Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
Oregon Measure 34, State Fish and Wildlife Commission Authority and Repeal 1994 Hunting Tactics Limitations Initiative (1996)
Oregon Measure 34 | |
---|---|
Election date |
|
Topic Game and fish commissions and Hunting regulations |
|
Status |
|
Type Initiated state statute |
Origin |
Oregon Measure 34 was on the ballot as an initiated state statute in Oregon on November 5, 1996. It was defeated.
A "yes" vote supported providing sole authority to the State Fish and Wildlife Commission to manage wildlife and repealing Measure 18 of 1994, allowing hunters to utilize bait and dogs when hunting for bears or cougars. |
A "no" vote opposed providing sole authority to the State Fish and Wildlife Commission to manage wildlife and repealing Measure 18 of 1994, allowing hunters to utilize bait and dogs when hunting for bears or cougars. |
Election results
Oregon Measure 34 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
Yes | 570,803 | 42.80% | ||
762,979 | 57.20% |
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Measure 34 was as follows:
“ | WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT EXCLUSIVE TO COMMISSION; REPEALS 1994 BEAR/COUGAR INITIATIVE RESULT OF “YES” VOTE: “Yes” vote gives commission exclusive wildlife management authority; repeals 1994 bear/cougar hunting ban initiative. RESULT OF “NO” VOTE: “No” vote retains current wildlife management laws, including 1994 bear/cougar hunting ban initiative measure. SUMMARY: Current law gives the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission the authority to manage wildlife. Measure provides that this authority would be exclusive. Measure repeals all laws other than legislation and Commission rules enacted since 1975 that regulate time, place and manner of taking wildlife by angling, hunting or trapping, including the 1994 bear/cougar hunting ban initiative. That initiative banning use of bait or dogs to trap or hunt black bear and cougar was approved by vote of the people in the November, 1994 election. ESTIMATE OF FINANCIAL IMPACT: No financial effect on state or local government expenditures or revenues. | ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Path to the ballot
An initiated state statute is a citizen-initiated ballot measure that amends state statute. There are 21 states that allow citizens to initiate state statutes, including 14 that provide for direct initiatives and nine (9) that provide for indirect initiatives (two provide for both). An indirect initiated state statute goes to the legislature after a successful signature drive. The legislatures in these states have the option of approving the initiative itself, rather than the initiative appearing on the ballot.
In Oregon, the number of signatures required for an initiated state statute is equal to 6% of the votes cast in the last gubernatorial election. A simple majority vote is required for voter approval.
See also
External links
Footnotes
![]() |
State of Oregon Salem (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |