Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

PAMELA WITHROW v. ROBERT ALLEN WILLIAMS, JR. (1993)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
PAMELA WITHROW v. ROBERT ALLEN WILLIAMS, JR.
Term: 1992
Important Dates
Argued: November 3, 1992
Decided: April 21, 1993
Outcome
Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part and remanded
Vote
5-4
Majority
Harry BlackmunAnthony KennedyDavid SouterJohn Paul StevensByron White
Dissenting
Sandra Day O'ConnorWilliam RehnquistAntonin ScaliaClarence Thomas

PAMELA WITHROW v. ROBERT ALLEN WILLIAMS, JR. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on April 21, 1993. The case was argued before the court on November 3, 1992.

In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Michigan Eastern U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Habeas corpus
  • Petitioner: State
  • Petitioner state: Michigan
  • Respondent type: Person convicted of crime
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 507 U.S. 680
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: David Souter

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes