentiary hearing until January 11, 2019.[68][70]
- December 17, 2018: The North Carolina Republican Party released a resolution calling on the North Carolina State Board of Elections to produce evidence that the alleged voting irregularities would have changed the outcome of the race or immediately certify the results.[71]
- December 14, 2018: The North Carolina State Board of Elections announced it would hold a public evidentiary hearing on January 11, 2019, delaying the initially planned hearing set to be held by December 21, 2018.[72]
- December 11, 2018: Robin Hayes, the chairman of the North Carolina Republican Party, called for a new election if allegations that early votes in the race were improperly viewed were true. He said, “This action by election officials would be a fundamental violation of the sense of fair play, honesty, and integrity that the Republican Party stands for. We can never tolerate the state putting its thumb on the scale. The people involved in this must be held accountable and should it be true, this fact alone would likely require a new election."[73]
- December 6, 2018: The editorial board of the The Charlotte Observer called for a new election. The board wrote, "Unless new evidence somehow clears the clouds hanging over this election, the Board of Elections should toss out the 9th District results.[74]
- December 1, 2018: North Carolina State Board of Elections Chairman Andy Penry resigned from office following a complaint from Wake County Republican Chairman Charles Hellwig saying Penry had made social media posts critical of President Donald Trump (R) and other Republicans. Penry said in a statement announcing his resignation, "The investigation should be free of attempts at distraction and obstruction so that the truth can be revealed. I will not allow myself to be used as an instrument of distraction in this investigation."[75]
November 2018
- November 30, 2018: The North Carolina State Board of Elections reconvened and voted, 7-2, for an evidentiary hearing on the irregularities before December 21, 2018.[76]
- November 28, 2018: Bobby Ludlum, the chairman of the Bladen County Board of Elections, said that the chief investigator for the North Carolina Board of Elections collected absentee by mail ballot request forms and their return envelopes from Bladen County, which partially sits in the 9th District, after the election.[77]
- November 27, 2018: The North Carolina State Board of Elections, which is composed of four Democrats, four Republicans, and one independent member, voted unanimously not to certify the results in the 9th Congressional District. Vice Chairman Joshua Malcolm, who made the motion to delay certification, cited a law saying the board could "take any other action necessary to assure that an election is determined without taint of fraud or corruption and without irregularities that may have changed the result of an election."[78]
Special elections to the 116th Congress
Eight special elections for the U.S. House of Representatives occurred:
- California's 25th Congressional District
- Georgia's 5th Congressional District
- Maryland's 7th Congressional District
- New York's 27th Congressional District
- North Carolina's 3rd Congressional District
- North Carolina's 9th Congressional District
- Pennsylvania's 12th Congressional District
- Wisconsin's 7th Congressional District
Two special election for the U.S. Senate occurred:
Three of these races resulted in partisan flips. The special elections for U.S. Senate in Arizona and Georgia resulted in Democratic gains, and the special election for California's 25th Congressional District resulted in a Republican gain.
Special elections to Congress occur when a legislator resigns, dies, or is removed from office. Depending on the specific state laws governing vacancies, a state can either hold an election within the same calendar year or wait until the next regularly scheduled election.
Results
House
Results of special elections to the 116th Congress (House) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Race | Election date | Incumbent | Winner | Election MOV | Previous election MOV | 2016 Presidential election MOV[79] |
Pennsylvania's 12th Congressional District | May 21, 2019 | ![]() |
![]() |
R+36 | R+32 | R+37 |
North Carolina's 3rd Congressional District | September 10, 2019 | ![]() |
![]() |
R+24 | R+100 | R+24 |
North Carolina's 9th Congressional District[81] | September 10, 2019 | ![]() |
![]() |
R+2 | R+16 | R+11 |
Maryland's 7th Congressional District | April 28, 2020 | ![]() |
![]() |
D+49 | D+55 | D+55 |
California's 25th Congressional District | May 12, 2020 | ![]() |
![]() |
R+12 | D+9 | D+7 |
Wisconsin's 7th Congressional District | May 12, 2020 | ![]() |
![]() |
R+14 | R+21 | R+20 |
New York's 27th Congressional District | June 23, 2020 | ![]() |
![]() |
R+5 | R+0.3 | R+25 |
Georgia's 5th Congressional District | December 1, 2020 | ![]() |
![]() |
D+8[82] | D+100 | D+73 |
Senate
Results of special elections to the 116th Congress (Senate) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Race | Election date | Incumbent | Winner | Election MOV | Previous election MOV | 2016 Presidential election MOV |
U.S. Senate in Arizona | November 3, 2020 | ![]() |
![]() |
D+3 | D+2 | R+4 |
U.S. Senate in Georgia | January 5, 2021 (runoff) | ![]() |
![]() |
D+2.1 | R+14 | R+5 |
Historical data
Special elections, 2013-2022
From 2013 to 2022, 67 special elections to the United States Congress were called during the 113th through 117th Congresses. During that time, special elections were called for 23 seats vacated by Democrats and 44 vacated by Republicans.
The table below details how many congressional seats changed parties as the result of a special election between 2013 and 2022. The numbers on the left side of the table reflect how many vacant seats were originally held by each party, while the numbers on the right side of the table show how many vacant seats each party won in special elections.
Congressional special election vacancies and results, 113th Congress to 117th Congress | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Congress | Total elections held | Vacancies before elections | Seats held after elections | Net change | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | |||
117th Congress | 17 | 7 | 10 | 7 | 10 | No change |
116th Congress | 10 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 6 | +1D, -1R |
115th Congress | 17 | 4 | 13 | 8 | 9 | +4 D, -4 R |
114th Congress | 7 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 5 | No change |
113th Congress | 16 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 9 | No change |
Averages | 13 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 7 | N/A |
U.S. Senate special election partisan change from special elections, 113th Congress to 117th Congress | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party | As of special election | After special election | ||||
![]() |
5 | 8 | ||||
![]() |
7 | 4 | ||||
Total | 12 | 12 |
U.S. House special election partisan change from special elections, 113th Congress to 117th Congress | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party | As of special election | After special election | ||||
![]() |
18 | 20 | ||||
![]() |
37 | 35 | ||||
Total | 55 | 55 |
Special elections, 1986-2012
The table below presents the results of special elections to Congress from 1986 to 2012. Contact Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org for access to earlier data.
Results of special elections to Congress (1986-2012) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Election cycle | Total special elections | U.S. House elections | Seats changing partisan control | U.S. Senate elections | Seats changing partisan control | |
2011-2012 | 11 | 11 | None | None | None | |
2009-2010 | 15 | 10 | 3 (2 Democratic gains; 1 Republican gain) | 5 | 2 (all Republican gains) | |
2007-2008 | 14 | 12 | 3 (2 Republican gains; 1 Democratic gain) | 2 | None | |
2005-2006 | 12 | 12 | 3 (all Democratic gains) | None | None | |
2003-2004 | 6 | 6 | None | None | None | |
2001-2002 | 6 | 5 | 2 (all Democratic gains) | 1 | 1 (Republican gain) | |
1999-2000 | 9 | 8 | 1 (Republican gain) | 1 | 1 (Democratic gain) | |
1997-1998 | 3 | 3 | None | None | None | |
1995-1996 | 11 | 9 | 1 (Republican gain) | 2 | 1 (Democratic gain) | |
1993-1994 | 9 | 6 | 1 (Republican gain) | 3 | 3 (all Republican gains) | |
1991-1992 | 10 | 7 | 2 (all Republican gains) | 3 | 1 (Democratic gain) | |
1989-1990 | 10 | 8 | 1 (Democratic gain) | 2 | None | |
1987-1988 | 12 | 12 | 3 (2 Democratic gains; 1 Republican gain) | None | None | |
1985-1986 | 8 | 8 | 1 (Republican gain) | None | None | |
Total | 136 | 117 | 21 (11 Democratic gains; 10 Republican gains) | 19 | 9 (6 Republican gains; 3 Democratic gains) |
State profile
- See also: North Carolina and North Carolina elections, 2019
Partisan data
The information in this section was current as of May 7, 2019
Presidential voting pattern
- North Carolina voted Republican in six out of the seven presidential elections between 2000 and 2024.
Congressional delegation
- Following the 2018 elections, both U.S. Senators from North Carolina were Republicans.
- North Carolina had three Democratic and eight Republican U.S. Representatives, and two seats were vacant.
State executives
- Democrats held four and Republicans held six of North Carolina's 20 state executive offices. Elections for the other offices are nonpartisan.
- North Carolina's governor was Democrat Roy Cooper.
State legislature
- Republicans controlled the North Carolina State Senate with a 29-21 majority.
- Republicans controlled the North Carolina House of Representatives with a 65-54 majority.
North Carolina Party Control: 1992-2025
Fourteen years of Democratic trifectas • Four years of Republican trifectas
Scroll left and right on the table below to view more years.
Year | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 00 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Governor | R | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | R | R | R | R | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D |
Senate | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
House | D | D | D | R | R | R | R | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
|
|
Demographic data for North Carolina | ||
---|---|---|
North Carolina | U.S. | |
Total population: | 10,035,186 | 316,515,021 |
Land area (sq mi): | 48,618 | 3,531,905 |
Race and ethnicity** | ||
White: | 69.5% | 73.6% |
Black/African American: | 21.5% | 12.6% |
Asian: | 2.5% | 5.1% |
Native American: | 1.2% | 0.8% |
Pacific Islander: | 0.1% | 0.2% |
Two or more: | 2.4% | 3% |
Hispanic/Latino: | 8.8% | 17.1% |
Education | ||
High school graduation rate: | 85.8% | 86.7% |
College graduation rate: | 28.4% | 29.8% |
Income | ||
Median household income: | $46,868 | $53,889 |
Persons below poverty level: | 20.5% | 11.3% |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, "American Community Survey" (5-year estimates 2010-2015) Click here for more information on the 2020 census and here for more on its impact on the redistricting process in North Carolina. **Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here. |
Pivot Counties
- See also: Pivot Counties by state
Six of 100 North Carolina counties—6 percent—are Pivot Counties. Pivot Counties are counties that voted for Barack Obama (D) in 2008 and 2012 and for Donald Trump (R) in 2016. Altogether, the nation had 206 Pivot Counties, with most being concentrated in upper midwestern and northeastern states.
Counties won by Trump in 2016 and Obama in 2012 and 2008 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County | Trump margin of victory in 2016 | Obama margin of victory in 2012 | Obama margin of victory in 2008 | ||||
Bladen County, North Carolina | 9.39% | 1.97% | 2.07% | ||||
Gates County, North Carolina | 9.07% | 4.11% | 5.22% | ||||
Granville County, North Carolina | 2.49% | 4.54% | 6.58% | ||||
Martin County, North Carolina | 0.43% | 4.65% | 4.64% | ||||
Richmond County, North Carolina | 9.74% | 2.95% | 1.50% | ||||
Robeson County, North Carolina | 4.27% | 17.41% | 13.78% |
In the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump (R) won North Carolina with 49.8 percent of the vote. Hillary Clinton (D) received 46.2 percent. In presidential elections between 1792 and 2016, North Carolina voted Democratic 53.5 percent of the time and Republican 25 percent of the time. In the five presidential elections between 2000 and 2016, North Carolina voted Republican all five times with the exception of the 2008 presidential election.[96]
Presidential results by legislative district
The following table details results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections by state House districts in North Carolina. Click [show] to expand the table. The "Obama," "Romney," "Clinton," and "Trump" columns describe the percent of the vote each presidential candidate received in the district. The "2012 Margin" and "2016 Margin" columns describe the margin of victory between the two presidential candidates in those years. The "Party Control" column notes which party held that seat heading into the 2018 general election. Data on the results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections broken down by state legislative districts was compiled by Daily Kos.[97][98]
In 2012, Barack Obama (D) won 40 out of 120 state House districts in North Carolina with an average margin of victory of 38.3 points. In 2016, Hillary Clinton (D) won 44 out of 120 state House districts in North Carolina with an average margin of victory of 36.4 points. Clinton won three districts controlled by Republicans heading into the 2018 elections. |
In 2012, Mitt Romney (R) won 80 out of 120 state House districts in North Carolina with an average margin of victory of 22.7 points. In 2016, Donald Trump (R) won 76 out of 120 state House districts in North Carolina with an average margin of victory of 27.7 points. Trump won five districts controlled by Democrats heading into the 2018 elections. |
2016 presidential results by state House district | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | Obama | Romney | 2012 Margin | Clinton | Trump | 2016 Margin | Party Control |
1 | 39.07% | 59.75% | R+20.7 | 32.23% | 64.86% | R+32.6 | R |
2 | 45.36% | 53.77% | R+8.4 | 41.98% | 55.70% | R+13.7 | R |
3 | 39.50% | 59.71% | R+20.2 | 37.03% | 60.71% | R+23.7 | R |
4 | 34.52% | 64.80% | R+30.3 | 32.81% | 65.32% | R+32.5 | R |
5 | 66.40% | 33.04% | D+33.4 | 60.73% | 37.68% | D+23.1 | D |
6 | 41.31% | 57.70% | R+16.4 | 37.74% | 59.79% | R+22 | R |
7 | 61.12% | 38.34% | D+22.8 | 59.67% | 38.69% | D+21 | D |
8 | 44.59% | 54.67% | R+10.1 | 44.25% | 53.51% | R+9.3 | R |
9 | 43.79% | 55.31% | R+11.5 | 44.05% | 52.81% | R+8.8 | R |
10 | 32.61% | 66.71% | R+34.1 | 31.37% | 66.58% | R+35.2 | R |
11 | 62.10% | 35.81% | D+26.3 | 65.41% | 29.85% | D+35.6 | D |
12 | 57.29% | 42.15% | D+15.1 | 53.64% | 44.58% | D+9.1 | D |
13 | 31.14% | 67.96% | R+36.8 | 28.23% | 69.48% | R+41.2 | R |
14 | 39.87% | 59.05% | R+19.2 | 35.26% | 61.20% | R+25.9 | R |
15 | 34.90% | 63.92% | R+29 | 28.94% | 67.59% | R+38.7 | R |
16 | 36.25% | 62.86% | R+26.6 | 31.07% | 66.35% | R+35.3 | R |
17 | 36.26% | 62.94% | R+26.7 | 32.62% | 65.00% | R+32.4 | R |
18 | 62.39% | 36.46% | D+25.9 | 56.14% | 40.55% | D+15.6 | D |
19 | 40.85% | 57.94% | R+17.1 | 41.19% | 55.45% | R+14.3 | R |
20 | 39.49% | 59.33% | R+19.8 | 40.58% | 55.60% | R+15 | R |
21 | 65.25% | 34.32% | D+30.9 | 62.68% | 35.99% | D+26.7 | D |
22 | 43.73% | 55.60% | R+11.9 | 39.83% | 58.67% | R+18.8 | D |
23 | 62.89% | 36.74% | D+26.2 | 60.17% | 38.60% | D+21.6 | D |
24 | 74.47% | 25.04% | D+49.4 | 72.60% | 25.66% | D+46.9 | D |
25 | 38.23% | 60.96% | R+22.7 | 35.91% | 61.84% | R+25.9 | R |
26 | 38.98% | 59.91% | R+20.9 | 37.76% | 59.07% | R+21.3 | R |
27 | 66.33% | 33.28% | D+33 | 62.75% | 36.15% | D+26.6 | D |
28 | 32.52% | 66.58% | R+34.1 | 28.54% | 69.16% | R+40.6 | R |
29 | 85.11% | 14.02% | D+71.1 | 88.12% | 9.63% | D+78.5 | D |
30 | 70.85% | 28.07% | D+42.8 | 77.30% | 19.61% | D+57.7 | D |
31 | 82.65% | 16.65% | D+66 | 83.75% | 14.17% | D+69.6 | D |
32 | 65.02% | 34.58% | D+30.4 | 61.76% | 36.76% | D+25 | D |
33 | 81.34% | 17.53% | D+63.8 | 81.09% | 15.94% | D+65.2 | D |
34 | 62.78% | 35.76% | D+27 | 67.28% | 28.80% | D+38.5 | D |
35 | 44.44% | 54.51% | R+10.1 | 47.51% | 49.16% | R+1.7 | R |
36 | 44.86% | 53.90% | R+9 | 50.19% | 45.86% | D+4.3 | R |
37 | 42.89% | 55.76% | R+12.9 | 44.58% | 51.08% | R+6.5 | R |
38 | 78.90% | 20.26% | D+58.6 | 78.47% | 19.01% | D+59.5 | D |
39 | 57.12% | 41.74% | D+15.4 | 57.85% | 38.85% | D+19 | D |
40 | 46.18% | 52.52% | R+6.3 | 52.39% | 43.60% | D+8.8 | D |
41 | 50.04% | 48.63% | D+1.4 | 57.26% | 38.74% | D+18.5 | D |
42 | 73.16% | 26.19% | D+47 | 71.85% | 25.66% | D+46.2 | D |
43 | 67.66% | 31.73% | D+35.9 | 64.79% | 32.77% | D+32 | D |
44 | 51.66% | 47.45% | D+4.2 | 50.97% | 45.97% | D+5 | D |
45 | 43.67% | 55.55% | R+11.9 | 39.47% | 57.82% | R+18.3 | R |
46 | 42.45% | 56.86% | R+14.4 | 35.55% | 63.04% | R+27.5 | R |
47 | 58.64% | 40.32% | D+18.3 | 45.40% | 52.38% | R+7 | D |
48 | 67.88% | 31.42% | D+36.5 | 60.08% | 38.08% | D+22 | D |
49 | 46.75% | 52.19% | R+5.4 | 54.02% | 42.19% | D+11.8 | D |
50 | 57.85% | 40.99% | D+16.9 | 58.33% | 38.67% | D+19.7 | D |
51 | 40.42% | 58.52% | R+18.1 | 36.86% | 60.20% | R+23.3 | R |
52 | 36.18% | 63.11% | R+26.9 | 34.94% | 62.15% | R+27.2 | R |
53 | 40.43% | 58.68% | R+18.2 | 37.83% | 59.61% | R+21.8 | R |
54 | 52.55% | 46.52% | D+6 | 53.78% | 43.36% | D+10.4 | D |
55 | 39.63% | 59.55% | R+19.9 | 33.67% | 64.12% | R+30.5 | R |
56 | 76.58% | 21.93% | D+54.7 | 81.22% | 15.78% | D+65.4 | D |
57 | 73.72% | 25.56% | D+48.2 | 73.89% | 23.97% | D+49.9 | D |
58 | 77.83% | 21.42% | D+56.4 | 78.39% | 19.21% | D+59.2 | D |
59 | 40.94% | 58.07% | R+17.1 | 43.10% | 54.02% | R+10.9 | R |
60 | 78.79% | 20.56% | D+58.2 | 77.66% | 20.26% | D+57.4 | D |
61 | 41.22% | 57.90% | R+16.7 | 43.79% | 53.30% | R+9.5 | R |
62 | 43.41% | 55.66% | R+12.2 | 46.55% | 50.23% | R+3.7 | R |
63 | 43.77% | 55.31% | R+11.5 | 43.91% | 53.48% | R+9.6 | R |
64 | 41.50% | 57.66% | R+16.2 | 40.64% | 56.88% | R+16.2 | R |
65 | 39.24% | 59.93% | R+20.7 | 34.18% | 63.90% | R+29.7 | R |
66 | 50.14% | 49.07% | D+1.1 | 44.86% | 52.75% | R+7.9 | D |
67 | 31.16% | 67.81% | R+36.6 | 25.66% | 72.18% | R+46.5 | R |
68 | 36.03% | 63.07% | R+27 | 36.68% | 59.73% | R+23.1 | R |
69 | 36.47% | 62.53% | R+26.1 | 34.32% | 62.55% | R+28.2 | R |
70 | 25.89% | 73.02% | R+47.1 | 22.47% | 75.21% | R+52.7 | R |
71 | 73.71% | 25.48% | D+48.2 | 72.37% | 24.90% | D+47.5 | D |
72 | 70.87% | 28.46% | D+42.4 | 72.50% | 24.96% | D+47.5 | D |
73 | 25.05% | 73.49% | R+48.4 | 19.25% | 78.41% | R+59.2 | R |
74 | 39.29% | 59.69% | R+20.4 | 40.06% | 56.70% | R+16.6 | R |
75 | 42.46% | 56.51% | R+14.1 | 44.27% | 52.43% | R+8.2 | R |
76 | 32.63% | 66.25% | R+33.6 | 26.49% | 71.30% | R+44.8 | R |
77 | 37.74% | 61.25% | R+23.5 | 32.03% | 65.52% | R+33.5 | R |
78 | 24.09% | 74.93% | R+50.8 | 19.67% | 78.28% | R+58.6 | R |
79 | 33.69% | 65.34% | R+31.7 | 33.43% | 63.34% | R+29.9 | R |
80 | 26.50% | 72.43% | R+45.9 | 22.95% | 74.61% | R+51.7 | R |
81 | 31.87% | 67.00% | R+35.1 | 25.84% | 71.60% | R+45.8 | R |
82 | 41.86% | 57.06% | R+15.2 | 43.08% | 53.51% | R+10.4 | R |
83 | 40.29% | 58.67% | R+18.4 | 38.03% | 59.11% | R+21.1 | R |
84 | 34.47% | 64.56% | R+30.1 | 29.74% | 68.05% | R+38.3 | R |
85 | 29.12% | 69.71% | R+40.6 | 22.21% | 75.83% | R+53.6 | R |
86 | 38.15% | 60.64% | R+22.5 | 30.31% | 67.09% | R+36.8 | R |
87 | 31.49% | 67.12% | R+35.6 | 23.47% | 74.16% | R+50.7 | R |
88 | 45.63% | 53.22% | R+7.6 | 54.80% | 40.57% | D+14.2 | D |
89 | 32.82% | 66.05% | R+33.2 | 26.16% | 71.32% | R+45.2 | R |
90 | 30.65% | 68.17% | R+37.5 | 23.14% | 74.57% | R+51.4 | R |
91 | 35.21% | 63.69% | R+28.5 | 28.79% | 68.75% | R+40 | R |
92 | 52.61% | 46.42% | D+6.2 | 55.42% | 40.77% | D+14.7 | D |
93 | 42.77% | 55.22% | R+12.5 | 41.58% | 54.48% | R+12.9 | R |
94 | 29.16% | 69.58% | R+40.4 | 22.48% | 75.35% | R+52.9 | R |
95 | 34.05% | 64.95% | R+30.9 | 30.76% | 66.16% | R+35.4 | R |
96 | 36.56% | 62.36% | R+25.8 | 33.21% | 63.78% | R+30.6 | R |
97 | 30.07% | 68.92% | R+38.9 | 24.95% | 72.61% | R+47.7 | R |
98 | 43.13% | 55.96% | R+12.8 | 47.37% | 48.84% | R+1.5 | R |
99 | 82.32% | 17.15% | D+65.2 | 80.97% | 16.82% | D+64.1 | D |
100 | 73.70% | 25.10% | D+48.6 | 73.96% | 22.47% | D+51.5 | D |
101 | 74.92% | 24.37% | D+50.6 | 75.11% | 22.40% | D+52.7 | D |
102 | 83.35% | 15.90% | D+67.4 | 80.04% | 16.78% | D+63.3 | D |
103 | 44.46% | 54.49% | R+10 | 47.72% | 49.05% | R+1.3 | R |
104 | 43.47% | 55.67% | R+12.2 | 52.29% | 43.74% | D+8.5 | R |
105 | 42.40% | 56.77% | R+14.4 | 49.86% | 46.71% | D+3.1 | R |
106 | 85.84% | 13.48% | D+72.4 | 84.91% | 13.08% | D+71.8 | D |
107 | 80.29% | 18.93% | D+61.4 | 78.80% | 18.56% | D+60.2 | D |
108 | 38.42% | 60.50% | R+22.1 | 34.04% | 63.24% | R+29.2 | R |
109 | 40.80% | 58.27% | R+17.5 | 37.73% | 59.48% | R+21.7 | R |
110 | 35.30% | 63.74% | R+28.4 | 30.10% | 67.87% | R+37.8 | R |
111 | 35.81% | 63.24% | R+27.4 | 29.81% | 68.35% | R+38.5 | R |
112 | 32.80% | 66.12% | R+33.3 | 24.47% | 73.43% | R+49 | R |
113 | 37.58% | 61.29% | R+23.7 | 34.83% | 62.59% | R+27.8 | R |
114 | 73.38% | 25.18% | D+48.2 | 73.93% | 23.07% | D+50.9 | D |
115 | 48.12% | 50.52% | R+2.4 | 47.29% | 49.54% | R+2.2 | D |
116 | 43.61% | 55.12% | R+11.5 | 44.41% | 52.24% | R+7.8 | D |
117 | 36.77% | 62.07% | R+25.3 | 35.57% | 61.42% | R+25.8 | R |
118 | 41.50% | 57.02% | R+15.5 | 32.52% | 64.60% | R+32.1 | R |
119 | 47.93% | 50.40% | R+2.5 | 40.80% | 55.45% | R+14.7 | R |
120 | 30.12% | 68.56% | R+38.4 | 23.73% | 73.79% | R+50.1 | R |
Total | 48.48% | 50.53% | R+2 | 46.76% | 50.46% | R+3.7 | - |
Source: Daily Kos |
See also
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ Roll Call, "North Carolina gears up for competitive special election in 9th District," July 10, 2019
- ↑ Washington Examiner, "'Test drive': Democrats hope to flip last undecided House race of 2018 and use it as a template for 2020," September 4, 2019
- ↑ Open Secrets, "NC-09’s near-record $10 million in outside spending fuels blitz of TV ads," September 6, 2019
- ↑ Charlotte Observer, “Biggest GOP field since 2012 to compete in North Carolina’s 9th district primary,” March 15, 2019
- ↑ The Hill, "GOP's Mark Harris won't run again in contested North Carolina House race," February 26, 2019
- ↑ General Assembly of North Carolina, "2016 Contingent Congressional Plan - Corrected*," accessed September 28, 2018
- ↑ Cook Political Report, "Under Four Months Until the Special Election, NC-09 Remains in Toss Up," May 17, 2019
- ↑ WFAE, "What You Need To Know About The 9th District," March 5, 2019
- ↑ Dan McCready for Congress, "Meet Dan," accessed September 17, 2018
- ↑ YouTube, "Country First," accessed July 5, 2019
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 Dan McCready for Congress, "Home," accessed June 5, 2019
- ↑ The Charlotte Observer, "Dan McCready lays out prescription drug plan, blasts 9th District rival Dan Bishop," June 20, 2019
- ↑ Our Campaigns, "Dan Bishop," accessed April 11, 2019
- ↑ Vote Dan Bishop, "Home," accessed July 5, 2019
- ↑ Charlotte Observer, "First 9th District Republican goes on air, mocking Democrats and backing Trump," April 9, 2019
- ↑ WCNC, "President Trump endorses Dan Bishop in 9th District congressional race," May 16, 2019
- ↑ Spectrum Local News, "Former VP, Candidate Joe Biden Backs Dan McCready for District 9 Seat," August 28, 2019
- ↑ The Charlotte Observer, "Former justice: New primary in 9th District is unconstitutional," December 18, 2018
- ↑ 19.0 19.1 Politico, "Waller and Reeves go toe-to-toe ahead of Mississippi runoff," August 22, 2019
- ↑ OpenSecrets.org, "Outside Spending," accessed September 22, 2015
- ↑ OpenSecrets.org, "Total Outside Spending by Election Cycle, All Groups," accessed September 22, 2015
- ↑ National Review.com, "Why the Media Hate Super PACs," November 6, 2015
- ↑ 23.0 23.1 23.2 The Charlotte Observer, "GOP groups jump hard into 9th District race with $4 million worth of ad buys," July 31, 2019
- ↑ DailyKos, "Morning Digest: Democrats could gain a 2020 Ohio Supreme Court majority in time for redistricting," August 20, 2019
- ↑ Breitbart, "PAC Spends $200K in N. Carolina Special Election to Back GOP’s Dan Bishop," August 29, 2019
- ↑ Roll Call, "GOP super PAC investing in North Carolina special election," August 1, 2019
- ↑ 27.0 27.1 Politico, "Plouffe on 2020, joining ACRONYM," September 5, 2019
- ↑ EDF Action, "EDF Action Votes Brings Back NC-09 TV Ad in the Special Election," August 13, 2019
- ↑ Federal Election Commission, "FILING FEC-1350880," accessed September 9, 2019
- ↑ The Washington Post, "North Carolina’s 9th Congressional District has gotten worse for Republicans," August 12, 2019
- ↑ VoteVets, "VoteVets Releases Ad in NC-09 Special Election," August 7, 2019
- ↑ 32.0 32.1 The Washington Post, "In private memo, Democrats underscore commitment to N.C. special election," August 9, 2019
- ↑ Politico, "DCCC joins the NC-09 air war," August 15, 2019
- ↑ Twitter, "Advertising Analytics on August 28, 2019," accessed August 29, 2019
- ↑ Federal Election Commission, "FILING FEC-1350626," accessed September 4, 2019
- ↑ 36.0 36.1 36.2 36.3 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Vote Dan Bishop, "Home," accessed September 10, 2019
- ↑ Dan McCready for Congress, “Issues,” accessed September 10, 2019
- ↑ Jeff Scott for Congress, "Home," accessed June 4, 2019
- ↑ Allen Smith's 2019 campaign website, "Issues," accessed July 5, 2019
- ↑ Rewire News, "Health Care to Play Key Role in North Carolina Special Election," July 24, 2019
- ↑ 42.0 42.1 The Charlotte Observer, "Q. Where do the 9th District candidates stand on health care? A. Not on the same side," July 12, 2019
- ↑ Politico, "What to watch for in tonight’s debate," September 12, 2019
- ↑ Elon News Network, "Trump endorses Dan Bishop for NC 09 at Fayetteville rally," September 9, 2019
- ↑ WCNC, "VP Mike Pence campaigns for Dan Bishop before District 9 vote," September 9, 2019
- ↑ North Carolina State Board of Elections, "Voting & Disasters," accessed September 6, 2017
- ↑ WBTV, "Bishop, McCready call for NCSBE to extend early voting due to Hurricane Dorian," September 5, 2019
- ↑ Real Clear Politics, "Donald Trump Jr.: We Need To Run Republicans To Take On 'The Hamas Wing Of Congress,' The Squad," August 29, 2019
- ↑ The Charlotte Observer, "Vice president’s wife touts Dan Bishop in 9th District, sees a close race," August 20, 2019
- ↑ The Fayetteville Observer, "Pence raises money for 9th District candidate Dan Bishop in Fayetteville," July 17, 2019
- ↑ The News & Observer, "NC 9th Congressional District candidate Dan Bishop addresses crowd at Trump rally," July 19, 2019
- ↑ Facebook, "Dan McCready for Congress on June 3, 2019," accessed June 6, 2019
- ↑ Associated Press, "North Carolina Democrat in House race not for impeachment," May 23, 2019
- ↑ Twitter, "Donald Trump," May 16, 2019
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Morning Digest: House candidate touted by national GOP caught tweeting racist conspiracy theories," May 16, 2019
- ↑ Cook Political Report, "Introducing the 2017 Cook Political Report Partisan Voter Index," April 7, 2017
- ↑ FiveThirtyEight, "Election Update: The Most (And Least) Elastic States And Districts," September 6, 2018
- ↑ North Carolina State Board of Elections, "June Primary Candidates," accessed March 27, 2016
- ↑ The Charlotte Observer, "Recount confirms Robert Pittenger’s win in the 9th District," June 20, 2016
- ↑ Twitter, "Associated Press," February 21, 2019
- ↑ The State, "Decision on new election expected this month in 9th district fraud investigation," February 4, 2019
- ↑ WSOC TV, "McCready, Harris file new briefings ahead of next week's hearings," February 13, 2019
- ↑ WSOC, "Cooper appoints 5 members to new Board of Elections; 3 from Charlotte area," January 31, 2019
- ↑ Charlotte Observer, "With key Democrats’ help, Dan McCready has raised big money for possible new election," January 26, 2019
- ↑ News & Observer, "Judge denies Mark Harris request to certify his win despite election fraud investigation," January 22, 2019
- ↑ Associated Press, "Hearing into North Carolina ballot fraud claims postponed," January 2, 2019
- ↑ Roll Call, "Rep. Robert Pittenger Won’t Run Even if ‘Ballot Harvesting’ Probe Causes Primary Do-Over," January 2, 2019
- ↑ 68.0 68.1 The Charlotte Observer, "9th District chaos: Cooper plans interim elections board, Harris asks to be named winner," December 28, 2018
- ↑ Politico, "House leader: Dems won't seat candidate in unresolved race," December 28, 2018
- ↑ FOX 46, "NC State Board of Elections to be dissolved Friday, 9th District investigation in limbo," December 27, 2018
- ↑ WBTV, "NCGOP calls on elections board to immediately produce evidence or certify results in NC-09 race," December 17, 2018
- ↑ The News & Observer, "NC elections board delays hearing on 9th Congressional District irregularities," December 14, 2018
- ↑ Politico, "N.C. GOP says fresh misconduct allegation should trigger new House election," December 11, 2018
- ↑ Charlotte Observer, "Hold a new election in NC’s tainted 9th District," December 6, 2018
- ↑ Charlotte News & Observer, "Amidst social media controversy, NC Board of Elections chair resigns," December 2, 2018
- ↑ Twitter, "Joe Bruno," November 30, 2018
- ↑ WFAE, "NC Elections Investigator Seized Bladen County Absentee Ballot Forms," November 28, 2018
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedcertify
- ↑ Daily Kos, "2008, 2012, & 2016 Presidential Election Results by District," accessed February 1, 2019
- ↑ Jones died on February 10, 2019.
- ↑ The 9th District was not filled in the 2018 elections due to allegations of electoral fraud. In February 2019, the North Carolina Board of Elections called for a new election to fill the vacant seat.
- ↑ This election was between two Democrats
- ↑ In December 2018, McSally was appointed to fill the Senate seat previously held by John McCain (R), who passed away in August 2018. Jon Kyl (R) was first appointed to the seat and held it from September 2018 to December 2018. The 2020 special election decided who would serve out the rest of the six-year term McCain was elected to in 2016.
- ↑ Isakson announced his resignation effective December 31, 2019. The 2020 special election decided who would serve out the rest of the six-year term Isakson was elected to in 2016.
- ↑ Both general election candidates were Republicans.
- ↑ This race was unopposed.
- ↑ 87.0 87.1 Both general election candidates were Democrats.
- ↑ Lamb won by a margin of 0.4 percentage points.
- ↑ Wild won by a margin of 0.2 percentage points.
- ↑ The state Board of Elections declined to certify the results of the 2018 election following allegations of absentee ballot fraud.
- ↑ Collins won by 0.3 percentage points.
- ↑ This special election was called to fill the vacancy left by 2020 Congressman-elect Luke Letlow (R), who died before being sworn in to Congress.
- ↑ Runoff MOV between two Republican candidates.
- ↑ Runoff MOV between two Democratic candidates.
- ↑ Runoff MOV between two Republican candidates.
- ↑ 270towin.com, "North Carolina," accessed June 1, 2017
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' statewide election results by congressional and legislative districts," July 9, 2013
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' 2016 presidential results for congressional and legislative districts," February 6, 2017