Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

OCCIDENTAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION (1977)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
OCCIDENTAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Term: 1976
Important Dates
Argued: April 20, 1977
Decided: June 20, 1977
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
7-2
Majority
Harry BlackmunWilliam BrennanThurgood MarshallLewis PowellJohn Paul StevensPotter StewartByron White
Dissenting
Warren BurgerWilliam Rehnquist

OCCIDENTAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 20, 1977. The case was argued before the court on April 20, 1977.

In a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the California Central U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1970s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Burger Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Civil Rights - employment discrimination: on basis of race, age, religion, illegitimacy, national origin, or working conditions.
  • Petitioner: employer. If employer's relations with employees are governed by the nature of the employer's business (e.g., railroad, boat), rather than labor law generally, the more specific designation is used in place of Employer.
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 432 U.S. 355
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Warren Burger
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Potter Stewart

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes