O'CONNOR et al. v. ORTEGA (1987)

| O'CONNOR et al. v. ORTEGA |
|---|
| Term: 1986 |
| Important Dates |
| Argued: October 15, 1986 |
| Decided: March 31, 1987 |
| Outcome |
| Reversed and remanded |
| Vote |
| 5-4 |
| Judgment of the court |
| Sandra Day O'Connor |
| Majority |
| Lewis Powell • William Rehnquist • Byron White |
| Concurring |
| Antonin Scalia |
| Dissenting |
| Harry Blackmun • William Brennan • Thurgood Marshall • John Paul Stevens |
O'CONNOR et al. v. ORTEGA is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 31, 1987. The case was argued before the court on October 15, 1986.
In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the California Northern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1980s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - search and seizure (other than as pertains to vehicles or Crime Control Act)
- Petitioner: Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact
- Petitioner state: California
- Respondent type: Governmental employee or job applicant
- Respondent state: California
- Citation: 480 U.S. 709
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Judgment of the Court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Sandra Day O'Connor
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes