North Carolina Amendment 5, Emergency Judges Amendment (1914)
North Carolina Amendment 5 | |
---|---|
Election date |
|
Topic State judiciary structure |
|
Status |
|
Type Legislatively referred constitutional amendment |
Origin |
North Carolina Amendment 5 was on the ballot as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment in North Carolina on November 3, 1914. It was defeated.
A "yes" vote supported providing emergency judges to prevent trial delays. |
A "no" vote opposed providing emergency judges to prevent trial delays. |
Election results
North Carolina Amendment 5 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
Yes | 56,255 | 47.18% | ||
62,981 | 52.82% |
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Amendment 5 was as follows:
“ | Amendment to Article IV, Section 11, To prevent delays in trials by providing emergency judges [ ] Yes
[ ] No | ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Path to the ballot
The North Carolina State Legislature can refer statewide ballot measures, in the form of constitutional amendments and bond issues, to the ballot for statewide elections.
North Carolina requires a 60% vote in each legislative chamber during a single legislative session to refer a constitutional amendment to the ballot. That amounts to a minimum of 72 votes in the North Carolina House of Representatives and 30 votes in the North Carolina Senate, assuming no vacancies. Amendments do not require the governor's signature to be referred to the ballot.
Statutes, including bond issues, require a simple majority vote in each legislative chamber during one legislative session and the governor's signature to appear on the ballot.
See also
External links
Footnotes
![]() |
State of North Carolina Raleigh (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |