PAUL MCNEIL v. WISCONSIN (1991)

![]() |
PAUL MCNEIL v. WISCONSIN |
---|
Term: 1990 |
Important Dates |
Argued: February 25, 1991 |
Decided: June 13, 1991 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
6-3 |
Majority |
Sandra Day O'Connor • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • David Souter • Byron White |
Concurring |
Anthony Kennedy |
Dissenting |
Harry Blackmun • Thurgood Marshall • John Paul Stevens |
PAUL MCNEIL v. WISCONSIN is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 13, 1991. The case was argued before the court on February 25, 1991.
In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Wisconsin State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Right to counsel (cf. indigents appointment of counsel or inadequate representation)
- Petitioner: Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: State
- Respondent state: Wisconsin
- Citation: 501 U.S. 171
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Antonin Scalia
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes