Oregon Remove Slavery as Punishment for Crime from Constitution Amendment (2022)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Oregon Remove Slavery as Punishment for Crime from Constitution Amendment
Flag of Oregon.png
Election date
November 8, 2022
Topic
Constitutional language
Status
On the ballot
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature

The Oregon Remove Slavery as Punishment for Crime from Constitution Amendment is on the ballot in Oregon as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 8, 2022.[1]

A "yes" vote supports:

  • repealing language from the state constitution that allows the use of slavery and involuntary servitude as criminal punishments and 
  • adding language that authorizes an Oregon court or a probation or parole agency to order alternatives to incarceration for a convicted individual as part of their sentencing. 

A "no" vote opposes this amendment to repeal language from the state constitution that prohibits slavery or involuntary servitude except as punishment for a crime.


Overview

What would the amendment do?

See also: Text of measure

The amendment would remove language in the Oregon Constitution that allows the use of slavery and involuntary servitude as criminal punishments, thereby prohibiting slavery and involuntary servitude without exception. The amendment would also add language authorizing an Oregon court or a probation or parole agency to order alternatives to incarceration for a convicted individual as part of their sentencing.[2]

As of January 2021, Oregon was one of 10 states that had a provision prohibiting enslavement and involuntary servitude but with an exception for criminal punishments.

Have other states voted on similar measures?

See also: Related ballot measures

In 2022, Tennessee voters will also be deciding on a constitutional amendment to remove language that allows the use of slavery and involuntary servitude as criminal punishments.

In 2020, Nebraska and Utah approved similar constitutional amendments. Nebraskans approved the amendment by a margin of 68.23% to 31.77%. Utahans approved the amendment by a margin of 80.48% to 19.52%. In 2018, Colorado approved a similar amendment with 66.2% of the vote after defeating the same amendment in 2016.

Who supports and opposes the amendment?

See also: Support and Opposition

Oregonians Against Slavery Involuntary Servitude (OASIS) is leading the campaign in support of the amendment. OASIS said, “[The amendment] would remove the exception of slavery and involuntary servitude from the Oregon State Constitution and brings us one step closer to a more just and equitable state and world. By changing this language, Oregon would do away with the antiquated racist legacy of slavery in our State's most important document.” [3]

If you are aware of any opponents or opposing arguments, please send an email with a link to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title is as follows:[4]

Amends Constitution: Removes language allowing slavery and involuntary servitude as punishment for crime

Result of 'Yes' Vote: 'Yes' vote amends constitution to remove language allowing slavery and involuntary servitude as punishment for crime; allows programs to be ordered as part of sentencing.

Result of 'No' Vote: 'No' vote retains current language that generally prohibits slavery and involuntary servitude but allows slavery and involuntary servitude as punishment for crime.[5]

Ballot summary

The ballot summary is as follows:[4]

Amends Constitution. Article I, section 34 of the Oregon Constitution currently prohibits slavery and involuntary servitude but allows an exception to that prohibition as a punishment for crime. Measure removes language that allows slavery and involuntary servitude as a punishment for crime. Under measure, a court or probation or parole agency is allowed to order a person convicted of a crime to engage in education, counseling, treatment, community service, or other alternatives to incarceration, as part of sentencing for the crime. Ordered programs must be in line with programs that historically, or in the future, have been in place to provide for accountability, reformation, protection of society, or rehabilitation. Effect on current constitutional provisions requiring inmate work programs unclear.[5]

Constitutional changes

See also: Article I, Oregon Constitution

The measure would amend Article I of the state constitution. The following underlined text would be added, and struck-through text would be deleted:[2]

Text of Section 34:

Slavery or Involuntary Servitude

(1.)There shall be neither slavery, nor involuntary servitude in this state the State, otherwise than as a punishment for crime, whereof the party shall have been duly convicted.

(2.) Upon conviction of a crime, an Oregon court or a probation or parole agency may order the convicted person to engage in education, counseling, treatment, community service or other alternatives to incarceration, as part of sentencing for the crime, in accordance with programs that have been in place historically or that may be developed in the future, to provide accountability, reformation, protection of society or rehabilitation.[5]

Support

Oregonians Against Slavery Involuntary Servitude (OASIS) is leading the campaign in support of the amendment.[3]

Supporters

Officials

Organizations

  • ACLU of Oregon
  • Abolish Slavery National Network
  • Asian Pacific American Network of Oregon
  • Next Up Action Fund
  • Oregon Justice Resource Center
  • Partnership for Safety and Justice
  • Planned Parenthood Adovcates of Oregon
  • Urban League of Portland

Arguments

  • Rebecca Gladstone, president of League of Women Voters' Oregon, and Marge Easley, director of advocacy for League of Women Voters' Oregon: "Given the fact that African Americans and other minorities are greatly over-represented in prison populations, the existence of this clause continues the pattern of minority marginalization and dehumanization and has no place in the inclusive society we aspire to be. We join with those who are committed to diversity, equity, and inclusion in Oregon. The League believes that we must do all we can to remove remaining vestiges of slavery and racist policies from our nation’s past and urge passage of SJR 10."
  • Zach Winston, policy director of the Oregon Justice Resource Center: "While the slavery exception was drafted over 160 years ago, the impact is still disproportionately felt today by the BIPOC communities."
  • Ken Jeske, administrator of Oregon Corrections Enterprises: "Oregon Corrections Enterprises (OCE) believes in second chance opportunities for adults in custody and providing meaningful work and training opportunities and avenues for personal and professional development for those participating in our voluntary programs."


Opposition

If you are aware of any opponents or opposing arguments, please send an email with a link to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Oregon ballot measures

If you are aware of a committee registered to support or oppose this amendment, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Background

Related ballot measures

In 2022, Tennessee voters will also be deciding on a constitutional amendment to remove language that allows the use of slavery and involuntary servitude as criminal punishments. It will be replaced with the statement, "Slavery and involuntary servitude are forever prohibited."

In 2020, voters in Nebraska and Utah voted to remove language from their respective constitutions that allowed the use of slavery and involuntary servitude as criminal punishments. Nebraska Amendment 1 was approved by a margin of 68.23% to 31.77%. Utah Constitutional Amendment C was approved by a margin of 80.48% to 19.52%.

In 2018, voters in Colorado approved Amendment A, which removed language from the state constitution saying that slavery and involuntary servitude were permitted as criminal punishments. Amendment A received 66.2% of the vote. In 2016, voters in Colorado rejected a constitutional amendment—Amendment T—that would have removed the same language as Amendment A. Amendment T received 49.7% of the vote.

Federal constitution

See also: Amendment XIII, United States Constitution

The Thirteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was ratified on December 6, 1865. Like the Oregon Constitution, the Thirteenth Amendment prohibited slavery and involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for those convicted of crimes. The text of the Thirteenth Amendment is as follows:

1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

State constitutions

Slavery as criminal punishment

As of 2021, 10 states had constitutions that included provisions prohibiting enslavement and involuntary servitude but with an exception for criminal punishments. These constitutional provisions were added to state constitutions, in their original forms, from the 1850s to the 1890s.

State Constitution Language
Arkansas Article II, Section 27 "There shall be no slavery in this State, nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime."
Indiana Article I, Section 37 "There shall be neither slavery, nor involuntary servitude, within the State, otherwise than for the punishment of crimes, whereof the party shall have been duly convicted."
Kentucky Article I, Section 25 "Slavery and involuntary servitude in this State are forbidden, except as a punishment for crime, whereof the party shall have been duly convicted."
Minnesota Article I, Section 2 "There shall be neither slavery nor involuntary servitude in the state otherwise than as punishment for a crime of which the party has been convicted."
Mississippi Article III, Section 15 "There shall be neither slavery nor involuntary servitude in this state, otherwise than in the punishment of crime, whereof the party shall have been duly convicted."
Nevada Article I, Section 17 "Neither Slavery nor involuntary servitude unless for the punishment of crimes shall ever be tolerated in this State."
North Dakota Article I, Section 6 "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, unless for the punishment of crime, shall ever be tolerated in this state."
Oregon Article I, Section 34 "There shall be neither slavery, nor involuntary servitude in the State, otherwise than as a punishment for crime, whereof the party shall have been duly convicted."
Tennessee Article I, Section 33 "That slavery and involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime, whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, are forever prohibited in this state."
Wisconsin Article I, Section 2 "There shall be neither slavery, nor involuntary servitude in this state, otherwise than for the punishment of crime, whereof the party shall have been duly convicted."

Involuntary servitude as criminal punishment

As of 2021, nine states had constitutions that included provisions permitting involuntary servitude, but not slavery, as a criminal punishment.

State Constitution Language
Alabama Article I, Section 32 "That no form of slavery shall exist in this state; and there shall not be any involuntary servitude, otherwise than for the punishment of crime, of which the party shall have been duly convicted."
California Article I, Section 6 "Slavery is prohibited. Involuntary servitude is prohibited except to punish crime."
Georgia Article I, Paragraph XX "There shall be no involuntary servitude within the State of Georgia except as a punishment for crime after legal conviction thereof or for contempt of court."
Iowa Article I, Section 23 "There shall be no slavery in this state; nor shall there be involuntary servitude, unless for the punishment of crime."
Kansas Bill of Rights, Section 6 "There shall be no slavery in this state; and no involuntary servitude, except for the punishment of crime, whereof the party shall have been duly convicted."
Louisiana Article I, Section 3 "Slavery and involuntary servitude are prohibited, except in the latter case as punishment for crime."
Michigan Article I, Section 9 "Neither slavery, nor involuntary servitude unless for the punishment of crime, shall ever be tolerated in this state."
North Carolina Article I, Section 17 "Slavery is forever prohibited. Involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the parties have been adjudged guilty, is forever prohibited."
Ohio Article I, Section 6 "There shall be no slavery in this state; nor involuntary servitude, unless for the punishment of crime."

Involuntary servitude as other punishment

As of 2021, one state—Vermont—had a constitutional provision permitting involuntary servitude to pay a debt, damage, fine, or cost.

State Constitution Language
Vermont Chapter 1, Article 1 "... therefore no person born in this country, or brought from over sea, ought to be holden by law, to serve any person as a servant, slave or apprentice, after arriving to the age of twenty-one years, unless bound by the person's own consent, after arriving to such age, or bound by law for the payment of debts, damages, fines, costs, or the like."

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Oregon Constitution

To put a legislatively referred constitutional amendment before voters, a simple majority is required in both the Oregon State Senate and the Oregon House of Representatives.

This amendment was introduced as Senate Joint Resolution 10 on January 11, 2021. On April 14, 2021, the state Senate passed SJR 10 in a vote of 27-2 with one excused. On June 22, 2021, the state House passed SJR 10 with amendments in a vote of 51-7 with one excused. On June 24, 2021, the Senate concurred with the House amendments by a vote of 25-4 with one excused.[1]

Vote in the Oregon House of Representatives
June 22, 2021
Requirement: Simple majority vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 30  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total5171
Total percent86.44%11.86%1.70%
Democrat3601
Republican1570

Vote in the Oregon State Senate
June 24, 2021
Requirement: Simple majority vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 16  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total2541
Total percent83.33%13.33%3.34%
Democrat1701
Republican830
Independent010

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Oregon

Click "Show" to learn more about voter registration, identification requirements, and poll times in Oregon.

See also

External links

Support

Opposition

Submit links to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Footnotes