Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
OGDEN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. SAUNDERS, DEFENDANT IN ERROR (1827)

![]() |
OGDEN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. SAUNDERS, DEFENDANT IN ERROR |
---|
Term: 1827 |
Important Dates |
Argued: January 18, 1827 |
Decided: March 13, 1827 |
Outcome |
Reversed and remanded |
Vote |
4-3 |
Majority |
William Johnson Jr. • Smith Thompson • Robert Trimble • Bushrod Washington |
Dissenting |
Gabriel Duvall • John Marshall • Joseph Story |
OGDEN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. SAUNDERS, DEFENDANT IN ERROR is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 13, 1827. The case was argued before the court on January 18, 1827.
In a 4-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Louisiana U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1820s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Marshall Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Civil Rights - Debtors' rights
- Petitioner: Defendant
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Injured person or legal entity, nonphysically and non-employment related
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 25 U.S. 213
- How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
- What type of decision was made: Seriatim
- Who was the chief justice: John Marshall
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Unknown
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes