Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

OXFORD HEALTH PLANS LLC, PETITIONER v. JOHN IVAN SUTTER (2013)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
OXFORD HEALTH PLANS LLC, PETITIONER v. JOHN IVAN SUTTER
Term: 2012
Important Dates
Argued: March 25, 2013
Decided: June 10, 2013
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
9-0
Majority
Stephen BreyerRuth Bader GinsburgElena KaganAnthony KennedyJohn RobertsAntonin ScaliaSonia Sotomayor
Concurring
Samuel AlitoClarence Thomas

OXFORD HEALTH PLANS LLC, PETITIONER v. JOHN IVAN SUTTER is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 10, 2013. The case was argued before the court on March 25, 2013.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the New Jersey U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 2010s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Economic Activity - Arbitration (other than as pertains to labor-management or employer-employee relations (cf. union arbitration)
  • Petitioner: Health organization or person, nursing home, medical clinic or laboratory, chiropractor
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: physician, MD or DO, dentist, or medical society
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 569 U.S. 564
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Elena Kagan

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes