Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey
Oregon Measure Nos. 310-311, Free Rail Transportation for State Officers Referendum (June 1908)
Oregon Measure Nos. 310-311 | |
---|---|
Election date |
|
Topic Eminent domain policy and Transportation |
|
Status |
|
Type Veto referendum |
Origin |
Oregon Measure Nos. 310-311 was on the ballot as a veto referendum in Oregon on June 1, 1908. It was defeated.
A "yes" vote supported requiring railway firms to grant free transportation to state officers, county judges and sheriffs, as a condition precedent for these firms to acquire land through eminent domain. |
A "no" vote opposed requiring railway firms to grant free transportation to state officers, county judges and sheriffs, as a condition precedent for these firms to acquire land through eminent domain. |
Election results
Oregon Measure Nos. 310-311 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
Yes | 28,856 | 32.69% | ||
59,406 | 67.31% |
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Measure Nos. 310-311 was as follows:
“ | Referendum Ordered by Petition of the People For an act requiring railroads and other common carriers to grant free transportation to State officers and county judges and sheriffs, as a condition precedent to acquiring land for corporate purposes by the exercise of eminent domain, and to prohibit the payment of mileage for such free transportation. --- Vote YES or NO. | ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Path to the ballot
The number of signatures required for a veto referendum was equal to 5% of the total votes cast in the last Supreme Court justice election.
See also
External links
Footnotes
![]() |
State of Oregon Salem (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |