Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY, et al. v. EUGENE WOODARD (1998)

![]() |
OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY, et al. v. EUGENE WOODARD |
---|
Term: 1997 |
Important Dates |
Argued: December 10, 1997 |
Decided: March 25, 1998 |
Outcome |
Reversed |
Vote |
9-0 |
Majority |
Anthony Kennedy • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • Clarence Thomas |
Concurring |
Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Sandra Day O'Connor • David Souter • John Paul Stevens |
OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY, et al. v. EUGENE WOODARD is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 25, 1998. The case was argued before the court on December 10, 1997.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Ohio Southern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Due Process - Due process: prisoners' rights and defendants' rights
- Petitioner: State commission, board, committee, or authority
- Petitioner state: Ohio
- Respondent type: Person convicted of crime
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 523 U.S. 272
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: William Rehnquist
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes