PAMELA WITHROW v. ROBERT ALLEN WILLIAMS, JR. (1993)

![]() |
PAMELA WITHROW v. ROBERT ALLEN WILLIAMS, JR. |
---|
Term: 1992 |
Important Dates |
Argued: November 3, 1992 |
Decided: April 21, 1993 |
Outcome |
Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part and remanded |
Vote |
5-4 |
Majority |
Harry Blackmun • Anthony Kennedy • David Souter • John Paul Stevens • Byron White |
Dissenting |
Sandra Day O'Connor • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • Clarence Thomas |
PAMELA WITHROW v. ROBERT ALLEN WILLIAMS, JR. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on April 21, 1993. The case was argued before the court on November 3, 1992.
In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Michigan Eastern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Habeas corpus
- Petitioner: State
- Petitioner state: Michigan
- Respondent type: Person convicted of crime
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 507 U.S. 680
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: David Souter
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes