PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE v. NANCY DREW SUDERS (2004)

![]() |
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE v. NANCY DREW SUDERS |
---|
Term: 2003 |
Important Dates |
Argued: March 31, 2004 |
Decided: June 14, 2004 |
Outcome |
Vacated and remanded |
Vote |
8-1 |
Majority |
Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Anthony Kennedy • Sandra Day O'Connor • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • David Souter • John Paul Stevens |
Dissenting |
Clarence Thomas |
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE v. NANCY DREW SUDERS is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 14, 2004. The case was argued before the court on March 31, 2004.
In an 8-1 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Pennsylvania Middle U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Civil Rights - Sex discrimination in employment (cf. sex discrimination)
- Petitioner: State department or agency
- Petitioner state: Pennsylvania
- Respondent type: Female governmental employee or job applicant
- Respondent state: Pennsylvania
- Citation: 542 U.S. 129
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Ruth Bader Ginsburg
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes