Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

North Dakota Policy Council Legislative Review (2011)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The North Dakota Policy Council, a North Dakota-based nonprofit research organization that described itself as an "advocate of public policy ideas based on economic freedom," published the North Dakota Legislative Review, a report on how state legislators voted during the 2011 legislative session.[1] The report analyzed appropriations bills to give residents of the state a look at how their legislators voted on issues important to the council.[2] The NDPC tracked twenty-four bills during the legislative session.[3]

2011 report

The 2011 report covered the voting records of state legislators serving in the 62nd session of the state legislature. Twenty-four bills were tracked during the session and scored based on the values of the council. Scores of members of the state House and state Senate were not comparable, since each chamber voted on different bills. While the House voted on 22 policy bills that were tracked, the Senate voted on nine policy bills.

The five members of the state House considered most supportive of the council's goals in terms of government spending were:

The five members of the state House considered most supportive of the council's goals in terms of long-term policy were:

The five members of the state Senate considered most supportive of the council's goals in terms of government spending were:

The five members of the state Senate considered most supportive of the council's goals in terms of long-term policy were:

2011 North Dakota House scorecard

2011 North Dakota Senate scorecard

Methodology

Legislation

The NDPC tracked twenty-four bills during the legislative session and scored legislators based on whether the bills supported or opposed the goals of the council. Below are the council's descriptions of some of the bills that it evaluated in the scorecard.[3]

Outcomes that the council supported

  • Income tax cuts: "HB1047 passed the legislature providing North Dakota taxpayers with $145 million in personal and corporate income tax cuts."
  • Obamacare: "HB1165 [made] it illegal to compel North Dakotans to purchase health insurance; SB2309 [declared] Obamacare to be unconstitutional and [protected] the rights of North Dakotans to purchase medical services free from government interference; HCR3016 [was] a resolution encouraging the US Congress to repeal Obamacare."
  • Property rights: "The legislature passed SB2204 which [required] legislative approval of all money given to the Northern Plains National Heritage Area, a federal program designed to enact local government land use changes via federal grants of money."
  • Tax increment financing policy: "In response to the North Dakota Policy Council's lawsuit against the City of Bismarck, the legislature passed SB2050 reforming tax increment financing laws."

Outcomes that the council opposed

  • Pensions: "The House of Representatives narrowly rejected HB1228 and thoroughly rejected HB1258 which would have reformed the state employees' pension system and teachers' retirement fund from [a] defined- benefits program to a 401k-style defined-contribution [program]."
  • Economic development: "SB2057 easily passed the legislature, appropriating $133 million for corporate welfare subsidies."
  • Budget increase: "The 2011-13 budget passed by the legislature totaled more than $4 billion, an increase of 25% over the previous budget."
  • Government transparency: "In 2009, taxpayers had a major victory as the legislature passed a law mandating the North Dakota Office of Management and Budget to post every state expenditure on a searchable website. In 2011, the legislature rejected a similar measure that would have required all local governments to do the same."

Scoring

The council broke down proposed policy ideas into "long-term" and "short-term" categories. For each "yea" vote on a long-term policy idea, legislators were given 3 points. For each vote on a short-term policy idea that agreed with the council's position, legislators were given 2 points. There were also several bills that touched on issues the NDPC found important but were not in the policy guide. Each legislator was given 1.5 points for a vote on those bills that agreed with the council's position. Legislators also received one point for votes on non-binding resolutions that agreed with the council's position. Earned points were added up and divided by the total possible points to reach a percentage. Missed votes were not counted either as points earned or as possible points.[3]

See also

External links

Footnotes